Culture Clash: One More Attempt to Change the Lexicon Presentation to the RLV Working Group Michael S. Kelly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Division Of Early Warning And Assessment MODULE 11: ASSESSING THE FUTURE.
Advertisements

MOS RC Glider Avoidance. Recent incidents of near misses and /or collision with remote controlled gliders, requires strong action by the members of the.
Air Force Junior ROTC How to be a Rocket Scientist  Rocket Workshop.
Air Force Junior ROTC How to be a Rocket Scientist  Rocket Workshop.
Project management Project manager must;
RLV Working Group Presentation to the COMSTAC Michael S. Kelly 26 May 2005.
Architecture Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Training for Commercial Spaceflight. OCP Building training center –Classroom –Simulation –Actual flight time.
Delta Clipper To Boldly Go…. A presentation by: Jason Moore & Ashraf Shaikh.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Allen Guzik January 31, 2008 Trajectory Airplane Launch Trajectory Code and ΔV Drag Comparison Trajectory Optimization 1/5.
Manajemen Basis Data Pertemuan 8 Matakuliah: M0264/Manajemen Basis Data Tahun: 2008.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status to the COMSTAC Philip McAlister NASA Exploration Systems Mission.
Edmund Ross. Virgin Galactic is… A revolutionary new company with ambitions to make public space flight common, and affordable. The company is owned and.
Evaluation and Criticism Does it meet the general requirements of this kind of play? Are the playwright’s intentions stated, and does he achieve them?
IT Project Management Weeks 2 and 3. Topics of Discussion Introduction Identify the Business Case Scope the Project Plan the Project Delivery and Outcome.
By Prof. Dr. Ram S. Jakhu, Panel Chair 8 TH ANNUAL MCGILL CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL AVIATION LIABILITY & INSURANCE Montreal: 18 April 2015 INTRODUCTION.
Lim Sei cK.  There are considerable similarities between the management of projects and of events.  Both are unique, time-limited operations.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 27 Slide 1 Quality Management 1.
Page 0 COMSTAC RLV Task Force on Training RLV TASK FORCE ON TRAINING May 15, 2008 Maurice Kennedy.
Introduction to Computer Technology
New Mexico Space Grant Consortium Student Launch Program Provide annual access to space for student experiments from Spaceport America.
Steven A. Jones Associate Professor Biomedical Engineering Louisiana Tech University Created for our NSF-funded Research Experiences for Teachers Program.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 COE CST Research Road Mapping Workshop #2 August 16, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration Research Area 2: Space Transportation.
Strategic Planning Session David Rudder, Ph.D. Rudder Consultants, LLC. May 17, 2006.
RLV Summit Debrief Launch Operations Support Working Group May 23, 2006.
Lecture 5: Climb PERFORMANCE
Downloaded from Lecture 8: Crew Personality & Attitude.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Concept of Operations for Commercial.
Leading Cadet Training
RLV Working Group Reusable Launch Vehicles Working Group Presentation to the COMSTAC 25 October 2006 Michael S. Kelly, Chairman.
CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Journal Write a paragraph about a decision you recently made. Describe the decision and circumstances surrounding it. How did it turn out? Looking back,
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
2/27/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 2/27/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance Gaps.
Assessment of Alternate Methodologies for Establishing Equivalent Satisfaction of the Ec Criterion for Launch Licensing Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering.
1 COMSTAC RLV Working Group Meeting Report Presentation to the COMSTAC Michael S. Kelly Chairman 20 May 2004.
Presented to: COMSTAC RLV Working Group By: Ken Wong, Licensing and Safety Division Manager Date: May 15, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Federal.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration International Outreach Update FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation COMSTAC RLV.
1 Psych 5500/6500 The t Test for a Single Group Mean (Part 1): Two-tail Tests & Confidence Intervals Fall, 2008.
5/9/02 1 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Federal Government DoD DoC DoT NASA State Government NCSS Industry University Detailed.
Space Transportation Operations Working Group (STOWG) Report to COMSTAC October 7, 2010 Debra Facktor Lepore Acting Chair.
Industry Comments to Commercial Space Transportation Reusable Launch Vehicle Operations & Maintenance Guidelines Presented to the COMSTAC RLV Working Group.
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
Presented to: COMSTAC RLV Working Group By: Ken Wong, Licensing and Safety Division Deputy Manager Date: October 10, 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.
COMSTAC STOWG Commercial Aerospaceports Licensing and Development.
 Ensure the scene is setup for a safe successful outcome  Request the necessary resources  Access and extricate the injured  Transport all patients.
Commercial Space Transportation Research and Development Program COMSTAC RLV Working Group Chuck Larsen October 10, 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.
RLV Working Group Reusable Launch Vehicles Working Group Presentation to the COMSTAC 18 May 2007 Michael S. Kelly, Chairman.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA AST Overview Presentation Federal Aviation Administration Overview of the Federal Aviation Administration.
THE NEW XS-1 SPACE PLANE CAN INNOVATION GET ANY BETTER?
Winter 2011SEG Chapter 11 Chapter 1 (Part 1) Review from previous courses Subject 1: The Software Development Process.
Emerging Developments & Issues - Suborbital Commercial Spaceflight
AST Research & Development Activities 26 October 2004 COMSTAC RLV WG Presentation by Shelia Helton-Ingram.
Guide to the Identification of Safety-Critical Hardware Items for RLV Developers COMSTAC RLV Working Group Meeting Washington D.C. 25 May 2005.
ASTWG Vision Team Group Exercise: Initial Summary of Results.
The Spaceport Enterprise Defining and Developing the Concept Kevin Brown Command and Control Technologies Corp. Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group.
Quality Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Meeting Users ’ Requirements for Internet Quality of Service Anna Bouch, Allan Kuchinsky, Nina Bhatti HP Labs Technical.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: COMSTAC By: Bretton Alexander, RLV Working Group Chair Date: May 11, 2011.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: COMSTAC By: Debra Facktor Lepore, Acting Chair, Space Transportation Operations.
Lab 4 Oct 5/7 Pass in assignment 2 -www should have already ed me your website addresss: ie. Decide.
Chapter 5 Population Health Quality and Safety Learning Objectives 1. Explain why it is difficult to monitor healthcare quality and safety at the population.
1 Science of Flight The Aerospace Environment Model Rocketry.
Spaceports – Emerging Business Models
* 07/16/96 Propulsion Lab 6 Winter Quarter *.
Housekeeping: Candidate’s Statement
Knowing When to Stop: An Examination of Methods to Minimize the False Negative Risk of Automated Abort Triggers RAM XI Training Summit October 2018 Patrick.
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Division Chief, Spaceport Management & Integration
Presentation transcript:

