Opening Statements. Importance of Opening Statements First time the judge/jury will see the attorney.  A good first impression is IMPORTANT! You will.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing for the Real World Chapter 11 Sensitivity and Tact.
Advertisements

In-House Mock Trial Seminar
OPENING STATEMENTS 2007 Street Law Mock Trial. WHY is the opening statement so important?
R OLES & R ESPONSIBILITIES From Speaking With A Purpose: Jo Thornton & Jessica Pegis.
Persuading a Jury: Optional H/W from last lesson: What effect does the order in which testimony is presented have on persuading a jury? (10) JUN 11.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
Unit 7 Critical Thinking and Reading Comprehension
Parts with Explanations
To Kill a Mockingbird Mock Trial
Preparing for a Mock Trial
After Reading KEY TRAITS Writing Workshop Persuasive Essay...continued 1.IDEAS 2. ORGANIZATION Presents a thesis statement taking a position on a clearly.
Introduction to Persuasive Speech Writing
MOVING PEOPLE TO A BELIEF, POSITION, OR COURSE OF ACTION PERSUASION AND ARGUMENT: A REVIEW Adapted from Mike McGuire’s Com 101 class notes, MV Community.
Moving people to a belief, position, or course of action Adapted from Mike McGuire’s Com 101 class notes, MV Community College.
THE MODES OF WRITING: HOW TO WRITE FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES Created for Edmond Public Schools©
Simplified Rules of Evidence How to Behave in the Courtroom.
Nonfiction.
IB English Language B Stem Cell Research - Speeches 21/10/2014.
Direct Examinations DO NOW: VOCABULARY ON LINE ON MY WEBSITE.
Anatomy of a Trial Composition of Team (for Competition) Prosecution/Plaintiff 3 Attorneys 3 Witnesses Defense/Defendant 3 Attorneys 3 Witnesses.
Trial Courts (pages 46 to 50). Trial Courts Courts that listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts.
Closing Statements. About Closing Statements They are more difficult to prepare than opening statements.  You never know exactly what will come out at.
 Memorable word or phrase that summarizes your theory  Emotionally compelling  Incorporate jurors sense of fairness and universal truths  Simple 
Rhetorical Framework Purpose Audience Situation Persona/Ethos Message.
Presentation skills 1 Group work: discussion and presentation on the topic Qualities to Work in a Care Home 1)suppose you are volunteers in a care home.
ANATOMY OF A TRIAL Opening Statements -1 st : Plaintiff -2 nd : Defendant Examinations -1 st : Plaintiff Witnesses -2 nd : Defendant Witnesses Closing.
Central Core CD Unit B 2-5 Employability in Agriculture/Horticulture Industry.
Argumentative Essays Ms. Sanders rocks Ms. Sanders rocks.
Strategies for Effective Argument Problem/Solution.
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY OVERVIEW
Opening Statements Closing Arguments. Opening Statements 1. Have a theme and use it at least 3 times. It should be memorable and relate to your side.
Guidelines for the Argumentative Essay
Effective Communication for All Employees
Trial Procedure. Theory of a case  Attorneys must present a logical argument demonstrating what really happened to the jury  This is prepared prior.
Critical Thinking Topic: “Your Topic” College Prep
What is rhetoric? What you need to know for AP Language.
+ Trial Basics Information you need for the trial!
Persuasive Writing Writing to persuade or convince the reader.
Making Opening Statements. What is an Opening Statement? -A statement that introduces your case - It is the most crucial part of the trial! -An opportunity.
Chapter 24: Persuasive Speaking
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
 Your side’s version of “what really happened”  Logical  Fit the legal requirements of the claims or defenses  Be simple to understand  Be consistent.
 By Michael Johnson.  How does a judge/jury decide a case? o Factual content o Legal requirements o Just result.
 Influences the reader by using fact based evidence and reasoning to express a point of view or uncover the truth  It is the process of establishing.
Closing Arguments Organizing and delivering effective closing arguments.
Argumentative Essay Writing
PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF A MOCK TRIAL
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
The Final Exam.
How writers use language to influence the reader
Opening Statements & Closing Arguments
Argumentative Writing
The argumentative essay
Argument: Key Terms.
By: The Mock Trial Class of 4B
Trial Courts.
The In-Class Critical Essay
OPENING STATEMENTS 2007 Street Law Mock Trial.
Argumentative Writing
The Art of Argumentation
Argumentative Writing
OPENING STATEMENTS Mock Trial.
It’s a murder trial. Get ready.
A SPEAKER’S GUIDEBOOK 4TH EDITION CHAPTER 26
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
OPENING STATEMENTS 2007 Street Law Mock Trial.
OPENING STATEMENTS Mock Trial.
Opening Statements.
9th Literature EOC Review
Summation.
Presentation transcript:

Opening Statements

Importance of Opening Statements First time the judge/jury will see the attorney.  A good first impression is IMPORTANT! You will let the jury know what evidence you will present & what it is supposed to prove. Helps in persuading the jury to view the evidence through YOUR framework.  Whichever framework the jury adopts is the light that they will process the evidence through!  If you can get the jury to see the case from your perspective they will be more likely to remember evidence that fits into that framework. This is a major victory!

