 The fallacies we will discuss tonight are largely able to be classified as fallacies of ambiguity. In other words, they occur when words are used with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentative /Persuasive Reading & writing
Advertisements

Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
1 Fallacies of Weak Induction. 2 Introduction The key characteristic of these fallacies is that the connection between the premises and conclusion is.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Mastering the Art of Persuasion & Recognizing Fallacies.
A summary of common fallacies
Name That Fallacy. According to a Harris Poll of 889 U.S. adults conducted in 2005, approximately 60% believe in the devil (61%) and in hell (59%) so.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
Fallacies Information taken from Purdue OWL, Nancy Wood’s Perspectives on Argument and Annette Rottenberg’s Elements of Argument.
Flawed Arguments COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIES.  Flaws in an argument  Often subtle  Learning to recognize these will:  Strengthen your own arguments 
 In this task you will see 16 different arguments.  You have to identify which of the 8 common fallacies is being used by the argument.
What is Knowledge?.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
Logical Fallacies A Brief Review. Argumentum ad hominem This is the error of attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Art of Critical Reading Mather ● McCarthy 1 Part 4 Reading Critically Chapter 11 Analyzing.
Eng 111 Dana Frierson Fall Types of Reasoning (Logic) n Deductive u Inferring particular “fact” from general assumptions u General to specific n.
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
American Literature Research Paper. » An effort to understand how people attempt to influence others through language and symbolic action » This includes.
What is a logical fallacy?. Logical fallacies Do you know what a “fallacy” is? Look at the word – it has “falla” in it, which could mean “fault,” “flaw,”
Logical Fallacies1 This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because pity does not serve as evidence for a claim Just to get a scholarship does not justify.
FALLACIES COMMON AND RECURRENT ERRORS IN REASONING
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
Let’s see some more examples!
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. INFORMAL.
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Logical Fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies
Look for these in the arguments of others and avoid them in your own arguments.
Standard: Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text… identify false statements and fallacious reasoning.
Look for these in the arguments of others and avoid them in your own arguments.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Effective Persuasion Avoiding Logical Fallacies. Avoid Logical Fallacies These are some common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your.
COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIES FLAWED ARGUMENTS. LOGICAL FALLACIES… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: –Strengthen your own.
Paulina Cabrera, Celina Palafox, Daniela Gomez, Cynthia Avalos.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
Persuasive Texts Understanding Argument. Definitions Argument: A set of statements where it is claimed that one statement (conclusion) is true and supported.
Lecture Notes © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education© 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education 1 Critical Thinking Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Common Logical Fallacies FLAWED ARGUMENTS SUBTLE ERRORS IN JUDGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION.
Talking points 1. Would Neil still have committed suicide if Mr. Keating had never come into his life? Who is most to blame for Neil’s death? Mr. Keating?
Unit Four Seminar. Fallacies A.What is a fallacy? 1. A fallacy is a defect in an argument that consists in something other than false premises alone.
Logical Fallacies Overview Logical fallacies are instances of “broken reasoning.” Fallacies avoid the actual argument. We want to avoid fallacies, be.
Common Logical Fallacies
Common Logical Fallacies
Logos—Logical Appeal (Logical Fallacies)
Common Logical Fallacies
Common Logical Fallacies
Topic: Logical Fallacies Objective: I will identify various logical fallacies EQ: What are the most common logical fallacies and where do they appear?
Logical Fallacies ENGL 101.
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies.
From Chapter 4 Philosophy: Questions and Theories
Logical Fallacies List
Looking for false logic in someone’s argument
Chapter 14: Argumentation
Logical Fallacy Study Guide
More on Argument.
Fallacious Reasoning a.k.a. Fallacy.
Common Logical Fallacies
Chapter 6 Reasoning Errors
Common Logical Fallacies
Common Logical Fallacies
Brain Teaser Eskimos are very good hunters, but why they don't hunt the penguins?
Common Logical Fallacies
3.1 Fallacies in General Fallacies: Making Bad Arguments Appear Good.
1. Could I receive an A for this class
Presentation transcript:

 The fallacies we will discuss tonight are largely able to be classified as fallacies of ambiguity. In other words, they occur when words are used with distinct meanings in the same argument, premises are repeated, etc.

