ORKA Preservation Task Force ORKA Preservation Task Force first meeting Wednesday, February 8, 2012 1 Notes by Peter H. Garbincius Notes from meeting are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Positron Source Update Jim Clarke Deepa Angal-Kalinin James Jones Norbert Collomb At Daresbury Laboratory and Cockroft Institute 21/07/2009.
Advertisements

DoE Review June 6-7, 2000 Current Detector Configuration June 6, 2000  Solenoid, Central Preshower installed in central bore  A-layer MDTs installed.
CDF → ORKA: Preliminary Cost and Schedule Estimates Jonathan Lewis ORKA Task Force 2 March pm Jonathan Lewis ORKA Meeting 2 March 2012date corrected.
F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha March 17, 2011.
NUMI NuMI Hot Handling Jim Hylen (FNAL) NBI02 March 13, 2002 Page 1 NuMI Target Hall Radioactive Component Handling NuMI Target Hall Utilizes Three Basic.
October 22, 2003H.J. Krebs1 LST Mechanical Design Review Mechanical Installation Preparation H. James Krebs October 21, 2003.
October 22, 2003H.J. Krebs1 LST Mechanical Design Review 2004 IR-2 Installation Schedule H.J. Krebs October 22, 2003.
7/28/03P. Kroon AEROGEL Assembly of Cells into 80-cell Array: –8 cells wide by 10 cells high mm high (Y) by 2077 mm wide (Z) by about 335 mm deep.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
The Tevatron Decommissioning Plans AEM 10/17/11 Paul C. Czarapata.
Construction and Installation of the CLIC Experimental Area
1 Summary of MICE beamline & hall installations This is a very rough summary of the progress since mid-December Richard Apsimon & Andy Nichols MICO meeting.
Integration GlueX Detector Integration Mission: To ensure systems meet or exceed physics driven goals To ensure that detectors are designed in a sensible.
CDF Decommissioning Status Jonathan Lewis D&D Task Force 22 November 2011.
1 MICE - INFRASTRUCTURE MICO meeting 7 th February 2008 Tim Hayler.
CDF Decommissioning Status Jonathan Lewis Master Planning Meeting 9 November 2011.
Hall D Civil and Detector Progress Elliott Wolin 12-Sep-2002 U. Of Regina Middle of Nowhere Canada.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto 1.
Baseline Change Request BCR Title: EBD New 6 Ton Bridge Crane Installation BCR #: N/A Presenter’s Name: Robert Law CCB Presentation Date:
EBD existing crane details and future bridge crane upgrade Alev Ibrahimov June
Magnetic Shielding Issues Roy Preece STFC - RAL. Overview Issues Items in harms way – Step IV Step IV mitigation plan –Racks –Compressors Current / Future.
Undulator Orientation & Electron Beam Spacing Should the undulator frames be toward the central aisle or the tunnel walls? What is the optimum spacing.
1 Discussion for basic options — engineering video conference July 12, 2006 Outline Water pool — advantages — issues, problems, engineering options Aquarium.
Schedule and Work We are moving into a very intensive 4 months with a lot of work to be carried out Electrical services to the devices – after the South.
MoEDAL MoU EDMS No Issues from LHCb & CERN  MoEDAL at IP8  Infrastructure  TimePix Deployment  Access & Safety  General Conditions MoEDAL.
Magnetic Mitigation - Contents l Magnetic Mitigation General l West Wall Compressors l Rack Room 2 l Magnetic Shielding Yoke Jason Tarrant – Integration.
UPDATE ON THE CRYOSTAT DESIGN AND INSTALLATION SEQUENCE.
PHENIX WEEKLY PLANNING 2/14/2008 Don Lynch. 1/31/2008 Weekly Planning Meeting2 Run 8 Task Schedule ItemStartFinish RPC supportOn GoingOn Going CM Crane.
Mu2e WGM 11/16/2011 R. Ray Mu2e Project manager. Review of the past few months In September it became apparent that the cost of Mu2e was well in excess.
F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha March 22, 2011.
IARC Milestones completed Sept 2011: End of Tevatron Run, FESS obtains ~full access to infrastructure at CDF, PPD begins D&D in CDF assembly bldg Sept.
Forward Muon Installation and Commissioning Dmitri Denisov Fermilab Director’s review 7/12/1999 Plan Forward muon detectors Mini-drift tubes installation.
