RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 Key Issues Review: Enabling Sustained Deep Space Exploration with a Broad Vision Congressional Visits Day Preparatory Briefing Teleconferences February.
Advertisements

Why Are We Exploring Space? What’s Up At NASA? An overview of NASA’s Plans and some really cool stuff happening in a solar system near you.
Presented by Marco Christov at the 11th Mars Society Annual Convention, 14 – 17 August 2008, Boulder Colorado. A Mars Heavy Transport.
A GenCorp Company High Thrust In-Space Propulsion Technology Development R. Joseph Cassady Aerojet 22 March 2011.
Comparative Assessment of Human Missions to Mars Damon F. Landau Ph. D. Preliminary Exam September 13, 2005.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Presentation to the NASA Goddard Academy 2. Constellation Overview Ken Davidian Lead, Commercial.
1 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee Evaluation Measures and Criteria for Humans Spaceflight Options 12 August 2009.
Why Go into Space ? I was asked by a student once, “Why Go Into Space ? What is it good for ?” There are many reasons, some not so obvious. There are short.
Ad hoc Biomedical Committee Report NIH/NASA MOU Exploration Technology Development Program (ETDP) Milestones 2009 Human Research Program Status For Section.
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA) Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX RUTGERS.
Lecture 26. Exploration, the Federal and NASA Budgets, and Politics.
Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems.
Minimalist Human Mars Mission Surface infrastructure discussion July 26 th, 2008.
Architecture Outline. 2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture Race Overview  What is HERCULES? Race Logistics Provider Subsystems Orchestration.
NASA_G_O_02_09_05.ppt 1 National Goals and Objectives National Goal To advance U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space.
Communication and Navigation System Doro Gracia Kazuya Suzuki Patrick Zeitouni.
Habitat & Waypoints Picture. 2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture Design Requirements: A safe, reliable, low maintenance habitat to.
Modern Exploration Mars Pathfinder  “NASA’s Mars Pathfinder mission – the first spacecraft to land on Mars in more than 20 years and the first ever to.
Strategic Plan Elements: ISRU, Analog Outpost Mike Duke November 10, 2008.
Space Exploration: Should It Be Done? Nishith Patel.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
EADS Space Transportation - Orbital & Reusable Systems Hartmut Müller TB 91 Page 1 Mission to the Moon Recent Developments and Future Perspectives Hartmut.
The Return to Space Exploration Constellation. NASA Authorization Act of 2005 The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human.
A3 Altitude Test Facility
Futron Corporation 7315 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 900W Bethesda, Maryland Phone Fax ISO 9001 Registered Better.
Future Space Exploration A Summary of “The Global Exploration Roadmap”, International Space Exploration Coordination Group, August 2013 Summarized by:
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Challenges & Strategies for Lunar Habitation Systems Larry Toups Advanced Projects Office Constellation Program October 2006.
Presented to Kepler Pre-Launch Educator Workshop January 31, 2009 Shari Asplund Discovery and New Frontiers Programs Education and Public Outreach Manager.
MIT : NED : Mission to Mars Presentation of proposed mission plan
Minimalist Mars Mission Establishing a Human Toehold on the Red Planet Executive Summary DevelopSpace MinMars Team.
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
Introduction to the Altair Project
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
Probabilistic Technology Initiative for NASA Pam Caruso Technical Assistant to the Director, Engineering NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center Presented to.
Copyright 2004 Northrop Grumman Corporation 0 21 June 2004 Doug Young NG Lead Executive for Project Constellation Northrop Grumman Corporation Cooperating.
The Augustine Committee Review of Human Spaceflight Plans Committee Briefing to COMSTAC October 29, 2009 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
Challenge: Creating a Mars Cargo Landing System (CMLS) Major Randy Carlson, PhD Air Force Scientist 27 September 2013 Graphic by NASA.
Partners for 21st Century Learning Focusing Federal Investments in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math.
11 Space Transportation Policy and Market Risks Panel 5 – International Customers, Competitors and Partners The George Washington University Elliot School.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
0 Space Exploration and International Cooperation Gilbert R. Kirkham Office of External Relations June 2004.
Near-Term Mars Colonization -A DevelopSpace Project- May 4 th, 2008.
Crew Mobility for Lunar Surface Exploration Dr. Rob Ambrose NASA-JSC May 2008.
LEO Propellant Depot: A Commercial Opportunity? LEAG Private Sector Involvement October 1 - 5, 2007 Houston, Texas LEAG Private Sector Involvement October.
LuNet Integrated Network Architecture for Sustained Human and Robotic Exploration Gary Noreen Telecommunications Architect Communications Architecture.
NASA Working Toward Mission to Mars. In this June photo provided by the University of Hawaii, research space scientist Oleg Abramov walks outside.
CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s Revised Budget. CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s New Vision and Objectives (as of January 14, 2004)  VISION  The fundamental goal.
1 June 10, 2004 Gary L. Wentz, Jr. Deputy Manager, MSFC Office of Exploration Systems MSFC Office for Exploration Systems.
October, 2005 NASA’s Exploration Architecture. 2 A Bold Vision for Space Exploration  Complete the International Space Station  Safely fly the Space.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Orbital Aggregation & Space Infrastructure Systems (OASIS) Background Develop robust and cost effective concepts in support of future space commercialization.
Affording Mars II: October, 2014 Turning Vision into Reality Humans to Mars Summit May, 2016 George Washington University Washington,
Workshop on Science Associated with the Lunar Exploration Architecture - Earth Science Subcommittee Theme: A Lunar-Based Earth Observatory Science Observations.
NASA Model-Based Systems Engineering Pathfinder 2016 Summary and Path Forward Karen J. Weiland, Ph.D. Jon Holladay, NASA Systems Engineering Technical.
Bringing Digital Technology Back to Earth ISCe2005 Presented by Ken Dozier USC Viterbi School of Engineering NASA Far West Technology Transfer Center.
National Goals and Objectives
The Future of Human Spaceflight *** A Journey to Mars
Callisto Mission LaRC Option
The Future in Space.
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Two Parallel Paths Public-private Govt - International
h t t p : / / w w w . u s c . e d u / g o / t t c
Sustainable Space Development
Design 6 Classes 4th Quarter Lunar/Mars Rover Science Project
Mars as Seen from Phobos
Space Communications Architecture Application Portfolio
Where do we go from here? Goals of human exploration of Mars: Science, Outpost, Settlement NASA’s Plan: Earth Reliant è Proving Ground è Independence.
Deep Space Exploration Requires the best from all of us
Presentation transcript:

RASC-AL 2010 Topics

TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference architectures that use chemical or nuclear thermal propulsion require several years to complete, a large number of heavy lift launches and over 500 days on the surface the first time humans visit the planet. The durations associated with this type of mission increase the risk to the crew from galactic radiation and system failure. Innovative technologies and system approaches that lower the cost and risk Mars missions are of great interest. Examples of technologies and systems include: in situ resource utilization systems, inflatable entry and aerocapture devices, efficient Mars transfer propulsion systems (reusability is an option), advanced habitation approaches, etc. Key mission constraints to be met by any of the design proposals are: 4 crew, minimum 30 day minimum surface stay, maximum 2-year total mission, use of no more then 5 launches of a 125-mT(LEO) payload launch vehicle with a 10-meter- diameter payload shroud. Mission benefits (e.g., lowering cost) of specific technologies should be clearly demonstrated through systems analysis of the entire mission. Approaches that lead to sustainable human Mars exploration leading up to the establishment of an outpost are encouraged.

BRINGING THE WORLD ALONG WITH PARTICIPATORY EXPLORATION An important element of NASA’s exploration program is engaging the general public in human exploration missions. To capture the attention of a large cross section of the general population, NASA must use a variety of innovative and diverse approaches. A potential example might be the development of high-definition cameras on the rovers and in the habitats, with the ability to control rovers or monitor experiments from Earth. This would not only require a communications infrastructure that would enable the transmission of high-definition images from the Moon, but would also require the use of satellites and ground stations to provide communications connections and interfaces. Other potential activities could include: fly-along experiments on a lunar lander, remote controlled rover races or other competitions, near real-time use of the general public and scientific community in exploration data analysis, prizes like the Google-X prize, innovative use of the Google Moon application, new multimedia program content for NASA TV or web sites, and use of immersive virtual reality in exploration. Opportunities for commercial involvement and funding are strongly encouraged. Teams should develop an integrated approach that begins in 2010 that defines how NASA must implement participatory exploration into its thinking, programs and missions. The approach should also identify investments required in enabling technologies, support infrastructure and the potential impact of “participatory sensors” on destination systems. The approach should yield a cultural shift in and outside of NASA that results in awareness and excitement about what NASA is doing at the moment, not what it did in the past.

COMMON LUNAR SORTIE / NEAR-EARTH OBJECT (NEO) MISSION DESIGN NASA is interested in architecture approaches that provide cost- effective Earth neighborhood exploration with minimal infrastructure. One approach would be to perform sortie-class human missions to the lunar surface for 60 days at a time to study particular sites of interest rather than being limited to a particular lunar outpost location. The lunar mission of interest would be to transport crew of 2 to 4 to the far side Aiken Basin region of the lunar surface for a 60- mission. The Mission would require a minimum of 1,000 kg of usable cargo to be transported with the crew and at least 10 mT of cargo to be transported without crew to pre-implace infrastructure to support the 60 day mission. This same set (or subset) of hardware would also be used to support a 60~120 crewed mission to a Near Earth Object (NEO). Assuming that commonality with currently planned Constellation architecture elements is not required, what low-cost options are available to accomplish such a mission?

Which One? Technology-Enabled Human Mars Mission Bringing the World Along With Participatory Exploration Common Lunar Sortie/NEO Mission Design