Some investigations on Shower in Aug11 DST Szymon Harabasz Version: 15 November 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Alessandro Fois Detection of  particles in B meson decay.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Clustering: Algorithm development and analysis R. Cassell, G. Bower.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
9/15/06Ali Hanks1 Measuring bremsstrahlung photons in sqrt(s)=200 GeV pp collisions Ali Hanks Hard/Photon analysis fest September 15, 2006.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
Analysis of E852 Data at Indiana University Ryan Mitchell PWA Workshop Pittsburgh, PA February 2006.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.
HADES coll. meeting, Oct. 31, 2007 Charged pion production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV results of data analysis from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 Jehad Mousa.
Background from pion beam interactions with LH2 & solid state targets J.Biernat/I.Koenig/J. Markert/W.Przygoda/P.Salabura.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Status of KLOE real data analysis by the AMADEUS group Oton Vázquez Doce, 4 Maggio 2007.
K charged meeting 10/11/03 K tracking efficiency & geometrical acceptance :  K (p K,  K )  We use the tag in the handle emisphere to have in the signal.
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
Experimental data by HADES PID method As an example let`s take deuterons and protons with p = 750 MeV/c. Their PDFs are gaussians with mean at β = p/(
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Two Density-based Clustering Algorithms L. Xia (ANL) V. Zutshi (NIU)
1 Pion production in np collisions at 1.25AGeV A.Kurilkin, P.Kurilkin, V.Ladygin, A.Ierusalimov, T.Vasiliev, LHEP-JINR, Dubna, Russia For the HADES collaboration.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection December 11, 2006 Track Selection for T-Alignment studies Louis Nicolas EPFL Monday Seminar December.
One,Two pion channels from PE target August 2014 (~10 hours of beam) 50 MLN events (1.2 shift) Day 232/233 Piotr & Witek.
2012/7/231 Cosmic Ray at STAR Shuai Yang Center of Particle Physics and Technology University of Science and Technology of China STAR Regional Meeting.
Particle Identification with TRD Prashant Shukla Institute of Physics University of Heidelberg Presentation at International Workshop on TRD 27 th September.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Estimate of META efficiency in NOV02 Aim: check of META efficiency implemented in digitizers in order to get proper efficiency correction of yields Needed:
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Поликарпов Сергей, 12 апреля 2012, ИТЭФ Статья принята в Physics Letters B 1 марта 2011.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Layer00 Efficiency Studies Stephen Levy, UChicago.
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
Elliptic flow of D mesons Francesco Prino for the D2H physics analysis group PWG3, April 12 th 2010.
QM2004 Version1 Measurements of the  ->     with PHENIX in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at RHIC PPG016 Figures with Final Approval Charles F. Maguire.
1 HBD Update Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, May 7, 2008 May7, 2008.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
Meeting V0 Daughter PID by TPC dEdx:pp real data By AliTPCIDResponse (aleph parameterization), 4 sigma Daughter PID cuts With this K0s candidates,
Comparison of different chamber configurations for the high luminosity upgrade of M2R2 G. Martellotti - LNF - 13/03/2015 Roma1 + Alessia.
1 A (very) preliminary study of channel pp->h->ZZ->4mu via gg fusion with CMSSW Alessandro Giacobbe Cristina Botta Daniele Trocino Relatrice: Chiara Mariotti.
Data Analysis Practice looking for Φ(1020) Nuclear Physics Ⅲ Kyung-Eon,Choi.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
Hadron production in C+C at 2 A GeV measured by the HADES spectrometer Nov02 gen3 analysis and results for spline tracks (shown in Dubna) changes - removing.
HADRON 2009, FloridaAnar Rustamov, GSI Darmstadt, Germany 1 Inclusive meson production at 3.5 GeV pp collisions with the HADES spectrometer Anar Rustamov.
TOF detector in PHENIX experiment PHENIX time-of-flight counter The PHENIX time-of-flight (TOF) counter serves as a particle identification device for.
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
Tracking, Computing & other Stuff. Correlation of detector hits The track segments of inner and outer MDCs are matched on Cluster level The track segments.
Search for a new light boson in  decays J.Stepaniak, M.Berłowski, NCBJ Warsaw For WASA-at-COSY Collaboration Meson2014,Krakow
April12 DST calibration status
Performance of the HADES-TOF RPC wall in a Au-Au beam
analisys: Systematics checks
First steps on optimising RICH analysis
Marco Incagli – INFN Pisa
Time Independent Analysis
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Shower detector status report
Newt Ganugapati and Teresa Montaruli
Checks of TOF Fiducial Cuts
Charged PID in Arbor 23/02/2016 Dan YU.
Reconstruction of TauTau events
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Some Attempts to The Separation of Coherent and Incoherent ψ Production Po-Ju Lin August 3,2004.
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Samples and MC Selection
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

Some investigations on Shower in Aug11 DST Szymon Harabasz Version: 15 November 2015

PID plot 2

mass 3

Pre – RPC correlations 4

All RPC clusters to all Pre hits in event Closest RPC clusters matched with all tracks to all Pre hits in event 5

