Computational Mineral Physics and the Physical Properties of Mantle Minerals John Brodholt UCL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
7/12/04CIDER/ITP Short Course Composition and Structure of Earth’s Interior A Perspective from Mineral Physics.
Advertisements

Molecular dynamics modeling of thermal and mechanical properties Alejandro Strachan School of Materials Engineering Purdue University
Modelling of Defects DFT and complementary methods
Thermodynamics of Oxygen Defective Magnéli Phases in Rutile: A First Principles Study Leandro Liborio and Nicholas Harrison Department of Chemistry, Imperial.
Thermoelastic properties of ferropericlase R. Wentzcovitch Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute J. F.
The Structures of Magmas No Phase Diagrams!. The Structures of Magmas Melt structure controls: The physical properties of magmas The chemical behaviour.
Case Studies Class 5. Computational Chemistry Structure of molecules and their reactivities Two major areas –molecular mechanics –electronic structure.
Journey to the Centre of the Earth (The structure of iron in the inner core) Lidunka Vočadlo.
Diffusion in a multi-component system (1) Diffusion without interaction (2) Diffusion with electrostatic (chemical) interaction.
Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations for Extremely Large Systems: Application to the Takayanagi Reconstruction of Si(111) Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 68, Number.
Metals: Drude Model and Conductivity (Covering Pages 2-11) Objectives
Joo Chul Yoon with Prof. Scott T. Dunham Electrical Engineering University of Washington Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
FUNDAMENTALS The quantum-mechanical many-electron problem and Density Functional Theory Emilio Artacho Department of Earth Sciences University of Cambridge.
Molecular Modeling Fundamentals: Modus in Silico C372 Introduction to Cheminformatics II Kelsey Forsythe.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) Purdue, Norfolk State, Northwestern, MIT, Molecular Foundry, UC Berkeley, Univ. of Illinois, UTEP DFT Calculations.
Why? Three options for studying the Earth’s interior 1.Direct observations e.g. seismics, electrical conductivity 2.High pressure experiments, e.g. multi-anvil.
 Recent studies show that a single Ti atom coated on a single-walled nanotube (SWNT) and C 60 fullerene could bind up to four hydrogen molecules [1-2].
Phases of Matter.
Copyright©2004 by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1 Introductory Chemistry: A Foundation FIFTH EDITION by Steven S. Zumdahl University of.
STATES OF MATTER Chemistry CP.
The Nuts and Bolts of First-Principles Simulation Durham, 6th-13th December : DFT Plane Wave Pseudopotential versus Other Approaches CASTEP Developers’
CHEMISTRY. Composition of Matter Matter - Everything in universe is composed of matter Matter is anything that occupies space or has mass Mass – quantity.
CHEMISTRY. Composition of Matter Matter - Everything in universe is composed of matter Matter is anything that occupies space or has mass Mass – quantity.
The Third Law, Absolute Entropy and Free Energy Lecture 4.
Phase Transitions in the Earth’s Mantle
How to generate a pseudopotential with non-linear core corrections Objectives Check whether the non-linear core-corrections are necessary and how to include.
Atomic scale understandings on hydrogen behavior in Li 2 O - toward a multi-scale modeling - Satoru Tanaka, Takuji Oda and Yasuhisa Oya The University.
The Nuts and Bolts of First-Principles Simulation Durham, 6th-13th December : Computational Materials Science: an Overview CASTEP Developers’ Group.
Lecture 1 Chemical Bonds: Atomic Orbital Theory and Molecular Orbital Theory Dr. A.K.M. Shafiqul Islam
1 Chemical Bonding Chapter Structure Determines Properties! A cardinal principle of chemistry is that the macroscopic observed properties of a material.
ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE OF MATERIALS From reality to simulation and back A roundtrip ticket.
Fundamentals of DFT R. Wentzcovitch U of Minnesota VLab Tutorial Hohemberg-Kohn and Kohn-Sham theorems Self-consistency cycle Extensions of DFT.
Partitioning of FeSiO 3 and FeAlO 3, Fe-spin state and elasticity for bridgmanite and post-bridgmanite C.E. Mohn 1 R.G. Trønnes 1,2 1 Centre for Earth.
Diffusion in Earth’s Deep Interior: Insights from High-Pressure Experiments Jim Van Orman Department of Geological Sciences Case Western Reserve University.
Quantum Monte Carlo on geomaterials Dario Alfè 2007 Summer School on Computational Materials Science Quantum Monte Carlo: From Minerals.
Chapter 27 Current and Resistance. Electrical Conduction – A Model Treat a conductor as a regular array of atoms plus a collection of free electrons.
Quasiharmonic Thermodynamic Properties of Minerals Renata M. M. Wentzcovitch Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science Minnesota Supercomputer.
Javier Junquera Introduction to atomistic simulation methods in condensed matter Alberto García Pablo Ordejón.
Quantum Methods For Adsorption
Post-perovskite Transition in MgSiO3
Earth’s Core-Mantle Boundary: Results of Experiments at High Pressures and Temperatures Knittle& Jeanloz, Science, Vol. 251 (5000), 1991.
Molecular dynamics (4) Treatment of long-range interactions Computing properties from simulation results.
Durham, 6th-13th December 2001 CASTEP Developers’ Group with support from the ESF  k Network The Nuts and Bolts of First-Principles Simulation 20: Surfaces.
The Nuts and Bolts of First-Principles Simulation Durham, 6th-13th December : Testing Testing. Basic procedure to “validate” calculations CASTEP.
Advanced methods of molecular dynamics 1.Monte Carlo methods 2.Free energy calculations 3.Ab initio molecular dynamics 4.Quantum molecular dynamics 5.Trajectory.
Model for B Site Ordering in PMN Eric Cockayne Benjamin P. Burton Material Measurement Laboratory, NIST, Gaithersburg.
Composition of the Earth’s core from ab-initio calculation of chemical potentials Department of Earth Sciences & Department of Physics and Astronomy, Thomas.
Spin Transitions in Lower Mantle Minerals? Concentrate on ferropericlase as more likely to have a big effect.
The Core-Mantle Boundary Region Jeanloz & Williams, 1998 Lower mantle Outer core CMB Heat flow.
Physical Behavior of Matter Review. Matter is classified as a substance or a mixture of substances.
Comp. Mat. Science School Electrons in Materials Density Functional Theory Richard M. Martin Electron density in La 2 CuO 4 - difference from sum.
1 4.1 Introduction to CASTEP (1)  CASTEP is a state-of-the-art quantum mechanics-based program designed specifically for solid-state materials science.
CCMGCCMGCCMGCCMGCCMGCCMGCCMGCCMG Ji-Hui Yang, Shiyou Chen, Wan-Jian Yin, and X.G. Gong Department of Physics and MOE laboratory for computational physical.
Kintetic Molecular Theory
Physical Behavior of Matter Review
Kintetic Molecular Theory
DEVELOPMENT OF SEMI-EMPIRICAL ATOMISTIC POTENTIALS MS-MEAM
Chap 1,2&3 Review Honors Chemistry.
Production of an S(α,β) Covariance Matrix with a Monte Carlo-Generated
DFT simulations of Li-ion conductor Li2(OH)Cl
Effects of Si on the Electronic Properties of the Clathrates
Length scale of heterogeneity
Atomistic simulations of contact physics Alejandro Strachan Materials Engineering PRISM, Fall 2007.
Atomistic materials simulations at The DoE NNSA/PSAAP PRISM Center
Electronic Structure and First Principles Theory
Prof. Sanjay. V. Khare Department of Physics and Astronomy,
CIDER/ITP Short Course
Masoud Aryanpour & Varun Rai
Metastability of the boron-vacancy complex (C center) in silicon: A hybrid functional study Cecil Ouma and Walter Meyer Department of Physics, University.
Chapter 4 Earth Chemistry.
Presentation transcript:

Computational Mineral Physics and the Physical Properties of Mantle Minerals John Brodholt UCL

Outline of the talk Different computational techniques: Molecular dynamics Ab initio (quantum mechanics) calculations Ab initio molecular dynamics. Ab initio calculations on elastic constants of perovskite at lower mantle P and T and using this to make an estimate of temperature variations on the lower mantle. The effect of aluminium on the physical properties of perovskite. Future directions?

P and T at centre of Earth ~ 3.5 Mbar and ~ 6000 K P and T at core/mantle ~ 1.3 Mbar and ~ 3000 to 4000 K Piston cylinder ~ 40 kbar Multi-anvil ~ 400 kbar Diamond-anvil ~ 2 Mbar (temperatures uncertain, gradients high) Shock guns ~ 2 Mbar (temperatures extremely uncertain) High P and T experiments are hard and can have large uncertainties. Why use computational mineral physics? Use computational minerals physics to predict the properties of Earth materials at mantle and core conditions. Also to understand properties at an atomistic level.

Predict: Volumes, bulk modulus Elastic constants (seismic velocities) Heat capacities Free energies of reactions (phase diagrams) Defects Diffusion Viscosities Element partitioning etc

Molecular Dynamics Simulate the properties of minerals, fluids, melts, etc at an atomistic (or sub-atomic) level. If you know the forces (or potential energy) between the constituent atoms, you can find the total force on the atoms (or ions) and solve the equations of motions and move them through time Obtain averages over time that give you the properties of the material of interest. i.e. the kinetic energy gives the temperature.

In classical simulations, the potentials are parameterised empirically; fit to some experimental data.

Simulation of Na diffusing in Quartz

Matsui, P.E.P.I., 2000: (Uses breathing shell for the oxygen)

Pros and Cons of Empirical Potentials Pros: Large systems (millions of atoms) Long runs (millions of time steps ~ ns) Cons Very difficult to assess how transferable the potentials are: will work in one phase but not another. So, solution is to use ab initio quantum mechanical techniques to get the forces.

“I think I can safely say nobody understands quantum mechanics” Richard Feynman H  = E  Alternatively,

Ab Initio Techniques Numerically solving Schrodinger’s equation One major approximation; the effect on any one electron from all the other electrons (a very serious many body problem) is wrapped up into a term called the exchange- correlation. The exchange correlation functional can be either the Local Density Approximation (LDA) or the Generalised Gradient Approximation (GGA). Also use pseudopotentials for the interactions between valence electrons and the tightly bound core electrons (not to be confused with empirical pair potentials). Run on national supercomputers – T3E. Until recently has been used only at 0K.

LDA vs GGA LDA tends to underestimate volume (1-3%) and overestimate the bulk modulus (by a few %). GGA tends to do the opposite – overestimate the volume and underestimate the bulk modulus. GGA is better for reaction energies. GGA is better for hydrogen bonded systems. This is just a fact of life.

Masters et al., 2000

Forte and Mitrovica, Nature, 26 April km depth ~ D’’

Oganov, Brodholt and Price, EPSL, 2001

ATHERMAL (0 K) ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF PEROVSKITE Volume is constrained to experimental zero pressure V. Calc. Exp. K(GPa) G C11(GPa) C C C C C C C C According to Artem Oganov, “ These are simply brilliant ”

Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics VASP (Vienna Ab-Initio Simulation Package) Generalised Gradient Approximation (GGA) Ultrasoft pseudopotential for O Norm-conserving pseudopotential with partial core corrections for Mg and Si Plane-wave cutoff of 500 eV 1 kpt (gamma point) 80 atom cell NVT Run lengths of about 2 ps with a 1 fs timestep Run on CSAR T3E (which NERC has ¼).

Elastic constants of MgSiO 3 Perovskite Oganov, Brodholt & Price, Nature 2001 – QMD on perovskite at P and T. Remains orthorhombic in mantle P-T space. Elastic constants obtained from finite deformation of box and stress/strain relations:

38 GPa 1500K 38 GPa 2500K 88 GPa 1500K 88 GPa 3500K C C C C C C C C C K G At 38 GPa dlnVs/dlnVp = 1.48 At 88 GPa dlnVs/dlnVp = 1.91

High Temperature Vp and Vs from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics R = 1.48 to 1.91 If we extrapolate, R ~ 2.3 at core-mantle boundary This is in accordance with other minerals. Observed R is about 1.7 to perhaps greater that 3. So, this supports the suggestion that the deeper lower mantle is either chemically heterogeneous or it is caused by anelasticity. Anelasticity could perhaps take R up to about 2.7 (Karato, 2001). Need to know the dependence of elastic constants on chemistry.

High Temperature Vp and Vs from Ab Inito Molecular Dynamics V  = Sqrt(K/  ) is relatively independent of composition and anelasticity. Therefore, use V  to make an estimate of temperature variations in the lower mantle. Masters et al, (2000) give a maximum δV  /V  of about 1.4% at 1225 and 2195 km. Our results give: dlnV  /dT = -1.7×10 -5 K -1 at 1000 km dlnV  /dT = -0.9×10 -5 K -1 at 2000 km Maximum temperature contrast is ~800 K at 1000 km and about ~1500 K at 2000 km. Possibly > 2000 K at core-mantle boundary Using Kennett et al, (1998) we get smaller temperature variations: 500 and 1000K.

Forte and Mitrovica, Nature, 26 April km depth ~ top of D’’

Summary 1.Experiments on MgSiO 3 perovskites with only 5% Al 2 O 3 have unexpectedly high compressibilities (mantle has ~ 4 wt%). 2.This is only consistent with a mechanism where Al 3+ substitutes for Si 4+, charge balanced by oxygen vacancies. 3.But, this mechanism is only favoured in the shallow part of the lower mantle. In the deeper part Al is incorporated be a vacancy free mechanism. 4.This means that alumina will only effect the properties of perovskite (compressibility, creep strength, diffusion, etc) in the shallow lower mantle; the deeper lower mantle will have properties in accord with alumina-free perovskite.

Incorporation of Al 3+ in Perovskite from Empirical Potential Calculations 1.At 0 GPa Al 3+ goes into Si site only, charge balanced by oxygen vacancies. 2.But P > 15 GPa, Al substitutes for both Si and Mg with no vacancies. Richmond and Brodholt (1999)

A 2 B 2 O 5 A 3 B 3 O 8 A 4 B 4 O 11 A n B n O 3n-1 ABO 3 Homologous series of compounds along the oxygen deficient axis. Smyth et al. 1996

Computational Details Used commercially available DFT code CASTEP. Ultrasoft pseudopotentials Default planewave cutoff (380 eV). Energy difference between 380 eV and 900 eV was 0.04 eV. K-point grid 0.1 1/Å. Increased sampling gave negligible difference on equation-of- state and reaction enthalpies. All atomic positions were fully relaxed.

(Mg 3 Al)(Si 3 Al)O 12 K = 224 GPa V = Ang**3 Adjust for 5% Al 2 O 3 and assume linear mixing V = <1.001*V(MgSiO 3 ) Vexp = 1.005*V(MgSiO 3 ) K = < 1% smaller Kexp = 10% smaller

Brownmillerite K = 155 GPa V = Ang**3 Adjust for 5% Al 2 O 3 and assume linear mixing V = 1.006*V(MgSiO 3 ) Vexp = 1.005*V(MgSiO 3 ) K = 6% smaller Kexp = 10% smaller

Oxygen Vacancies Enhanced diffusion Weaker – faster creep rates Oxygen ionic conductor – implications for electrical conductivity Seismic velocities might be lower Source for water: V o + O 2- + H 2 O = 2OH -

Oxygen Vacancies Might be an explanation for the mid-mantle discontinuity that is sometimes reported (900 to 1100 km) Might be a zone of mantle below the lower mantle which is weaker than that below.

Cizkova et al., GRL 1999

“ The more progress physical sciences make, the more they tend to enter the domain of mathematics, which is a kind of centre to which they all converge. We may even judge the degree of perfection to which a science has arrived by the facility with which it may be submitted to calculation.” Adolpohe Quetelet

“ Every attempt to employ mathematics in the study of chemical questions must be considered profoundly irrational and contrary to the spirit of chemistry. If mathematical sciences should ever hold a prominent place in chemistry – an aberration which is happily almost impossible – it would occasion a rapid and widespread degeneration of that science.” A. Compte

THE END