Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 22 - 1 Beware: Lots of hidden slides!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions.
Advertisements

Objective: To test claims about inferences for two proportions, under specific conditions Chapter 22.
1-1 Copyright © 2015, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 21, Slide 1 Chapter 21 Comparing Two Proportions.
Comparing Two Proportions
Confidence Interval and Hypothesis Testing for:
1-1 Copyright © 2015, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 18, Slide 1 Chapter 18 Confidence Intervals for Proportions.
Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 9-1 Introduction to Statistics Chapter 10 Estimation and Hypothesis.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 19 Confidence Intervals for Proportions.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 24 Comparing Means.
Chapter 19: Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Objective: To test claims about inferences for two sample means, under specific conditions.
Ch 10 Comparing Two Proportions Target Goal: I can determine the significance of a two sample proportion. 10.1b h.w: pg 623: 15, 17, 21, 23.
Statistics Pooled Examples.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Inference for Counts:
1-1 Copyright © 2015, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 23, Slide 1 Chapter 23 Comparing Means.
Comparing Two Proportions
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 24 Comparing Means.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 24 Comparing Means.
Chapter 22: Comparing Two Proportions
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 20 Testing hypotheses about proportions
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Slide
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 20 Testing Hypotheses About Proportions.
STT 315 Ashwini Maurya Acknowledgement: Author is indebted to Dr. Ashok Sinha, Dr. Jennifer Kaplan and Dr. Parthanil Roy for allowing him to use/edit many.
AP Statistics Chapter 22 Notes “Comparing Two Proportions”
Chapter 22 Two-Sample Proportions Inference. Steps for doing a confidence interval: 1)State the parameter 2)Assumptions – 1) The samples are chosen randomly.
Chapter 22: Comparing Two Proportions. Yet Another Standard Deviation (YASD) Standard deviation of the sampling distribution The variance of the sum or.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions.
Chapter 20 Testing Hypothesis about proportions
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 19 Confidence Intervals for Proportions.
AP Statistics Chapter 24 Comparing Means.
Chapter 13 Inference for Counts: Chi-Square Tests © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Business Statistics: A First Course.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 24 Comparing Means.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 19 Confidence Intervals for Proportions.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 19 Confidence Intervals for Proportions.
Comparing Means Chapter 24. Plot the Data The natural display for comparing two groups is boxplots of the data for the two groups, placed side-by-side.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley AP Statistics Objectives Ch22.
Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions.  Comparisons between two percentages are much more common than questions about isolated percentages.  We often.
Chapter 22 Comparing two proportions Math2200. Are men more intelligent? Gallup poll A random sample of 520 women and 506 men 28% of the men thought men.
Sullivan – Fundamentals of Statistics – 2 nd Edition – Chapter 11 Section 3 – Slide 1 of 27 Chapter 11 Section 3 Inference about Two Population Proportions.
Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions. Comparing 2 Proportions How do the two groups differ? Did a treatment work better than the placebo control? Are.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 19 Confidence Intervals for Proportions.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Slide Next Time: Make sure to cover only pooling in TI-84 and note.
Chapter 22: Comparing Two Proportions AP Statistics.
1-1 Copyright © 2015, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 23, Slide 1 Chapter 24 Comparing Means.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide
AP STATISTICS COMPARING TWO PROPORTIONS Chapter 22.
Statistics 24 Comparing Means. Plot the Data The natural display for comparing two groups is boxplots of the data for the two groups, placed side-by-side.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions.
Statistics 22 Comparing Two Proportions. Comparisons between two percentages are much more common than questions about isolated percentages. And they.
Comparing Two Proportions Chapter 21. In a two-sample problem, we want to compare two populations or the responses to two treatments based on two independent.
Chapter 11 Lesson 11.3b Comparing Two Populations or Treatments 11.3: Inferences Concerning the Difference Between 2 Population or Treatment Proportions.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Slide
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Slide
COMPARING TWO PROPORTIONS Chapter 22 Part 1. Subscripts Use subscripts when comparing two groups.
Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Comparing Two Proportions
Comparing Two Proportions
Chapter 23 Comparing Means.
AP Statistics Comparing Two Proportions
Comparing Two Proportions
Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Comparing Two Proportions
Hypothesis Testing Two Proportions
Elementary Statistics
Comparing Two Proportions
Chapter 24 Comparing Means Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Beware: Lots of hidden slides!

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Answer: A

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 22 Comparing Two Proportions

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Comparing Two Proportions Comparisons between two percentages are much more common than questions about isolated percentages. And they are more interesting. We often want to know how two groups differ, whether a treatment is better than a placebo control, or whether this year’s results are better than last year’s.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide The Standard Deviation of the Difference Between Two Proportions Proportions observed in independent random samples are independent. Thus, we can add their variances. So… The standard deviation of the difference between two sample proportions is Thus, the standard error is

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Example: A recent survey of 886 randomly selected teenagers (age 12-17) found that more than half of them had online profiles. Some researchers and privacy advocates are concerned about the possible access to personal information about teens in public places on the internet. There appear to be differences between boys and girls in their online behavior. Among teens aged , 57% of the 248 boys had posted profiles, compared to 70% of the 256 girls. Let’s start the process of estimating how large the true gender gap might be. What is the standard error of the difference in sample proportions?

