Presentations May 23 – 25, 2005 Portland, Maine For related information visit:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction. What is ISO14001? A documented system of all impacts a company are having on the environment. A detailed strategy to reduce these impacts.
Advertisements

Why Product Stewardship? THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE Zack Hansen, Ramsey County Leslie Wilson, Carver County December 15, 2010.
WI Auto and Scrap Recyclers Mercury Collection Program Mark Harings - WDNR Project Support WISRI CARS Storm Water CCP Programs Grant Provided By GLNPO.
Universal Waste Management Training
EPA Field Activities Relating to Nanoscale Materials Bradley R. Grams, Environmental Scientist Chemicals Management Branch Land and Chemicals Division,
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Feedlot Program.
Presentations May 23 – 25, 2005 Portland, Maine For related information visit:
Toward a Great Lakes Phase-Down Strategy for Mercury in Products and Waste Jessica Winter U.S. EPA GLNPO March 13, 2007.
PBT – P2 Preventing Pollution: A Tool to Reduce and Eliminate Persistent Toxic Substances in the Great Lakes Basin.
Pollution Prevention (P2) in Indiana Great Lakes Pollution Prevention Roundtable meeting May 12, 2011.
DEQ Mission By the end of the decade, Virginians will enjoy cleaner water available for all uses, improved air quality that supports communities and ecosystems,
A Clean Water Agency Quarterly Environmental Compliance Report Presented to the Environment Committee April 28, 2009 Mary Gail Scott Manager, Environmental.
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Where in the hierarchy is Source Reduction? Liz Harriman Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Clean Air Corridor Section 309 Requirements Presentation to WRAP Board July 24, 2002.
Great Lakes Region Pollution Prevention Roundtable Summer 2005 Conference Developing Pollution Prevention strategies for the New York/New Jersey Harbor.
1 MN auto mercury switch programs History and current status John Gilkeson MN Pollution Control Agency January 18, 2006.
Heavy Metals in Products Improved measures and technological developments Petra Ekblom Swedish Chemicals Inspectorate Sufficiency and Effectiveness Review.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Connections with Sustainability Scott Matthews Green Design Institute.
Obtaining the goals.  Identify realistic future use of all water bodies – drinking water, irrigation water, livestock watering, bathing, fishing, recipient.
Pollution Prevention for Light Industry and the Service Industry P2 Ideas for Urban Environments.
Copyright The Solution Foundry. All rights reserved. WELCOME TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS 101.
Demonstration of Healthcare Waste Management Tools Developed by H2E Janet Bowen and Mary Dever EPA Region /
Mercury Retirement Canadian Assessment Breaking the Mercury Cycle Boston Massachusetts May 1 – 3, 2002 Luke Trip, Manager National Mercury Programs, Environment.
Environment Performance in the Oil & Gas E&P Industry: Assessment and Challenges Emmanuel Garland Total Exploration & Production Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Mercury Product Life-Cycle Model: Uses and Results Alexis Cain, US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 NAHMMA Conference: Tacoma, WA September 21,
UNIVERSAL WASTE SAFETY TRAINING CLASS. AGENDA Identifying Universal Waste Identifying Universal Waste Universal Waste Handlers Universal Waste Handlers.
Consumer Products and Recycling John Rogers. Mercury is in the Home.
NASA GHG Emissions NEPA Considerations Linda Wennerberg, Ph.D. Environmental Management Division Erik Tucker SAIC.
330 North Wabash EPA’S ENERGY STAR RATING ACHIEVED December, 2009  330’s Energy Performance is in the top 25% nationwide accomplished through:  No Cost.
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
Lee Pera and Ethan McMahon Office of Environmental Information July 21, 2010 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Educator Resources.
Mercury Collection Programs from Schools, Dental Offices & Households Terri Goldberg NEWMOA.
Mercury-Containing Product Reduction Programs in the Northeast Terri Goldberg NEWMOA.
® Sam Pulcrano, Vice President, Sustainability The U.S. Postal Service.
Smart Growth Implementation Assistance Montgomery County, MD Fact Sheet More about Smart Growth at Preliminary Project.
Use of Multi-Media Monitoring to Develop a Statewide Mercury TMDL Bruce Monson and Howard Markus Environmental Analysis & Outcomes Division Minnesota Pollution.
The Mercury Challenge An Opportunity for Ohio Hospitals. Ohio EPA Office of Pollution Prevention & CGH Environmental Strategies, Inc.
Source Control Planning for Municipal Wastewater System Permit Compliance Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Austin, TX. May 6, 2015 David James Santiago.
Michigan Pollution Prevention Update GLRPPR Winter Meeting March 5-6, 2003.
Mercury Pollution Prevention in Healthcare Initiative Erie County Department of Environment & Planning Western New York Healthcare Association Buffalo.
ASHRAE GAME Plan Ideas for Greening ASHRAE Meetings & Events.
Paul Leinster Director Environmental Protection. Overview Spearheads Regulatory & Charging Strategy Move towards Environmental Risk Based Regulation Integration.
ERT 319 Industrial Waste Treatment Semester /2013 Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Greening the Supply Chain “ Pollution Prevention for Product Systems” John O. Sparks U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Design for the Environment Program.
Anthropogenic Mercury Flow in the US and Florida, Janja D. Husar and Rudolf B. Husar Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri Supported by.
Prevent the Release of Mercury into the Environment By: David McEwen.
Chapter 39 Environmental Law. 2  Under what common law theories may polluters be held liable?  What is an environmental impact statement? What is the.
Anthropogenic Mercury Flow in the US and Florida, Janja D. Husar and Rudolf B. Husar Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri Supported by.
Public Choices for a Healthy Harbor US EPA Collaborative Science & Technology Network for Innovation Rosslyn, VA - October 18 th, 2005 Marta A. Panero.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Leveraging the Management Review Process of ISO and OHSAS for Facility-level and Institutional-level.
Managing Potential Pollutants from Livestock Farms: An Economics Perspective Kelly Zering North Carolina State University.
Action towards Resource-efficient and Low Carbon Cities in Asia
Mercury in Health Care: WHO Policy Paper Hisashi Ogawa WHO Western Pacific Regional Office.
1 UNEP Global Mercury Partnership April UN General Assembly Resolution 60/215 defines partnerships as… “voluntary and collaborative relationships.
19 October 2004Enterprise Architecture in WSRP Portal 1 Foreword: Building Enterprise Architecture Through WSRP in Sample EPA Regional Portal FEA Goals:
Local Activities on Climate Change California Air Districts Step Up May 17, 2010 Barbara Lee, Northern Sonoma County APCD.
S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A 1 Buying Green When Times Are Lean Environmentally Preferable Purchasing.
What’s the Big Deal with Dental Amalgam In the US, more than 100 million Hg fillings are placed each year Estimated 12,172 pounds of mercury are discharged.
Material Flow Carol Timson 4/12/2004. Overview l Biogeochemical Systems Mass Balance l Ecosystem Closed Loop l Anthroposystem Open System l Material Flow.
Tracking Environmental Performance - Tomas Pivoras, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania 1 Tracking Environmental Performance Tomas Pivoras.
Introduction. Apple and Environment Climate Change. Materials Efficiency. Energy Efficiency. Packaging Main factors that affect the environment Recycling.
BACWA – Leading the way to protect our Bay Mercury Watershed Permit Special Provisions BACWA Annual Members Meeting January 29, 2009 Michele Pla Melody.
Wellhead Protection on Tribal Lands
Ideas for Greening ASHRAE Meetings & Events
Perspectives on the Implementation of Greener Cleanups
Van Wert, OH Water and Wastewater Element Training
Product Stewardship Institute Advisory Council Meeting The Lenox Hotel – Boston, MA September 14, 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Presentations May 23 – 25, 2005 Portland, Maine For related information visit:

Demonstration of the EPA Region 5 Tool for Assessing the Potential Impacts of Various Mercury-added Products & Wastes Alexis Cain, US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 Achieving Mercury Reductions in Products and Wastes, Portland, ME, May 25, 2005

Mercury Product Life-Cycle Release Estimation Project Minnesota PCA (Ed Swain)/Barr Engineering (Carol Andrews, Bruce Monson)– estimates for MN in 2001– Used to improve MPCA mercury emissions inventories Wisconsin DNR/Barr/Dane County– adapted for WI in ; EPA Region 5, WDNR (Randy Case), Barr (John Reindl), Barr (Cliff Twaroski, Sarah Disch) develop national estimates

Life-Cycle Mercury Flow Approach Mass Balance Spreadsheets Distribution Factors Release Factors Estimated releases to air, water, land in 1990, 2000, Mercury used in products is released, recycled, or added to inventory

Products Covered Dental amalgam Fluorescent lamps, other lamps Bulk liquid mercury Switches and relays Auto switches Thermostats Measurement and Control Devices Thermometers Batteries– a back of the envelope analysis Did not evaluate chemicals, fungicides

Ways the Tool Could be Improved Include more product sub-categories Update mercury use data Improve release factors Zinc production, auto shredders Land application of biosolids WWTP mercury removal (especially for dental amalgam) Dental office vacuum system, exhalation Breakage by consumers, in transport

Cautions Adaptations are encouraged, but: Need to follow through the spreadsheets carefully to ensure that impact of changes flows through spreadsheets in a realistic way In many cases, mercury inputs and outputs are calculated separately Provide documentation

Collaboration How best to allow interested parties to work with the spreadsheets and improve them, while coordinating and tracking these changes Suggestions welcomed!

Alexis Cain USEPA-Region 5 (312)