NEW SESIS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: A PROMISING PRACTICE READINESS FOR CHANGE: PROGRESS IN THE PROCESS MAY 5, 2014 Andrew J. Ecker Lower Hudson RSE-TASC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

Are You Ready for the Change? Change: is a PROCESS, not an event is made by INDIVIDUALS first, then institutions is a highly PERSONAL experience entails.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Integrating ICT and Interactive Whiteboards in the Classroom.
Using Theories of Change to Plan for Effective Coaching Conversations
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
EDC&I 585 4/13/11 What’d We Talk About Last Week? Organizing Our Discussions for This Week Setting the Stage for Next Week.
LEA Self-Assessment EC Division Institute March 2015
The Process of VTPBiS Implementation Getting From Here to There! Vermont.
Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM)
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Adult Learning and Change Theory How To Successfully Implement School Initiatives Using Theories of Change.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Literacy Coaching / Michele Zwart / Literacy Coach / Brady Elementary School / Aurora East District 131 / / Michele Zwart / Literacy.
Response to Intervention
Theory to Practice: How One SEA Uses Implementation Science Minnesota Department of Education presentation for the CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness.
NC SSIP DAC Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
1 Session 3 Targeting the key players. 2 The School Principal Cultivate professional working relationship Seek regular meetings Be supportive and respectful.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
1 Aiding Students in Reading with NaturalReader 9.0 Laura Stemler.
Northpoint Elementary School School Improvement Plan for January 8, 2013 School Board Meeting.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
(Adapted from Ortiz, 1987; Horner, 1998; Sugai, 2001) Intensive 1-7% (Specialized/Individual Support System) Intervention 5-15% (At-Risk System, Supplemental,
WELCOME! LEADING FOR CHANGE. 2 Outcomes By the end of this training, participants will be able to: Identify and analyze the phases of change individuals.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Heidi Erstad and Peg Mazeika, Technical Assistance Coordinators Wisconsin RtI Center Bridget Blask, Rachel Blum, and Leslie Connors Franklin Elementary.
Team Choice Activity What would it be like to present to the school board and district leadership? 1.Need for a District Leadership Implementation Team.
Oregon RTI The Who, What & How of Participation in
Rob Horner University of Oregonwww.pbis.org. Celebrate: PBS now being used in many parts of society. Focus: On school-wide positive behavior support.
Improving Outcomes for All Students: Bringing Evidence-Based Practices to Scale March 25, 2009 MN RtI Center Conference Cammy Lehr, Ph.D. EBP & Implementation.
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
Measuring Implementation: School-Wide Instructional Staff Perspective Amy Gaumer Erickson, Ph.D. University of Kansas Evaluator: Kansas & Missouri SPDGs.
Southwest Educational Development Laboratory Austin, Texas Strategy One: Create A Context for Change Section C.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Professional Development and International Practice Faculty Perceptions and Growth Become passionately curious…. Albert Einstein.
Pandora Bedford Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
S UPPORTING T EACHERS ON THEIR UBD J OURNEY Bell ringer-Supporting practitioners in backwards design: joys and questions.
Keystone State Reading Association October 19, 2013 State College, PA.
Professional Development Implementation Team January 28, 2013.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
May 6, 2014 Inver Grove Heights Community Schools Sustaining Momentum.
Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 3 Day 2 September 23-25, 2009 Denver, CO.
Integrated System for Student Achievement SISEP in Illinois.
Change Relevant Research Ellen Marshall, Ph.D. & Cathy McAuliffe-Dickerson, Ph.D.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
Understanding the Adult Learner A synopsis of “Tornado of Change” And Andragogy and Self Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory”
Choice Activity What would it be like to present to the school board and district leadership? 1.The need for an EBISS District Leadership Implementation.
Alaska School Leadership Institute 2012 Rural Alaska Principal Preparation Project June 1, 2012 – Institutionalizing New Approaches Captain Cook Hotel.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
Making Change Happen The Concerns-Based Adoption Model.
Vermont Integrated Instruction Model (ViiM) Highlights August 2012.
New York State’s Special Education Technical Assistance Resources Higher Education Task Force Meeting September 2009.
Evidence-Based and Promising Practices to Increase Graduation and Improve Outcomes Dr. Loujeania Bost Dr. Catherine Fowler Dr. Matthew Klare.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
UTAH MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORTS
Questions and Concerns
One-to-one laptops in English classrooms: Teachers’ concern profiles and the implications to professional development strategies. Wan Fareed Centre for.
RtI Innovations: Evaluation Anna Harms & Jose Castillo
The Process of VTPBiS Implementation
Universal Components Defining behavior expectations
A Trip Down Leadership Lane May 2011 MTL Meeting
Presentation transcript:

NEW SESIS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: A PROMISING PRACTICE READINESS FOR CHANGE: PROGRESS IN THE PROCESS MAY 5, 2014 Andrew J. Ecker Lower Hudson RSE-TASC Region 2

