U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Norman B. Bliss, ASRC Federal InuTeq Contractor to the USGS 6/4/2015 A continental view of soil.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Attribute values are classified, e.g. DR = Depth to rock. S = Shallow ( < 40 cm) M = Moderate ( cm) D = Deep ( cm) V = Very deep ( > 120.
Advertisements

Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination in Texas
September 5, 2013 Tyler Jones Research Assistant Dept. of Geology & Geography Auburn University.
Farmland Classification in Montana July 2008 Neal Svendsen Resource Soil Scientist USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Missoula, Montana.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Sacramento Model Derivation of Initial Parameters.
DRASTIc Groundwater Vulnerability map of Tennessee
2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 SHARP PP 2: Region of Western Macedonia Fig. 1: Vulnerability map for Florina Basin GIS-based Vulnerability.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
Robert Dobos National Soil Survey Center 12 October 2011.
Green-Ampt Parameterization for Rainfall Excess Determination
The four components of soil:
Naikoa Aguilar-Amuchastegui  Forest Carbon Scientist  REDD+  Forest and Climate Initiative olutions/mitigation/Pages/climate_REDD.a.
GIS-Data Sources Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
OGIC Soils FIT 11/5/2014 Statewide Soils Dataset Status.
Databases in Soil Survey. Objectives Identify databases used for population, analysis, and publication of soils data Understand NASIS correlation concepts.
Spatial Analysis University of Maryland, College Park 2013.
JRC Ispra - IES 1 Overview of soil data at European scales F. Carré & T. Mayr.
MAPPING AND REPRESENTING SOIL INFORMATION AND DATA.
Designation of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Romania Catalin Simota Research Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Bucharest - Romania.
Web Soil Survey Online Support Tools for Forest Management Steve Campbell Soil Scientist USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service West National Technology.
Arc Hydro groundwater data model: a data model for groundwater systems within ArcGIS ESRI user conference May 2004 Gil Strassberg and David Maidment, University.
Updating Erosion Hazard Ratings in a Post-fire Assessment A GIS Tool for Soil Scientists.
Overview Reproduction of the native Great Plains Cottonwood (Populous deltoides) may be significantly declining within the boundaries of the Pine Ridge.
Geographic Information Systems Other Digital Data.
Towards participatory approaches to a Multiscale European Soil Information System Nicola Filippi, Panagos Panos, Borut Vrscaj EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT.
Roger Miller, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Barry Jackson, USGS Arkansas Water Science Center ARKANSAS EXCHANGE NETWORK FOR GROUNDWATER-QUALITY.
Map Scale, Resolution and Data Models. Components of a GIS Map Maps can be displayed at various scales –Scale - the relationship between the size of features.
Soil characteristics, an important terrestrial ecosystem modeling input, affects the photosynthesis, respiration, evapotranspiration, or other biosphere.
Using Core Data layers (FGDB) to assist in MLRA Correlation Decision Making – Group I S. Waltman, A. Moore, S. Brown, P. Finnell – NGDC, NCGC and NSSC.
Geographical Information Systems (GIS): An Essential Tool for Research, Planning, and Archival of Data for Most Governmental Agencies Mohammad A. Rob University.
BY:- RAVI MALKAT HARSH JAIN JATIN ARORA CIVIL -2 ND YEAR.
Providing New Soil Survey Products to the GIS Modeling Community- Gridded SSURGO National Atlas of Ecosystem Services Project 2010 National Cooperative.
Putting SSURGO to work Developing meaningful Soil Data with ArcGIS & Microsoft Access 2005 Users Conference.
An important product of Weathering.
The pilot area approach as a basis to develop a network Meeting on Harmonization of Soil Information in the Alps JRC Ispra 1-2 July 2004 Ialina Vinci and.
Oregon GIS Framework Forum 05/20/2015 Oregon Soils Data Standard.
Study on scaling property of Topindex and the aquifer rating-curve in Illinois with the application of TopModel CE394K Term Project Presentation CE394K.
Agricultural Subsurface Drainage USGS Staff: Nancy Baker, Wes Stone GIS Contact: Michael Wieczorek.
Onion creek catchment modeling using PIHM By, Harish Sangireddy PhD Candidate The University of Texas at Austin.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
Wetlands Investigation Utilizing GIS and Remote Sensing Technology for Lucas County, Ohio: a hybrid analysis. Nathan Torbick Spring 2003 Update on current.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
During the 20 th century, thematic maps have been an ever useful tool for correlating data sets and representing relevant information. Recent technological.
Estimating Groundwater Recharge in Porous Media Aquifers in Texas Bridget Scanlon Kelley Keese Robert Reedy Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of.
Building an OpenNSPECT Database for Your Watershed Shan Burkhalter and Dave Eslinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The National Map Corps Volunteer Program of the USGS USGS Volunteered Geographic Information January.
Preparing input for the TOPKAPI (TOPographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration) model PRASANNA DAHAL.
Interfacing Vegetation Databases with ecological theory and practical analysis. Mike Austin, Margaret Cawsey and Andre Zerger CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
Soil Section 5.2.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Automatic Generation of Parameter Inputs and Visualization of Model Outputs for AGNPS using GIS.
Arc Hydro groundwater data model: a data model for groundwater systems within ArcGIS AWRA Specialty Conference Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and.
Mapping of soil moisture content by SWAT and GIS programming Yuri Kim Jessica Jahnke GEOG 593.
-gSSURGO- Using the Soil Data Management Toolbox Steve Peaslee USDA-NRCS National Soil Survey Center Lincoln, Nebraska March.
Colorado River Water Resources Vulnerability Project for Hill Country Conservancy Daniel Zavala Araiza.
Agricultural Land Use as it Relates to Land Slope James Plourde, Dr. Bryan Pijanowski Human-Environment Modeling & Analysis Laboratory Purdue University.
1 USDA-NRCS Hurricane Preparedness Data Products: Digital Soils Information (SSURGO) Services: Download SSURGO data at the following Web Site
Surface Analysis Tools. Lesson 7 overview  Topographic data  Sources  Uses  Topographic analysis  Hillshade  Visibility  Contours  Slope, aspect,
Final Presentation of GIS in Water Resources
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
An Integrated Approach for Subsidence Monitoring and Sinkhole Formation in the Karst Terrain of Dougherty County, Georgia Matthew Cahalan1 and Adam Milewski1.
Aquifers and Groundwater flow
Emma Gildesgame, Katie Lebling and Ian McCullough
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Warm-Up 08DEC2014 How can the distribution of natural resources influence politics and economics? What are the 3 rock types? How can you identify them.
Data Queries Raster & Vector Data Models
Lab Director, Center for Environmental Quality Wilkes University
Soil Section 5.2.
Naikoa Aguilar-Amuchastegui Forest Carbon Scientist REDD+ Forest and Climate Initiative
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Norman B. Bliss, ASRC Federal InuTeq Contractor to the USGS 6/4/2015 A continental view of soil properties: Linking scales from 1 cm to 4,000 km

