The Civil Rights Movement & Legislation Chapter 6, Theme B.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Affirmative Action? 1961 – President Kennedy implements affirmative action executive orders directing federal agencies to pursue a policy of minority.
Advertisements

Civil Rights Define Explain how it relates to the Civil Rights Story in America Choose a picture that relates to the meaning.
Chapter Sixteen Equality and Civil Rights. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved Conceptions of Equality Americans want equality,
Wilson 6A. Who Governs?To What Ends? If the law supports equality of opportunity, why has affirmative action become so important? Under what circumstances.
Jessie Hauser. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke “ This landmark Supreme Court case imposed limitations on affirmative action to ensure.
Civil Rights AP US Government (Chapter 6)
Civil Rights and Public Policy Chapter 5 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry Government.
Civil Rights Chapter 6 Part 4. VI. Affirmative action A.Equality of results 1. Racism and sexism can be overcome only by taking them into account in designing.
Chapter Six Civil Rights.
Affirmative Action. DISCLAIMER This presentation does not imply any racial agenda or discrimination. The views that are going to be presented in this.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. Civil Rights and Public Policy Chapter 5 Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry Government.
Chapter 5 Civil Rights Legal basis for civil rights Enforcing the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment Critical Supreme Court ruling in the battle.
14 th amendment All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.
Current Issues in Civil Rights. Affirmative Action Affirmative action – preferential practices should be used in hiring.
Current Issues in Civil Rights. Affirmative Action Affirmative action – preferential hiring practices should be used in hiring.
 Civil Rights  Definition: policies designed to protect people against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by government officials or individuals 
Civil Rights Refers to government-protected rights of individuals against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by governments or individuals based on.
Four developments begin to turn the tide: -Public opinion starts to change -Violent white reactions of segregationists received extensive media coverage.
Chapter Six Civil Rights. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.6 | 2 What are civil rights? Protect certain groups against discrimination.
Civil Rights – A Time Line Chapter 29. Vocabulary De facto discrimination – cultural/societal discrimination De facto discrimination – cultural/societal.
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 3
The Campaign in Congress for Civil Rights A study of civil rights legislation Chapter 6, Theme A, part 2.
BY: WILL CLAYTON & GRIFFIN SMITH.  Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.
© 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Magruder ’ s American Government C H A P T E R 21 Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law.
Affirmative Action Chapter 6, Theme C. Affirmative Action Solution  Define it!  What are the two views of the practice?  Compensatory action (helping.
Civil Rights and Public Policy Chapter 5. Introduction Civil Rights: – Definition: Policies designed to protect people against arbitrary or discriminatory.
CHAPTER 6 Powers or privileges guaranteed to individuals and protected from arbitrary removal at the hands of government or individuals.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. Civil Rights.
Civil Rights and Public Policy Chapter 5 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry Government.
Affirmative Action Has there been a move away from Affirmative Action in Recent Years?
Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint
Chapter 6 Civil Rights. Early Slavery Issues Congress banned slave trade in –20 year period specified by Constitution Battle of north vs. south.
Federal Civil Rights Laws Chapter 21 Section 3. Question As a Ten year old you bullied someone every day causing that kid great torment. Then you saw.
THE UNFAIR TREATMENT OF MEMBERS OF MAJORITY GROUPS(WHITES) CAUSED FROM PREFERENTIAL POLICIES, AS IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS OR EMPLOYMENT, PROPOSED TO HELP.
Ashley Eng Lauren Gregory Sari Luciano Kevin Perdriere Justin Sanches Ashley White Jehan Yakoo.
Chapter 19: Civil Rights The Essentials Mr. Goldstein AP US Government and Politics.
EQUAL RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW Significant Litigation and Legislation of the Civil Rights Movement and the Women’s Right Movement.
GENDER AND EQUAL RIGHTS Wilson 6B. SUFFRAGE  Senaca Falls Convention (1848)  Demonstrations  Organized movement  States in the west granted women.
Pearson Education, Inc., Longman © 2008 Civil Rights and Public Policy Chapter 5 Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy Thirteenth AP* Edition.
CIVIL RIGHTS **BOLD= Something you need to know/write down** Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.6 | 1.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. Civil Rights and Public Policy Chapter 5 Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry Government.
Racial and ethnic politics Unit 3 Topic 4
What are civil rights? Protect certain groups against discrimination
Civil Rights-Unit 7--Chapter 5
Civil Rights and Public Policy
Unit 7: The Judicial Branch, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights
Intro to American Law.
Civil Rights and Public Policy
Chapter 6: Civil Rights.
Ch. 5 Vocabulary Review – AP Government
Affirmative Action.
Civil Rights.
Civics: Chapter 11 Section 3
Chapter Six Civil Rights.
Civil Rights and Public Policy
Civil Rights.
Chapter 4 Section 3 & 4.
AP Government “Civil Rights Movement”
Key Ch. 5 Vocabulary Review – AP Government
Affirmative Action.
Civil Rights and Public Policy
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Opener
What are civil rights? Protect certain groups against discrimination
Civil Rights Chap 5, Day 3 Aim:.
The Civil Rights Struggle
Ap u.s. government & politics
Civil Rights/Civil Liberties
Civil Rights and Public Policy
Presentation transcript:

The Civil Rights Movement & Legislation Chapter 6, Theme B

Pop Quiz 6  In what city was JFK assassinated?  Name the House committee that was the graveyard of CR legislation.  What practice did the 24 th Amendment outlaw?  Name 1 practice outlawed by CRA of 1964?  Name the Senate committee that halted CR legislation.  What state saw 3 young civil rights workers killed by the Klan & local sheriff?

“Front Burner” Issue NAACP knew the problem had to be placed on the public agenda. Change public opinion, but how? a. Use media campaigns (Invite coverage of abuse) to play on sympathies of whites. b. Use civil disobedience to initiate dramatic confrontations (Rosa Parks) c. Enfranchise black voters d. Discourage riots as frustration grew over the slow progress.

The Campaign in Congress  Powerful Southern Democrats blocked nearly all legislation in committees or filibustered in Senate. The House Rules & Senate Judiciary Committees were the graveyards of legislation.  In 1957, Strom Thurmond filibustered for over 24 hrs to block civil rights legislation.  In 1964, a filibuster was ended by cloture leading to passage of the Civil Rights Act.  So, what led to this change?

The Campaign in Congress  How did the assassination of JFK help the civil rights movement?  How did the 1964 elections bring change?  The Civil Rights Act of 1964 & the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were landmark laws. Why were these so significant?  Discuss each.

What REALLY led to integration?  Futile resistance  Disruption of economy & government  Enfranchisement of blacks  Unsuccessful legal challenges  Withholding federal funds  Public opinion changed Is the battle over for civil rights? How have police tactics fueled debates over race?

Affirmative Action Solution  Define it!  What are the two views of the practice?  Compensatory action (helping minorities catch up) vs. preferential treatment (giving minorities preference, applying quotas)  Which does the public support & why?  So, how do you achieve and measure equality? Equality of Results versus Equality of Opportunity

Equality of Results  What does this mean?  Racism & sexism can be overcome only by taking them into account in designing remedies  How does society achieve these results?  Affirmative action― preferential hiring practices― should be used in hiring  What are the goals?  Diversity or multiculturalism  Remedy to level the playing field for past discrimination

Equality of Opportunity  What does this mean?  Reverse discrimination occurs when race or sex is used as a basis for preferential treatment.  How does society prevent this problem?  Laws should be color blind and sex neutral  What are the goals?  Government should only eliminate barriers  The most qualified and demanded applicants are hired.

Court Battles  No clear direction in Court decisions.  Court is deeply divided & affected by ideology. Results are conflicting & confusing. a) Bakke (1978): numerical minority quotas are not permissible, but race could be considered b) Court upheld federal rule that set aside 10% of all federal construction contracts for minority-owned firms (1980) c) In 1989, Court overturned Virginia law that set aside 30% of construction contracts for minority firms d) In 1990, Court upheld federal rule that gave preference to minority-owned firms in awarding broadcast licenses

Meaning of Standards for Quotas  Quota system subjected to strict scrutiny— must be compelling state interest to justify quotas: Adarand Constructors v. Pena (1995)  Must correct an actual pattern of discrimination  Must identify actual practices that discriminate  Voluntary preference systems may be easier to justify

More Court Battles!  Recent examples: Discuss using CT packet Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)―overturned UMI admissions policy giving “bonus points” to racial minority applicants for undergraduate program Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) upheld UMI Law School admissions policy that used race as a “plus factor” but not as part of a numerical quota Fisher v. University of TX (2012)—Watch clipWatch clip