IAIS-ASSAL Training Seminar 24 November 2009, Lima Peru Jason Park – Principal Administrator International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEMINAR NAIC/ASSAL/SVS REGULATION & SUPERVISION OF MARKET CONDUCT © 2014 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Overview and Purpose of Market.
Advertisements

Session 8 IFRS and Solvency Requirements Regional Training Seminar IAIS-ASSAL-FIDES 25 November 2009, Lima Peru Takao Miyamoto, IAIS Secretariat.
1 ICP 18 to 23 Presented in One day Workshop on Financial Sector Assessment Program N. Srinivasa Rao & S. P. Chakraborty Hyderabad, 29 th December, 2010.
The Development of Enterprise Risk Management and Supervision for Insurance Companies in Taiwan Dr. Huang, Tien-Mu Director General, Insurance Bureau Financial.
The ROLE of the ACTUARY in INSURANCE PRUDENTIAL SUPERVISION Yangon, Myanmar 14 July 2014 Chi Cheng Hock, FFA.
Basel III.
Investments Institute of Insurance and Risk Management (IIRM) Hyderabad, India 15 November 2005 Arup Chatterjee – Advisor International Association of.
Risk & Capital Management A Regulator’s Perspective Stuart Wason Senior Director Actuarial Division, OSFI June 16, 2008.
*connectedthinking  Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts Sabine Wuiame.
Solvency II Alberto Corinti
Chile Insurance Solvency Reform Guillermo Larrain Superintendent Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros April 2009.
ICP 14 Valuation Christina Urias Managing Director, International Insurance Regulatory Affairs National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
| | Seite 1 Basic Principles of Insurance Supervision Duties and Operation of a Supervisory Authority under Coordinated European Legislation.
IAIS Recent Developments Hyderabad, 16 November 2005 Yoshi Kawai – Secretary General International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) Website:
©2007 National Association of Insurance Commissioners International Solvency Issues – some US positions Rob Esson, NAIC, Chair of the IAIS Insurance Contracts.
GOOD PRACTICE IN REGULATING ANNUITY PROVIDERS Chris Daykin UK Government Actuary.
IAIS guidance paper on investment risk management Insurance Training Seminar IAIS - ASSAL Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1-4 November 2005 Makoto Okubo – Member.
Solvency II and the Swiss Solvency Test
The Basel Committee’s Approach
1 Solvency II Part 3: Other pillars Vesa Ronkainen Insurance Supervisory Authority, Finland
Practical Implications of Regulatory Convergence – Lessons from Basel II Mary Frances Monroe Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation Board of Governors.
IAIS Standards Setting Activities and the Insurance Core Principles Washington – 4 May 2004 Luc Cardinal – Member of Secretariat International Association.
Global Insurance Regulation and Systemic Risk: The North American Perspective International Insurance Society Madrid, Spain – June 2010 Jerry M. de St.
Solvency II Framework IUMI Conference Copenhagen, 10 September 2007 Cosimo Turi Swiss Reinsurance Company.
INSTRUCTIONS Guidance on formatting the beam is available in the notes pages of this document. 21March, 2012 Solvency II Main requirements.
Session 9: Panel on Assets Jeffery Yong IAIS Secretariat Regional Training Seminar IAIS-ASSAL San Salvador, 24 November 2010.
Workshop on the Insurance Core Principles IV Conference on Insurance Regulation and Supervision in Latin America Punta Cana, May Makoto Okubo,
IAIS-ASSAL Training Seminar Ixtapa, Mexico, April 2009 Shinichi Kishi – Principal Administrator International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS)
Panel 6 IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation IAIS-ASSAL Training Seminar 24 November 2009, Lima Peru Jason Park – Principal Administrator International.
Best Estimate of the Technical Provisions Seminar on Risk-Based Supervisory Practices and Regulatory Capital Stuart Wason, FSA, FCIA, CERA Senior Director,
Impact of the Financial Crisis and Lessons Learnt Impact of the Financial Crisis and Lessons Learnt Rob Curtis Regional Information Session, Cape Town.