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Assumptions and Conditions Independence Assumptions: Randomization Condition: The data in each group should be drawn independently and at random from a homogeneous population or generated by a randomized comparative experiment. The 10% Condition: If the data are sampled without replacement, the sample should not exceed 10% of the population. Independent Groups Assumption: The two groups we’re comparing must be independent of each other.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Assumptions and Conditions (cont.) Sample Size Condition: Each of the groups must be big enough… Success/Failure Condition: Both groups are big enough that at least 10 successes and at least 10 failures have been observed in each.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Sample: Among randomly sampled teens aged 15-17, 57% of the 248 boys had posted online profiles, compared to 70% of the 256 girls. Can we use these results to make inferences about all year-olds?

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide The Sampling Distribution We already know that for large enough samples, each of our proportions has an approximately Normal sampling distribution. The same is true of their difference.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide The Sampling Distribution (cont.) Provided that the sampled values are independent, the samples are independent, and the samples sizes are large enough, the sampling distribution of is modeled by a Normal model with Mean: Standard deviation:

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Two-Proportion z-Interval When the conditions are met, we are ready to find the confidence interval for the difference of two proportions: The confidence interval is where The critical value z* depends on the particular confidence level, C, that you specify.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Sample: Among randomly sampled year olds, 57% of the 248 boys had posted online profiles, compared to 70% of the 256 girls. We calculated the standard error for the difference in sample proportions to be.0425 and found that the assumptions and conditions required for inference were met. What does a confidence interval say about the difference in online behavior?

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide TI-Tips Find a Confidence Interval STATS TESTS B:2-PropZInt 57% of the 248 boys = (round to nearest int.) 70% of the 256 girls = (round to nearest int.) (Put data in, largest %, then smallest %)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Hypothesis Test for the Difference in Two Proportions The typical hypothesis test for the difference in two proportions is the one of no difference. In symbols, H 0 : p 1 – p 2 = 0. Since we are hypothesizing that there is no difference between the two proportions, that means that the standard deviations for each proportion are the same. Since this is the case, we combine (pool) the counts to get one overall proportion.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Everyone into the Pool (cont.) The pooled proportion is where and If the numbers of successes are not whole numbers, round them first. (This is the only time you should round values in the middle of a calculation.)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide We then put this pooled value into the formula, substituting it for both sample proportions in the standard error formula:

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Compared to What? We’ll reject our null hypothesis if we see a large enough difference in the two proportions. How can we decide whether the difference we see is large? Just compare it with its standard deviation. Unlike previous hypothesis testing situations, the null hypothesis doesn’t provide a standard deviation, so we’ll use a standard error (here, pooled).

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Two-Proportion z-Test The conditions for the two-proportion z-test are the same as for the two-proportion z-interval. We are testing the hypothesis H 0 : p 1 – p 2 = 0, or, equivalently, H 0 : p 1 = p 2. Because we hypothesize that the proportions are equal, we pool them to find

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Two-Proportion z-Test (cont.) We use the pooled value to estimate the standard error: Now we find the test statistic: When the conditions are met and the null hypothesis is true, this statistic follows the standard Normal model, so we can use that model to obtain a P-value.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide I think it is best to learn by example… Example of a two-proportion z-test: One concern of the study on teens’ online profiles was safety and privacy. In the random sample, girls were less likely than boys to say that they are easy to find online from their profiles. Only 19% (62 girls) of 325 teen girls with profiles say that they are easy to find, while 28% (75 boys) of the 268 boys with profiles say the same. Are these results evident of a real difference between boys and girls? Perform a two—proportion z-test and discuss what you find.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide TI-Tips Two-proportion z-test Stat Tests 6:2-PropZTest Enter numbers for each group Choose tail. Determines the z-value and p-value!

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Example (#24): A survey of 430 randomly chosen adults found that 21% of the 222 men and 18% of the 208 women had purchased books online. a. Is there evidence that men are more likely than women to make online purchases of books? Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion in context. b. If you conclusion in fact proves to be wrong, did you make a type I or Type II error? c. Estimate this difference with a confidence interval. d. Interpret your interval in context.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide What Can Go Wrong? Don’t use two-sample proportion methods when the samples aren’t independent. These methods give wrong answers when the independence assumption is violated. Don’t apply inference methods when there was no randomization. Our data must come from representative random samples or from a properly randomized experiment.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Pg (day 1) Pg (day2)