Al Giorgi – BioAnalysts Inc.. FCRPS BiOp RPA 52.6 = action plan status monitoring- Hydro Many RM&E RPAs require PIT data Coordinated and Effective FWP.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program

Advertisements

Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#

NOAA PIT Tag needs. NOAA needs to develop an internal PIT tag plan integrating research and monitoring objectives.

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.

Data Management Projects Data Management Framework Subcommittee Update June 19, 2007.

UW Offsite Habitat and Fish Survival Effectiveness Monitoring Objective: Assist in developing and applying central guidance and criteria for improving.

Fish and Wildlife Agencies and Tribes Program Amendment Recommendations June 12 Comments NPCC Meeting June 2008 Spokane, Wa.

BiOP RPA 52.6 ISAB recommends a regional tagging & marking plan BioAnalysts, Inc.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) and StreamNet NW Power & Conservation Council, Sept. 20, 2006.

Conserving Americas Fisheries U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Columbia River Fisheries Program Office Future of Our Salmon A Vision of Restoration in the.

PTAGIS Program Review and Roadmap Focused on Portland Team for the 2014 PIT Tag Steering Committee Annual Meeting.

NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”

1 May 8, 2006 Briefing to Northwest Congressional Delegation Staff.

Long-term planning for design, implementation and maintenance of in-stream detection systems Chris Jordan, NOAA-NWFSC – moderator & A panel of experts.

FCRPS BIOPHatchery BIOP Program HGMP’s ESA coverage New Hatchery Reform Actions Program Description & Assessment Selection of Projects for New HSRG/HRT/HGMP.

Al Giorgi – BioAnalysts, Inc. BioAnalysts, Inc.. BiOP RPA 52.6 = Monitoring Plan PIT data  Many RM&E RPAs Clarify needs, specifications (N, Populations,

149 th Caribbean Fishery Management Council Meeting St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands April 22-23, 2014 Draft Scoping Document Timing of Accountability Measure-Based.

A. Giorgi J. Geiselman J. Tenney N. Tancreto. Database system: Forecast Columbia Basin PIT tag use Anadromous salmonids Integrated with PTAGIS Time step.

PIT Tag Forecaster Upgrade Review Meeting Presented 11/4/2013 at PSMFC, Portland Authors: John Tenney, Nicole Tancreto PSMFC Al Giorgi Bioanalysts, Inc.

1 “Changing Performance” Nashville, Tennessee February 2, National Title I Conference M aximizing the I mpact of S choolwide P rograms on I mproving.

Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) A Presentation for: Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Anadromous Fish Advisory Committee.

8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.

Fall Technical Conference Regional Haze SIP Development Snowbird, Utah September , 2002.

Overview of the Impact of Research and Monitoring in the Columbia River Basin Rob Clapp Gary Rule Blane Bellerud Ritchie Graves.

A Guiding Framework For Regional Monitoring Participants –Alan Byrne (IDFG) –Alex Conley (Yakima Salmon Recovery Board) –Chris Drivdahl (WA State NPCC)

Alternative Gear Implementation Project Pat Frazier WDFW Region 5 Fish Program Manager Photo by Wild Fish Conservancy.

GOMC Organizational Assessment Progress to Date Joan LeBlanc GOMC Council Coordinator.

Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.

StreamNet Project Overview for Data Management Category Review Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presented to: NPCC Independent.

Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.

1. IASC Operational Guidance on Coordinated Assessments (session 05) Information in Disasters Workshop Tanoa Plaza Hotel, Suva, Fiji June

1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.

Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.

1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.

Summer Flounder Amendment August 13, 2014 Washington, DC Review of Revised Draft Scoping Document.

REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.

Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board June 28, 2013 Status of State-Led Basin-Wide Feasibility Studies.

: Program Coordination and Facilitation Services January 17, 2012 Tom Iverson Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Foundation.

FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.

Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.

Common PSMFC “data use agreement or policy” Overview of current data sharing in PTAGIS, RMIS, StreamNet.

Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.

1.  Mapping Terms  Security Documentation  Predictor Table  Data Discussion Worksheet 2.

Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,

Columbia River Basin Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Reporting (MERR) Plan DRAFT Nancy Leonard Fish, Wildlife, Ecosystem Monitoring and Evaluation.

1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.

Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.

Implementation of the Lower Columbia River Recovery Plan Northwest Region August 19, 2013.

What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.

Tracey Yerxa Bonneville Power Administration Implementing the 2008 FCRPS BiOp Using Emerging Tools and Strategies

November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.

RTT Analysis Workshop Synthesis: Data Gaps and Research Needs (Chapter 5) Presented by Keely Murdoch MaDMC Chair Yakama Nation.

Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.

Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, Associate Professor.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

1 Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Yolo Bypass Fisheries Enhancement.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET

Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting

An Introduction to NETS*T

BPA Expectations for Regionally Coordinated RM&E Programs Jim Geiselman – BPA BPA Expectations on the Development of Standard.

NOAA-NOS International Programs Office

Parallel Session, Group 1: D3 assessment under MSFD

Collaboration on Comprehensive Columbia River Basin Hatchery RM&E How do we get to a comprehensive list of Hatchery RM&E for the Basin??

Articulation of Basin-wide Monitoring “Framework”

Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop

North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019

Presentation transcript:

Al Giorgi – BioAnalysts Inc.

FCRPS BiOp RPA 52.6 = action plan status monitoring- Hydro Many RM&E RPAs require PIT data Coordinated and Effective FWP projects

Develop Regional PIT Tag Monitoring Plan To ensure adequate performance indices are obtained into the future Meet needs of BiOp, FWP, Accords, HCPs Improve efficiency- coordinate tagging among All-H user groups Minimize effect s of tagging Inform the more comprehensive, regional tagging and marking forum

Spring/Summer 2011 AA/NOAA/NPCC workgroup drafted initial draft PIT plan ns.aspx ns.aspx Fall 2011 AA & NOAA held a work session with the region and requested review and comments on the draft PIT plan January 2012 Comments received from FPC, ODFW, PSMFC, Chelan & Douglas PUDs, and individuals (2) February 2012 AA & NOAA comments Decide to re-focus the document

Purpose and application of the document needs clarification Needs more prescriptive prioritization of actions with timelines to be considered an an action plan Needs clearer processes for coordination of tagging among agencies Willamette Basin and other species besides anadromous salmonids should be treated Tradeoffs between information needs and potential tags effects should be further treated

Restructure, refocus and revise the document Refocus on FCRPS BiOp needs and objectives Shift away from the “action plan” concept Restructure it into a “status and path forward” document Perform alternatives assessments in follow-on work to support action planning Use alternative assessments to inform the upcoming 2014 FCRPS BiOp Remand and BiOp Implementation Plan Leave broader regional issues to other forums- Other species, Willamette Basin needs, etc. NPCC Tagging & Marking Forum, Willamette BiOp RME process, AFEP (e.g., lamprey).

Scope will be reformulated, consistent with the title Identify Pit information improvements across Hs that are needed to meet BiOp requirements Describe evaluations that are needed in order to select among options. Describe processes or steps to ensure coordination of federal and regional fishery agency future needs with regard to- Stock coverage,& numbers of tagged fish, and Locations of new detection systems.

Revise the document with FCRPS BiOp focus (Spring 2012) Conduct assessments identified in the “Status” document Use the document and assessments to inform the 2014 FCRPS BiOp Remand and BiOp Implementation Plan Work with PSMFC to incorporate the PIT Tag Forecast Database into PTAGIS.