O PERATIONS AND A LGEBRAIC T HINKING - OA K-2 D EFINING S TORY P ROBLEM T YPES Math Teacher Leader Meeting December 6, 2011 Beth SchefelkerLee Ann Pruske.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Progressions for the Common Core State Standards
Advertisements

Implementing the CCSS 8:30-8:40 Introductions & quick background
K The Common Core State Standards in Mathematics © Copyright 2011 Institute for Mathematics and Education Welcome to a clickable.
A Secondary Mathematics Progression Expressions, Equations and Functions.
O PERATIONS AND A LGEBRAIC T HINKING - OA K-2 P UTTING IT TOGETHER : N UMBER S TRATEGIES AND S TORY P ROBLEM T YPES Math Teacher Leader Meeting January.
Transition to CCSS Math What it means and what are the expectations for learning? Middle School Parent Meeting March 26, 2014.
Common Core State Standards 101 An Introduction. View the “Let’s Chat Core” Video.
AzMERIT Arizona’s Statewide Achievement Assessment for English Language Arts and Mathematics November 20, 2014.
COMPLETING THE FIRST LEG OF OUR FRACTION JOURNEY MAY MTL MEETING 2012 LEE ANN PRUSKEBETH SCHEFELKERCONNIE LAUGHLIN.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics (CCSSM)
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
Module 2: Content and Curriculum, K-8 Mathematics.
Professional Development for Teachers in Connection with CCSS Mathematics Nadine Bezuk San Diego State University
DEC2012 SECONDARY MATH TRANSITION. Chicken and Pigs A farmer sends his daughter and son into the barnyard to count the number of chickens and pigs. When.
K–8 Session 3: Exploring the Domain Progressions in Grades K–8 Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Welcome Academic Math Coaches! Let’s Mix It Up! Find a seat at a table. Use the dot on your nametag to make sure each color is represented. Green 1-2 years.
BUILDING LEARNING PROGRESSIONS WITH THE COMMON CORE By Marcia Torgrude.
Wake County Public Schools Elementary Mathematics
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Domains of Study/Conceptual Categories Learning Progressions/Trajectories.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Transitioning to the Common Core.
Understanding the Shifts in the Common Core State Standards A Focus on Mathematics Wednesday, October 19 th, :00 pm – 3:30 pm Doug Sovde, Senior.
Digging Deeper into the Standards and Progressions Making the Common Core come alive for youMaking the Common Core come alive for you! Level 1 Session.
North Carolina State Standards Update Common Core and More.
 Declining US competitiveness with other developed countries  Largely flat performance on NAEP over the past 40 years  High rates of college remediation.
Presented by: COMMON CORE Standards Plus ®. A nonprofit group of educators All Learning Plus instructional materials are developed by educators. Our mission.
1 Grade-Level Standards  K-8 grade-by-grade standards organized by domain  9-12 high school standards organized by conceptual categories Common Core.
1 Getting to Know the CMSP Three Components of the CMSP- Mathematics Curriculum Guides Pacing Guides Lesson Design Template.
CCSS Domain Progression
CC B.1 Common Core 1, 2, 3, … 1 st Standard, 2 nd Standard, 3 rd Standard … Standard Categories 2.1 Numbers and Operations 2.2 Algebraic Concepts.
DPI Conference April 7, 2015 Eric Kuennen University of Wisconsin Oshkosh.
COMMON CORE OVERVIEW Welcome. NYS Common Core 5 Strands (Same for Prek-12) (Number Sense, Algebra, Geometry, Measurement, Statistics and Probability)
Level 2 Training ~ Part 2A: Shift 2: Coherence How does coherence affect classroom instruction?
Late Start February 9, 2012 Diane Burtchin
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades K-5: Focus on Content Standards.
6-12 Mathematics 1 © CCSESA, California, All rights reserved Mathematics Teacher Overview.
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 3: Exploring Standard Progressions across High School Courses.
1.Mathematical Practice Standards 2.Mathematical Content Standards Link Part 2: Mathematical Practices.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
High School Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
COMMON CORE WORKS 3 Minute Clip
A new foundation for student success.
Mathematics Department Update
Laying the Foundation for Single-Digit Addition & Subtraction Fluency Grades K-2 and Beyond Common Core Leadership for Mathematics June 21, 2011 DeAnn.
Welcome to the SCMP 2 Grades 3-5 Fall Content Day.
Mt. Olive Elementary School February 9, 2015 Joyce Bishop, Ph.D.
Joint Council April 6,  Standards for Mathematical Practice  Standards for Mathematical Content  PA Standards & CCSSM.
Grade Level Overview Critical Area of Focus Cross-cutting themes.
The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), Using Properties to Reason through Tough Questions.
Fostering Vocabulary Development and Deeper Conceptual Understanding in the Mathematics Classroom Melissa Christie September 16, 2013.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Parent Night Understanding the Common Core. K-8  Former 1989 Standards were “a mile wide and an inch deep.”  Common Core standards were developed from.
CMSP: Finding our Mathematical Roots Lee Ann Pruske Beth Schefelker MTL Meeting October 18, 2011.
Ohio’s Learning Standards Standards Revision Discussion Group.
Common Core Math Standards. Comparison of CCSSM and NCTM Approaches to Process… CCSSM Standards for Mathematical Practices Principles and Standards Process.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant (DPI)
Common Core Math and CPM
Framed by the Distributive Property
Single-Digit Addition Fluency Grades K-2
Jeanette Grisham March 28, 2012
Investigating the CCSSM Tracing Fraction Progression
Math 6 – 12 Content networking
Getting to the Core of Common Core
What is OAK 2? Operations and Algebraic Thinking - OA K-2
Reflecting on Practice: Making Connections that Support Learning
3rd TOTAL 48/57 84% 4th 44/57 77% 5th 37/57 66% Grade Domain
Math Shifts Focus Coherence Rigor
Common Core Vs Kansas Standards
Presentation transcript:

O PERATIONS AND A LGEBRAIC T HINKING - OA K-2 D EFINING S TORY P ROBLEM T YPES Math Teacher Leader Meeting December 6, 2011 Beth SchefelkerLee Ann Pruske Connie LaughlinHank Kepner

CCSS D OMAIN P ROGRESSION K HS Counting & Cardinality Number and Operations in Base Ten Ratios and Proportional Relationships Number & Quantity Number and Operations – Fractions The Number System Operations and Algebraic Thinking Expressions and EquationsAlgebra Functions Geometry Measurement and DataStatistics and Probability Statistics & Probability

P ROFESSIONAL P RACTICE For December 6 th MTL Meeting: Read the Excerpted Mathematics Curriculum Guide to study the OA Standards in grade K, 1, and 2. Highlight important ideas and come prepared to discuss them in December.

L EARNING I NTENTIONS AND S UCCESS C RITERIA We are deepening our understanding of the progression of the OA standards K-2 and story problem types. We will be successful when we can articulate how the story problem types change developmentally across the continuum.

T APPING I NTO OA – K-2 R EADING Count off by 6’s 1’s and 2’s - K5 3’s and 4’s - 1st grade 5’s and 6’s – 2 nd grade Work in your groups – Use your highlighted notes to create a poster outlining these two areas: Important ideas Things that make you say hhmmss…

G ALLERY W ALK Post your chart on the wall. Groups 1, 3, and 5 – right wall Groups 2, 4, and 6 – left wall Start at the grade level you studied. Note the progressions from grade to grade, record on your data sheet.

D EBRIEF How do the ideas in these standards grow in K-2 across the grades? What connection can you make to the problem types table in your MTL Study Guide?

E XPLORING P ROGRESSIONS Label the problem types by grade level What makes a Change Unknown problem type more difficult than a Result Unknown problem type? How can understanding the developmental changes required in the story problem structures help us reach all learners?

A S YOU T HINK OF YOUR WORK … What does a K5, 1 st, and 2 nd grade teacher need to know about story problem progressions? How will you implement this information into your work in the next month? Be prepared to share your successes and/or challenges at the January MTL meeting. Work with a teacher or teacher team Explore textbooks for story problem formats Try problem types with a group of students

L EARNING I NTENTIONS AND S UCCESS C RITERIA We are deepening our understanding of the progression of the OA standards K-2 and story problem types. We will be successful when we can articulate how the story problem types change developmentally across the continuum.

F EEDBACK Q UESTIONS Story problem formats are the cornerstone of the OA K-2, what do you need to further develop your skills and understanding of these concepts?

D OMAIN P ROGRESSIONS - N UMBER

K-8 D OMAINS K Counting & Cardinality Ratios & Proportional Relationships Operations & Algebraic ThinkingExpressions & Equations Number & Operations in Base TenThe Number System Number & Operations - Fractions Functions Measurement & Data Statistics & Probability Geometry K-8 Content Domains, CCSSM