CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCE BELGRADE ALEN PROJECT

CO&CO CONTENT A.BACKGROUND B.BASIC ASSUMPTIONS C.STRATEGY D.APPROACH

CO&CO A.BACKGROUND -PERSONAL BACKGROUND -DUTCH BACKGROUND: NGO’S AND OWN INITIATIVE -STRONG MIDFIELDWEAK GOVERNMENT

CO&CO A.BACKGROUND TRANSITIONS in the Netherlands: 1.From group to individual 2.From inside to outside 3.From stand alone to partnerships

CO&CO A.BACKGROUND THE NETHERLANDS; 1.STRONG CIVIL SOCIETY 2.“WEAK” STATE 3.CHANGING BALANCES

CO&CO A.BACKGROUND Actual critics: 1.Attemps to regulate everything at the same time 2.Tailored to the provision of supply driven care 3.Unable to give the recipient much, if any control

CO&CO A.BACKGROUND DUTCH CHALLENGES: 1.NEW FORMS OF IDENTITY 2.DISTANCE TO POLITICS AND POLICY 3.GROWING SEARCHING BEHAVIOR

CO&CO B. BASIC ASSUMPTIONS DEPENDENCE: 1.VULNERABLE: MORE THAN AVERAGE DEPENDENT 2.VULNERABLE PEOPLE AND RESTRICTED CIRCLES 3.MISSING OUT VALIDATED ROLES

CO&CO B. BASIC ASSUMPTIONS DEPENDENCE: 1.LESS VALIDATED ROLES=LESS RESOURCES=MORE PROFESSIONALS 2.VALIDATED ROLES AND IDENTITY 3.POSITIVE INDIVIDUAL IDENTITY

CO&CO B. BASIC ASSUMPTIONS Summary: 1.NEED FOR BASIC ASSUMPTIONS 2.A COMPREHENSIVE AND MULTI DIMENSIONAL APPROACH

CO&CO B. BASIC ASSUMPTIONS CRITICAL REMARKS: 1.PROFESSIONALS TAKE OVER 2.LACK OF EMPOWERMENT AND READINESS OF FAMILIES 3.NEEDED; A SHIFT FROM SUPPLY CARE TO LOCAL SERVICES

CO&CO C. STRATEGY (THREE LEVELS: TOP-MIDDLE-BOTTOM UP) TOP LEVEL: 1.POLICY BY GOVERNMENT 2.LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS 3.FINANCING SYSTEMS AND BUDGET

CO&CO C. STRATEGY MIDDLE LEVEL: 1.SUPPORT AND CARE SERVICES 2.LOCAL LEADERSHIP 3.LOCAL COOPERATION

CO&CO C. STRATEGY BOTTOM UP: 1.ADVOCATES 2.FAMILIES AND SUPPORT 3.BEHAVIOR AND SKILLS

CO&CO D. APPROACH ME CO-CREATION AND INTERACTIVITY 2.INDIVIDUALS IN THE LEAD 3.VALUE ORIENTATION 4.FOCUS ON SUCCESS

CO&CO D. APPROACH YOU... 1.A STEERING AND FACILITATING GOVERNMENT 2.COOPERATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS 3.GOOD AND INSPIRING EXAMPLES 4.FOCUS ON SUPPORT AND NOT ON ORGANIZATIONS

CO&CO D. APPROACH CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS....: -IDENTIFICATION OF NEEDS -ACTIVITIES -COMMUNITY RESOURCES -PARENT SUPPORT -STAFF TRAINING -LEADERSHIP -CREATIVITY, COURAGE, FLEXIBILITY.....

CO&CO D. APPROACH EXAMPLES : EARLY INTERVENTIONRESPITE CAREACTIVITIES AMBULANT SUPPORTCRISES SUPPORTHOME SUPPORT QUALITY OF LIFE AT HOMEDEVELOMENT OF CHILD/YOUNGSTER LESS BURDEN FOR PARENTS PREVENT EXPENSIVE COSTS ELSEWHERE

CO&CO D. APPROACH FOR YOU: 1.FIND COMBINATION OF PUSH AND PULL 2.FIND BALANCE BETWEEN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY 3.FIND BALANCE BETWEEN SYSTEM LOGIC AND SITUATIONAL LOGIC

CO&CO D. APPROACH AGENDA (E.G.) 1.TRANSITION MANAGEMENT 2.SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION 3.EXPLORATORY AND DESIGN DRIVEN 4.MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES 5.NO UNWANTED KNOCK-ON EFFECTS 6.NO MORTGAGE ON FUTURE RESOURCES 7.COMPLEXITY AND VARIETY

CO&CO D. APPROACH CREATE AN AGENDA FOR INNOVATION RATHER THAN REFORMING THE SYSTEM AND APPLY TRANSITION MANAGEMENT INSTEAD OF TRADITIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND CENTRALIZED DECISION-MAKING DISCUSSION!!!

CO&CO D. APPROACH CONCLUSION: A FUNDAMENTAL DEBATE, WITH PRACTICAL ARGUMENTS AND DEEP THINKING THANK YOU VERY MUCH !!!!!!!!! HANS van der WIELEN