 Begging the question is committed whenever the arguer creates the illusion that inadequate premises provide adequate support for the conclusion by leaving out a key premise, by restating the conclusion as a premise, or by reasoning in a circle.

 Equivocation occurs when the conclusion of an argument depends on the fact that a word or phrase is used, either explicitly or implicitly, in two different senses within a single argument.

 Loaded language occurs when a term or terms known to have negative or positive connotations are deliberately placed in an argument to evoke favor toward your conclusion.

 This fallacy occurs when the conclusion of an argument depends on an analogy (or similarity) that is not strong enough to support the conclusion.  From discussion: › Both marijuana and alcohol can be dangerous. So, both should be illegal.

 A rationalization fallacy is an attempt to make it appear that reason is being used when in actuality excuses are being made.

 The slippery slope fallacy occurs when the conclusion of an argument rests on an alleged chain reaction, and there is not sufficient reason to think that the chain reaction will actually occur.

 The reductio occurs when we take an opponents view and show that if followed to its logical conclusion is absurd or leads to absurd consequences.  Or, you can try to prove your point by assuming the opposite of your point and showing that it leads to absurdity: to a contradictory or silly result.

 Name that Fallacy

 “Attempts to outlaw pornography threaten basic civil rights and should be abandoned. If it is outlawed then censorship or newspapers is only a short step away.” › A. Begging the Question › B. Slippery Slope › C. Reductio › D. False Cause

 “ The amount of television that children view daily has increased over the last 25 years. During this time standardized test scores for children have dropped. Obviously, television is making our kids intellectually lazy.” › A. Hasty Generalization › B. Appeal to ignorance › C. False Cause › D. Card Stacking › E. No Fallacy

 “When a car breaks down so often that repairs become pointless, the car is thrown in the junk. Similarly, when a person becomes old and diseased, he or she should be mercifully put to death.” › A. False cause › B. Rationalization › C. Ad baculum › D. Weak analogy

 “Mike’s car is light blue, has leather upholstery, and gets great gas mileage. Bill’s car also is light blue and has leather upholstery. Therefore, it must get great gas mileage.” › A. False analogy › B. False Cause › C. Strawman › D. Circular Reasoning

 “Your honor it is true that I abused my children, but I was abused myself. It is understandable that I abused them.” › A. Ad baculum › B. Rationalization › C. Weak analogy › D. False Cause

 “Of course you should vote for Strickland! Everyone here in the department is voting for Strickland.” › A. False Cause › B. Weak analogy › C. Ad populum › D. Loaded Language › E. No fallacy

 “Have you stopped drinking excessively yet?” › A. Ad hominem › B. False Cause › C. Weak analogy › D. Loaded Language

 “Islamic fundamentalists stormed cites in India, killing and holding people hostage. The message is clear: All Muslims are religious fanatics prone to violence.” › A. Card Stacking › B. Hasty Generalization › C. Ad Ignorantium › D. Ad Nauseum › E. No Fallacy

 “The Book of Mormon is true because it was written by Joseph Smith. Smith wrote the truth because he was divinely inspired. We know he was divinely inspired because the Book of Mormon says so.” › A. Reductio › B. False Analogy › C. Begging the Question › D. False Cause

 “California condors are rapidly disappearing. This bird is a California condor. Therefore, this bird should disappear any minute now.” › A. Equivocation › B. Begging the Question › C. False Cause › D. No fallacy

 “Evangelical make up a significant voting bloc. However, this shouldn’t be tolerated. Religious extremists have no place voting in a deliberative democracy.” › A. Loaded Language › B. Weak analogy › C. False cause › D. Ad hominem

 “If we extend the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement, the governments of Central and South America will demand that we buy their goods and hire their nationals in our factories. Soon, American industry will be unable to compete. Then our national sovereignty will erode as we become progressively poorer and other countries in our hemisphere become progressively richer.” › A. Strawman › B. Rationalization › C. Weak analogy › D. Slippery Slope

 “Domestic terrorism is on the rise. Apparently those right-wing radio talk shows are starting to bear fruit.” › A. Stawman › B. Weak Analogy › C. Begging the Question › D. Equivocation