RSVP AGS Upgrade Projects MECO RSVP Preliminary Baseline Review Brookhaven National Lab April 6-8, 2005 D. Phillips.
MICE Project Report Alan Bross (for Paul Drumm). Project Issues ● Key dates: – ISIS Synchrotron start-up scheduled for 1st August ● Shielded area around.
RSVP AGS Upgrade Projects MECO RSVP Preliminary Baseline Review Brookhaven National Lab April 6-8, 2005 D. Phillips.
Access Yard Assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC), November 13, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
PASI OsC meeting 12th July 2012
Fermilab 1 SNUMI Civil Issues September 18, 2006Dixon Bogert SNUMI Civil Design & Site Considerations; Issues and FESS work Dixon Bogert SNUMI Meeting,
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 Plant Design Integration, General Arrangement Drawings E. D. Perry.
SNuMI 1 Outline Action Items PP2 Progress [Nancy/Elaine] –Org Chart Update –FY07 Budget/Plans Discussion –FY08 Summer Shutdown –Overall cost Reduction.
GLD experimental hall and detector assembly Y.Sugimoto KEK 27 Sep
Spreaders & Recombiners Beam Transport Michael Bevins May 30, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Spreader/Recombiner Dipoles and Layout, & Installation.
SiD MDI Issues Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Beijing ACFA/GDE Meeting 05 February 2007.
DON LYNCH NOVEMBER 6, AGENDA November 4, BABAR Magnet Update Global Design Concept – Update Outer HCal Structural Analysis (2 nd pass) sPHENIX.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
SPHENIX MECHANICAL D. Lynch September 11, AGENDA Global Design Concept – Updated Global Assembly Concept – Updated Inner HCal Installation concept.
August 12, Machine Status: 2013  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac : Roof hatch installed Booster : Magnet.
LBNE Remote Handling Conceptual Design Issues for ORNL Collaboration Kick-off Meeting at ORNL 1/6/2010.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF Beamline optimization schedule Vaia Papadimitriou LBNF Beamline Manager Accelerator and Beam Interface Group Meeting.
SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.
1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.
WBS – 30 Straight Section Reconfiguration g-2 Accelerator – 30 Straight Section Reconfiguration D. Still Fermilab Muon g-2 IDR, June 5-7.
This talk is not a summary of costs for conventional facilities This talk is Review of conventional facilities used by CDF Discussion of status of systems.
LBNE Remote Handling Layout Options Adam Carroll Van Graves Tom Burgess FNAL/ORNL Videoconference March 11, 2010.
ORKA support - status report Scope of conceptual design task Develop a conceptual design for how to support the ORKA detector inside the CDF detector Develop.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months Vaia Papadimitriou Beamline Technical Board Meeting.
Rad. Shield 2 Feb. 06D.LACARRERE1 IP8 POINT 8 – RADIATION SHIELD – UX85 Introduction  History (in brief)  Conceptual Design  Why installation shifted.
SuperB Experimental hall General considerations on the Babar experimental area Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. A floor plan. Specification.
June 2, 2008 Bill Wisniewski1 BaBar Disassembly and Disposal Overview.
Comments on Services Elba Comments on Services & … Bill Wisniewski SLAC.
1 Update of detector hall in mountain regions Y.Sugimoto in Granada.
Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions
Detector Hall Design and Cost Information CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES
St. George Infrastructure
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/2/1 ILD integration meeting
MICE Partial Return Yoke Mechanical Design
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
Far Experimental Hall Hutches Civil Construction
SiD IR Layout M. Breidenbach, P. Burrows, T. Markiewicz
Presentation transcript:

ORKA Preservation Task Force ORKA Preservation Task Force first meeting Wednesday, February 8, Notes by Peter H. Garbincius Notes from meeting are interspersed (Riesselmann and Sands did not participate)

2

my interpretation and priorities: Not to immediately concentrate on costs! Prime issues seem to be material handling and possible interference for CDF building refurbishment for and IARC operations When we understand the requirements of ORKA, IARC, and their mutual interactions, then we can work on estimates what about BNL/RHIC/sPhoenix? Only concentrate on these ORKA/IARC issues, not on items that are independent please humor my learning curve! 3

CHANGES from ORKA proposal S-shaped (dogleg) K+ beamdump to Tevatron tunnel CDF solenoid remains parallel to Tevatron tunnel 5’ x 8’ door BIG door 4 Crane hook coverage in assembly hall? Go look at it at CDF! This area of target & K+ beam is at 710’ elevation 12’ x 26’ transporter CAN move beyond Central Detector installed in Collision Hall radiation shielding studies

short 14 m Doug Jensen working on design of a short 14 m 0.6 GeV/c enriched K + beam are low-p components availability from BNL? Very likely, except for two 600 KV separators. 95 GeV from MI to beam stop stopping target 5

6

What does ORKA need from CDF? What has to go? How? When? ORKA fits here! target position modify plug for close-in quads note SS insert 3 o -10 o BNL may want Central Calorimeters Decision = Fall 2012? Tevatron beam 723’-4.25” 4’ high elevation change 7 Hanging steel CAN be removed with detector in place, needs engineered move

Magnetic Circuit Magnetic Circuit small contribution from central calorimeters no need to map B-field, plenty of K + →π + π o Is flux return steel just top and bottom - YES, or does it include North and South walls? - NO 8 3 o -10 o SS plug

comparable installation: comparable installation: Remove CDF SVX & CTC intact? Install ORKA in pieces in collision hall? 9

Can plug be modified for input beam quads while in collision hall? NO, must be done in Assembly Hall 10 Non-magnetic Stainless Steel Plug 3 o -10 o. Does removing it provide enough room for Quadrupole Magnets?

X-5 X X-3 X-4 X-7 X-1 X-3 X-4 ? ? ? X-2 X X 11 out 1200 ton door – order Central Detector is #2 SVX, CTC, and Central Calorimeter Arches are removed in Assembly Hall

questions? When does the big Door have to be open? How much can be done through 5’ x 8’ door? How much access is needed to Assembly Pit, upstairs CDF building, crane, when? Can N/S muon walls, plug, forward toroids be removed without removing central detector? How does Cable Bridge get removed? Even if we could remove roof of Collision Hall for later installation, do we have to remove upper notch steel hung from ceiling first? 12

continued… How much space and time with big door open: – Soon to remove CDF before IARC referbishing? – Later to install ORKA during IRAC operations? What other massive, bulky items? – Target and 600 MeV/c beamline elements – Beam stop (in d.s. tunnel) What about provision for plasma wakefield test? next meeting: next meeting: ___________ Terry E will poll 13

14 710’ elev 706’ elev garage for door 710’ elev Limit of 50 ton crane coverage ~ 4.5’ from wall PHG – 4march2012

Discussion on Feb 8, 2012 What would be ideal schedule to minimize impact on IARC schedule & accommodate ORKA? – Feb 2014 IARC building complete, begin refurbish CDF bldg – Remove CDF components now, including cable bridge, replace Solenoid & (modified) plug(s) into Collision Hall ~ 18 Months + $ X M (JDL will provide better estimate), then, if provisions made, public tours in CDF Collision Hall – End of 2014 – begin IARC operations in deep pit starting from North (far) end, leaving space for 1200 ton shield door and 1 or 2 transporters for ORKA – ORKA, if and when approved, assemble elsewhere, use just crane and 1 or 2 transporters for installation, then close shield door – IARC can expand through Assembly Hall, but would need to allow for opening door and use of 1-2 transporters 15

continued discussion Would Fermilab invest in display/tours before installation of ORKA? Expenses could be saved – human engineering, life safety, egress – repurposing building from experiment => public Even temporarily…before ORKA Who decides this usage which implies what codes apply? Grandfathering? – What are these saved refurbishment costs and how do they compare to, or offset some of the investment of removing CDF components? Once we have cost estimate and timescale, Director must choose between ORKA investment (gamble), public tours, & impact on IARC operations 16

4march2012: Peter checked Exact size of CDF equipment transporter: 25’ + 32” = 27’-8” x 11’-11” Crane coverage – carriage and south catwalk as found: hook is 12’ from I-beam + 18” from wall (upstairs). I-beam is 4’ from catwalk rail, catwalk rail is 4’ from major wall (downstairs) so I-beam is at same position as downstairs wall From 3 rd floor, measured crane had another 90” = 7.5’ travel before reaching stop => 12’-7.5’=4.5’ from I-beam = downstairs wall. 17