1 RADAR OPERATIONS CENTER (ROC) EVALUATION OF THE WSR-88D OPEN RADAR DATA ACQUISITION (ORDA) SYSTEM SIGNAL PROCESSING WSR-88D Radar Operations Center Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEDT8007 Simulering av ultralydsignal fra spredere i bevegelse Hans Torp Institutt for sirkulasjon og medisinsk bildediagnostikk Hans Torp NTNU, Norway.
Advertisements

Your Name Your Title Your Organization (Line #1) Your Organization (Line #2) Week 8 Update Joe Hoatam Josh Merritt Aaron Nielsen.
CLEAN-AP Update Cl utter E nvironment An alysis using A daptive P rocessing Sebastián Torres and David Warde CIMMS/The University of Oklahoma and National.
1 Sebastian Torres NEXRAD Range-Velocity Ambiguity Mitigation Staggered PRT and Phase Coding Algorithms on the KOUN Research Radar.
The Implementation of the Cornell Ionospheric Scintillation Model into the Spirent GNSS Simulator Marcio Aquino, Zeynep Elmas,
CLUTTER MITIGATION DECISION (CMD) THEORY AND PROBLEM DIAGNOSIS
Lecture 7 Linear time invariant systems
NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.
Your Name Your Title Your Organization (Line #1) Your Organization (Line #2) Semester 2 Update Joe Hoatam Josh Merritt Aaron Nielsen.
Filtering Filtering is one of the most widely used complex signal processing operations The system implementing this operation is called a filter A filter.
So far We have introduced the Z transform
Evolution of the SZ-2 Algorithm Sebastian Torres CIMMS/NSSL Technical Interchange Meeting Fall 2006.
Updates to the SZ-2 Algorithm Sebastián Torres CIMMS/NSSL Technical Interchange Meeting Fall 2007.
Staggered PRT Update Part I Sebastián Torres and David Warde CIMMS/The University of Oklahoma and National Severe Storms Laboratory/NOAA NEXRAD TAC Norman,
Carlos A. Rodríguez Rivera Mentor: Dr. Robert Palmer Carlos A. Rodríguez Rivera Mentor: Dr. Robert Palmer Is Spectral Processing Important for Future WSR-88D.
Your Name Your Title Your Organization (Line #1) Your Organization (Line #2) Dual Polarization Radar Signal Processing Dr. Chandra Joe Hoatam Josh Merritt.
Your Name Your Title Your Organization (Line #1) Your Organization (Line #2) Weeks 5-6 Update Joe Hoatam Josh Merritt Aaron Nielsen.
Communications & Multimedia Signal Processing Refinement in FTLP-HNM system for Speech Enhancement Qin Yan Communication & Multimedia Signal Processing.
Long-Term Ambient Noise Statistics in the Gulf of Mexico Mark A. Snyder & Peter A. Orlin Naval Oceanographic Office Stennis Space Center, MS Anthony I.
Problem: Ground Clutter Clutter: There is always clutter in signals and it distorts the purposeful component of the signal. Getting rid of clutter, or.
Despeckle Filtering in Medical Ultrasound Imaging
Doppler Radar From Josh Wurman NCAR S-POL DOPPLER RADAR.
Surveillance Weather Radar 2000 AD. Weather Radar Technology- Merits in Chronological Order WSR-57 WSR-88D WSR-07PD.
Considerations in the Observation of Weather Sebastian Torres CIMMS/NSSL.
Doppler Radar From Josh Wurman Radar Meteorology M. D. Eastin.
HIAPER Cloud Radar Transceiver Exciter Receiver Oscillators High-Powered Amplifier Calibration Exciter Receiver Oscillators High-Powered Amplifier Calibration.
Data Windowing in ORDA Technical Briefing Sebastián Torres 1,2, Chris Curtis 1,2, Rodger Brown 2, and Michael Jain 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale.
Over-Sampling and Multi-Rate DSP Systems
11/18/02Technical Interchange Meeting Progress in FY-02 Research RDA –Capability to collect time series data –Control of phase shifter Phase coding –Sigmet’s.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
Sebastian Torres NEXRAD Range-Velocity Ambiguity Mitigation Spring 2004 – Technical Interchange Meeting.
DOLPHIN INTEGRATION TAMES-2 workshop 23/05/2004 Corsica1 Behavioural Error Injection, Spectral Analysis and Error Detection for a 4 th order Single-loop.
