HIAD Mission Infusion: Technology Development & Potential Utilization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Hypersonic Weapon Flight Test Overview to the Space & Missile Defense Conference 14 August 2012 Ms. Debra G. Wymer Director, Technical Center.
Advertisements

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Presentation to the NASA Goddard Academy 2. Constellation Overview Ken Davidian Lead, Commercial.
International Planetary Probe Workshop 10
1 Flexible Thermal Protection System Development for Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerators Joseph A. Del Corso, Walter E. Bruce III, Stephen J.
Flight Performance of the Inflatable Reentry Vehicle Experiment 3 10 th International Planetary Probe Workshop June 21, 2013 Robert Dillman 1, John DiNonno.
M. R. Tetlow and C.J. Doolan School on Mechanical Engineering
The “NASA Deep Space Mission” Learning How to Live and Work in Deep Space for Extended Stays and Very Long Missions (Like to the Asteroids and Mars)
High Energy Atmospheric Reentry Test (HEART) Overview of Proposed Flight Test 21 June 2012 Henry Wright Dr. F. McNeil Cheatwood.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
10th International Planetary Probe Workshop
Copyright 2011 | Company Proprietary Parachute Development for Venus Missions Christopher Kelley – Airborne Systems Robert Sinclair – Airborne Systems.
Inner Guides=Text Boundary Outer Guides=Inner Boundary Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration Michele Gates Human Exploration and Operations Mission.
Comprehend the Challenger accident Comprehend the Columbia accident The Space Shuttle Program: Challenger and Columbia Accidents.
Mars EDL CubeSat Mission Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic Exploration Laboratory School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE) Arizona.
THE FUTURE PLANS OF NASA FOR HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT; MISSIONS, LAUNCH VEHICLES.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Atul Kumar Presentation Week 3: February 1 st, 2007 Aerodynamics Team Re-Entry vehicle analysis - Lifting body 1.
NASA_G_O_02_09_05.ppt 1 National Goals and Objectives National Goal To advance U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space.
Hypersonic Reentry Dynamics Faculty Advisors Professor Mease (UC Irvine) Dr. Helen Boussalis (CSULA) Student Assistants Katie Demko Shing Chi Chan 7/12/2015NASA.
Flexible Thermal Protection System Design and Margin Policy
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Reducing the cost of sustained operations through technology infusion April 2004 Darin Skelly NASA Kennedy Space Center Transformational Spaceport & Range.
Intercollegiate Rocket Engineering Competition Spring 2015 EML Ethics and Design Project Organization.
Why Venus? The 2013 Planetary Science Decadal Survey recommends the Venus In Situ Explorer mission as highest-priority within New Frontiers class. Venus.
Traveling in Space 1.The Space Agency 2.Unmanned Space Vehicles 3.Manned Space Vehicles 4.Equipment needed in Space 5.The Future of Space Exploration NASA.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
USA Fundamental Hypersonics
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
MER PDS PDR - Document No. EA Mars Exploration Rover 3 April 2001ACW - 1 Welcome MER Parachute DeceleratorSystem Preliminary Design Review.
A Simple Entry, Descent, and Floating System for Planetary Ballooning Daisuke Akita Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Titan Mariner Spacecraft Study Titan Team! IPPW-5 June 24, 2007.
The Return to Space Exploration Constellation. NASA Authorization Act of 2005 The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human.
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
A3 Altitude Test Facility
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
AAE 450- Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01.
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
MIT : NED : Mission to Mars Presentation of proposed mission plan
RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.
Minimalist Mars Mission Establishing a Human Toehold on the Red Planet Executive Summary DevelopSpace MinMars Team.
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Joseph A. Del Corso Stephen Hughes, Neil Cheatwood, Keith Johnson, Anthony Calomino IPPW-12 Presentation.
The Augustine Committee Review of Human Spaceflight Plans Committee Briefing to COMSTAC October 29, 2009 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
1 Aerothermal Ground Testing of Flexible Thermal Protection Systems for Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerators Walter E. Bruce III, Nathaniel J.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
IRNCLAM – InteRNational CisLunar Ascension Module Brian Anderson ASTE /11/23.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Evolvable Mars Campaign, SKGs February 24, 2015 Ben Bussey Chief Exploration Scientist HEOMD, NASA HQ NOTE.
Review of Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems. Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems MinMars Mars entry body design is derived from JPL Austere Mars entry.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
October, 2005 NASA’s Exploration Architecture. 2 A Bold Vision for Space Exploration  Complete the International Space Station  Safely fly the Space.
Launch Structure Challenge - Background Humans landed on the moon in 1969 – Apollo 11 space flight. In 2003, NASA started a new program (Ares) to send.
CubeSat Re-Entry Experimental System Testbed C.R.E.S.T. STK 11 This software is an orbital simulator that allows the user to examine the flight path of.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use FISO COLLOQUIUM, 18 June 2014 B. HUFENBACH ESA’S SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY.
An Earth – Moon Transportation System Patrick Zeitouni Space Technology.
Cable-Controlled Aeroshell Deceleration System Sashank Gummella, Sophomore, Aerospace Engineering Steven Kosvick, Sophomore, Aerospace Engineering Austin.
The Year in Review 2016 Humans to Mars Report. Mars Science Paving the Way Notable Discoveries – The Past 5 Years Mars was once a habitable environment.
National Goals and Objectives
The Future of Human Spaceflight *** A Journey to Mars
Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
NASA Hypersonic Research
Mars Sustainability Workshop Kennedy Space Center February 8, 2018
Space Travel Present & Future
Mars as Seen from Phobos
Rocketry Trajectory Basics
Deep Space Exploration Requires the best from all of us
Presentation transcript:

HIAD Mission Infusion: Technology Development & Potential Utilization National Aeronautics and Space Administration HIAD Mission Infusion: Technology Development & Potential Utilization Dr. F. McNeil Cheatwood Stephen Hughes Dr. Anthony Calomino NASA Langley Research Center IPPW-12 Presentation June 16, 2015

What is a HIAD? A Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) is a deployable aeroshell consisting of an Inflatable Structure (IS) that maintains shape during atmospheric flight, and a Flexible Thermal Protection System (F-TPS) employed to protect the entry vehicle through hypersonic atmospheric entry.

Background: Why a HIAD? Entry mass at Mars (and other destinations with atmospheres) is limited by launch vehicle shroud size. At Mars, increased capability needed for higher mass and/or higher altitude, eventual human missions. Inflatable technologies allow larger aeroshell to be stowed inside launch shroud. Inflation of Inflatable Structure (IS) occurs prior to atmospheric entry. Flexible Thermal Protection System (F-TPS) protects IS and payload from entry environments. NASA LaRC has been developing Inflatable Aeroshell technology for over 10 years.

HIAD Technology Development Cadence Systematic and stepwise technology advancement Ground Test: Project to Advance Inflatable Decelerators for Atmospheric Entry (PAI-DAE)—Softgoods technology breakthrough Flight Test: Inflatable Reentry Vehicle Experiment (IRVE), 2007: LV anomaly—no experiment Flight Test: IRVE-II, 2009—IRVE “build-to-print” re-flight; first successful HIAD flight Ground Test: HIAD Project improving structural and thermal system performance (Gen-1 & Gen-2)—Extensive work on entire aeroshell assembly Flight Test: IRVE-3, 2012—Improved (Gen-1) 3m IS & F- TPS, higher energy reentry; first controlled lift entry Next Steps Ground Effort: Gen-3 F-TPS, advanced structures, packing, manufacturability at scale >10m, controllability, and demonstrated staging to secondary decelerator. Prepares for large-scale flight test and readiness for Mars mission. Flight Test Possibilities: United Launch Alliance (ULA) flight test and/or booster recovery at scale and environments relevant to Mars Human EDL Pathfinder.

HIAD Ground-Based Development To Date Manufacturing • Define large-scale fabrication methods • Optimize packed volume and density requirements • Establish manufacturing processes and quality control standards Testing • Quantify aerodynamic structural response • Verify load reaction and structural integrity • Establish structural performance limits Performance • Qualify structural materials performance capability • Establish handling and stowage requirement • Define design methods and safety margins Modeling • Validate non-linear structural modeling capability • Establish structural design procedures and standards • Define system weight, stiffness, and strength options Inflatable Structure Static Loading Dynamic Response Torus Stacking and Alignment Torus Compression/ Torsion Tests • Establish large-scale fabrication methods • Define manufacturing processes and quality control standards • Determine handling and stowage requirements • Characterize mechanical and thermal physical properties • Define mission-cycle performance capability • Establish F-TPS material performance limits • Extend F-TPS materials performance capability • Qualify thermal and aero-elastic response • Define system integration metrics and requirements • Validate a multi-physics thermal response model • Establish design requirements and safety margins • Verify integrated system load response Flexible TPS Structural Contribution Fabrication Stagnation Multi-Physics Model

