Large-Scale Assessment of Student Learning: Valid, Reliable and Customizable Instruments for Courses, Departments, and Across Programs Stephen Carroll.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Post 16 Citizenship Liz Craft Valuing progress Celebrating achievement.
Advertisements

Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
Learning Assessment for the 21st Century: Making Course Evaluations More Meaningful and Useful with the FREE Student Assessment of Learning Gains Stephen.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Teacher Preparation and Education Reform: A Behavioral Systems Perspective Çhair: Ronnie Detrich, Wing Institute Discussant: Chuck Salzberg, Utah State.
Greenville Technical College Assessing and Developing Student Computing Technology Skills September 19, 2012 Dr. Lenna Young, Mark Krawczyk, and Mary Locke.
Student Evaluations. Introduction: Conducted: Qualtrics Survey Fall 2011 o Sample Size: 642 o FT Tenured: 158, FT Untenured: 59 o Adjunct: 190 o Students:
The Test Assessment Questionnaire Katherine M. Sauer William Mertens Metropolitan State College of Denver University of Colorado at Boulder
Motivation & Learning Christopher Price, Ph.D. Director, Center for Excellence in Learning & Teaching, The College at Brockport
Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses
The Professional Certificate Program in Washington State January 8, 2008.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Boston University Center for Excellence and Innovation in Teaching and IS&T Why Use ePortfolios? Janelle Heineke CEIT Teaching Talk Fall 2012.
Grappling with Grading Assessment & Rubrics
Developing a Teaching Philosophy Batya Elbaum Department of Teaching and Learning Preparing Future Faculty Workshop March 28, 2009.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
+ Measuring Teaching Quality in the Online Classroom Ann H. Taylor Director, Dutton e-Education Institute College of Earth and Mineral Sciences.
Supporting Evaluation Rubrics with Digital Evidence and Artifacts Bill Jensen, Rhonda Laswell, Rose Maudlin & Ramesh Sabetiashraf.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
Formative Assessment.
Student Learning targets
What should teachers do in order to maximize learning outcomes for their students?
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Writing at Doane College: a Workshop David Smit Department of English Kansas State University.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
RESPONDENT BACKGROUND DISTRIBUTION Data from 31 survey respondents Student Assessment of Their Learning Gains from Conducting Collaborative Research Projects.
Enhancing student learning through assessment: a school-wide approach Christine O'Leary, Centre for Promoting Learner Autonomy Sheffield Business School.
Assessing Tomorrow’s Leaders Today in an Integrated Reading and Writing Course NADE 2015 – Greenville, SC Kina Lara and Tina Willhoite San Jacinto College.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
ACTIVE LEARNING: Putting “how people learn” to work Robin Wright
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
An Introduction to LiveText: ePortfolios and Beyond Webinar Series October 26, 2011.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Using Student & Staff Feedback in Educator Evaluation November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.
Welcome Welcome to “Getting Results” A National Science Foundation project developed by WGBH with the League for Innovation and 13 community colleges from.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Dr. Marsha Watson Director of Assessment Dr. Kenny Royal Assistant Director of Measurement & Analysis Dr. Julie F. Johnson Assessment Specialist.
Jeff Johnston Assistant Director, Center for Teaching Lecturer, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University Meeting the learning.
Faculty Applications of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Research Kathleen McKinney and Patricia Jarvis with the assistance of Denise Faigao.
Information Literacy: Assessing Your Instruction Texas Library Association District 10 Fall Workshop October 15, 2005 Michelle Millet Information Literacy.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
CSU Center for Teacher Quality Assessing Teacher Preparation Outcomes for Program Improvement and Institutional Accountability CSU Academic Council Meeting.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Tests that Challenge and Excite: Creative Assessment for the Secondary Classroom Ross Abrams.
E-Mission + Team of undergraduates = ??? Background and motivation.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
Assessment of Student Academic Achievement. What is Assessment An evaluative process Provides continuous review and oversight of curriculum.
Personalization through Advisory Programs Kevin Cyr and Maureen Cohen February 2011.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Shifts in video and LMS adoption: Impact on student outcomes
Instructional Design Groundwork:
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
European Network on teacher Education Policies
Meet the Teacher September 2016
Provincial K-8 Report Card
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
Revamping the student opinion instrument for faculty
Presentation transcript:

Large-Scale Assessment of Student Learning: Valid, Reliable and Customizable Instruments for Courses, Departments, and Across Programs Stephen Carroll & Melissa Ganus LearningHabits.wordpress.com WASC ARC 2012

SALG Student Assessment of their Learning Gains Freely available courtesy of NSF at

Think-Pair-Share Find a partner you haven’t worked with before and discuss this question: How much do you spend on student course evaluations and what value do your students and faculty get from that expense?

Challenges with Standardized Course Evaluations (SCEs) Almost all SCEs using Scantron-based forms have questions primarily focused on teacher behavior and other qualities and/or student satisfaction Neither teacher behavior nor student satisfaction are necessarily related to course goals – they are not good proxies for actual student learning SCEs rarely provide any information that helps teachers make specific improvements in their teaching or courses

The challenges with Standardized Course Evaluations (SCEs) The experience of filing out most course evaluations offers little to nothing of value to students These kinds of SCE’s punish innovative teaching They also punish those who step outside of traditional gender roles Are SCEs wasting time for both faculty and students?

Why SALG? SALG was designed specifically to avoid these problems SALG was created to provide detailed, meaningful feedback to teachers about the value and efficacy of their teaching and to guide improvements SALG was designed to promote metacognition in students, improving their learning

Why SALG? SALG is a valid, reliable instrument that has been in use and ongoing development since 1997 SALG is used by over 5,000 college and university instructors SALG is FREE! SALG is accepted as evidence of student learning by many accrediting bodies

SALG Basic Principles You measure teaching effectiveness in terms of the specific stated goals of the course Students have something valuable to tell us about what they learned in our class and what helped them learn it (and what didn’t) Students have the opportunity to be metacognitive, reflecting on their learning gains, as they complete a SALG

SALG Structure 2 Main parts: - Learning goals (4 question sections) - Pedagogy (6 questions) The first four questions focus on learning goals: Understanding Skills Affective gains Integrations (or Habits) (Mnemonic= USA-1)

SALG Structure The second six questions focus on pedagogy: Course design Class activities Graded assignments Resources Meta-information Support for the individual learner

Validity & Flexibility? The stem questions and the scales they use are fixed to preserve the validity and identity of the SALG (and to make it useful as a research instrument) But since evaluation always has to be in terms of stated goals and those goals are always specific, the SALG was designed to encourage instructors to adapt it specifically to their own courses.

Customizing your SALG

SALG Scheduling Baseline survey near the beginning of the term assesses students’ current level of achievement in relation to course learning goals SALG survey at the end of the term measures learning gains (improvements relative to course learning goals) Can also run SALG surveys as mid-term surveys

Analytical Capabilities Detailed statistics about student responses N, Mean, Std Dev, Mode, # at Mode, etc. Histograms for each question set Aggregated statistics for multiple instruments Cross-tabs Simple text coding for qualitative analysis Entire analysis can be downloaded into Excel

Department SALG Department admin can make templates with locked questions related to departmental learning goals Faculty using templates cannot modify locked questions, but can control everything else After the survey, department admin gets data for locked questions only; instructors get all data back

Outside of College Classrooms An adaptation of the SALG is the SAIL: Self-Assessment of Increases in Learning Designed for paper-based evaluation of conference sessions, workshops, and shorter format learning experiences Core questions remain: What gains do you feel you made during the session? How well did the components presented contributed help with those gains?

SALG User Community Over 5,000 instructors using the SALG, with many customized instruments publicly viewable and reusable Word-of-mouth helps promote educational innovations Users can use SALG data for SoTL research publications User input needed to help prioritize improvements as we move forward

Thank You! & This material is also available at learninghabits.wordpress.com learninghabits.wordpress.com