THIS PRESENTATION IS INTENDED AS ONE COMPLETE PRESENTATION. HOWEVER, IT IS DIVIDED INTO 3 PARTS IN ORDER TO FACILITATE EASIER DOWNLOADING AND VIEWING,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REGIONAL CONFERENCES Planning, Doing, and Using Evaluation.
Advertisements

REGIONAL CONFERENCES Planning, Doing, and Using Evaluation.
1 Drafting a Standard n Establish the requirements n Agree the process n Draft the Standard n Test the Standard n Implement the Standard.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Developing the Learning Contract
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Campus Improvement Plans
Designing an Effective Evaluation Strategy
Does It Work? Evaluating Your Program
Chapter 2 Flashcards.
Developing a Logic Model
Dennis McBride, Ph.D. The Washington Institute (253) Goal Driven Logic Models.
Evaluation research Using research methods in combinations Policy analysis.
Decision-Making and Strategic Information Workshop on M&E of PHN Programs July 24-August 11, 2006 Addis Ababa.
The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
How to Write Goals and Objectives
Developing Earmark Grant Performance Measures: Grant Proposal Section 3 Deanna Khemani.
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
DPW BD&C Employee Performance Evaluation Guideline Discussion
Evaluation: A Necessity for the Profession, an Essential Support for Practitioners Linking Intervention with Outcome Bryan Hiebert University of Victoria.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
Sociology 3322a. “…the systematic assessment of the operation and/or outcomes of a program or policy, compared to a set of explicit or implicit standards.
STANDARDS FOR THE PRACTICE RECREATIONAL THERAPY (ATRA, REVISED 2013) HPR 453.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
CrossRoads Association and Princess Royal Trust for Carers Applied Policy and Practice Research Unit.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
TYPES OF EVALUATION Types of evaluations ask different questions and focus on different purposes. This list is meant to be illustrative rather than exhaustive.
OVERVIEW Partners in Pregnancy is a community program aimed at giving young couples the resources they need with their pregnancy. Young pregnant couples.
1 of 27 How to invest in Information for Development An Introduction Introduction This question is the focus of our examination of the information management.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
This is a continuation of part 2 and is extremely important.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
1 A QTS Web Training Writing Consumer Education & Referral Outcomes.
Using Logic Models to Create Effective Programs
Health Management Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi, DrPH Community Medicine Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan First Semester 2015 / 2016.
Data Driven Planning and Decision-making for Continuous School Improvement: Developing a Program Evaluation Plan Leadership for Innovative Omani Schools.
LABORATORY MANAGEMENT Lecture 4. Planning at the Departmental Level The laboratory director must determine both laboratory goals and objectives, as well.
CHAPTER 16 Preparing Effective Proposals. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS  Conducting a Preliminary Assessment  Prior to Writing the Proposal  How Fundable.
Basic Concepts of Outcome-Informed Practice (OIP).
Planning and Organizing Chapter 13. The Planning Function Planning for a business should stem from the company’s Business Plan – The business plan sets.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
So You Think You’ve Made a Change? Developing Indicators and Selecting Measurement Tools Chad Higgins, Ph.D. Allison Nichols, Ed.D.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
HSC Provide information about health and social care or children and young people’s services EDUC8TIONS LTD.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Incorporating Evaluation into a Clinical Project
Technical Business Consultancy Project
Training processes for extension education
Nursing Process Applied to Community Health Nursing
Right-sized Evaluation
Introduction to Program Evaluation
SUCCESSFUL MEASURING JAMES HARDIN, DIRECTOR, HEALTH IMPACT
Program Planning and Evaluation Essentials
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Roles, Goals & Performance Expectations
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Teams What is a team? Maintaining Focus
FUNCTION OF MANAGEMENT
BOOTCAMP SOCIAL INNOVATION ACCELERATOR TO CREATE LASTING CHANGE
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Presentation transcript:

THIS PRESENTATION IS INTENDED AS ONE COMPLETE PRESENTATION. HOWEVER, IT IS DIVIDED INTO 3 PARTS IN ORDER TO FACILITATE EASIER DOWNLOADING AND VIEWING, THEY ARE LABELED WEEK ONE PART 1, WEEK ONE PART 2 AND WEEK ONE PART3

Why should I learn about P.E. You will either have to do one or You will participate in one Most people in your agency will not know what a good P.E. looks like Somebody needs to know how to find out if a program is ACTUALLY working Knowing how to conduct a PE will help you know what a good program looks like Many of you will be supervisors of programs It will help you know what to look for in order to improve your program It is a valuable skill that can lead to advancement It is the next level of knowing whether your clients are getting better and if the improvement is due to the program Funding is often dependent on demonstrating program effectiveness

What is program evaluation? Systematic collection of information about the activities characteristics, and outcomes of programs, for use by specific people to reduce uncertainties, improve effectiveness and/or efficiency, and make decisions with regard to what those programs are doing and affecting. Most evaluations are aimed at assessing the program goal attainment!!!!! How effective (does the program work?) or how efficient (how does the program work?) is the program in meeting measurable goals and/or objectives?

A PROPOSAL FOR A PROGRAM EVALUATION ADDRESSES ALL OF THESE: 1. IS THERE A PROGRAM? HOW DO YOU KNOW? WHAT IS IT? 2. THE PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION SHOULD BE CLEAR AND CLEARLY STATED!!!!!!!!! THIS MEANS STATING BEFOREHAND ‘HOW IT WILL BE USED, WHO THE STAKEHOLDERS ARE AND WHAT THE STAKEHOLDERS WANT TO KNOW!!!! THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS 3, IS IT ACTUALLY FEASIBLE TO DO AN EVALUATION NOW? 4, CONCRETE EVALUATIVE CRITERIA SHOULD BE AGREED UPON AND ESTABLISHED BEFORE THE EVALUATION IS CONDUCTED!!!!!!!! THAT IS, YOU SHOULD KNOW BEFORE YOU UNDERTAKE THE EVALUATION, WHAT SPECIFIC THINGS YOU ARE GOING TO EVALUATE AND HOW THESE ‘THINGS’ TO BE EVALUATED RELATE TO THE PROGRAM. YOU MUST HAVE SOURCES OF DATA. YOU MUST KNOW WHERE THE DATA YOU USE TO EVALUATE THE PROGRAM IS LOCATED OR HOW IT CAN BE CREATED! 5. THE MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES AND INSTRUMENTS SHOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO THE GOALS AND EVALUATIVE CRITERIA. 6. ARE THERE THINGS THE STAKEHOLDERS SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN EVALUATION BEFORE IT IS CARRIED OUT. SOMETIMES IT BECOMES CLEAR THAT CARRYING OUT AN EVALUATION AT THE CURRENT TIME WOULD PROVE DISASTROUS!!!

But first you must know if there is an actual program. QUESTION ONE: WHAT IS THE PROGRAM TO BE EVALUATED What is a program? PROGRAMS ARE DESIGNED TO ADDRESS SPECIFIC PROBLEMS FOR A PARTICULAR POPULATION. EXAMPLES a program for pregnant teens whose purpose is to help them a. be responsible parents and b. keep them in school. a program to reduce pregnancy in high school a program designed to reduce truancy in highschool a program designed to help people on welfare get viable employment a program designed to increase independent living skills in people with chronic and severe psychiatric diagnoses. a program designed to place and maintain people with chronic and severe diagnoses in independent living quarters a summer day program designed to reduce hospitalization in adolescents who are at risk for psychiatric hospitalization or jail, during the summer, when school is out. Notice how each program identifies 1. the problem. 2. the population to be served. And 3. its focused purpose!

