The debate An opportunity to show your brilliance, strut your stuff, and grind the opposition beneath your intellectual heels

Outline Each team will have 4-5 members The class period will be completely set aside for the debate You will be given two eight-minute periods to provide your argument –You may include audiovisual material You will have an opportunity to challenge your opposition after the official presentation –You will have the opportunity to respond to the challenges as well

Timing The affirmative team will have the first 8-minute period to present its case The negative will then be provided 8 minutes to make its opening case 2 minute break The affirmative team will then be given 8 minutes to conclude its arguments and to respond to negative comments The negative will then have 8 minutes 5-minute recess Each team has 4 minutes to close, negative first Teams take turns asking questions of the other, starting with the negative team –1-minute responses After 2 questions per team, audience may ask questions

Opening remarks Affirmative: –Define terms “When we say video games lead to war, we mean...” –State what you will show “We will demonstrate that not only are video games more harmful than any earlier violent media, but that they directly contribute to war fever...” –Identify major evidence, logical flow of argument “We will introduce poll data, experiments linking video game playing to violent behavior and...” –Begin the presentation of evidence

Opening remarks Negative: –Define terms Identify any discrepancies with affirmative –State what you will show Flaws in affirmative claims Evidence directly in opposition to basic statement –Begin presentation of evidence Tie to beginning of affirmative presentation

Affirmative response Be certain to conclude your basic remarks before responding to negative statements Follow logical flow outlined in your opening Be selective about evidence—strongest and most compelling is most valuable –Most arresting for presentation style Once through with your basic presentation, attack most critical and weakest negative points –Prepare your responses to most likely negative points in advance of debate –Disconfirming evidence –Take points to their illogical end –Watch out for ad hominem attacks, guilt by association, etc. Learn propaganda ploys, watch for them

Negative response Follow your game plan first, then respond to the affirmative –Do your best to provide a structure for your criticism— don’t just engage in scattershot sniping Those not speaking should be actively working out response while speaker goes through basic arguments Make sure you understand the critique before you try to rebut it

Negative closing Bring all your points together into categories and restate –“We can see from the evidence presented earlier, that the affirmative has depended on false premises ( XXXX), incorrect logic (XXX), biased reading of the research record (XXXX) and wishful thinking (XXXX)” –“We note once again that...” (Give your strongest evidence) –“And so, when these points are taken together, it is clear that we must reject the statement (restate the original statement) because it does not...” –Recommended close: “Thank you, oh wise and wonderful sage of media theory for allowing we who are not worthy to present our case to your exalted personage.”

Affirmative closing Reiterate your initial statement about how you would prove the assertion Remind your audience of the evidence you have presented that demonstrates that the assertion is true –Be brief—just note the major points “And so, as we have shown, the evidence proves beyond a doubt that...” Recommended Thank the Great One even more felicitously than your opposition.

Questioning period Ask your most devastating question first. Be sure to ask it in a way that favors your outcome or makes it difficult to answer. Prepare your best responses to the most likely questions beforehand. –Simple, direct answer –Evidence –Answer in way that questions opposition position

Support for a statement/position The best evidence is empirical research evidence The next best is logic (be sure that it is compelling) The next best is statements by experts, etc. Demonstrating a point in the debate itself can be effective, but is risky Beyond that, personal experience, news stories, historical examples, etc. All of these are pretty weak.

What I will look for A consistent, logically coordinated position –Big holes or arguing against yourself hurt Powerful evidence/support for the position Demonstration of background research Compelling presentation –Including audiovisual materials