The Academic and Student Services Assessment Process at CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Note: This is an “overview” and many implementation details are not.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 23, Todays Outcomes By the end of todays workshop, participants will be able to... Revise and/or finalize SAOs within their areas Discover.
Advertisements

Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Campus Improvement Plans
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
The Nuts and Bolts to Administrative Unit Outcomes (AUOs) Franklin P. Ow, Ph.D East Los Angeles College Assistant Professor, Chemistry Learning Assessment.
- Overview- Program Review and SLOs Preparing to Write the Self-Study Why? What? How? For more SLO resources see:
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
The Academic Assessment Process
FY 2010 Leadership Performance Management Process and Form Who should take this course? All Leaders Content Expert: Jane Pettit
Assessment Assessment Planning Assessment Improvements Assessment Data Dialogue & Reflection.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Administrative.
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Academic.
© 2003 IBM Corporation July 2004 Technology planning for not-for-profit organizations IBM volunteer name Title, organization.
TITLEIIA(3) IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM 1.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Learning Outcomes Assessment in WEAVEonline
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
2004 National Oral Health Conference Strategic Planning for Oral Health Programs B.J. Tatro, MSSW, PhD B.J. Tatro Consulting Scottsdale, Arizona.
February 1, 2008Retreat on StudentLlearning and Assessment, Irvine 1 Integrating Student Learning into Program Review Barbara Wright Associate Director,
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Draft TIP for E-rate. What is E-rate? The E-rate provides discounts to assist schools and libraries in the United States to obtain affordable telecommunications.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
WRITING LEARNING OUTCOMES AND MAPPING CURRICULUM UK Office of Assessment.
1 Access to the World and Its Languages LRC Technical Assistance Workshop (Part 1) Access to the World and Its Languages I N T E R.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Evaluating Our Assessment Program Spring 2004 What is assessment? Assessment is the ongoing process of understanding and improving student learning.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
1 UST Support for Institutional Effectiveness: Information for Academic OA Plan Writers.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness
Consider Your Audience
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
League for Innovation in the Community College March 29, 2010
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Using the Transition Planning Form (28M/9)
Assessing Student Learning
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
PRESENTATION TITLE Faculty Enhancement and Instructional Development (FEID) Proposal Support Sharon Seidman, Ph.D. (HHD) and Erica Bowers, Ed.D. (Director,
Fort Valley State University
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

The Academic and Student Services Assessment Process at CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Note: This is an “overview” and many implementation details are not included What is assessment and why should I even care? Neal F. McBride, Ed.D., Ph.D. Professor and Associate Provost Phil Martinez, M.A. Director of Assessment Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment

? What is assessment within higher education (and here at CBU)

3 What is Assessment? Put simply, assessment is collecting evidence (data) to ascertain to what degree an academic or student life department is meeting its stated student learning and institutional capacity (administrative) outcomes. The collected evidence provides the basis for deciding on what improvements, if any, are warranted.

4 WHY DO ASSESSMENT? Assessment is an important tool in helping us to: 1. BETTER SERVE OUR STUDENTS BY PURSUING ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE 2. OBTAIN RELIABLE INFORMATION FOR MAKING DECISIONS (Budget, Personnel, Curriculum, etc.) 3. MEET CONSITUENCY AND ACCREDITATION EXPECTATIONS Why I Should Care

5 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS HOW DO WE KNOW WE ARE DOING WHAT WE SAY WE ARE DOING? CLAIM: “We offer quality education.” How do we know this claim is true? HOW DO WE KNOW WE ARE DOING WHAT WE SAY WE ARE DOING? CLAIM: “We offer quality education.” How do we know this claim is true? Educational effectiveness is the common goal for all CBU colleges, schools, departments, and programs Demonstrating educational effectiveness is the goal for assessment... collecting EVIDENCE THE BASIC, KEY QUESTION:

6 ASSESSMENT IS INTEGRAL TO HIGHER EDUCATION FACT: We have always done course-level student assessment, now we apply assessment processes to academic and student services programs in order to pursue educational effectiveness throughout CBU Assessment is NOT optional... It is a professional obligation Assessment is not a passing fad... Holding your breath until it goes away won’t work

