Safety Planning. Safety Plan KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Information Domains and Information Collection.
Advertisements

Safety Planning. Safety Plan KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5:
Normalcy – Letting Kids be Kids Objectives Understand the Law Recognize and Remove Barriers Deal with Frequent Issues Special Considerations
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Successful Solutions Professional Development LLC A Basic Approach to Child Safety Chapter 4 Mandated Reporting Law.
An overview of Florida’s Practice Model Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
1.  Incident reports should be written only when you are sure that a persons rights have been violated. True False  Full names of consumers should never.
Safety and Health Programs
Orientation Core 100_OR_PPT_July 2013 PPT 1. Module 1: Introduction to the Child Welfare Pre-Service Training OBJECTIVES : Identify Child Welfare Pre-Service.
Supplier Invoicing North America
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
1 Module 1. 2 Module 1 Learning Objectives Participants are able to: Discuss the purpose of a safety plan in response to impending danger. Justify the.
Overview of the Safety Assessment and Management Process Bryle Zickler, Human Services Program Specialist – OCYF Jana Hitchcock, Curriculum & Instructional.
Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
Assessment Skills Lab Structured Decision Making (SDM) Version 1.0 | 2014.
 Basic information on the essential elements of a Measurable Behavioral Objective (MBO).  A Template to guide you in the creation of an individualized,
SMART Tip Sheets Maryland February 2008 IGSR Technical Support: Adding A New Client Client Search Client Profile Client Intake This tip sheet.
1 Safety, Risk And Protective Capacity. 2 Competencies Assessing safety, risk and protective capacity Gathers and evaluates relevant information about.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
WEBINAR, AUGUST 9, 2011 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Quality Service Review Ratings on the Quick.
Georgia Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation App
CREATING A SAFE SANCTUARY POLICY Helping A Local Congregation Reduce the Risk of Abuse in their Church.
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Self-Sufficiency Matrix Short Services Option Based on Abt Associates Training PP Michigan Statewide HMIS Staff Training.
GEORGIA CRISIS RESPONSE SYSTEM- DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Charles Ringling DBHDD Region 5 Coordinator/ RC Team Leader.
Circuit 7 Department of Children and Families. What About Safety Plans??? Let’s think about it.  Do all safety plans have the same function or purpose?
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
Environment, Health and Safety OARS Online Accident Reporting System A guide to the University of Calgary’s new web- based On-line Accident Reporting System.
Introduction to Key Concepts
Critical Thinking in Safety Decision-Making: Evaluating Information Sufficiency Reconciling and Validating Information Applying the Safety Threshold Criteria.
Indicator 13 Assessment Webcast Section 3: Evaluating Transition Plans Complete by November 15, 2011.
Welcome to the … CAPMIS Refresher 1. Name Agency, unit, and primary job function or title, time “on the job” One thing you find helpful about CAPMIS Introductions.
Conducting & Documenting Monthly Health and Safety Visits with Children, and Monthly Visits with Caregivers and Parents.
Child Safety Framework: Analyzing and Planning for Child Safety.
1. 2 Ensuring Respect for the Best Interests of Children on the Move in Europe Jyothi Kanics 20 th November 2015.
ACCELERATED FAMILY REUNIFICATION (A-FRE) State Initiative Leads: Marcella Herrera (Region 6) Maria Galloway (Region 8)
Thursday, January 07, 2016 Charting the Course towards Permanency for Children in Pennsylvania Module 5: Risk Assessment.
Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium.
 Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Family Functioning Assessment.
Case Management. 2 Case Management Defined Assists an individual in gaining and coordinating access to necessary care and services appropriate to the.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Overview.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
Case Planning FSFN 1 CM 121_CP_FSFN_PPT_July 2012 PPT 1.
SAFETY ORGANIZED PRACTICE THE BASICS. A NEW CORE PRACTICE MODEL FOR CHILD WELFARE Old Practice: Adversarial, Deficit-based New Practice: Strength-based,
7/6/09Office of Training and Professional Development1 Unit 3D: Safety Assessment Safety Permanency Well-being.
1 Norman Services because every child deserves a home IntroductionsandRoll-Call If your name is not on the roster you must register for another session.
Clinical Supervision in CPS and FVS Safety Risk Critical Thinking.
Signs of Safety Toni Morkin, Senior Manager
Introduction to the Domains
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
Family Preservation Services
Making Small but Significant Changes
Case Management Module 2
Module 9 Safety Planning
Assessment and Analyzing Family Functioning
Module Safety and Risk.
Removal and Placement FSFN
Ongoing Assessment and Safety Planning
Removal and Placement FSFN
Ongoing Assessment of Change and Permanency
Module 7 Why We Must Understand the Family, The Child and the Parent / Caregiver
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Seven: Determining the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) SBIEP Module Seven: Determining the.
CM 123_CP_FSFN_PPT_July 2013 PPT 1
Present Danger Assessment and Planning
Further Information Gathering for Impending Danger Assessment
Present Danger Assessment
Family Functioning Assessment - Ongoing
Presentation transcript:

Safety Planning

Safety Plan KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5: General Parenting Practices D6: Discipline or Behavior Management Safe? Yes No

 What it is…and what it is NOT!  What is a sufficient safety plan?  How do we create the least intrusive but effective safety plan?

When you have finished this module, you will be able to:  List criteria for a sufficient plan  Explain the steps to determine in-home or out-of-home plan  Develop the least intrusive plan

Sufficient Information Information that... Gives us a full picture of the family Is relevant to only one particular domain Is pertinent to gaining a complete understanding of the domain Covers the principal or core issues of the domain Is adequate enough to give us confidence in our conclusions

Danger Threats Child Vulnerability Caregiver Protective Capacity Unsafe Child SAFETY PLAN!!!

Initiation of actions and services that will temporarily substitute for the lacking parental protective capacity to control the danger threats

 An unsafe child does not automatically require placement outside the home  Safety plans range from entirely in-home to exclusively out-of-home care Intrusiveness

Managing threatening behavior Managing crises Providing for social support Providing resources Providing for temporary separations between adult and child

Professional or paid safety service provider Formal daycare provider or church volunteer Grandmother or mentor Case Manager

Danger Threats Child Vulnerability Caregiver Protective Capacity Unsafe Child

Danger Threats Child Vulnerability Safe Child Safety plan substituting for lack of protective capacity

Safety Plans In-home safety plan combination Out-of-home safety plan

If an in-home safety plan would be sufficient, and the agency fails to consider or implement one, then the agency has failed to provide reasonable efforts to prevent removal

 When do the danger threats emerge? ◦ Does each threat happen every day? Different times of day? Is there any pattern or are they unpredictable? ◦ How long have these threats been occurring? Will it be easier or harder to control or manage threatening behavior with a long family history? ◦ Does anything specific trigger the threat or accompany the threat, such as pay day, alcohol use, or migraine?

 How do the parents react to the idea of an in-home safety plan? ◦ Are the parents living in the home, or do they disappear occasionally? ◦ Are the parents willing to cooperate with an in-home plan? How are we gauging “cooperation”? ◦ Is the household predictable enough that actions will eliminate or manage threats of danger? ◦ *If no to any of the above…, then an in-home safety plan is not appropriate!

 The right services…; At the right level...; At the right frequency: ◦ How often and long would safety actions be needed (e.g., separation service: after-school daycare two times per week, from 3 pm to 6 pm)? ◦ Are informal or formal safety management providers available to carry out services at appropriate times, frequency and duration?

 The right services…; At the right level...; At the right frequency: ◦ Are the people who would carry out the in-home safety plan aware, committed, and reliable? ◦ Are safety plan providers, informal or formal, able to sustain the intense effort until the parent can protect without support?

Any No = Out-of-Home Plan Sufficient? Feasible? Sustainable? Yes! No!

1 The safety plan only controls or manages danger threats. 2 Must have an immediate effect on controlling threats. 3 People and services identified in the safety plan must be accessible and available when the threats are present. 4 Safety plans must have concrete, action-oriented activities and tasks. 5 Never rely on parental promises.

Identifies how danger threat is displayed in this family?

Identifies how threat is managed. Who? When? How long?

