Supreme Court Cases Setting the Precedent. John Marshall Helped make the Supreme Court the powerful institution it is today Presided over several important.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

McCulloch v Maryland (1819)

Advertisements

CHAPTER 16.3: THE DREDD SCOTT DECISION. FACTS 1.Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) 2. Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin for four years. 3.

Kansas-Nebraska Act Dred Scott Case Pages Workbook 88.

April 28, 2011 If you did not turn in your guided reading yesterday, turn it in today! WE HAVE A QUIZ TOMORROW-STUDY GUIDES ARE DUE BEFORE WE TAKE THE.

Road to Civil War Challenges to Slavery p

The Crisis Deepens: The Dred Scott Decision and Lincoln-Douglas Debates EQ: Why did the Dred Scott Decision and John Brown’s raid increase tensions between.

The Marshall Court Mr. Johnson AP US History.

The Court ruled that Scott's "sojourn" of two years to Illinois and the Northwest Territory did not make him free once he returned to Missouri.

Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The Constitution is not clear about the power of the Supreme Court.

Marbury v. Madison (Appointed fed. Judge by Pres. Adams night before Adams left office) (Sec. of State for Jefferson) (1803) Background –“Midnight Judge”

John Marshall, Chief Justice

SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)

 Question 1 2 Points Question #2 2 POINTS H. II and III.

The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?

JOHN MARSHALL’S GREATEST HITS Marbury v. Madison1803 Fletcher v. Peck1810 McCulloch v. Maryland1819 Gibbons v. Ogden1824.

John Marshall and the Marshall Court By Meghan Gabel and Kathleen Reilly.

DO NOW: “We are under a Constitution. But the Constitution is only what the Supreme Court says it is. It is these judges that safeguard our liberty, protect.

John Marshall, Chief Justice  Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801  Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” 

Bell Work In your notebooks, respond to the prompt: How can differences among students affect the school? What kinds of differences could lead to problems.

By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.

Emerson DeLoach Elicia Bilyeu Isidro Hernandez Noah Hickman Supreme Court Cases.

Essential Information US History Early Republic. The Marshall Court John Marshall was Chief Justice of the Supreme Court from He believed in.

Government Powers STATION 2. 2 Court Cases that Increased Government Power- Under Chief Justice Marshall! Gibbons V. Ogden- NY State gives Ogden rights.

Supreme Court Cases Overview. Marbury v. Madison Marbury sued Sec of State Madison for his appointment to be a judge (midnight judges – Adams administration)

AHSGE Supreme Court Cases. Brown v. Board of Education Ends segregation Overturns Plessy v. Ferguson.

LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES Elizabeth Benavides Mariya Gershkovich.

 California a Free State  New Mexico Terr. – slavery allowed  Slave trade banned in D.C.  Stronger Fugitive Slave law  Taylor as President.

Lesson 18: The Union in Peril part 7

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia 1831 John Ross- Cherokee Chief John Marshall- Chief Justice The Cherokee Nation wanted a federal injunction against laws passed.

Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The strength and path of the court were found with Chief Justice John Marshall 4 th Chief Justice 1801 – 1835.

The Marshall Courts. Purpose of the Judicial Branch  Interpret the Law –Set Legal Precedents –Determine if laws passed by Congress or Presidential Actions.

By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.

Supreme Court Cases. In your group, you will.. Read your court case individually Examine the case as a group Present your findings to the class.

WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.

UNIT II – CONSTITUTION AND RIGHTS OUR LIVING CONSTITUTION.

21.6 & 21.7: The Dred Scott Case & Decision Page

Judicial System - Case Study impartiality, weighing the evidence and the power of Reason and Justice.

 Dred Scott was a slave.  He had lived in a free territory with his owner.  His owner moved back into a slave state.  While there, the.

Our Living Constitution

Supreme Court Cases Landmark Supreme Court cases that outlined the powers of the Judicial Branch.

Dred Scott Decision 1857.

NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT

Unit 4 Study Guide.

VUS5e John Marshall How did Chief Justice John Marshall, a Virginian, contribute to the growth of the U.S. Supreme Court’s importance in relation to the.

McCulloch v Maryland (1819)

Warm-Up What are the 3 major Effects of the War of 1812?

Background: Who was Dred Scott?

Famous Abolitionists.

1820’s – 1860’s Vocabulary.

How did John Marshall’s decisions strengthen the power of the federal government?

Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION

Reviewing Marshall Court Decisions

Why was the case “Marbury vs. Madison” significant?

Growth of the Supreme Court

The Compromise Missouri Compromise (1820)

The power of Judicial Review

Marbury v. Madison Issue: Marbury sued over a judgeship promised him by an outgoing president. Ruling: Established the principal of Judicial Review; strengthening.

Dred Scott Decision Scott was not a citizen, could not sue

The Judicial Branch: Shaping Public Policy

James Monroe th President.

April 27, 2015.

(Warm-Up 12-6) Which Supreme Court case set up the principle of judicial review? Gibbons v Ogden Marbury v Madison McCulloch v Maryland Engel v Vitale.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Trimester 2 Part 2.

Do Now (Background Essay)

Marshall Court AIM: Did the Supreme Court under John Marshall Give Too Much Power to the Federal Government at the Expense of the State Governments?

Andrew Jackson.

Day #5 Supreme Court Cases

Presentation transcript:

Supreme Court Cases Setting the Precedent

John Marshall Helped make the Supreme Court the powerful institution it is today Presided over several important cases and established Judicial Review Info on Court Cases Supreme Court cases (like body builders) can be recognized by the “v.” in the middle—it stands for “versus” The first name is the person bringing the lawsuit (plaintiff) the second name is the person or institution being sued (defendant. V

Marbury v. Madison Marbury v. Madison (1803)— Established the idea of Judicial Review Justice Marshall said that the Supreme Court (judicial) had the right to review all laws made by congress to decide if they are unconstitutional Memory Tool: Papa M&M and Jr. M&M M&M = Marbary v Madison Jr. = Judicial Review “Papa” “Jr.”

Worcester v. Georgia In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Cherokees sued Georgia to keep their lands and won. President Jackson ignored the ruling. In 1837 the, federal troops forced the Cherokees to move in what is called the “Trail of Tears”.

McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), was about because a tax by the State of Maryland on the the Bank of the United States The Court said Congress can create a national bank or other institutions using the Elastic Clause of the Constitution This case made the federal government stronger In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Court further reduced the power of the states and increased the supremacy of the Federal Government.

The Dred Scott Decision In 1857 Dred Scott, a slave, sued for his freedom. He argued that because his owner had once taken him to live in Wisconsin (a free territory according to the Missouri Compromise), he should be free.

The Dred Scott Decision Continues The court ruled the following: 1.Scott could not bring a lawsuit because slaves were property, not citizens. 2.The Constitution protects property from being taken without due process of law. 3.Therefore, the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional because it banned slavery in the territories (did not protect people’s property). This case greatly divided the North and South.