7 Assessment or Evaluation? Evaluation – The next logical step after assessment, evaluation seeks to make judgments and decisions, based on the assessment data, about the appropriate course of action (i.e., continue on as is, make indicated adjustments, add a needed element, and/or terminate all or part of the program/service) Functionally, evaluation is done as an integral step within assessment conducting by individual programs and/or departments, as well as by their respective schools, colleges, or student services leadership Evaluation – The next logical step after assessment, evaluation seeks to make judgments and decisions, based on the assessment data, about the appropriate course of action (i.e., continue on as is, make indicated adjustments, add a needed element, and/or terminate all or part of the program/service) Functionally, evaluation is done as an integral step within assessment conducting by individual programs and/or departments, as well as by their respective schools, colleges, or student services leadership

8 A Side Comment About Terms GOAL OBJECTIVE AIM GOAL OBJECTIVE AIM ALL EQUAL “OUTCOME” A statement expressing intent We use “outcome” as a generic replacement for the other terms

9 Who is Responsible for Assessment? ► The appropriate VP and/or School/College Dean ► Assessment Coordinators in each school, college, or student services ► Department Chair or Program Director ► All faculty and student services staff Assessment is a shared responsibility No one person can do it alone! Successful assessment demands a team effort

10 Doing assessment to collect data (evidence) on educational effectiveness is not a one-time event or an isolated process, but is an on-going, continuous expectation Please Keep in Mind: Assessment is a yearly activity that provides data for Program Review, which is a periodic event

11 The Assessment Process at CBU Step 1 - MISSION  Mission Statement Step 2 - OUTCOMES  Student Learning  Capacity Outcomes (Optional) Step 3 - OVERALL PLAN  Overall Plan 201X-201X Assessment Cycle  Annual Plan  Yearly Report THE BASIC SYSTEM OR “SKELETON”

12 FIRST, LET’S LOOK AT THE OVERALL ASSESSMENT PROCESS DEPICTED IN A FLOW DIAGRAM FIRST, LET’S LOOK AT THE OVERALL ASSESSMENT PROCESS DEPICTED IN A FLOW DIAGRAM

13 The Basic Assessment Process CBU Mission and Priorities and University Student Outcomes (Core 4) CBU Mission and Priorities and University Student Outcomes (Core 4) Student Learning Outcomes (including faith Integration) and Optional Institutional Capacity Outcomes “Mapping” Student Learning Outcomes (including faith Integration) and Optional Institutional Capacity Outcomes “Mapping” WRITE Given the College, School, Department and/or program Mission College, School, Department and/or program Mission WRITE Continued...

14 The Basic Assessment Process Student Learning Outcomes (including faith integration) Optional Institutional Capacity Outcomes Maps Student Learning Outcomes (including faith integration) Optional Institutional Capacity Outcomes Maps WRITE Given the “OPlan” Overall Assessment Plan “OPlan” Overall Assessment Plan WRITE CONTINUED “APlan” Annual Assessment Plan “APlan” Annual Assessment Plan Continued...

15 The Basic Assessment Process THEN WRITE CONTINUED Yearly Assessment Report Yearly Assessment Report DO ASSESSMENT Implement the Annual Assessment Plan; collect data (evidence); analyze the data; make decisions (evaluate); and make any needed changes/adjustments, etc. DO ASSESSMENT Implement the Annual Assessment Plan; collect data (evidence); analyze the data; make decisions (evaluate); and make any needed changes/adjustments, etc. Continued...

16 The Basic Assessment Process CONTINUED WRITE As Needed CBU Program Reviews or WASC Self Studies or Professional Accreditation Reports or Grant Requests Etc. CBU Program Reviews or WASC Self Studies or Professional Accreditation Reports or Grant Requests Etc. Yearly Assessment Reports Yearly Assessment Reports Given the What do you do with the evidence (data)?