Identifies how danger threat is displayed in this family? Awareness/acknowledgement of threat Acceptance/willingness to employ plan

Identifies how threat is managed. Who? When? How long? How plan will be managed by investigator and/or case manager? Identifies how danger threat is displayed in this family?

 As long as they are needed  Need defined by active danger threats and lack of protective capacity

 Steps to determine what type of safety plan will be sufficient  Requirements to consider the least intrusive plan possible  Specific criteria used to evaluate the sufficiency of in-home safety plans  Essential written components of all in-home safety plans

a. The primary purpose of a safety plan is control b. People involved in safety plans must be immediately accessible and available c. A safety plan only lasts for 30 days d. A safety plan must have an immediate effect e. Safety plans can include professional and non-professional providers

a. The primary purpose of a safety plan is control b. People involved in safety plans must be immediately accessible and available c. A SAFETY PLAN ONLY LASTS FOR 30 DAYS d. A safety plan must have an immediate effect e. Safety plans can include professional and non-professional providers Answer (c) is not true because safety plans are always “open-ended”, that is, they are in place as long as they are needed which is defined by how soon the parental or caregiver protective capacity can control any and all active danger threats previously or currently identified in the home.

a. Present danger b. Child vulnerability c. Basic resources d. Lacking parental protective capacity

a. Present danger b. Child vulnerability c. Basic resources d. LACKING PARENTAL PROTECTIVE CAPACITY Answer (d) “Lacking parental protective capacity” is the correct response. Substituting for inadequate protective capacity will assist in controlling the danger threat while the parent or caregiver begins to address what he or she needs to change to be able to protect their children without agency oversight or involvement.

a. Addresses all apparent needs in the family b. Has an immediate effect on controlling threats c. Has concrete, action oriented activities and tasks d. Must never rely on parental promises e. Must be based on people and services that are available when the threats are present

a. ADDRESSES ALL APPARENT NEEDS IN THE FAMILY b. Has an immediate effect on controlling threats c. Has concrete, action oriented activities and tasks d. Must never rely on parental promises e. Must be based on people and services that are available when the threats are present Answer (a) is not one of the criteria for implementation of an in-home safety plan. Safety plans are all about taking immediate safety actions to control active danger threats and appropriately manage the plan, which is commonly referred to as “safety management.” As important as it is to meet the parent’s and children’s needs, that again, is an aspect of case planning, not safety planning.

a. True b. False

a. TRUE b. False The correct answer (a) “True.” Not only do we have to consider an in-home safety plan prior to placing a child in an out-of-home placement, we have to be able to demonstrate to the court why even with the provision of appropriate services the child cannot be maintained safely in his or her home. This is why your efforts in documenting the insufficiency, unfeasibility and the unsustainability of an in-home plan are so important: they provide the rationale and justification to the court for the out-of-home placement.

a. A description of the danger threats in language the family can understand b. A description of how the danger threats will be managed and by whom c. A description of the parent or caregiver’s awareness of the danger threats d. A description of how the plan will be managed by the investigator or case manager e. All of the above

a. A description of the danger threats in language the family can understand b. A description of how the danger threats will be managed and by whom c. A description of the parent or caregiver’s awareness of the danger threats d. A description of how the plan will be managed by the investigator or case manager e. ALL OF THE ABOVE Answer (e) “all of the above” is correct. When your written safety plan includes all the elements listed in (a) through (d) you have developed a detailed plan which takes all the guesswork out of what is supposed to be happening on a hourly, daily or weekly, basis, who is responsible for completing the action, and how the plan is going to be managed and reviewed in a timely manner in order to make any necessary adjustments to ensure child safety.

Module Four: Safety Planning

To receive credit for this course, you will need to: 1. Log into FSFN. 2. Click Create > Worker Training > Individual Training Plan. 3. Click Search within the Assigned Training in Progress group box. 4. Enter E-Learning 4: Safety Planning (or simply enter “E“ followed by *) and then click search. 5. Click Select next to the course when it appears. 6. Click Continue at the bottom of the page. 7. When the selected course title is displayed on your Individual Worker screen, indicate that the status is “Completed” and record the completion date. 8. Click Save. This should then be displayed in your “Individual Training History”.