6 Selct only bottom parts of both detectors Correlation fairly better!

All RPC clusters to all Pre hits in event Closest RPC clusters matched with all tracks to all Pre hits in event 7

8

cand with different cuts Positive particlesNegative particles 9

Positive particlesNegative particles Φ cand with different cuts 10

Angular distributions all Particle Candidates Positive particlesNegative particles 11

Angular distributions Particle candidates matched with Pre and correlated with Post I Positive particlesNegative particles 12

Row-Col for Shower hits best matched with particle candidates Positive particlesNegative particles 13

cand vs. Shower hit row Aug 11 Positive particlesNegative particles 14

All particlesNegative particles cand vs. Shower hit row Nov 10 Why previously there was no problem to calculate efficiency in bottom rows? 15

Sum0 vs. momentum Negative pionsProtons π-π- 16

Sum1 vs. momentum Protons π-π- 17

Sum2 vs. momentum Protons π-π- 18

Sum1-Sum0 vs. Momentum sector 1 Protons π-π- 19

Sum2-Sum0 vs. Momentum sector 1 Protons π-π- 20

Mean Sum0 - protons 21

Mean Sum1 - protons 22

Mean Sum2 - protons 23

Mean Sum0 – π - 24

Mean Sum1 – π - 25

Mean Sum2 – π - 26

Shower alignment not perfect? 27

Shower alignment not perfect? 28

Digitization 29

Eff Pre ( β ) All particles Negative particles 30

Eff Post I ( β ) All particles Negative particles 31

Eff Pre ( position ) Negative particles All particles 32

Eff Post I ( position ) Negative particles All particles 33

HParticleTrackSorter - how does it work? Fill internal structures from HParticleCand by calling Int_t HParticleTrackSorter::fill(Bool_t (*function)(HParticleCand* )) (eg. Bool_t HParticleTrackSorter::selectHadrons(HParticle Cand* pcand) ) For accepted objects flags are evaluated Int_t selectBest(HParticleTrackSorter::ESwitch byQuality, Int_t byParticle) sets isBest... flags (here also kIsUsed is marked) 34

Looking for leptons 35

First attempt Read data from all HparticleCands, write it to ntuple, apply conditions when drawing histograms with Draw method Meta matching quality < 4 Average charge > 70 Inner segment chi2 > 0 RK chi2 < 1000 Graphical cut: 36

37

38

System 0, p < 150 MeV/c System 1, 200 < p < 300 MeV/c 39

Next attempts Second: The same conditions as in the first attempt plus kIsUsed flag Third: The same conditions as in the first attempt plus flags: kIsAcceptedHitRICHMDC kIsAcceptedHitInnerMDC kIsAcceptedHitOuterMDC kIsAcceptedRKMETA 40

∆ θ RICH – Track, System 0 All histograms in one figure scaled to (almost) common maximum value 41

∆ θ RICH – Track, System 1 42 All histograms in one figure scaled to (almost) common maximum value

Second attempt Third attempt 43

44

45

Fourth attempt 46 Read data from all HparticleCands, write it to ntuple, apply conditions when drawing histograms with Draw method Meta matching quality < 4 Average charge > 70 Inner segment chi2 > 0 RK chi2 < 1000 β > 0.9

47 Fourth attempt

48 Fourth attempt – positive particles

49 Fourth attempt – negative particles

50 Fourth attempt Scaled to common max value (on both plots separately)

51 Fourth attempt Scaled to common max value (on both plots separately)

Shower response on leptons? 52

53 Fourth attempt

Shower response on leptons 54

Sideband method 55

Sideband method 56

Sideband method 57

Sideband method 58

Sideband method 59 Everything After sideband background subtraction

Sideband method 60 Everything After sideband background subtraction

Sideband method 61 Everything After sideband background subtraction

Sideband method 62 Everything After sideband background subtraction Oops…

Sideband method 63 Everything After sideband background subtraction

Sideband method 64 Everything After sideband background subtraction

Sideband method 65 Everything After sideband background subtraction Something is wrong in some sumdiff bins. Let’s check it.

66

67

68

69

Sideband method in sumdiff bins 70

Sideband method in sumdiff bins 71

Sideband method in sumdiff bins 72

Sideband method in sumdiff bins 73

Sideband method in sumdiff bins 74

Sideband method in sumdiff bins 75

Time of flight 76 Everything After sideband background subtraction

Backup slides 77

Sum0, Sum2 > 0 78

Post I efficiency 79

Sum0, Sum1, Sum2 > 0 80

Sum0, Sum1 > 0 and RPC cluster exists 81

Sum1 > 0 and RPC cluster exists 82

Pre efficiency Sum0 is always > 0 83

Shower Hit Row-Col – cands matched with Pre and correlated with Post I All particlesNegative particles 84

Theta for all and negative particle candidates All particlesNegative particles Here all tracks matched with Shower are considered 85

Phi for all and negative particle cands Here tracks matched with Shower and RPC at the same time are considered 86

Sum0 & Sum1 vs. beta Protons π-π- 87

Shower alignment not perfect? Pre to Track matching quality as a function of a position on the detector 88