17 NOW THAT YOU CAN PICTURE THE WHOLE PROCESS, LET’S QUICKLY CONSIDER EACH ELEMENT IN THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS NOW THAT YOU CAN PICTURE THE WHOLE PROCESS, LET’S QUICKLY CONSIDER EACH ELEMENT IN THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS

18 Mission Statement An adequate mission statement clearly identifies 1) what your program is, 2) what your program does (why you exist), 3) how you do it, and 4) who your program serves (not necessarily in that order)... it is not a idealistic “vision” statement, which delineates what you want to accomplish or become in the future Usually accomplished once; updated from time to time based on assessment data. The program mission must support the CBU mission, priorities, and University Student Outcomes An adequate mission statement clearly identifies 1) what your program is, 2) what your program does (why you exist), 3) how you do it, and 4) who your program serves (not necessarily in that order)... it is not a idealistic “vision” statement, which delineates what you want to accomplish or become in the future Usually accomplished once; updated from time to time based on assessment data. The program mission must support the CBU mission, priorities, and University Student Outcomes

19 1.Write student learning (including faith integration) outcomes 2.Write institutional capacity outcomes (optional) 3.Outcomes-goals are mapped 1.Write student learning (including faith integration) outcomes 2.Write institutional capacity outcomes (optional) 3.Outcomes-goals are mapped Each program may develop as many outcome statements as deemed necessary, but be realistic and pragmatic. What can you really accomplish? OUTCOMES Step Two involves three activities: OUTCOMES Outcomes are used in formulating your program’s Overall Assessment Plan (OPlan) and subsequent Yearly Assessment Plans (APlan)

20 Academic assessment plans include student learning outcomes (including faith integration) and optional institutional capacity outcomes Student Services assessment plans include mainly institutional capacity outcomes (administrative goals), but in some cases also include student learning outcomes OUTCOMESOUTCOMES

21 Overall Assessment Plan - “OPlan” The assessment “Big Picture” or “catalog” listing basic information about the program’s outcomes and related general assessment information As descriptive as necessary to identify the various elements in the overall plan, but exacting specificity is not necessary because such information is reserved for the yearly assessment plan

22 Overall Assessment Plan - “OPlan” The Program’s Overall Assessment Plan identifies: ►Where each outcome is addressed— specific courses, services, internships, service projects, work experiences, independent studies, etc. (based on the previously completed “map”) ►Proposed assessment methods (the ideal is 2 methods per outcome) ►Criteria for each assessment method— the desired, intended performance standard, the level of acceptable performance or accomplishment ►Assessment frequency— how often assessed; yearly, every other year, etc.

23 Measuring Educational Effectiveness Assessment methods must be appropriate to the academic discipline and level or student service area; select and use either or both quantitative or qualitative strategies for measuring stated outcomes There are many different assessment strategies and methods. Select at least one option for each outcome you intend to measure

24 Some Assessment Every Year The goal is to accomplish some assessment each year... accumulating evidence over time, building a weight of evidence. It is not necessary or possible to assess everything every year Assessment must be realistic and manageable So, find what works and do a little each year

25 Annual Assessment Plan - “APlan” Identify two or three (number can vary) student learning outcomes and perhaps optional institutional capacity outcomes to assess during the up-coming year Identify two or three (number can vary) student learning outcomes and perhaps optional institutional capacity outcomes to assess during the up-coming year Focusing on just a few outcomes each year adds up over time and results in all the outcomes being assessed two or three times within a ten-year period Focusing on just a few outcomes each year adds up over time and results in all the outcomes being assessed two or three times within a ten-year period Annual Assessment Plans are developed each year– for the subsequent fiscal year– after the Yearly Assessment Report is completed Annual Assessment Plans are developed each year– for the subsequent fiscal year– after the Yearly Assessment Report is completed In some limited cases, particular outcomes may require assessment each year In some limited cases, particular outcomes may require assessment each year

26 Annual Assessment Plan - “APlan” 1)WHAT assessment method(s)—identify the exact assessment method(s) to be used 2)WHEN the assessment takes place—date(s), time(s) 3)HOW the assessment method is accomplished—the specific steps or procedures, including any necessary materials 4)WHO is responsible to complete the assessment—person or persons who are tasked with actually implementing the assessment process and collecting the assessment data Identify four elements for each selected student learning or optional institutional capacity outcome:

27 During the school year or at other designated times, Time for action... During the school year or at other designated times, collect the desired assessment data (evidence) Follow your Annual Assessment Plan (APlan), but make whatever adjustments are needed along the way to insure collecting the data you need DO ASSESSMENT

28 Doing Assessment This is the “so what” process within assessment It is necessary to take action based on the resulting assessment information Once the desired data (evidence) is collected and analyzed, make decisions (evaluate) supported by data, which lead to making adjustments or changes in the program, curriculum, processes, etc.