1 IFRS in the Banking Sector A supervisor’s perspective REPARIS Workshop Marc Pickeur Vienna CBFA March 2006 Belgium.
Linkage of Risk, Capital and Financial Management John J. Kollar, FCAS, MAAA, CPCU, RWW November 12, 2007.
Case Study on Asset-Liability Management Jeffery Yong IAIS Secretariat Regional Training Seminar IAIS-ASSAL San Salvador, 24 November 2010.
Corporate Governance Yoshi Kawai Secretary General, IAIS IAIS-ASSAL Regional Seminar Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 2011 PUBLIC.
Solvency II Open Forum 4 th March 2008 Michael Aitchison.
Overview and Activities related to Accounting IAIS Overview and Activities related to Accounting1 GDNL Program – Module 25 (1) 16 May 2006 Dynamics in.
Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) Mutual Insurance and Takāful in a Changing World November 2012 | Zulhijjah 1433 Ceylan.
International Actuarial Association Page1 ASSOCIATION ACTUARIELLE INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATION IASB Board Meeting June 22, 2006 Presented.
Session 3 Solvency Capital Requirements Regional Training Seminar IAIS-ASSAL San Salvador, El Salvador, November 2010 Takao Miyamoto, IAIS Secretariat.
Breakout Session 7 Ahead of the game - World class regulation Sponsored by Speaker Michael Graham - GFSC.
Recent developments in the IAIS Solvency and Actuarial Issues Subcommittee 20 April 2009 Rob Curtis - Chair, Solvency & Actuarial Issues Subcommittee.
Presentation on second IAIS Liabilities Paper1 Technical Committee 31 May 2006 IAIS Second Liabilities Paper Presentation to Technical Committee Rob Esson.
Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission
Financial Services Commission1 International Insurance Regulation Michael Oliver Director of Insurance Financial Services Commission British Virgin Islands.
IFRS and Basel 2 Ian Michael Accounting and Auditing Policy Department
Mr. Edward Rivera, Esq. Deputy Commissioner of Insurance of Puerto Rico How to Present Financial Information/ The Role of Disclosure Brasil, Rio de Janeiro.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
Solvency II Andrew Mawdsley. Overview The challenges in preparing for Solvency II Adequate financial resources Supervisory Review Process Disclosure Timeline.
Credit risk in banks - importance of appraisal and monitoring PRESENTED BY : KRATI VERMA (09bshyd0390)
Mini Case Study on Insurance Core Principles - ICP23 Capital Adequacy and Solvency - Insurance Training Seminar IAIS - ASSAL Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1-4.
Developing an Investment Governance Framework
December 29, 2010 Satyan Jambunathan Prudential requirements A Life industry perspective.
1 Larry J. Bruning FSA, MAAA, CLU International Life Actuary, NAIC USA 6 September 2011 Capital Adequacy and Supervisory Assessment of Solvency Positions.
© Copyright Allianz IIS Redefining the industry: Regulation, Risk & Global Strategy July 9, 2007 Berlin Helmut Perlet, Allianz SE The Emergence of Solvency.
Andreas Rauter, UNIQA REPARIS Workshop, Vienna March 15, 2006 Adoption of IFRS in the Insurance Sector.
The Use of Actuaries as Part of a Supervisory Model Michael Hafeman – Consultant World Bank May 2004.
Calculation of the Best Estimate for insurance obligations Hugo Borginho TAIEX seminar Istanbul, 5 th November 2010.
CIA Annual Meeting Assemblée annuelle de l’ICA June 29 & 30, 2006  Les 29 et 30 juin 2006 Ottawa, Ontario International Actuarial Accounting and Regulatory.
Page 1 Own Solvency and Risk Assessment Jarl Kure Malta 9 April 2010.
Consultation on Guidance for (Re)Insurance undertakings on the Head of Actuarial Function Role (CP 103) Presentation to Society of Actuaries in Ireland.
Panel 6 IAIS Framework for Prudential Regulation
1 The roles of actuaries & general operating environment
Risk adjustment (margin)
Energy Risk Management Credit Rating Perspective
IAIS – ASSAL Training Seminar April 28, 2009 David Oakden
International Insurance Regulation
11May 2007 Yoshi Kawai – Secretary General
Assessing compliance with ICPs ICP 17
International Solvency Issues – some US positions
Presentation transcript:

IAIS-ASSAL Training Seminar 24 November 2009, Lima Peru Jason Park – Principal Administrator International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) Panel 5 Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology2 November 2009 Jason Park Presentation Overview Part I : Introduction of the IAIS Part II : International Solvency Requirements (ISRs) within the IAIS Framework for Supervision Structure of regulatory capital requirements Use of internal models for regulatory capital purposes Value at Risk Methodology in IAIS document Valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology3 November 2009 Jason Park IAIS: a global forum for insurance regulators Founded in 1994 Members from more than 190 jurisdictions in over 140 countries Membership classes Members Insurance Supervisors The NAIC International Governmental/ Statutory bodies Observers Other interested parties

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology4 November 2009 Jason Park Standards Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) Guidance papers Issues papersApplication papers Supervisory papersSupporting papers Standard setting activities aim at global convergence of supervisory practices

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology5 November 2009 Jason Park ICPs provide globally-accepted framework for insurance regulation and supervision Benchmark for insurance supervisors Used to establish new regimes Used to improve existing regimes Used in evaluation of supervisory regimes – FSAPs Applies to all insurers and reinsurers but not intermediaries, unless indicated Principles Assessment criteria Explanatory notes Essential criteria Advanced criteria

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology6 November 2009 Jason Park ICPs cover all insurance supervisory aspects

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology7 November 2009 Jason Park Presentation Overview Part I : Introduction of the IAIS Part II : International Solvency Requirements (ISRs) within the IAIS Framework for Supervision Structure of regulatory capital requirements Use of internal models for regulatory capital purposes Value at Risk Methodology in IAIS document Valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology8 November 2009 Jason Park Solvency requirements are integral in the Framework for insurance supervision Preconditions Regulatory requirements Supervisory assessment LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Supervisory assessment and intervention Basic conditions for the effective functioning of the insurance supervisory authority the insurance sector and insurance supervision Financial Governance Market conduct Common Solvency Structure and Standards Framework for Insurance Supervision

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology9 November 2009 Jason Park ISRs: a comprehensive and cohesive set of solvency assessment documentation International Solvency Requirements (ISRs) ISR 1 Capital requirements (adopted) ISR 2 Capital resources (adopted in 2009) ISR 3 Valuation of assets & liabilities (due Oct 2010) ISR 4 Investments (due Oct 2010) ISR 5 Enterprise risk management (adopted) ISR 6 Internal models (adopted) STANDARDS ISR 1 Capital requirements (adopted) ISR 2 Capital resources (adopted in 2009) ISR 3 Valuation of assets & liabilities (due Oct 2010) ISR 4 Investments (due Oct 2010) ISR 5 Enterprise risk management (adopted) ISR 6 Internal models (adopted) GUIDANCE PAPER

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology10 November 2009 Jason Park ICPs related to Prudential Requirements ICP 23 Capital adequacy and solvency Requires insurers to comply with the prescribed solvency regime. This regime includes capital adequacy requirements and requires suitable forms of capital that enable the insurer to absorb significant unforeseen losses. –Capital Requirements –Capital Resources –Internal Models

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology11 November 2009 Jason Park ICPs related to Prudential Requirements ICP 18 Risk assessment and management Requires insurers to recognise the range of risks that they face and to assess and manage them effectively. –Internal Models ICP 21 Investments Requires insurers to comply with standards on investment activities. These standards include requirements on investment policy, asset mix, valuation, diversification, asset-liability matching, and risk management. ICP 22 Derivatives and similar commitments Requires insurers to comply with standards on the use of derivatives and similar commitments. These standards address restrictions in their use and disclosure requirements, as well as internal controls and monitoring of the related positions. –Investments