What is a program It is not an agency, an organization or services. A program is a sub-system of an agency or a self-contained system that has staff, clients, services, data/records, a budget and resources which are designed to achieve specific objectives, or the goal(s) of an organization; or specific objectives derived from a mission statement. Programs are usually sub-units of organizations, agencies or departments. Some program are large and have several self-contained COMPONENTS. FOR THE PURPOSE OF YOUR ASSIGNMENT, YOU NEED TO BE EVALUATING EITHER A SIMPLE PROGRAM OR A PROGRAM COMPONENT They should address a specific problem or problems, have clearly defined 1. purpose, 2. objectives, 3. services, 4. activities-which are components of the services and 5. sources of data that can be used for analysis. Data sources should be usable in order to measure whether or not a program is meeting its objectives. Objectives should be 1. clear, 2. specific and 3. measurable. Data should be either available or obtainable in order to measure objectives!!!

Every program should have 1. A purpose= a way to solve a need 2. A way to accomplish it 3. A way of knowing if this was done 1.A purpose = mission -> goals -> objectives -> program -> results (outcomes) (notice how these flow logically from one to the next) 2. A means of LOGICALLY achieving the above = resources (inputs) -> plan/strategies -> activities-> finishes (outputs) -> results (notice the logical structure here as well) 3. In the form of measuring meaningful outcomes and impact

You will find many programs that have major flaws in their logical structure. Three common one are: mission -> goals -> objectives -> program -> results (outcomes) resources (inputs) -> plan/strategies -> activities-> finishes (outputs) -> results measurement of meaningful outcomes and impact No specific measurable objectives Activities don’t Match purpose No real measurement of outcomes

You will probably run into one or more of those three in your program eval. When you do, you must really address it!!!!

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SERVICES AND PROGRAMS Services What helping professionals offer (along with goods) in order to alleviate or eliminate a problem of an individual client or client system. Services may consist of various types of intervention including treatment, refer­ral, case management, family assessment, and so on. Services are offered by one or more professionals, and are only one component of a program. Programs Subunits of organizations constructed in a unique manner to address a social problem. Programs are more or less self-contained and have their own goals(THAT MAY BE A PART OF THE ORGAINZIATION BUT THAT THE PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO ADDRESS), objectives, policies, rules, procedures, services, strategies, activities, interventions, staff, budget, space, resources, and so on Programs may be time-limited or a relatively permanent part of an organization. Programs should be consistent with the organization’s mission, objectives and vision statements.

******The most important program components for a successful evaluation are: 1. specific problem or problems to be addressed 2. specific and measurable objectives specific and observable activities, interventions and/or services. 3. available, obtainable or creatable sources of data and data.

Example of a major problem in program evaluation: the program’s activities are not designed to meet the objectives! One of the major issues in evaluating a program is whether or not the activities, services and interventions are congruent with or help achieve the purpose and objectives of the program. This is sometimes NOT the case. For example, there is a day program for people with ‘chronic and severe psychiatric diagnoses. The purpose is to increase independent living. Three of the major objectives are to increase self-sufficiency in the daily living skills of 1. shopping, 2. money management and 3. home care. However, the activities that are observable and documentable are these: 1. Daily exercise walks. 2. jig saw puzzle working. 3. a group in which problems of daily living are discussed. It should be clear that the only activity that is directed toward the objectives is the group!!!!! UNLESS!!!!

1.THERE IS EVIDENCE IN THE LITERATURE ON SUCH PROGRAMS THAT EXERCISE WALKS AND JIG-SAW PUZZLE WORKING THAT SHOW THAT THEY HELP TO CREATE INDEPENDENT LIVING SKILLS!!! 2.Before you can do a program evaluation, you must FIRST RESEARCH WHAT HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED TO WORK AS A SOLUTION FOR THE SPECIFIC PROBLEM (ONCE YOU KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM THAT THE PROGRAM IS ADDRESSING)! 3.This means you must review the literature on the problem in order to determine what has proven to be effective!!!! 4.You must do a literature review for the problem 5. A literature review is a systematic search of journals and books that may contain information on a specific problem and “evidence-based” solutions to it.