Outline   Soil Geographic Databases in the USA  SSURGO: detailed mapping (e.g., 1:24,000 scale)  STATSGO : general mapping (e.g., 1:250,000 scale)   Data structure   Example maps   Future work

Soil Geographic Data Bases in USA   Origin: SSURGO and STATSGO  National Cooperative Soil Survey  Federal, State, University  Coordinated by Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)   Distribution  Vector data, web mapping services  gSSURGO: raster data at 10 meter resolution  Attribute data: hierarchy of related tables

Data structure (SSURGO)   chorizon: soil profile horizons (3 million)   component: attributes not delineated (1 million)   mapunit: delineate (300,000)   Spatial data: digitized maps (10 m resolution)

Approach   Use hierarchical data structure to query attributes and make raster maps   Fill missing data in SSURGO with data from the General Soil Map (STATSGO2)   Deliver as 30 meter rasters

Recent work   Rock percentages, Sand, silt, clay percentages   Hydrologic group   Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity   Available Water Capacity & Available Water Storage   Soil organic carbon   Erosion factor (kffact)   Drainage class   Hydric soils   Depth of soil, depth to bedrock, to water table   Flooding frequency   Calcium Carbonate, pH, cation exchange capacity

Results: Rock percentage   Raster datasets for 6 depth zones (SSURGO only): 0-5, 5-20, 20-50, , , greater than 150cm   Rock percentage: 0-5 cm and cm

Results: Sand percentage   Raster datasets for 6 depth zones (SSURGO filled): 0-5, 5-20, 20-50, , , greater than 150cm   Sand percentage: 0-5 cm and cm

Results: Silt percentage   Silt percentage: 0-5 cm and cm

Results: Clay percentage   Clay percentage: 0-5 cm and cm

Results: Hydrologic group (infiltration)   Dominant condition and percentages of individual classes (as appropriate):   Hydrologic group: Dominant condition, Group A %

Results: Ksat   Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity 0-5 cm and cm

Results: Available Water Storage (mm)   Raster datasets for 6 depth zones (as appropriate): 0-5, 5-20, 20-50, , , greater than 150cm   Available Water Storage: 0-5 cm and cm

Results: Soil organic carbon (kgC m -2 )   Soil organic carbon : 0-5 cm and cm

Results: spatial metadata  Metadata rasters  Left: percentage area with components contributing to the dominant condition hydrologic group  Right: status map: pixels filled with STATSGO2 (blue)

Impact of results   EPA will incorporate into the EnviroAtlas  A state-of-the-art map viewing and analysis tool   Data are model-ready  Hydrologic models  Carbon cycle models  Climate change drivers  Climate change impacts  Modelers want defined depth zones

Future work   Digital soil mapping: link pedon data to maps  Data structure to support results of this conference  Make use of legacy soil data: SSURGO & STATSGO  Use Landsat and other images  GlobalSoilMap.net  New topographic derivatives  Multi-scale view of a landscape  Large features precisely defined  Slope and slope length simultaneously  Floodplain delineation

Acknowledgments   US Geological Survey: Climate and Land Use Change Program   US Environmental Protection Agency: EnviroAtlas   US Department of Agriculture: Natural Resources Conservation Service Thank you

Results   Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) Organic layer Mineral layer (up to 1-m) Red is low, blue is high Color scales are not comparable between these plots SOC is often higher in Organic than in Mineral

Results   Organic Layer Thickness  Probability that the organic layer is >= 40 cm thick Red is low, blue is high Maximum is 87%