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology12 November 2009 Jason Park ICPs related to Prudential Requirements ICP 20 Liabilities Requires insurers to comply with standards for establishing adequate technical provisions and other liabilities, and making allowance for reinsurance recoverable. The supervisory authority has both the authority and the ability to assess the adequacy of the technical provisions and to require that these provisions be increased, if necessary. ICP 21 Investments Essential criterion b) requires that investments are valued according to a method prescribed by or acceptable to the supervisory authority. ICP 23 Capital Adequacy and Solvency Essential criterion a) requires that the solvency regime addresses the following in a consistent manner: Valuation of liabilities, including technical provisions and the margins contained therein Quality, liquidity and valuation of assets Matching of assets and liabilities, etc. –Valuation of Liabilities and Assets

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology13 November 2009 Jason Park Presentation Overview Part I : Introduction of the IAIS Part II : International Solvency Requirements (ISRs) within the IAIS Framework for Supervision Structure of regulatory capital requirements Use of internal models for regulatory capital purposes Value at Risk Methodology in IAIS document Valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology14 November 2009 Jason Park Standard & Guidance on the Structure of Regulatory Capital Requirements Total balance sheet approach –Recognise interdependence between assets, liabilities, regulatory capital requirements and capital resources –Ensure that determination of available and required capital is based on consistent assumptions for the recognition and valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes Establishment of a range of solvency control levels –with appropriate supervisory interventions Allowance of a range of approaches –standardised approaches and more advanced approaches, such as internal models Determination of prescribed levels of RCRs –MCRs and PCRs –relationships between different levels

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology15 November 2009 Jason Park Public financial reporting capital liabilities assets liabilities Supervisory assessment of the financial position value of assets for supervisory purposes current estimate policy obligations risk margin capital requirement liabilities available capital assetsliabilities and capital requirement financial position technical provisions Standard & Guidance on the Structure of Regulatory Capital Requirements Total balance sheet approach to recognise interdependencies

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology16 November 2009 Jason Park 16 Standard & Guidance on the Structure of Regulatory Capital Requirements Solvency Control Levels and Regulatory Capital Requirements Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) Technical Provisions (TP) and Other liabilities Capital Resources (CR) Required Capital Risk Margin (RM) Current Estimate (CE) Regulatory Capital Requirements Insurer’s Financial Position Prescribed Capital Requirement (PCR) Other liabilities (OL) Other liabilities (OL)

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology17 November 2009 Jason Park Standard & Guidance on the Structure of Regulatory Capital Requirements Prescribed capital requirement (PCR) level Supervisory intervention not required Capital Adequacy Ratio = Capital Available Capital Required 190% 160% 100% 130% Submission of business plan to improve capital buffers Increased on-site supervision Additional stress and scenario testing Limit shareholder dividends Restrict new business acquisition Delay approval of new products Minimum capital requirement (MCR) level Winding-up of operation Progressive intervention levels to ensure timely corrective measures – an example

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology18 November 2009 Jason Park Presentation Overview Part I : Introduction of the IAIS Part II : International Solvency Requirements (ISRs) within the IAIS Framework for Supervision Structure of regulatory capital requirements Use of internal models for regulatory capital purposes Value at Risk Methodology in IAIS document Valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology19 November 2009 Jason Park Standard & Guidance on the Use of Internal Models for Regulatory Capital Purposes What are internal models? –A risk management system developed by an insurer to analyse and quantify its risk position and to determine the commensurate economic capital The internal model approach is suitable only if certain preconditions are met –Level of sophistication of insurers / markets –Corporate governance structures –Competent / accountable insurance professionals and management –Supervisory resources and expertise Standards and guidance paper applies only in jurisdictions where internal models are recognised for regulatory capital purposes