Wind Profiler Signal & Data Processing -Anil Anant Kulkarni SAMEER, IIT Campus,Powai Mumbai
A Doppler Radar Emulator and its Application to the Detection of Tornadic Signatures Ryan M. May.
25 Sept. 2006ERAD2006 Crossbeam Wind Measurements with Phased-Array Doppler Weather Radar Richard J. Doviak National Severe Storms Laboratory Guifu Zhang.
Speech Enhancement Using Spectral Subtraction
Technical Interchange Meeting Spring 2008: Status and Accomplishments.
NEXRAD In Space (NIS) A GEO Satellite Doppler Weather Radar for Improved Observations & Forecasting of Hurricanes NIS concept study and design Simone Tanelli.
ECEN5633 Radar Theory Lecture #19 24 March 2015 Dr. George Scheets n Read 13.3, 9; 9.1 n Problems Web 4, 5, &
Initial Implementation of Super-Resolution Data on the NEXRAD Network Dr. Sebastian Torres CIMMS/NSSL A presentation to the Data Quality Team June 15,
Updates to the SZ-2 Algorithm Sebastian Torres CIMMS/NSSL Technical Interchange Meeting Spring 2007.
WEATHER SIGNALS Chapter 4 (Focus is on weather signals or echoes from radar resolution volumes filled with countless discrete scatterers---rain, insects,
Experiments on Noise CharacterizationRoma, March 10,1999Andrea Viceré Experiments on Noise Analysis l Need of noise characterization for  Monitoring the.
1 Spectral identification & suppression of ground clutter contributions for phased array radar Spectral identification of ground clutter Spectral identification.
Jump to first page New algorithmic approach for estimating the frequency and phase offset of a QAM carrier in AWGN conditions Using HOC.
Sebastian Torres NEXRAD Range-Velocity Ambiguity Mitigation Fall 2004 – Technical Interchange Meeting.
Technical Interchange Meeting – ROC / NSSL / NCAR ROC / NSSL / NCAR TIM Boulder CO 11 May 2005 Real-time time-series implementation of the Radar Echo Classifier.
NCAR Activity Update John Hubbert, Cathy Kessinger, Mike Dixon, Scott Ellis, Greg Meymaris and Frank Pratte To the NEXRAD TAC October 2005 San Diego,
S.Frasca on behalf of LSC-Virgo collaboration New York, June 23 rd, 2009.
DOPPLER SPECTRA OF WEATHER SIGNALS (Chapter 5; examples from chapter 9)
A. R. Jayan, P. C. Pandey, EE Dept., IIT Bombay 1 Abstract Perception of speech under adverse listening conditions may be improved by processing it to.
NEXRAD Data Quality 25 August 2000 Briefing Boulder, CO Cathy Kessinger Scott Ellis Joe VanAndel Don Ferraro Jeff Keeler.
1 Svetlana Bachmann November 20, 2007, Norman OK Technical Interchange Meeting “Data Quality / R-v ambiguities mitigation” Staggered PRT ground clutter.
Comparison of filters for burst detection M.-A. Bizouard on behalf of the LAL-Orsay group GWDAW 7 th IIAS-Kyoto 2002/12/19.
Estimation of Doppler Spectrum Parameters Comparison between FFT-based processing and Adaptive Filtering Processing J. Figueras i Ventura 1, M. Pinsky.
Learning from the Past, Looking to the Future James R. (Jim) Beaty, PhD - NASA Langley Research Center Vehicle Analysis Branch, Systems Analysis & Concepts.
A radar data simulator for SuperDARN A.J. Ribeiro, P.V. Ponomarenko, J.M. Ruohoniemi, J.B.H. Baker, L.B.N. Clausen, R.A. Greenwald /29/2012 SuperDARN.
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
A Moment Radar Data Emulator: The Current Progress and Future Direction Ryan M. May.
High Resolution Weather Radar Through Pulse Compression
Figure 11.1 Linear system model for a signal s[n].
Speech Signal Processing
Sandis Spolitis, Inna Kurbatska, Vjaceslavs Bobrovs
Design of Digital Filter Bank and General Purpose Digital Shaper
Updated Velocity Data for undamped panel 2
NEXRAD Data Quality Optimization AP Clutter Mitigation Scheme
the University of Oklahoma
Examples of spectral fields
Final Project: Phase Coding to Mitigate Range/Velocity Ambiguities
SystemView First Steps
Presentation transcript:

1 RADAR OPERATIONS CENTER (ROC) EVALUATION OF THE WSR-88D OPEN RADAR DATA ACQUISITION (ORDA) SYSTEM SIGNAL PROCESSING WSR-88D Radar Operations Center Engineering Branch Briefing for The NEXRAD Technical Advisory Committee February 11, 2004 Richard L. Ice RS Information Systems, Inc. Norman, Oklahoma

2 Objectives Review ROC Engineering Study into ORDA RVP8 Signal Processing Performance –Two Spectrum Width Estimators –New Clutter Filter Approach Address Technical Questions

3 Evaluation Focus Spectrum Width Estimators Legacy Style (R0/R1) Signal plus Noise Noise Compensated “Lag Two” (R1/R2) Bias and Standard Deviation Performance New Clutter Filters GMAP - Gaussian Model Adaptive Process –Bias –Standard Deviation –Suppression –Processing Windows –Comparison to Legacy Performance Phase 1: Simulations Phase 2: Real Data (Archived)

4 WSR-88D Specifications Bias –Reflectivity 1 dB –Velocity 1 ms -1 –Width 1 ms -1 Standard Deviation –Reflectivity 1 dB –Velocity, Width 1 ms -1 SNR 10 dB W = 4 ms -1 Suppression 50 dB –Min Usable Velocity 4 ms -1 Velocity and Width –Bias and SD 2 ms -1 Reflectivity Bias –1 to 10 dB –Depends on Width –Additional 1 dB from Clutter Residue SNR 20 dB Test W c = 0.28 ms -1 Moment Estimates Clutter Filters

5 Simulation Methodology MATLAB File conversion Histograms 3-D plots Calculations MS EXCEL Spreadsheets Graphs SIGMET RVP8 (and Utilities) A’scope Dig Sig Sim Recorder

6 Primary Simulation Parameters Spectrum Width –R0/R1 and R1/R2 –PRF: 1000 –N S : 64 –Width: 0.5 – 8.0 ms -1 –Nyquist Co-interval –SNR: 10 – 60 dB –Noise: -80 dBm –Clutter: off GMAP –R0/R1 and R1/R2 –PRF: 322, 450, 1000 –N S : 16, 32, 64 –Width: 4.0 ms -1 –SNR: 10 – 60 dB –CSR: up to 60 dB Input Time Series Simulated per Sirmans and Bumgarner (1975) 4,000 estimates per run 200 spectra and time series each file data files generated

7 Types of Spectrum Width Estimators WSR-88D Legacy Type R0/R1 0 th lag autocorrelation 1 st lag autocorrelation R0 Calculation Affected by Noise Contamination Biased at low SNR Poly Pulse Estimator R1/R2 1 st lag autocorrelation 2 nd lag autocorrelation R1, R2 Calculations Not affected by noise contamination Biased at higher widths

8 R0/R1 Spectrum Width Estimator Accuracy RDA Release , N S = True Spectrum Width, V n =25 Calculated Spectrum Width S/N 10, 20, 30 & 40 S/N 0S/N True Spectrum Width, V n =25 Calculated Spectrum Width S/N 10 S/N 20+ Width Estimator Bias Performance R0/R1R1/R2

9 Width Estimator Standard Deviation R0/R1R1/R2

10 R1/R2 Width Estimator Number of Samples Bias

11 Clutter Filters WSR-88D Legacy 5-pole Elliptic Filter In the Stop Band Region: Reduces signal up to 50 dB Notch Removes Clutter Notch Removes Weather Biases all Moment Estimates + V N - V N V = 0 Notch Filter Input Weather Signal -V N + V N Output Weather Signal Clutter

