Big Heads July 10, 2009 Next Generation Technical Services Rethinking Library Technical Services for the University of California.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Steering Around the Iceberg: Economic Sustainability for Digital Collections Brian Lavoie Research Scientist OCLC Economics.
Advertisements

Martha Hruska LAUC Spring Assembly May 13, 2009 Next Generation Technical Services Rethinking Library Technical Services for the University of California.
New Service Models. Why? Simply put: we cant do all you tell us you want and need Service and collection models that defined excellence in academic libraries.
University of California Libraries N EXT -G ENERATION T ECHNICAL S ERVICES Martha Hruska, Chair, NGTS Management Team Emily Lin, NGTS Communications Manager.
The U N I V E R S I T Y of C A L I F O R N I A L I B R A R I E S Next Generation Melvyl at the University of California Patricia Martin LAUC Assembly May.
Strategic Action Group 3: Scholarly Research & Communication (SAG3) Orientation Webinar June 24, 2013 University of California Libraries Systemwide Advisory.
NEXT-GEN AND MULTI- INSTITUTIONAL TECHNICAL SERVICES ARL Membership Meeting Brian E. C. Schottlaender The Audrey Geisel University Librarian 21 May 2009.
Collaborative Technical Services Team Report GUGM May 15, 2014 Cathy Jeffrey.
2 The Boston campus stands on the site of the first World Series, held in Tickets were $.50 About Northeastern.
Amanda Felix BUS 550 Tuesday, May 24,  Traditional methods are not enough!  Reduce costs, improve efficiency and spur innovation!  Information.
The University of California Next-Generation Technical Services Initiative Brian E. C. Schottlaender The Audrey Geisel University Librarian, UC San Diego.
The Subject Librarian's Role in Building Digital Collections: Where Information Management and Subject Expertise Meet Ruth Vondracek Oregon State University.
Data Sources & Using VIVO Data Visualizing Scholarship VIVO provides network analysis and visualization tools to maximize the benefits afforded by the.
Redesigning Technical Services By Reconceptualizing Staff University of Connecticut Libraries Francine M. DeFranco Living the Future VI April 7, 2006.
E-journal Publishing Strategies at Pitt Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
The National Digital Newspaper Program (NDNP) An NEH/LC Collaborative Program Enhancing access to historical newspapers Release: September 2006.
New ILS Directions: Open Source Options and Consortial Implementaion The Orbis Cascade Alliance Implementation of Ex Libris’ Alma and Primo Susan Hinken,
Delivering an Architecture for the Social Enterprise Alpesh Doshi, Fintricity Information Age Social&Mobile Business Conference Tuesday 31st January 2012.
Mid-Michigan Digital Practitioners, March 14, 2014 The National Digital Stewardship Alliance Agenda Mid-Michigan Digital Practitioners Meeting Abigail.
Ask A Librarian and QuestionPoint: Integrating Collaborative Digital Reference in the Real World (and in a really big library) Linda J. White Digital Project.
SIMCorBSIMCorB 1 Outreach Projects n SIMCorB Web site (8.3.1) n Strategic partnerships with other organizations (8.3.2) n Promote awareness of scientific.
Debby Andreadis, Chris Barth, Scottie Cochrane Collaborative Technical Services Work Redesign.
Open Access Symposium 2015 Open Access, the Law, and Public Information Mary Alice Baish UNT Dallas College of Law May 19, 2015 National Plan for Access.
Peter Zhou UC Berkeley Council on East Asian Libraries Annual Meeting Toronto, March 14, 2012 Exploring New Horizons and Boundaries:
21 st -Century Technical Services: The UNLV Libraries Experience Brad Eden, Ph.D. Head, Bibliographic and Metadata Services University of Nevada, Las.
1 On the Record Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control Diane Boehr Head of Cataloging, NLM
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Helen Heinrich, California State University, Northridge Chair, Technical Services, Oviatt Library.
Preserving Digital Collections for Future Scholarship Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University
Digital Preservation: Lessons learned through national action Digital Preservation Interoperability Framework Workshop April 2010.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Next Generation Technical Services Rethinking Library Technical Services for the University of California R Bruce Miller.
Delivering business value through Context Driven Content Management Karsten Fogh Ho-Lanng, CTO.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
The NextGen LAUC Member and the Reports from the LAUC Committee on Professional Governance LAUC-LA Brown Bag Discussion  December 16, 2011  Humanities.
1 Digital Archives - Past, Present & Future Issues Anne Van Camp Manager, Member Initiatives The Research Libraries Group Digital Archives Directions (DADs)
Library needs and workflows Diane Boehr Head of Cataloging National Library of Medicine, NIH, DHHS
In, Out, and Beyond: Integrating Special Collections at UCLA Library Tom Hyry UCLA Library Special Collections Living the Future Conference April 23, 2012.
Resourcing the Mission: The New Internal Financial Model.
RLG Programs Curating the Collective Collection Ricky Erway RLG Programs OCLC Programs and Research Western Digital Forum 9 August 2007.
ORGANIZATIONS AT THE MARGINS: PROSPECTS AND NEW DIRECTIONS Deanna B. Marcum July 20, 2002.
Maturing Digital Object Management Practices at GVSU Julian Jenson.
December 1, 2010 Steering Committee Meeting Produced by Re-Imagining Services Task Force.
2CUL: EMERGING MODEL OF DEEP COLLABORATION? Anne R. Kenney ASERL Fall 2010 Membership Meeting.
11 ALCTS RDA Forum American Library Association Annual Conference Anaheim, California, June 23, 2012 U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee Update Beacher.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
Enterprise Content Management: Building a Collaborative Framework 32 nd Meeting of the Section of International Organizations, International Council on.
OIT Reorganization August 27, Today’s Agenda Principles of Reorganization Survey Feedback Organization Chart Leadership Team Structure Items to.
Digital Accountability: The Line Between Producing and Preserving Digital Government Information Mary Alice Baish Superintendent of Documents Indiana State.
Funded by: © AHDS Preservation in Institutional Repositories Preliminary conclusions of the SHERPA DP project Gareth Knight Digital Preservation Officer.
The New Library Technical Services Cornell University Library Karen Calhoun Bill Kara Liisa Mobley May 25, 2005.
Orientation Webinar July 10, 2013 University of California Libraries Systemwide Advisory Structure.
NDSR Boston webinar: Digital Preservation Introduction Presenter: Nancy Y McGovern October 2015.
Envisioning Culture Shift: Building a Strategic Framework for Service Oriented Cataloging Jennifer O’Brien Roper Head, Cataloging and Metadata Services.
Collaborative Technical Services Work Redesign at Denison University & Kenyon College Debby Andreadis, Christopher Barth, Scottie Cochrane
JISC/CNI Conference Edinburgh, 26th June 2002 Challenges of Digital Preservation – do we have a road map? Maggie Jones.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
15.05 – From Strategy to Solutions: discovering and accessing monographs. Neil Grindley is responsible for areas of work at JISC that address how.
Future Directions for Scholarly Publishing at the University of California Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of.
Library Efforts and IT Infrastructure Services Paul Conway & Mike Pickett Duke University
Digital Project Management Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian Indiana University Digital Library Program.
In the Framework of: Financed by: Developed by: Business Planning for Water Associations Prepared by Water Supply and Sewerage Association of Albania SHUKALB.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
Digital Library Development: Springboard to State-Wide Access Barbara I. Dewey Dean of Libraries University of Tennessee.
Reorganization at the University of Tennessee, (and beyond) ASERL Webinar April 6, 2010 Barbara I. Dewey.
Redefining the Library’s Role through an Institutional Repository Sharon Mader, Dean Jeanne Pavy, Scholarly Communications Librarian Earl K. Long Library.
Rebecca L. Mugridge LFO Research Colloquium March 19, 2008.
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
Presentation transcript:

Big Heads July 10, 2009 Next Generation Technical Services Rethinking Library Technical Services for the University of California

Next Gen Tech Services (NGTS) Context Bibliographic Services Task Force Report 2005: next steps Catalysts for Change Community Thinking NGTS Initiative Guiding Principles Values Objectives Goals Information Types NGTS Organization TimeFrame

BSTF Report 2005 “Within Library workflows and systems too much effort is going into maintaining and integrating a fragmented infrastructure. We need to look seriously at opportunities to centralize and/or better coordinate services and data, while maintaining appropriate local control, as a way of reducing effort and complexity and of redirecting resources to focus on improving the user experience.”

BSTF Report: Next Steps Rearchitect cataloging workflow Select the appropriate metadata scheme Manually enrich metadata in important areas Automate Metadata Creation Supporting Continuous Improvement

Catalysts for Change: Beyond Cataloging and Bibliographic Services LC Final Report of the Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control Next-Generation Melvyl Requires harmonization of UC cataloging policies and process revisions for effective implementation Requires cooperative approaches to acquisitions practices Requires new ways of working with vendors (book and subscription agents) Mass Digitization Hathi Trust Web Archiving Expose Hidden Collections Manage the life –cycle of born-digital and other emerging formats UC-wide and campus financial pressures

Community Thinking “A White Paper on the Future of Cataloging at Indiana University” (January 2006) “ Better technological support for the cataloging process will assist catalogers in removing redundancies among and within institutions, allowing cataloging professionals to spend more time performing expert tasks.” “The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools” a.k.a. “The Calhoun Report” prepared for LC (March 2006) “… implementation issues associated with … innovation and cost reduction … include some technical but mostly organizational hurdles. To succeed … research libraries will need to master organizational change management and achieve unprecedented levels of collaboration with peers and external partners.

Community Thinking “On the Record: Report of The Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control” (January 2008) final.pdf “Although cataloging will and must continue to play a key role in bibliographic control, today there are many other sources of data that can and must be used to organize and provide access to the information universe. To take advantage of these sources, it is necessary to view bibliographic control as a distributed activity, not a centralized one.” “No Brief Candle” (August 2008) “ The current model of the library as a stand-alone service provider to the university is obsolescent.” “The Extended Library Enterprise: Collaborative Technical Services & Shared Staffing” (February 2009) action/collaborative_ts/extended_library_enterprise_final.pdf “It is almost impossible to overstate the cultural shift that must occur for any of these ideas to really work.”

UC NGTS Rationale Scale and Web-scale The Meltdown: Funding Space User Expectations Expose full range of UC Collections

NGTS: Charge Develop a framework for the next three to five years for Next Generation Technical Services for the UC Libraries. The Steering Team will: address the broad transformative changes that will move technical services to the network level and that will reap the benefits of collaborative technical services identify areas of coordination and collaboration among the UC Libraries technical services operations quickly implement identified “low ‐ hanging fruit” changes

NGTS Scope: Guiding Principles Infrastructure to support Next Gen UC collections Broad access to and easier discovery of collections Culture of continuous improvement of services applied to scholarly content Organize system-wide technical services Develop standards of practice to achieve efficiencies and include a broader scope of content

NGTS Values Speed processing System-wide Technical Services, single enterprise Start with existing metadata that is “good enough” from all available sources Continuous improvements to “good enough” from beyond UC Libraries: expert communities, vendors, other libraries Eliminate redundant work UC Collections easily found and used Focus cataloging and other metadata description efforts on unique resources

OBJECTIVES “… from shared cataloging to integrated cataloging : a vision in which the system adopts a single set of standards and policies, eliminates duplication of effort and local variation in practice, and leverages access to language and subject expertise in order to create a single copy of a bibliographic record for use by the entire system.” “… seek to articulate similarly broad visions that will engage and challenge the expertise of all of our libraries’ staffs in acquisitions, cataloging, metadata, digitization, and preservation.”

Goals Redefine, break down the silos of TS functions Collaborative approval plans Collaborative outsourcing and other vendor services Improved tools for system-wide acquisitions & cataloging Technical Services at the network level Less redundant work  Campuses focus on local priorities More collections managed with less total FTE

User Environment Library and Network Resources Collection Management Environment Commonly Held (Roman Scripts) Commonly Held (Non- Roman Scripts) UC Unique Collections 21 st Century Resources MetadataContentGet itManage itSelect itFind it

NGTS Organization Executive Team Steering Team Cross-functional teams for each information resource type

Time Frame Team reports due Oct – May 2010 Implementation 2010+

Follow developments at the web site: Questions/Comments