 Topic: Readiness for Change: Progress in the Process  Materials & References:  Presentation PowerPoint slides  QIP Manual (pages 1 – 18)  Concerns-Based Adoption Model A measure of concern: Research-based program aids innovation by addressing teacher  Readiness for Change State Implementation & Scaling-up of Evidence-based Practices, Scaling-up Brief ReadinessForChange pdf ReadinessForChange pdf  PBIS / Readiness for change / Staff resistance Understanding school personnel’s resistance to adopting schoolwide positive behavior support at a universal level of intervention

Quality Improvement Process (QIP)  Research-based process, engaging staff in assessing and implementing activities to improve instructional and behavioral practices and systems that have a direct impact on the performance of students with disabilities. 1- Establish the foundation 2- Assess the need & identify desired outcomes 3- Identify what needs to happen 4- Review of Quality Improvement Process and QIP plan 5- Implement QIP plan and check for progress 6- Design next steps Ongoing monitoring

Quality Improvement Process (QIP)  Based on steps 1, 2, & 3, I need to think about…  Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM)  Readiness for Change (RfC) 1- Establish the foundation 2- Assess the need & identify desired outcomes 3- Identify what needs to happen 4- Review of Quality Improvement Process and QIP plan 5- Implement QIP plan and check for progress 6- Design next steps Ongoing monitoring

Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM)  Understand and address educators’ concerns about change  Stages of concern Awareness Informational Personal Management Consequence Collaboration Refocussing

Quality Improvement Process (QIP) & Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) Stage 0 Awareness Aware that an innovation is being introduced but not really interested… Stage 1 Informational Interested in some information about the change Stage 2 Personal Wants to know the personal impact of the change Stage 3 Management Concerned about how the change will be managed in practice Stage 4 Consequence Interested in the impact on students or the school Stage 5 Collaboration Interested in working with colleagues to make the change effective Stage 6 Refocusing Begins refining the innovation to improve student learning results “I am not concerned about this innovation.” “I don’t really know what this innovation involves.” “I want to know more about this innovation.” “There is a lot I don’t know about this but I’m reading and asking questions.” “How is this going to affect me?” “I’m concerned about whether I can do this.” “How much control will I have over the way I use this?” “I seem to be appending all of my time getting materials ready.” I’m concerned that we’ll be spending more time in meetings.” “How is using this going to affect students?” I’m concerned about whether I can change this is order to ensure that students will learn better as a result of introducing this idea.” “I’m concerned about relating what I’m doing to what other instructors are doing.” “I want to see more cooperation among teachers as we work with this innovation” “I have some ideas about something that would work even better than this.”

Readiness for Change (RfC)

Quality Improvement Process (QIP) & Readiness for Change (RfC)  The capacity to create readiness for change, manage the change process, implement innovations effectively, and establish reliable and enduring indicators of progress is largely missing in nearly all State education systems. Creating this infrastructure is an essential part of effectively using evidence-based programs and other innovations to benefit students.  -Fixsen, Blase, Horner, & Sugai (2009)

Quality Improvement Process (QIP) & Readiness for Change (RfC)  Exploration  identifying the need for change  learning about possible interventions that may be solutions  creating readiness for change  learning about what it takes to implement the innovation effectively  developing stakeholders and champions  deciding to proceed (or not)

Quality Improvement Process (QIP) & Readiness for Change (RfC)  Installation  Establishing the resources needed to use an innovation  Establishing the resources required to implement the innovation with fidelity resulting in good outcomes for students

Readiness for Change (RfC) Implementation Stages QIP Steps 1, 2, 3 1- Establish the foundation 2- Assess the need & identify desired outcomes 3- Identify what needs to happen

Where am I?? QIP & RfC & CBAM 1- Establish the foundation 2- Assess the need & identify desired outcomes 3- Identify what needs to happen 4- Review of Quality Improvement Process and QIP plan 5- Implement QIP plan and check for progress 6- Design next steps Stage 0 Awareness Aware that an innovation is being introduced but not really interested… Stage 1 Informational Interested in some information about the change Stage 2 Personal Wants to know the personal impact of the change Stage 3 Management Concerned about how the change will be managed in practice Stage 4 Consequence Interested in the impact on students or the school Stage 5 Collaboration Interested in working with colleagues to make the change effective Stage 6 Refocusing Begins refining the innovation to improve student learning results

Next steps… 1- Think of your QIP or a change you’re implementing at a school ______________ (improvement) at _________________ (school) 2- Based on the current/or next QIP “step”, what can you expect staff’s concerns to be? ______________ (QIP step) ___________________ (CBAM stage) 3- Based on the current implementation change stage, what should I be thinking/doing/asking next? __________ (Implementation stage) _______________ (next action)