Repatriation of Vinča RA Reactor Spent Fuel The 15th International Symposium on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials PATRAM-2007 21-26.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Albania Good practices and Gaps 13 December 2013.
Advertisements

1 KRB-A (Grundremmingen, Germany). 2 Type:Boiling Water Reactor Power: 250 MW(e) Started in 1966, shut down in 1977 First commercial power reactor in.
Idaho Cleanup Project _____________________ ICP Spent Nuclear Fuel Examination Barbara Beller for Kathleen Hain, PBS-12 FPD April 15, NSNFP Strategy Meeting.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
Presentation on recent IAEA activities on RWM Y. Kumano WES / NSRW
NUCLEAR ENERGY What is it? David J. Diamond Energy Sciences & Technology Department February 2009.
Safe and secure management of sealed radioactive sources in Ghana: status of the borehole disposal project G. Emi-Reynolds, E.T. Glover, M. Nyarku*, P.
Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Background Before a company decides to close it’s power reactors the facility must be put in to a state that no longer.
Nuclear program of Lithuania Dr. Vidas Paulikas, Radiation Protection Department VATESI Visaginas, 29 June 2009.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
NRC Decommissioning Activities for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Bruce A. Watson, CHP Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch Division of Decommissioning,
Nuclear Energy in the 21 st Century BEIJING 2009 International Ministerial Conference April 2009.
IAEA Perspective and Lessons Learned in Shipping HEU Spent Fuel to Russia Institute of Nuclear Materials Management 48 th Annual Meeting July , 2007.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/2 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Capabilities & Competencies An Introduction to EnergySolutions September 19, 2007 Scott Baskett Erik Vogeley.
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.
NEXT Lessons Learned from Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014, Brussels Fernando Franco, Spanish Nuclear.
TEAM 1 NONAMECOUNTRY 1SU RUI (LEADER)CHINA 2TENG IYU LIN (PRESENTER)MALAYSIA 3MUHAMMAD TARIQ AZIZ (RAPPORTEUR)PAKISTAN 4NORAISHAH PUNGUTMALAYSIA 5MOHAMMAD.
U. S. Department of Energy West Valley Demonstration Project 18096_1 HLW Project Status Bryan Bower, DOE WVDP Denis Koutsandreas, DOE EM HQ Ron Farchmin,
Tom MAZOUR IAEA, Division of Nuclear Power
1 THE NUCLEAR ENERGY POLICY FOR SOUTH AFRICA ELSIE MONALE ICRP WORKSHOP.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Uranium Mining and Remediation Exchange Group, UMREG2012 Vienna 7 – 8 November 2012, DEVCO Nuclear Safety 1 EU - Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Nunavut Impact Review Board Presentation of Technical Submission AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project March 2015 Transport Canada.
Group Presentation to 27 th - 29 th May 2009 International Nuclear Forum BULGARIAN NUCLEAR ENERGY – NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND WORLD ENERGY SAFETY.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
IAEA Support of Research Reactor HEU to LEU Fuel Conversion Projects Institute of Nuclear Materials Management 48 th Annual Meeting July , 2007 Tucson,
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
Milestones or Millstones Alex R. Burkart, Deputy Director Office of Nuclear Energy, Safety and Security United States Department of State.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
C O N T R A C T O R I N F O R M A T I O N E X C H A N G E LashCIE Presentation 1/98 1 Recent Accomplishments and Future Directions Dan Giessing U.S. Department.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
El Cabril near surface disposal facility
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
Code of Conduct at the Slovenian TRIGA reactor with emphasis on Periodic safety Review Borut Smodiš Institut “Jožef Stefan”, Ljubljana, Slovenija 1RM on.
Outcomes of the Mediterranean project INT9176 Technical Meeting of the International Project CRAFT Part II Vienna,
STRENGTHENING NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURES FOR THE CONTROL OF RADIATION SOURCES RER/9/096 REGIONAL PLANNING MEETING ARMENIA ASHOT MNATSAKANYAN Head of Radiation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Milestones in the development of a national infrastructure for nuclear power The Nuclear Security dimension Technical.
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
INDONESIA NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION Dr. A. Sarwiyana Sastratenaya Director, Center for.
Role of Self-Assessment V.C. Agarwal, Director (HR) NPCIL,INDIA.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
Nuclear Safety & Security in the DPRK Sharon Squassoni Senior Fellow & Director Proliferation Prevention Program Asan Institute “The 2012 US-North Korea.
Expert Review of the Licensing Documentation of the Centralized Facility for Long-Term Storage of Disused Sealed Radiation Sources Oleksii Tokarevskyi.
S.M. Oyeyemi, T .C. Akpa, T.A. Faru
DDG Nuclear Energy: Mr Zizamele Mbambo
Nuclear decommissioning: Turning waste into Wealth
Anastasia Savidou, Eleni Ntalla, A. Chanousis
Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Waste Disposition Program Update
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
West Valley Demonstration Project Status Update
مستلزمات بناء المحطات النووية ضو مصباح الهيئة العربية للطاقة الذرية
Armenia Training and Tutoring Feedback
Nuclear Power in Jordan
October 23, 2015 LLW Forum Meeting Chicago, IL Melanie Wong,
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
Horst Monken-Fernandes Waste Technology Section NEFW
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
NUCLEAR ENERGY What is it?
. Salient Issues In The Review Of Nigerian Radioactive Waste Management Regulations By S.M Oyeyemi, T.C Akpa, T.A Faru Nigerian Nuclear Regulatory Authority.
Regulatory system in Hungary
Dr. Mitica Dragusin, Project Manager,
Presentation transcript:

Repatriation of Vinča RA Reactor Spent Fuel The 15th International Symposium on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials PATRAM October, 2007 Miami, FL USA Ed Bradley, Milan Pešić, John Kelly, Pablo Adelfang, Ira Goldman, and Dario Jinchuk

2 VIND Vinča Institute Nuclear Decommissioning (VIND) Program – initiated by Serbian government in 2004 repackage and ship spent fuel, improve radioactive waste storage at the Vinča Institute, and begin decommissioning of the RA research reactor and the radioactive waste storage hanger 1. IAEA support for VIND is being implemented in 3 closely integrated Technical Cooperation (TC) projects.

3 Safe management of radioactive waste The Vinča Institute remains the central waste storage and processing facility for Serbia and historically from the former Yugoslavia More than 4,000 sealed and unsealed sources, Depleted and natural uranium, Other safeguarded material. IAEA TC project SRB3003 is working to address these challenges as well as the safe & effective management of waste generated from fuel repatriation and decommissioning work.

4 Decommissioning the RA reactor IAEA TC project SRB3002 provides support for decommissioning the Vinča RA research reactor by completing: Facility characterization and Detailed decommissioning plans, Removal of contaminated structures will commence following the removal of spent nuclear fuel from the RA reactor building. Funding does not currently exist for decommissioning and dismantlement of these facilities. At the present time, Vinča senior management and the IAEA are exploring options for “incremental decommissioning” of the RA reactor ($0.5M to $4M per donor)

5 Safe removal of spent fuel IAEA TC project SRB4002 supports the stabilization, preparation and transport of spent fuel from the Vinča RA research reactor to the Russian Federation 8,030 TVR-S fuel elements (approximately 17% contain HEU) prerequisite infrastructure upgrades related documentation, regulatory approvals, international agreements and licenses project management and implementation including the procurement of required equipment and services

6 Safe removal of spent fuel

7 Significant Challenges Condition of the spent fuel elements Condition of spent fuel elements Degraded or inadequate support infrastructure Limited Serbian Regulatory resources

8 Challenges – spent fuel condition Water parameters pH Conductivity,  S/cm Cl, mg/L SO 4 mg/L Value7.53 ± ± 8473 ± 647 ± 13 Prolonged, poor water chemistry has resulted in corrosion and the loss of fuel element integrity Handling problems Increased basin activity

9 TVR-S corrosion in Al fuel channel or storage tube Corrosion began at a point of initial defect Elements fused to Al tube Tends to prevent further release of fission products Challenge – spent fuel condition

10 Challenge – spent fuel condition

11 Challenge – degraded infrastructure Carbon steel pipes in the spent fuel basin.

12 Sludge around a carbon steel component being removed from the spent fuel basin. Challenge – degraded infrastructure

13 Prerequisite activities Carbon steel component removal Fuel channel technical component removal Basin / sludge cleanup Basin floor plate / support structure modification Challenge – degraded infrastructure

14 Identified infrastructure upgrades include Water chemistry and level control systems Radioactive waste storage Radiation monitoring and protection Gas monitoring systems Materials handling equipment (cranes, forklifts, etc.) Ventilation systems Utilities and services (electrical, water, air, etc.) Challenge – degraded infrastructure

15 Challenge - Serbian regulatory support Multiple, complex submissions from the three integrated sub-projects Limited resources within Serbia Recent Government changes The project has secured resource support from the region through in-kind project donations. Considerably more resources are required.

16 Progress Sept – Contract signed Mar – Carbon steel removal complete May 2007 – Concept document complete June 2007 – PSAR submitted to SRA by Vinča Sept – WCCS requirements finalized

17 IAEA contributing activities Procurement of ŠKODA VPVR/M packaging system Procured through a TC project supporting RRRFR program IAEA donated 10 VPRM casks and ancillary equipment to NRI Řež

18 IAEA contributing activities RRRFR spent fuel shipment guideline October RRRFR Lessons Learned Workshop Provide technical and administrative information on preparations for shipping irradiated Russian research reactor fuel; including the sharing experiences with Uzbek spent fuel shipments, Finalize the outline and provide substantive documentation for preparation of an IAEA guideline document, and Determine actions to be taken by the IAEA to facilitate future shipments

19 Summary VIND Program is working to address significant environmental and proliferation concerns. Degraded fuel and support infrastructure as well as recent, regional conflicts underscore the need for prompt action. IAEA direct and indirect support has contributed to steady progress and the achievement of key project milestones. Several challenges, including funding, continue to threaten project progress.

20 Thank You For your attention