12 GMAP Overview Not a notch width based scheme Frequency domain signal, clutter, and noise analysis Uses best window (Blackman, Hamming, Rectangular) Models the clutter based on single input parameter –expected clutter spectrum width (0.28 m/sec for example) Uses system value or a rank order noise estimate Removes clutter associated spectral coefficients Restores signal spectral coefficients Autocorrelation moment estimates Reduces filter bias effects

Spectra Showing Coefficient Restoration Histogram of 4,000 Velocity and Width Estimator Outputs 10 dB SNR PRF 450, CSR 50 dB V = 4.8 ms -1 W = 4.0 ms -1 Width Estimator Bias: ms -1 Velocity Estimator Bias: 0.03 ms -1

14 Samples Illustrating GMAP Weather Signal Restoration SNR = 10 dB, CSR = 10 dB, PRF = 1000 Hz Clutter Removed Coefficients Restored

15 Surveillance Data – Reflectivity; N = 16, SNR = 10 dB GMAP Performance - Blackman Window - System Noise as an Input CSR= 10 dBCSR = 30 dBCSR = 50 dB V/V n P bias (dB)SD[P] (dB)P bias (dB)SD[P] (dB)P bias (dB)SD[P] (dB) Averages dB dB dB Avg 1 km 1.27 dB 1.42 dB 1.48 dB

16 CSR= 10 dBCSR = 30 dBCSR = 50 dB V/V n V bias (ms -1 ) SD[V] (ms -1 ) V bias (ms -1 ) SD[V] (ms -1 ) V bias (ms -1 ) SD[V] (ms -1 ) Averages Doppler Data – Velocity; N S = 64, SNR = 10 dB GMAP Performance - Blackman Window - System Noise as an Input

17 Doppler Data – Velocity; N S = 32, SNR = 10 dB GMAP Performance - Blackman Window - System Noise as an Input CSR= 10 dBCSR = 30 dBCSR = 50 dB V/V n V bias (m/sec) SD[V] (m/sec) V bias (m/sec) SD[V] (m/sec) V bias (m/sec) SD[V] (m/sec) Averages

18 dB SNR: Blackman, PRF 1000, SNR 10, Samples dB CSR dB SNR Corrected Reflectivity Deviation Suppression Level Analysis

19 dB SNR: Hamming, PRF 1000, SNR 10, Samples dB CSR dB SNR Corrected Reflectivity Deviation Suppression Level Analysis

20 GMAP Filter Width Analysis Filter Widths 0.1 to 0.4 ms -1

21 Reflectivity Bias Compared to Legacy Filters Performance in Zero Isotach in the Absence* of Clutter * For Example – Clutter Map Error

22 Conclusions from Simulations Width Estimators –Both Estimators Meet Specifications (1 ms -1 ) –R0/R1 Estimator Requires Good Noise Compensation –R1/R2 Has Advantages at Low SNRs and Narrow Widths –R0/R1 Has Less Bias at Higher Widths –R0/R1 Meets Variance Goal Over a Wider Range of Input Spectrum Widths Clutter Filters –GMAP Meets WSR-88D Specifications (2 ms -1 ) –Can Suppress Clutter up to 55 dB Above the Signal –Delivers Essentially Unbiased Estimates in the Presence of Clutter –Exhibits Higher Variance in Some Modes –Delivers Lower Bias than Legacy for Signals at Zero Velocity w/o Clutter

23 Phase 2 – Radar Data ROC Applications Branch Leading Study Engineering Team Supporting –Identifying and Processing Level 1 Data –Assist with RVP8 Technical Issues –Engineering Tests to Verify Simulated Results Possible Paths –Legacy Archive 1 (May 97, May 99, Jul 97) –New Level 1, 2 Data (L1RP) (KCRI, KOUN, S-POL) NCAR R -V Mitigation Work ORDA System Test –NSSL RRDA (KOUN) JPOLE

24 RVP8 Playback from Legacy A1 Recorder Data, May 3, 1999 Storms Reflectivity Velocity

25 S-POL Time Series Playback Into an RVP-8 Reflectivity UnfilteredGMAP Filtered

26 S-POL Time Series Playback Into an RVP-8 Velocity UnfilteredGMAP Filtered

27 Questions and Discussion Technical Report and Briefings on ROC ENG Web Page: