Use of emissions & other data reported within the LRTAP Convention in the IIASA GAINS model Z.Klimont Center for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Pollution and Climate
Advertisements

Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Links between climate, air pollution and energy policies Findings from the.
State of model development: RAINS/GAINS International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, A. Chambers, J. Cofala,
Cross Cutting Group B: Ammonia policy context and future challenges Chair: Till Spranger Rapporteur: Zbigniew Klimont Attendees: 13.
W ORKSHOP MINNI Roma, aprile 2013 GAINS-Italy Giovanni Vialetto, Tiziano Pignatelli Technical Unit on Environment Technologies.
Integrated Assessment Modeling, cost-effectiveness, and agricultural projections in the RAINS model Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: The approach. Cost-effectiveness needs integration Economic/energy development (projections) State of emission controls,
Methodology and applications of the RAINS air pollution integrated assessment model Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
National work with the GAINS model: experiences from Sweden and other countries Работы в рамках модели GAINS на национальном уровне: опыт Швеции и других.
The inclusion of near-term radiative forcing into a multi-pollutant/multi-effect framework Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM)
The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
M. Amann, W. Schöpp, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen The RAINS-GHG Model Approach Work in progress.
LINKAGES AND SYNERGIES OF REGIONAL AND GLOBAL EMISSION CONTROL Workshop of the UN/ECE Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling January 27-29, 2003.
1 Introduction, reporting requirements, workshop objectives Workshop on greenhouse gas and ammonia emission inventories and projections from agriculture.
European Commission: DG Environment Overview of projections data use in the European policy-making process TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections, 30 October.
Global and regional black carbon mitigation opportunities Zig Klimont Improving BC Emissions Estimates and Abatement.
European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.
Baseline emission projections for the EU-27 Results from the EC4MACS project and work plan for the TSAP revision Markus Amann International Institute for.
The GAINS model. Rationale Air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) often stem from the same sources Energy consumption and agricultural activities.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.
EC4MACS European Consortium for Modelling of Air Pollution and Climate Strategies GAINS Greenhouse Gas – Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies DG ECFIN.
Application of IIASA GAINS Model for Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution in Europe Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
M. Amann G. Klaassen, R. Mechler, J. Cofala, C. Heyes International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Modelling synergies and trade-offs between.
Transboundary Air Pollution and related Integrated Assessment Modelling Tiziano Pignatelli Enea – Atmospheric Pollution Unit
CLRTAP co-operation project seminar Karin Kindbom, 16 April 2013  Black carbon emission inventory  Emission inventory and emission inventory system.
Co-benefits of Integrated Approach to Air Quality Management and Climate Change Mitigation Role of Integrated Assessment Methods in SEA Dr. Vladislav.
Clean Air The revision of the National Emission Ceilings Directive and agriculture FERTILIZERS FORUM 23 June 2015.
GAINS databases Links and interactions with the international reporting processes UNECE TFEIP/EIONET meeting Dublin, Ireland, October, 2007 Z.Klimont.
Impact of the EGTEI proposed ELVs on Emission Scenarios UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Modelling analysis performed by the.
New concepts and ideas in air pollution strategies Richard Ballaman Chairman of the Working Group on Strategies and Review.
Coordination Centre for Effects Jean-Paul Hettelingh, EC4MACS kick off meeting, IIASA, 6-7 March 2007 EC4MACS Task 3: Ecosystem Impact Assessment by the.
Cost-effective measures to achieve further improvements of air quality in Europe ( focus on key measures in the EECCA and Balkan countries) Based on presentation.
IIASA M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress in developing the baseline scenario for CAFE.
RAINS becomes GAINS and other “future” stories TFIEP Workshop on Emission Projections Thessaloniki, Greece, October, 2006 Zbigniew Klimont EMEP Centre.
Current knowledge and possible systematic biases Linkages with greenhouse gas policy Fabian Wagner M. Amann, C. Berglund, J. Cofala, L. Höglund, Z. Klimont,
Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution CAFE team, DG Environment and streamlined air quality legislation.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International.
TF HTAP- TF IAM Global Air Pollution Emission scenarios Frank Dentener European Commission- JRC Co-chair TF HTAP Terry J. Keating, Ph.D. U.S. EPA Co-chair.
Janusz Cofala and Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Application.
Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg,
Future challenges for integrated assessment modelling Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
The links to global problems Presentation at the 25 th anniversary special event of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution “Past successes.
Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development The 14th Annual Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) Conference Co-benefits of energy efficiency.
Baseline emission projections and scope for further reductions in Europe up to 2020 Results from the CAFE analysis M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala,
EC4MACS update and recent developments in the GAINS model UNECE TFEIP Expert Panel on Emission Projections Dublin, Ireland, 25 October, 2007 Z.Klimont.
Comparison of GHG mitigation efforts between Annex 1 countries Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Scenarios for the Negotiations on the Revision of the Gothenburg Protocol with contributions from Imrich Bertok, Jens Borken-Kleefeld, Janusz Cofala, Chris.
TF HTAP, TF IAM, Vienna, February HTAP-GAINS scenario analysis: preliminary exploration of emission scenarios with regard to the benefits of global.
An outlook to future air quality in Europe: Priorities for EMEP and WGE from an Integrated Assessment perspective Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment.
Scope for further emission reductions: The range between Current Legislation and Maximum Technically Feasible Reductions M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala,
IIASA workshop on GAINS and Key measures - a summary Laxenburg June 2011 Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
European Environment Agency An EEA / ETC ACM project on emission scenarios John van Aardenne 7th meeting of the TFEIP’s projections expert panel 2nd May.
IIASA Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Emission Inventories, Emission Control Options and Control Strategies A.
1 Emission data needs for assessments and international reporting Joint UNECE and EIONET workshop on emission inventories and projections 9-11 May 2001,
Baseline and MTFR scenarios EECCA and Balkan countries Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
The GAINS optimization approach – Basic background information Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) IIASA workshop.
Air Quality in EEA and EECCA Europe’s Environment assessment report, th Europe’s Environment assessment report, 2007 (‘the Belgrade report’) Hans.
Objectives and activities of the Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen
Air pollution in Europe and Asia From Science to Policy
Thirtieth meeting of the Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling
Clean Air for Europe and Research Needs
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Updating the Baseline and Maximum Control scenarios State of play of the.
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z
Emission Projections for 2020
Integrated measures to reduce Ammonia emissions
Environmental objectives and target setting
Services to support the update of the EMEP EEA Emission Inventory Guidebook, in particular on methodologies for black carbon emissions.
Agriculture: Links between water and air IEAs
Tentative Ideas for Co-operation
Presentation transcript:

Use of emissions & other data reported within the LRTAP Convention in the IIASA GAINS model Z.Klimont Center for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) Emission Inventory Compilers and Users Workshop 13 th May 2013, Istanbul, Turkey

Typical IIASA-GAINS model use Understanding/reproducing reported emissions, Projecting emissions, Assessing mitigation potential, Calculating control costs, Assessing impacts and searching for cost-optimal strategies considering constraints/targets In all elements listed above we benefit from your and other stakeholders’ work and collaborate with other EMEP centers Emissions, costs time Baseline emissions Mitigation potential Control costs

PM (BC, OC) SO 2 NO x VOCNH 3 COCO 2 CH 4 N2ON2O HFCs PFCs SF 6 Health impacts: PM (Loss in life expectancy)  O 3 (Premature mortality)  Vegetation damage: O 3  Acidification  Eutrophication  Climate impacts: Long-term ++++ Near-term forcing +/ Black carbon deposition + The RAINS model (Regional Acidification Information and Simulation) The GAINS multi-pollutant/multi-effect framework (Greenhouse gas and Air pollution INteractions and Synergies)

Central question for policy makers Example: Revision of European air quality policy To what level should the emissions of air pollutants be reduced in the year 2020? –Where will emissions and effects be in 2020 without further policies? –What reductions are technically feasible? –How much do they cost? – optimal/non-optimal –Who (which countries) pays? –How much are they willing to pay? –Who benefits? –Is it enough? –Is it fair?

Scope for further environmental improvements in the UNECE area: 4(6) effects Closing the gap Expected achievements of current policy; relative to 2000 Scope

Results of GAINS analysis for TSAP (EU Thematic Strategy for Air Pollution): Health impacts PM2.5 Baseline implies ~5 months shortening of statistical life expectancy after 2020 Additional MTFR measures could save ~55 million years of life of European population CLE 2030 MCE Years of life lost Loss in statistical life expectancy (months)

Results of GAINS analysis for TSAP (EU Thematic Strategy for Air Pollution): Emission reductions in central scenario: NH 3 Key measures: Efficient (‘low emission’) application of urea fertilizer Low nitrogen feed (pigs, dairy cows, poultry) Low emission application of livestock manures; liquid and solid Closed storage of manures and new low emission housing (pigs, poultry)

PM (BC, OC) SO 2 NO x VOCNH 3 COCO 2 CH 4 N2ON2O HFCs PFCs SF 6 Health impacts: PM (Loss in life expectancy)  O 3 (Premature mortality)  Vegetation damage: O 3  Acidification  Eutrophication  Climate impacts: Long-term ++++ Near-term forcing +/ Black carbon deposition + The GAINS multi-pollutant/multi-effect framework (Greenhouse gas and Air pollution INteractions and Synergies)

Co-control of GHGs and air pollutants Annex I parties of UNFCCC, 2020 Source: IIASA GAINS

Considering co-emission of pollutants at technology level results in different mixes (ratios) of pollutants depending on chosen strategy Example : Mitigation potentials in 2030 in in two scenarios developed in UNEP (2011) study Source: IIASA GAINS

BC emissions in the EU-27, baseline, relative change and thousand tons [total] Source: GAINS model

Courtesy of Jessica McCarty, Michigan Tech Research Institute

Incomplete wish list… for discussion in the afternoon? National vs international databases: how to improve consistency, e.g, non-commercial fuelwood use, How to improve spatial allocation of some sources, e.g., inland navigation TFEIP repository of national, often not peer-reviewed, studies? More regular involvement of remote sensing and inverse modelling community, Strengthen collaboration with other regional and global inventory activities (developers and users), e.g. MACCity, GEIA, HTAP, etc.

More details and background available from: General GAINS policy portal: onofAirPollutionandGreenhousegases/Overview.en.html onofAirPollutionandGreenhousegases/Overview.en.html –GAINS model: UNECE Gothenburg Protocol revision work – revisionhttp://gains.iiasa.ac.at/index.php/policyapplications/gothenburg-protocol- revision Review of the EU Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution (TSAP); towards revision of National Emission Ceiling Directive (NECD) –