Basic information You cannot talk about any evidence in your opening statement that you do not have a reasonable expectation of presenting during the trial. You cannot discuss any evidence in your closing that was not presented during the trial. The opening and closing are NOT considered evidence. Opening = preview of evidence you plan to show. Closing = argument about the evidence you have already presented.

Features of a Persuasive Opening Statement 1. Present a clear theory of the case. 1. This is your no nonsense understanding of exactly what happened. 2. Present a clear theme of the case 1. Should provide the jury with the factual framework & emotional undercurrent of the case. 2. Should be short and concise. 3. Advanced technique: think of a short phrase or sentence that jurors can use to answer the question “what kind of case are you sitting on?” 1. Example: “This case is about a company who polluted our water just to make more profits” (for a case about toxic dumping).

Features of a Persuasive Opening Statement 3. Persuasive openings are well organized. 1. The theory of the case is reinforced by the content of the presentation & manner in which it is made. 2. Consideration must be given to the placement of key information. 1. Remember: Evidence is remembered best when it is encountered FIRST or LAST. Info from the middle will be the least remembered.

Features of a Persuasive Opening Statement 4. Effective opening statements take advantage of persuasive techniques such as rhetorical questions and inoculation strategies. 1. Rhetorical Questions: Asking the jurors questions that make them search for answers, and in some cases, implying answers on their own. 1. For a strong case: Good to present them near the beginning of a statement because the answers will be forthcoming. 2. For a weak case: They will not be helpful near the beginning of a statement because the answers will not be forthcoming. Can be useful near the end of the statement to point out weaknesses in the other side’s case. 2. Inoculation Strategies: Increases the resistance to persuasion. 1. Like a vaccine: Expose the jury to a weakened version of the other side’s argument. Then successfully refute those arguments. Make the jurors aware of the counterarguments! When those arguments are later raised, jury is more able to resist them.

Features of a Persuasive Opening Statement 5. A good opening statement lets the jury see the events through your clients eyes. 1. Recreate the event in such a way that the juror can see themselves as part of it. Allows for greater empathy for your client. You cannot ASK them to “put yourself in they party’s shoes,” however, a good opening statement will put the jury there if it effectively walks them through the case. 6. You cannot ignore problems in your client’s case. 1. Damaging evidence must be anticipated & discussed. The “sting” of the evidence can be removed by presenting it in the best possible light. Also makes the attorney look more honest to the jury.

Features of a Persuasive Opening Statement 7. Call into question the credibility of critical opposing witnesses when possible. 1. Knowing in advance that there are credibility problems strengthens the listener’s resistance to persuasion, lessening that witnesses effectiveness. 8. Take advantage of the fact that jurors MUST understand key legal standards and terms before they can view the case to properly integrate information. 1. Discuss key terms briefly in a way the jury can understand. 2. Non-critical legal terms, procedures, or long winded explanations detract from persuasiveness.

Features of a Persuasive Opening Statement 9. Present with confidence 1. Language should be powerful and direct. Choice of words and phrases is important. Words used to describe people, objects, or events that can be taken in more than one way – will be, and may create the wrong image in the mind of the juror. 2. You want to choose words that produce the most favorable psychological impact. 10. Attention level of jurors is at its highest point during opening statements. 1. Do not shortchange this presentation. 11. See handout on recommendations

Opening Statement Example

Questions to consider. 1. What was the lawyers framework/theory of the case? What was her theme? 2. Was the statement well organized? What do you most remember about what she told you? 3. Did she effectively use rhetorical statements? Did she effectively inoculate the jury against the other side’s case? 4. Were you able to put yourself in her client’s shoes? How? What did she do right or wrong? 5. What problems do you think the other side is going to point out? How did she nullify those problems? 6. Did she discuss the credibility of witnesses? 7. Did she do a good job of clearly and simply defining legal terminology? 8. What she confident & thorough? 9. What about her opening statement stood out to you as useful?