29 Yearly Assessment Report Every year after the annual assessment cycle is completed, it is time to file a short report, via LiveText, outlining the results and any actions taken or planned as a result of the assessment data Assessment reports are due July 31, annually, and are based on the preceding fiscal year— July 1 to June 30, including summer sessions Once the report is submitted, it is time to develop next year’s Annual Assessment Plan

30 Yearly Assessment Report (1)List the specific outcome (2)Briefly describe the assessment method(s) used (3)Summarize the evidence collected—what you found out (4)Describe the actions taken or planned based on the assessment evidence (5)(Optional) Cite any lessons learned For each student learning and institutional capacity outcome assessed during the past fiscal year, the assessment report must contain four or five sections:

31  State your program’s mission  Write student learning (including faith integration) and institutional capacity outcomes; “map” your outcomes  Explore and select assessment methods  Develop an overall assessment plan (OPlan)  Each year write an annual implementation plan (APlan)  Do assessment  Collect and analyze data (evidence)  Use data to make identified adjustment, improvements, etc.  Each year report assessment actions and results (Yearly Report)  Implement improvements Summary: BASIC Steps in Assessment

32 LiveText is the administrative software Used to Facilitate the CBU Assessment Process LiveText is the administrative software Used to Facilitate the CBU Assessment Process LiveText is Web-based portfolio software All academic programs and student service departments are required to maintain a assessment portfolio in LiveText The program’s assessment portfolio requires specific assessment documents (OPlan, APlans, etc.), but faculty/staff enjoy wide latitude in writing appropriate outcomes and selecting assessment methods LiveText is Web-based portfolio software All academic programs and student service departments are required to maintain a assessment portfolio in LiveText The program’s assessment portfolio requires specific assessment documents (OPlan, APlans, etc.), but faculty/staff enjoy wide latitude in writing appropriate outcomes and selecting assessment methods

33 Using Assessment Results At the appropriate times, use the collected assessment information to write...  Yearly Assessment Reports  CBU Program Reviews  WASC Self-Study Reports  Professional Accreditation Reports  Other documents requiring assessment data (e.g., grant applications) REMEMBER: Must act upon the assessment data Must act upon the assessment data Assessment is on-going and never ends Assessment is on-going and never ends

34 Office of Institutional Research Planning, and Assessment (OIRPA) ► The OIRPA exists to help academic and student life departments succeed in their assessment activities ► The OIRPA does not do evaluation, but assists programs, as needed, to collect evidence (data) so they can evaluate their own programs ►The OIRPA does not stipulate a program’s outcomes or assessment methods, this is a programmatic prerogative ► The OIRPA depends on the programs’ assessment activities as a basis for making statements about assessment at CBU as a whole ► The OIRPA exists to help academic and student life departments succeed in their assessment activities ► The OIRPA does not do evaluation, but assists programs, as needed, to collect evidence (data) so they can evaluate their own programs ►The OIRPA does not stipulate a program’s outcomes or assessment methods, this is a programmatic prerogative ► The OIRPA depends on the programs’ assessment activities as a basis for making statements about assessment at CBU as a whole

35 Assessment Assistance Who to go to for help: Tools provided to help you: 1. The Assessment Coordinator in your School or College or Student Services 2. OIRPA Assessment training Assessment training Assessment “how-to” manuals Assessment “how-to” manuals Public Folders documents Public Folders documents LiveText software and training LiveText software and training Etc. Etc.

36 Office of Institutional Research Planning, and Assessment (OIRPA) Personnel working with assessment:  Dr. Neal McBride, Associate Provost  Phil Martinez, Director of Assessment  Office Location: James 103  Telephone: Our job is to help YOU succeed in doing assessment

37 Programss with professional accreditation find that 80-95% of the assessment activities necessary for their professional accreditation are also satisfactory for CBU and WASC assessment expectations, with only minor editing required when reporting in LiveText

38 The Assessment Process