CarboOcean Bergen 08-10-2009 Carboschools+ What did students, teachers and scientists learn? Elma Dijkstra & Martin Goedhart Department of Education Faculty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Potential impact of PISA
Advertisements

Technology Education is More Than Just Computers
Earth Science in secondary schools in England & Wales Teacher attitudes and levels of teaching.
Using Case Studies and Other Methods in Teaching Environmental Science Do they foster understanding of the material as well as improve attitudes towards.
Student perceptions of the curriculum Paul Crisp Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education.
The Technology-Rich Outcomes-Focused Learning Environment Inventory (TROFLEI): A Cross-Cultural Validation Anita Welch, Claudette Peterson, Chris Ray,
Join the fun and enthusiasm of scientists in school projects! A quick look at on-going activities, December 2006 Philippe Saugier, CarboSchools coordinator.
Evaluation Results Aug 28 Seminar. Question I 1. Instruction: Rate aspects of the workshop on a 1 to 5 scale by selecting the number corresponding to.
 I would like to thank my dear teachers who have taken all the trouble to come to this remote place in upper Egypt.
“Building Effective Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context” in Bulgaria Institute for Ecological Modernisation.
NATIONAL PROJECT ACTIVITIES, EVALUATION , Ankara EUROFACE CONSULTING, CZECH REPUBLIC.
Birzeit University Experience in Designing, Developing and Delivering e-enabled Courses Palestine December,2005 Dr. Osama Mimi, Birzeit University.
Implementation of Computer Simulation Software in Learning Low-Level Computer Language: A Case Study Johnny Chan Chi Hown.
Noyce Program Evaluation Conference Thursday, December 6, 2007 Frances Lawrenz Michelle Fleming Pey-Yan Liou Christina Madsen Karen Hofstad-Parkhill 1.
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
Attitudes an introduction ist=PL03B96EBEDD01E386.
Now We’re Talking! Tool KitPowerPoint Presentation /C.1 ©Alberta Education, Alberta, Canada 2006 How to get more out of learning Learning Languages in.
PISA Partnership to Improve Student Achievement through Real World Learning in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Technology.
In search of engagement: Describing the drivers of secondary student science engagement in the United States and Finland Justin Bruner Michigan State University.
(former CERN Teacher-in-Residence)
The Impact of On-line Teaching Practices On Young EFL Learners' Instruction Dr. Trisevgeni Liontou RHODES MAY
After Carboschools+: European network for teaching global change Joachim Dengg (D), Danilo Marandola (I), Marc Jamous(F), Philippe Saugier (F), Martin.
Racce Educational Kit «Earthquakes and Volcanoes» Evaluation Sheet (Post - Test) The questionnaire aims to collect information on the features and tools.
General evaluation of the process and results of the preparation of the Innovative master program "Biodiversity and nature protection" Kseniya Kamenskaya,
Tech-Connected Teacher (TC*Teacher)
ZUZANA STRAKOVÁ IAA FF PU Pre-service Trainees´ Conception of Themselves Based on the EPOSTL Criteria: a Case Study.
CARBOOCEAN-IP Marine carbon sources and sinks assessment “Global Change and Ecosystems” (511176) The Norwegian CarboSchool project.
Outline  Case study  Significance of study  Need of career guidance in under-developed countries  Process  Overview of Career Guidance Model  Innovative.
CarboSchools+ new educational challenges for Philippe Saugier, CarboSchools coordinator.
Development version 19/06/ of 48 Effectiveness of a postural care training programme © 2012 Effectiveness of a postural care education programme.
Iuliana Zsoldos-Marchis
Local initiatives for women at the University of Bologna (Italy) Carla Raffaelli.
Project Cycle Management for International Development Cooperation: Applied Presentation of the course Teacher Pietro Celotti Università degli Studi di.
Presentation of the results of Study 1: Barriers to Female Participation in STEM post-secondary programs February, 2014.
Natural Europe Posttest Students The questionnaire is aimed at collecting information on the features and tools of the Natural Europe project. To analyze.
PROPONENTS: Isabelita R. Hizon, Ed. D. Susan O. Habacon INQUIRY-BASED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING PROGRAM (ICLP) FOR MANAGING LARGE CLASSES AND ITS EFFECT ON.
Yoko Hirata and Yoshihiro Hirata Hokkai-Gakuen University Sapporo, Japan.
Towards Sustainability: Challenges and Demands for Environmental Education in Hungary Márton HERCZEG&Noémi NAGYPÁL Ph.D. Student and Assistant Lecturer.
J.J. Navarro 1, T. Mardones 2, A. Ivanova 2 & L. Zamorano 2 1 Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CHILE) y Universidad de Sevilla (ESPAÑA) 2 Universidad Autónoma.
Tech-Know-Build: Indiana Students Building Knowledge with Technology Kathleen Keck Kathleen Steele Tami Haas Crawfordsville Community Schools Crawfordsville,
Evaluating HRD Programs
Sophie Sergent Ifremer European Affairs Department / MariFish WP7 ERANET MariFish COORDINATION OF EUROPEAN MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH Presentation of MariFish.
Natural Europe Questionnaire for teachers (school visit) The questionnaire is aimed at collecting information and on the features and tools of the Natural.
Professional Administrative Support for Adult Learning Pro- SAL PROJECT INFORMATION.
Natural Europe Posttest Students (Control group) The questionnaire is aimed at collecting information on the features and tools of the Natural Europe project.
Implementing Inquiry Based Science Teaching Through Teacher Networks The SINUS model for educational development in Germany Matthias Stadler, Kiel (Germany)
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Presentation of the results of Study 1: Barriers to Female Participation in STEM post-secondary programs February, 2014.
Service Learning Dr. Albrecht. Presenting Results 0 The following power point slides contain examples of how information from evaluation research can.
Teaching and Mentoring Student Researchers Part 2: Scientific Research Dr. Nancy Allen College of Education, Qatar University Dr. Gene Jongsma Education.
Factors Related to Students’ Interest in Science Learning Kostas Dimopoulos, Assistant Professor, Dept of Social and Educational Policy, University of.
IMPACT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN EFFECTIVENESS OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION IN ALBANIA IMPACT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN EFFECTIVENESS OF VOCATIONAL.
Tim Brower Professor & Chair Manufacturing & Mechanical Engr. Oregon Institute of Technology MSP Regional Meeting, San Francisco, February 14 & 15, 2008.
How can we draw more women to physics 1.  Some statistics from ATLAS and CERN  Easy things to do to improve the situation 2.
Communication training day Levi, 14th November 2005.
Teacher Professional Development for Problem-Based Integration of Technology James D. Lehman Peggy A. Ertmer Jingshu Huang Sung-Hee Park Purdue University.
Presentation of the project “Chemistry Is All Around Us” What is C.I.A.A.U.?
By: HANIM MOHAMED (MP ) SITI FATIMAH ZAINI (MP091421)
Cooperation among schools …on environmental topics Part one – Local level.
PREMA International Workshop El Parc Cientific de Barcelona, 25-26/1/07 Kathy Kikis-Papadakis.
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING USING INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING Veronika Šinigoj, Stanislav Avsec University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Slovenia.
By: HANIM MOHAMED (MP ) SITI FATIMAH ZAINI (MP091421)
Chapter 14: Affective Assessment
Many Perspectives on Engagement in PIRLS 2011  Instruction to Engage Students in Learning  Students Engaged in Reading Lessons  Instruction Limited.
CarboSchools+ new educational challenges for Philippe Saugier, CarboSchools coordinator.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
Presenter: Alice Instructor: Dr. Kate, Chen Date: January 17, 2011 Web 2.0 in learning English: The student perspective 1.
Me Tarzan, You Jane Me Tarzan, You Jane eTwinning and Comenius project ( October 2007 until July 2009) eTwinning and Comenius project ( October 2007 until.
Viewpoints of Students and Academics on Using the E-EPOSTL in my Institution Laila Priedīte Raimonds Jankovskis.
OVERCOMING PREJUDICE FOR CAREER IN STEM WITH DINOSOURS‘ STEPS
Presentation transcript:

CarboOcean Bergen Carboschools+ What did students, teachers and scientists learn? Elma Dijkstra & Martin Goedhart Department of Education Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences University of Groningen

CarboOcean Bergen Aims of Carboschools+ Key objective: Establish partnerships between research institutes and schools in developing and conducting student projects on climate change Related objectives: ›Support scientists and teachers to establish collaboration (co- production and exchange of tools, know-how, materials, methodologies at a European level) ›Inform and stimulate secondary school students to choose science careers ›Involve local players (school authorities, teacher associations, parents associations, teacher training institutes, science museums etc.)

CarboOcean Bergen Partners Bergen (N) Kiel (D) Jena (D) Bordeaux (F) Paris (F) Barcelona (Cat) Firenze (I) Norwich (UK) Groningen (NL) Associated partners: Cluj (Rom) Uppsala (S) Heidelberg (D)

CarboOcean Bergen Some activities ›School CO 2 web (NL + others) ›Sustainable agriculture (I) ›Marine research (D,N)

CarboOcean Bergen Aims of WP4 (evaluation) ›Evaluation of regional projects ›Impact of projects on... - students’ attitudes towards science - students’ attitudes towards school science - students’ attitudes towards scientists - students’ attitudes towards climate change

CarboOcean Bergen Instruments of WP4 Three instruments ›Self Evaluation Tool ›Attitudes Questionnaires ›Interviews

CarboOcean Bergen Structure of Self Evaluation Tool (SET) SET consists of three parts: Part A (12 items) ›Background characteristics (gender, birthyear, science background etc.) Part B (14 items) ›Opinions on project (organization, enjoyment, difficulty, impact). ›Likert items: strongly disagree – disagree – agree – strongly agree Part C (4 essay questions) ›Additional information about the project (suggestions to improve etc.) SET is translated to native language students

CarboOcean Bergen Results SET Backgroundcharacteristics ›29 schools from 5 countries ›Total number of students who filled in SET = 585 (305 girls / 276 boys / 4 unknown) ›Age: 13 – 21 year (m = 16.5) ›Grades: 7 – 13 (m = 10.4) ›Time spent on the project: 1 – 100 hours per student (m = 25 hours) UiB-BCCR Bergen Norway MPI-BGC Jena Germany CNR- IBIMET Firenze Italy LSCE-IPSL Gif sur Yvette France IFM- GEOMAR Kiel Germany RuG Groningen The Netherlands Total N = 63N = 23N = 157N = 312N = 28N = 2N = 585

CarboOcean Bergen Results SET Science background characteristics Most (at least 70%) of the students: -are interested in science topics -found their grades for science subjects high -do a lot of science at school -like science lessons more than other lessons at school -don’t think that scientists are boring 39% of the students found it difficult to understand scientists in general Students are positive about science and scientists in general

CarboOcean Bergen Results SET Organization of CS projects -Projects were well organized (see table below) -Overall opinion on projects was good -Instructions for projects were clear for most (at least 70%) students -Supervisor’s explanations helped most students to understand projects Sample item: B1 (n = 581) Strongly disagree DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree “This project was well organized.”1.4%14.4%57.3%26.3%

CarboOcean Bergen Results SET Enjoyment of the CS projects -Students like learning science in this way (see table below) -Most students (at least 70%) would like to work on projects like these more often -Most students enjoyed the projects very much Sample item: B8 (n = 582) Strongly disagree DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree “I like learning science in this way.”3.1%14.2%53.5%28.7%

CarboOcean Bergen Results SET Difficulty of the CS projects -Projects were not too difficult -Most of the students (at least 70%) found their knowledge was sufficient to understand the projects (see table below) Sample item: B11 (n = 581) Strongly disagree DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree “My knowledge was sufficient to understand this project.” 3.8%24.4%57.6%13.5%

CarboOcean Bergen Results SET Impact on students -The students learned many new things from the projects and from the scientists -The projects made the students understand that climate change studies are very important for human future and that people can affect climate change (see table below) -The projects made 43% of the students more interested in choosing a scientific career Example: B13 (n = 583) Strongly disagree DisagreeAgreeStrongly agree “This project made me realize that people can affect climate change.” 3.1%16.1%53.2%27.4%

CarboOcean Bergen Effect of background characteristics on opinions Gender: -Girls are slightly more positive about projects’ organization than boys -Boys found the projects slightly less difficult than girls -Girls found they learned slightly more new things from the projects than boys Research institute & student age: - Many differences, but those characteristics depend on projects

CarboOcean Bergen Effect of science background characteristics on opinions Significant (p <.05) correlations: ›Interest in science topics correlates positive with scientific career interest ›Enjoyment of science lessons correlates positive with scientific career interest ›High grades for science subjects correlate negative with projects’ difficulty ›Difficulty to understand scientists correlates negative with almost all evaluated aspects ›Opinion that scientists are boring correlates negative with all evaluated aspects

CarboOcean Bergen Conclusion Evaluation CS Projects ›Students are positive about the organization of projects, enjoyment and difficulty of projects, and projects’ impact ›SET reports give useful feedback to all regional coordinators on the projects

CarboOcean Bergen Attitudes Questionnaires (AQ) Pretest (before project) & posttest (after project) to measure changing attitudes PartScaleNumber of items Cronbach’s Alpha A Background characteristics 12- B AttitudesSchool ScienceAttitude towards School Science7.90 ScienceAttitude towards the Social Implications of Science Attitude towards Scientists Attitude towards a Career in Science Climate Change Attitudes towards Climate Change Environmental Awareness C Climate Change Knowledge Test 12-

CarboOcean Bergen AQ sample items ScaleSample item B Attitude towards School Science“Science lessons are fun.” B Attitude towards the Social Implications of Science“Science helps to make life better.” B Attitude towards Scientists“Scientists are less friendly than other people.” B Attitude towards a Career in Science“A job as scientist would be interesting.” B Attitudes towards Climate Change“Climate change is a threat to the world.” B Environmental Awareness“I feel it’s important to take good care of the environment.” C Climate Change Knowledge Test“Because of climate change certain plants and animals may become extinct.” “If my city will have a heat wave this summer, it means climate is changing.” Scores part B: strongly disagree – disagree – neutral – agree – strongly agree Scores part C: true – false – don’t know

CarboOcean Bergen Interviews Aim: to give additional information on the implementation of the projects in the schools and the curricula ›constraints with realizing projects within the school programme ›relation between the projects and the curriculum ›the role scientists may play in cooperation with schools from the perspective of teachers and scientists Interviews with: ›Students ›School teachers ›Scientists ›Regional coordinators

CarboOcean Bergen Thank you for your attention

A7 My interest in science topics is low A8 My grades for science subjects are high A9 We do a lot of science at school A10 I like science lessons more than other lessons at school A11 It is difficult to understand scientists A12 Most scientists are boring B1 This project was well organized. -,23 B2 I enjoyed this project very much. -,19-,18-,34 B3 I learned many new things from this project. -,15,09,13-,15-,30 B4 This project was too difficult.,19-,14,26,24 B5 The instructions for the project were clear. -,16 B6 This project made me understand climate change studies are very important for human future. -,13-,19 B7 I would like to work on projects like this more often. -,17,08-,12,10-,24-,30 B8 I like learning science in this way. -,14,10,16-,17-,23 B9 The supervisor's explanations helped me to understand this project. -,10,15,13-,12-,15 B10 My overall opinion on this project is good. -,12,14-,11-,29 B11 My knowledge was sufficient to understand this project. -,19,18,11-,16-,11 B12 I learned very much from the scientist(s) in this project.,10-,10-,21 B13 This project made me realize that people can affect climate change. -,10-,18 B14 This project makes me more interested in choosing a scientific career. -,27,16,32-,19-,30