The Status of Puget Sound Chinook Salmon What do we know? and How do we know it? Kit Rawson Tulalip Tribes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTT Analysis Workshop Species Status and Trend (Chapter 1) Casey Baldwin RTT Chairperson WDFW Research Scientist.
Advertisements

Salmonid Natural Production Monitoring & Evaluation Project Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation BPA Project #
Interior Columbia Basin TRT Draft Viability Criteria June, 2005 ESU & Population Levels.
Use of microsatellite DNA markers to determine the reproductive success of hatchery and natural origin chinook salmon in a supplemented Idaho stream Brian.
Evaluate recreational and commercial mark-selective fisheries. (35018) Geraldine Vander Haegen, WDFW Charmane Ashbrook, WDFW Chris Peery, U. Idaho Annette.
Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and
Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Paul Kucera and Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management BPA Project
Phase I Okanogan River Spring Chinook Production Proposal #29050 Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Lake Creek Chinook Salmon Performance Measures Paul Kucera and Chris Beasley Nez Perce Tribe/HDR FishPro.
Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Project Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Hatchery Evaluations – Salmon River Project No Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Spatial scales of homing and the efficacy of hatchery supplementation of wild populations Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Fish in/Fish out Monitoring - exploring funding options DRAFT WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council October 18, 2007.
WRIA 8 Fish in/Fish out Monitoring Summary
Frank Leonetti, Snohomish County
1 Measuring Progress: Monitoring and Evaluation in WRIA 8 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 19, 2009 Scott Stolnack WRIA 8 Technical Coordinator.
Cyndi Baker & Jen Graham. Began in 1998 to document bull trout life history in WSR and SC and monitor population abundance Data from 1998.
Summary of Recommendations: Peer Review of FY 13 Science Workplan Trinity River Restoration Program Preliminary Fiscal Year 2013 Science Workplan.
CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.
Adult Steelhead Monitoring Challenges in Cedar Creek, WA Josua Holowatz & Dan Rawding.
Precision of Redd Based Escapement Estimates for Steelhead
Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.
The current status of fisheries stock assessment Mark Maunder Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) Center for the Advancement of Population.
Improving the accuracy of aerial surveys for dugongs: implications for management of Indigenous hunting in Torres Strait Helene Marsh, Ken Pollock, Ivan.
Missing collaborator. Conceptual Overview SHIRAZ Landscape Processes Land Use Freshwater Habitat Biological Response Land use & landscape processes affect.
Columbia River salmon : Who (or what) will save them? John Williams Klarälven meeting in Karlstad 9 May 2011.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Chris Bare, Jim Latshaw, Ian Tattam, Jim Ruzycki, and Rich Carmichael Estimating Chinook escapement to the John Day River basin using a mark-recapture.
Coordinated Assessments Project; Priorities and Expectations March 16, 2015 StreamNet Executive Committee.
Directed Acyclic Graphs: A tool to incorporate uncertainty in steelhead redd-based escapement estimates Danny Warren Dan Rawding March 14 th, 2012.
Nigel Milner APEM Ltd Monitoring and Assessment. Or, “if you can’t measure it you can’t manage it”
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
May 10, 2012 Presented by Micki Varney Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
1 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Usha Varanasi, Ph.D. Science Director Philip Roni, Ph.D. Research Fishery Biologist Northwest Fisheries.
Adult Entry to Summer Juvenile Rearing of Klamath River Coho Randolph Ericksen Steven Cramer Ian Courter Kathryn Arendt Funded by.
Lewis River Fish Passage Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (draft)
Modeling physical environmental impacts on survival: the SHIRAZ model Ecosystem based management FISH 507.
Monitoring Challenges for VSP Parameters in the Oregon Portion of the Lower Columbia River Jamie Anthony Monitoring Coordinator.
Estimating integrative effects of the H’s on salmon populations.
February 5, 2003 Integrating Fisheries Management Into Comprehensive Recovery Planning Jeff Koenings, Randy Kinley Mike Grayum, Curt Kraemer, Kit Rawson.
Chinook Salmon Supplementation in the Imnaha River Basin- A Comparative Look at Changes in Abundance and Productivity Chinook Salmon Supplementation in.
03Nov2006 Revision11 Priority Questions of TID/MID/CCSF Regarding Tuolumne River Salmonids & Macroinvertebrates.
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
The influence of variable marine survival on fishery management objectives for wild steelhead Dan Rawding & Charlie Cochran.
Comparison of Winter Steelhead Trap Estimates in Small Basins to Other Escapement Methods and the Representativeness of ODFW Life-Cycle Monitoring Sites.
Coordinated Assessments April 3, 2014 Workshop Data Exchange Standard: Overview, Changes, Additions, and Direction Mike Banach PSMFC
1 Independent Scientific Advisory Board June 12, 2003 A Review of Salmon and Steelhead Supplementation.
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
SWRCB Workshop March 2005 Issue #8 CDFG Comments.
Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Technical Memo #1 Estimation of Returns of Naturally Produced Coho to the Klamath River Cramer Fish Sciences Nicklaus K. Ackerman Brian Pyper Ian Courter.
Analyses of intervention effects Mark Scheuerell & Eli Holmes FISH 507 – Applied Time Series Analysis 5 March 2015.
Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
MPG Spring-Summer Chinook
January 11,2011 Eureka, California
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin.
Adult Returns and Juvenile Outmigration Data
Missing collaborator.
Science Policy Exchange
Dave Pflug & Ed Connor Seattle City Light
Presentation transcript:

The Status of Puget Sound Chinook Salmon What do we know? and How do we know it? Kit Rawson Tulalip Tribes

Salmon Recovery What was the status of the resource historically? What is the status of the resource now? What is the desired future status of the resource? How’d we get here? Recovery Plan

Salmon Recovery What was the status of the resource historically? What is the status of the resource now? What is the desired future status of the resource? How’d we get here? Recovery Plan

Population Parameters (from “VSP”) Abundance Productivity Diversity Spatial Structure

Abundance Census of individuals (how many?) Total biomass (how much?) Count or biomass at: single life stage whole population

Abundance Census of individuals (how many?) Spawning escapement Eggs Juvenile outmigration Adult return

Spawning Escapement

Smith and Castle (1994) Redd counts (approx. weekly) Aerial, foot, float surveys Assume 2.5 fish/redd, 21-day “visible redd life” Supplemented with peak live, dead counts Varying methods for expanding to unsurveyed or poor visibility areas

Spawning Escapement No estimate of variance No standard method for separating hatchery and natural-origin

Adult Return Run Reconstruction Escapement + Terminal harvest + Mixed-stock harvest Chinook complications Immature fish harvest Non-landed mortality Age distribution

Coded-Wire Tag Program

Puget Sound Chinook Marine Survival Index

Snoqualmie – Current Conditions Equilibrium = 2,300

Snoqualmie

Juvenile Outmigration

Juvenile outmigration Sampling error ( 0.75 – 1.65% captured) Traps upstream of some rearing areas Variable time and size of migration

Puget Sound TRT A&P Workbooks For each of 22 natural chinook populations

Puget Sound TRT A&P Workbooks Data (some incomplete) Natural escapement estimates Hatchery/natural origin split Exploitation rate estimates Juvenile production Environmental predictors (marine survival, flow)

Puget Sound TRT A&P Workbooks Analyses Run reconstruction Trends and variance about trends Spawner/recruit relationships

Questions Q: What are the best indices of salmon status to use across species and areas? A: Focus on natural populations/stocks Look at trends in natural escapement and total return Control for marine survival and other signals

Questions Q: Over what time period should we assess recovery? Can we separate factors affecting abundance on different time scales? Should we? A: 20 years + Yes

Questions Q: How accurately do we need to measure salmon populations to effectively manage them? A: Management systems need to be robust to imprecise and inaccurate assessments of status Even so, we probably need better estimates than we have now.

Questions Q: Regional or “top-down” approach best (both within and between ESUs)? A: Regional/local focus is best for adaptive management Needs a few, well-understood guiding principles