Goals Achievement Partnership (GAP) Survey Why the GAP survey was administered.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Advertisements

1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Re-engineering your approach to the beginning college experience should include an acknowledgement of what is working well and only needs to be maintained,
New Employee Orientation: Performance Management
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
The Research Process.
What Gets Measured Gets Done Presented by Frances Head George Elliott.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
NumericNoExplosionAnswer.
State of New Hampshire Department of Administrative Services Division of Personnel Workforce Development Strategic Plan.
California Department of Aging State Contractors and Nationals Meeting January 13, 2010.
The need for gender disaggregated data and its impact on policies, and achieving gender equality goals Hamidan Bibi.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Mark Weist, Ph.D. University of South Carolina Carolina Network for School Mental Health Myrtle Beach, January 9, 2014.
Texas City Municipal Police Association 2012 Satisfaction Survey.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
1 The Indiana Department of Correction presents New Employee Orientation: Performance Management.
Disability and special educational needs: local area responsibilities under the Children and Families Act, 2014 Charlie Henry HMI National lead for disability.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction.
A Report on Progress toward the Strategic Goals Presented to the Valencia District Board of Trustees on behalf of the College Planning Council.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
A Guide for Navigators 1National Disability Institute.
RKM / BIA 2011 Business Outlook Survey (1 of 8) Research Design:  Systematic in-depth phone interviews with:  302 businesses with at least one location.
Site-Based Decision Making: A Basic Overview Texas Education Agency – Resource Guide.
Haldimand County Public Library Board 2001 Municipal amalgamation Why do a Strategic Plan? concentration of resources on key areas ability to deal with.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
Teacher Engagement Survey 2014
Proficiency level for Student Learning Outcomes - March 15, 2013  ACCJC College Status Report on Student Learning Outcomes Implementation  Respond to.
Strengthening families through prevention and partnership.
Engagement + Accreditation + (X) + (X) = Performance Management
October 21 st TMD Meeting MW-COG/Marriott Telework Update Robert Brown; Telecommuting Advantage Group.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
Paper Presented at the Standing Conference for African National and University Libraries in East, Central and Southern Africa (SCANUL – ECS), 1st and 2nd.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Update Cambrian School District December 3, 2013.
1 Promoting Evidence-Informed Practice: The BASSC Perspective Michael J. Austin, PhD, MSW, MSPH BASSC Staff Director Mack Professor of Nonprofit Management.
Clay County IIIP Evaluation Project. Clay County 101 Clay County 101 Components of evaluation plan Components of evaluation plan Results of surveys Results.
For over 70 years, the Texas Commission for the Blind has assisted blind and visually impaired Texans in achieving independent and successful lives through.
Evaluation of the AETC HIV Testing Initiative. Background In 2006, revised recommendations for routine HIV screening were released. AETCs have worked.
Community Health organizing concepts. community health professionals must possess specific knowledge and skills.  identify problems,  develop plan to.
Family Support Program of Albemarle County February, 2010.
Electronic Records Management: A New Understanding of Policy, Compliance, and Discovery Robert J. Sobie, Ph.D. Director Information Systems Department.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Preston & Sarah Gap Analysis.
Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES GAIN SANCTIONS AND THE GAIN SANCTION HOME VISIT OUTREACH PROJECT (GSHVO) October 2012.
Performance Management Training October , 2015 Grace Gorenflo, MPH, RN Principal Gorenflo Consulting, Inc.
Survey Of KOICA Training Programs Evaluation Dear Participants This questionnaire survey is designed to evaluate the KOICA training program you attended.
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
THE USE OF TWO TOOLS TO EVALUATE HEALTHY START COALITIONS Susan M. Wolfe, Ph.D.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
College Success Program John Cowles, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success and Retention Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, Michigan.
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Committee Orientation
Gender Statistics at the United States Census Bureau
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Be an Effective Council Member
Mental Health Connection Strategic Plan
State of World’s Cash Report:
Development of energy balance statistics
Process and Procedure Documentation
CoC Coordinator & Lead Agency Compliance & Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Goals Achievement Partnership (GAP) Survey Why the GAP survey was administered

Reasons for the GAP Survey To gain an understanding of what staff perceives as the three biggest problems (GAPS) preventing staff from assisting CalWORKs customers participate in WTW activities To gather staff ideas on how these problems may be solved To assess differences in perception between line staff and administration To assess who “walks the talk” when it comes to providing leadership for the Monterey County Values

Overall Goal To improve our services to Monterey County CalWORKs customers and assist them toward self-sufficiency in the remaining time available on their Welfare-To-Work (WTW) time clocks

Breakdown of GAP Respondents DivisionLine StaffAdminTotal Employment Services Benefits35944 Staff Development 044 System Support 112 Fiscal224 Services415 Total522981

Problem Identification (GAPS) What do you believe are the three biggest problems (GAPS) preventing staff from assisting CalWORKs customers move toward participation in employment or training activities?

“Three Biggest Problems” (Employment Services) Line Staff Caseloads and Insufficient Number of Staff Providing Services to Special Customer Populations Lack of Training (staff knowledge) Administration Caseloads and Insufficient Number of Staff Lack of Systems Support to Make Informed Decisions Lack of Training (customer service)

“Three Biggest Problems/GAPS” (Benefits Division) Line Staff High Caseloads Low Morale Lack of Time With Customers Administration High Caseloads Lack of Time With Customers Lack of Follow-Up With Sanctioned Customers

What changes in current practices would you recommend to improve staff’s ability to help move CalWORKs customers toward participation in employment or training activities? (Employment Services) Line Staff Reduce the Size of Caseloads Increase Number of Trainings and Improve Quality Improve WTW Caseload Management Administration Reduce the Size of Caseloads Increase Number of Trainings and Improve Quality Improve Collaboration Between CWES/Benefits Divisions

What impact will your recommendations have on current programs and services? (Employment Services) Line Staff Better Service to Customers Improved Staff Knowledge Administration Better Service to Customers More Knowledgeable Staff Base

What changes in current practices would you recommend to improve staff’s ability to help move CalWORKs customers toward participation in employment or training activities? (Benefits Division) Line Staff Reduce the Size of Caseloads Transfer all WTW Responsibilities to CWES Provide WTW Policy & Systems Training Administration Reduce the Size of Caseloads Co-locate CalWORKs Benefits Workers With CWES workers Agency Effectiveness

What impact will your recommendation have on current programs and services? (Benefits Division) Line Staff More Time With Customers Increase Quality Service Improve WTW Staff Knowledge Base Administration More Time With Customers Increase Quality Service Agency Effectiveness: Outcomes

4. Most DSS employees believe in and are living up to the County’s RICH values? Strongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Employment Services Line Staff 0%45.5% 9% Administration 0%62.5%25%12.5% BenefitsLine Staff 3%51%41%5% Administration 14.3%71.4%14.3%0%

5. Most DSS employees believe that administration is living up to the County’s RICH values? Strongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Employment Services Line Staff 0%8.3%66.7%25% Administration 0%69%31%0% BenefitsLine Staff 0%29%50%21% Administration 0%86%14%0%

4. Most DSS employees believe in and are living up to the County’s RICH values?

5. Most DSS employees believe that administration is living up to the County’s RICH values?

4. Most DSS employees believe in and are living up to the County’s RICH values?

5. Most DSS employees believe that administration is living up to the County’s RICH values?

Recommendations Evaluate Agency & Program Effectiveness Establish a Process for Setting WTW Priorities and Timelines for Overall Strategic Planning Purposes Co-locate CalWORKs Benefits/CWES Staff Conduct Annual GAP Survey to Gather Progress WTW Program Implementation