Culture Clash: One More Attempt to Change the Lexicon Presentation to the RLV Working Group Michael S. Kelly

Context: Licensing of SS1 Process of licensing the research flights of SS1 complete, and License issued on 1 April 2004 Frankly, a long, painful process –Should not have been a surprise –Was the magnitude strictly necessary? Indications from another process, XCOR’s successful license completion show that the process need not have been as painful as it was What is the difference?

The Source of the Problem Scaled and XCOR have different worldviews from “launch” industry Scaled and XCOR have different worldviews from each other FAA/AST’s practical licensing experience is completely in the “launch” (i.e. expendable) industry, which is a different world from the RLV “world” –It is a Tower of Babel – three groups speaking three different languages, trying to reach a common end (Makes the conclusion of the licensing process all the more remarkable an achievement)

Concepts and Language The relationship of concepts to language is complex enough – don’t make it harder Language doesn’t determine concepts, but it does influence how quickly or slowly valid concepts are formed The most significant part of language is in revealing the stage of conceptual development of the person(s) using it –Conceptual validity and precision is manifested by the use of appropriate language

Where We Stand We are in the infancy of “reusable launch vehicles” and commercial space “flight” In terms of our conceptual framework, we are tabula rasa However, one thing is very clear: application of the conceptual framework of “space launch” is absolutely inappropriate

Comparisons Launch: A single, unrepeatable event for a vehicle that will fly once and only once Launch Vehicle: A vehicle that will fly once and only once, and be completely destroyed whether it has accomplished its mission or not – and it’s not designed to perform any other way Flight Safety: The ability to destroy a launch vehicle ahead of schedule Range: A remote place where one conducts the highly dangerous activity of launch The normal mode of operation of a vehicle that does round trips into space: No equivalent word A vehicle that is designed to and routinely leaves the ground, reaches space, and returns to the ground: No equivalent word, but it certainly is NOT (in general) a “reusable launch vehicle” Flight Safety: The ability of a pilot (remote, on-board, automatic) to recover from pilot or hardware induced problems and safely return to the ground Spaceport: A place where vehicles designed to routinely leave the ground, reach space, and return do the leaving and returning

And a complicaton Aircraft: Has a set of well defined definitions for the various types Has a culture which has 100 years of practical experience with safety –How to ensure it –Or, more significantly, what happens when everything goes wrong Scaled comes from this world

The Pain of Not Speaking the Same Language Scaled worked from the perspective of a long- established industry, of unknown applicability FAA/AST worked from the perspective of another long- established industry, of unknown applicability It was inevitable that there would be a level of pain in determining what was applicable from each perspective As it turns out, there is more from the aircraft world than the launch world

Some Examples Crashes of “RLVs” are, in general, no different from crashes of aircraft after propellant exhaustion, regardless of vehicle energy state or altitude Control of “RLVs” is aircraft-like, and bears no resemblance to “launch” Safety is aircraft-like, not like that associated with artillery (launch vehicles) The psuedo-precision of safety predictions from “launch” is polluting the atmosphere for all of us

It’s Now Time It may have been premature to change the lexicon of “RLVs” when originally proposed, because we had no practical experience Now we do, and will continue to gain it We should be looking at a continued conceptual and linguistic development that is unique to this new industry, and do it with intent and eyes wide open