IRVE-3: A Fully Successful Flight Test Atmospheric Interface, 25Pa (666s, ~86km) Separate RV & Nose Cone From Brant & Transition 90s, 152km Yo-Yo De-Spin, 80.0s Brant Burnout, 56.9s Brant Ignition, 23.0s Taurus Separation 21.0s Taurus Burnout, 18.5s Taurus Ignition, 15.0s Talos Burnout, 6.4s Spin Motor Ignition, 0.9s Leaves Rail, 0.5s Talos Ignition, 0s Launch on Black Brant-XI from WFF 940lb payload, El 84deg, Az 155deg RV Peak Heat Rate 14-17W/cm2 680s, 50km, Mach 7 (peak Mach 10.2) RV splashdown at 30m/s 383km downrange (1193s) Eject Nose Cone 102s, 177km Apogee 366s, 474km RV Peak Dynamic Pressure 685s, 41km, 20.8g’s Reentry Experiment Complete at Mach < 0.7 (709s, 27km) Coast… Actuate CG offset system 628s, 181km (1s duration) Aeroshell Release 429s, 457km Start Aeroshell Inflation 433s, 455km ACS Reorientation 587s, 266km (40s duration) NIACS damps rates 91s, 152km (10s duration) LOS by land radar & TM 12-29km altitude Vent NIACS and Inflation System Gas CG Offset Maneuvers Recovery Attempt Check out the video at: http://youtu.be/7JGaOvC1sV4

THOR: The One That Got Away…

Potential HIAD Mission Infusion Robotic missions to any destination with an atmosphere (including sample return to Earth) High mass delivery to high altitudes at Mars (including humans to Mars) Lower cost access to space through launch vehicle asset recovery (for example, ULA’s booster module) ISS down mass (without Shuttle, the U.S. has no large-scale down mass capability)

Capabilities Missions Evolvable Mars Campaign – Capability & Mission Extensibility ISS Deep Space & Mars Risk Reduction Deep Space Mars Preparation Mars Moon Missions First Human Mission to Mars Surface Long Duration Human Missions Proving Ground Missions to Returned Asteroid & EAM for Mars risk reduction EM-X Crewed Missions in Cis-lunar space Asteroid Redirect Vehicle International Space Station Exploration Augmentation Module 70+ MT SLS 105+ MT SLS 130+ MT SLS EDL / Lander Long Duration Surface Systems Advanced Propulsion Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission Capabilities Missions Transportation Working In Space Staying Healthy Mars Surface Long Duration Habitat EDL Pathfinder All Paths Through Mars Orbit Mars 2020 ISRU

Capabilities Missions Evolvable Mars Campaign – Capability & Mission Extensibility ISS Deep Space & Mars Risk Reduction Deep Space Mars Preparation Mars Moon Missions First Human Mission to Mars Surface Long Duration Human Missions Proving Ground Missions to Returned Asteroid & EAM for Mars risk reduction EM-X Crewed Missions in Cis-lunar space Asteroid Redirect Vehicle International Space Station Exploration Augmentation Module 70+ MT SLS 105+ MT SLS 130+ MT SLS EDL / Lander Long Duration Surface Systems Advanced Propulsion Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission Capabilities Missions Transportation Working In Space Staying Healthy Mars Surface Long Duration Habitat EDL Pathfinder All Paths Through Mars Orbit Mars 2020 ISRU HIAD Future Path Development Activity Ground-Based Efforts Performance Flight Testing Human Precursor Mission at Mars Scalability Controllability Staging from HIAD 10

ULA’s Planned Utilization of a HIAD Image courtesy ULA

Full-Scale Capability Pathfinder Development Path for 2024 Mars Demo, Utilizing ULA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Launch CDR PDR EDL Full-Scale Capability Pathfinder EDL Architecture Study IRVE-3 HIAD Gen-1 complete “HIAD-2” (ground-based) Project Gen-2 & Gen-3 15m-class HIAD ½-Scale Orbital Flight Test Gen-2 6m-class Flight Test effort Ground Test effort Earth flight test IRVE-S Sounding Rocket Flight Test Cascade Decelerator Gen-2/3 12m-class HIAD Full-Scale Orbital Flight Test Launch TBD ULA Infusion

Full-Scale Centaur Recovery HIAD Similitude IRVE-3 ½-Scale Demo Full-Scale Centaur Recovery ULA Booster Recovery Mars 2024 EDL Pathfinder Scale 5-6m 10-12m TPS SiC 5X carbon felt Pyrogel 3X carbon felt Parafoil & Recover of Device(s) X Cascade Decelerator Similar ConOps