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology20 November 2009 Jason Park Value at Risk Methodology in IAIS document Guidance on the use of Internal Models briefly comments about VaR –The IAIS notes that some solvency regimes which allow the use of internal models to determine regulatory capital requirements currently set a confidence level for regulatory purposes, which is comparable with a minimum investment grade level. Some examples of modelling criteria include a 99.5% VaR calibrated confidence level over a one year timeframe, a 99% VaR over one year and a 95% TVaR over the term of the policy obligations. Different criteria apply for PCR and MCR.

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology21 November 2009 Jason Park A sample target criteria – VaR at 99% confidence level, 1 year time horizon Probability Losses Current estimate 75% percentile 99% percentile Technical provisionCapital requirement 1 in 100 years event

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology22 November 2009 Jason Park Presentation Overview Part I : Introduction of the IAIS Part II : International Solvency Requirements (ISRs) within the IAIS Framework for Supervision Structure of regulatory capital requirements Use of internal models for regulatory capital purposes Value at Risk Methodology in IAIS document Valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology23 November 2009 Jason Park Ongoing works of “Joint Valuation Working Group” (by the Solvency and Insurance Contracts Subcommittees) –Summary of Requirements / Guidance on the Valuation of Assets and Liabilities, including Technical Provisions for Solvency purposes –Appropriate valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes is a fundamental part of a solvency regime and contributes to the consistent assessment of insurer strength –Characteristics of technical provisions are similar to those being considered by IASB Standard & Guidance on the Valuation of Assets and Liabilities for Solvency Purposes

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology24 November 2009 Jason Park Standard on the Valuation of Assets and Liabilities for Solvency Purposes Key Principle The IAIS believes that it is most desirable that the methodologies for calculating items in general purpose financial reports can be used for, or are substantially consistent with, the methodologies used for regulatory reporting purposes, with as few changes as possible to satisfy regulatory requirements.

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology25 November 2009 Jason Park Standard on the Valuation of Assets and Liabilities for Solvency Purposes General valuation requirements for assets & liabilities The valuation for solvency purposes of assets and liabilities should be undertaken on consistent basis Assets and liabilities should be valued in a reliable and transparent manner The valuation for solvency purposes of assets and liabilities should be an economic valuation An economic valuation of assets and liabilities should reflect the risk adjusted present values of their CFs Key requirements – provisional

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology26 November 2009 Jason Park Standard on the Valuation of Assets and Liabilities for Solvency Purposes Valuation of technical provisions The solvency regime should require the valuation of technical provisions to exceed the current estimate of the cost of meeting the insurance obligations (Current Estimate) by a margin to reflect the inherent uncertainty of those obligations (Margin over the Current Estimate or MOCE) The Current Estimate should reflect the expected present value of all relevant future cash flows that arise in fulfilling insurance obligations using unbiased current assumptions Key requirements – provisional (continued)

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology27 November 2009 Jason Park Standard on the Valuation of Assets and Liabilities for Solvency Purposes Valuation of technical provisions The MOCE should reflect the inherent uncertainty related to all relevant future cash flows that arise in fulfilling insurance contract over the full time horizon thereof The valuation of technical provisions should allow for the time value of money. The solvency regime should establish criteria for the determination of appropriate interest rates to be used in the discounting of technical provisions Key requirements – provisional (continued)

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology28 November 2009 Jason Park Standard on the Valuation of Assets and Liabilities for Solvency Purposes Valuation of technical provisions The value of technical provisions should not reflect the insurer’s own credit standing The solvency regime should require the valuation of technical provisions to make appropriate allowance for embedded options and guarantees Key requirements – provisional (continued)

Solvency - Valuation of Liabilities & Value at Risk Methodology29 November 2009 Jason Park Asociación Internacional de Supervisores de Seguros Muchas Gracias !