AUTONOMOUS HIGH ALTITUDE RECORD AA241X students – Stanford Aero & Astro Advisors: Profs. Juan J. Alonso and Ilan M. Kroo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DSSI UAV Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Research & Development Project.
Advertisements

Tailwinds Flying Club Spring Safety Session Engine Takeoff Lake Elmo Airport (21D)
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Presentation. Customization for each client Each order is specifically designed to meet each clients’ aerial needs. On-board.
Short Field Takeoff & Landing
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
SD-May1014 Team: Michael Peat, Kollin Moore, Matt Rich, Alex Reifert Advisors: Dr. Nicola Elia and Dr. Phillip Jones.
ME 480 Introduction To Aerospace: Chapter 2 Prof. Doug Cairns.
High altitude airborne developments have presented huge advantages in the US military’s arsenal through: environmental monitoring precision navigation.
Parth Kumar ME5643: Mechatronics UAV ATTITUDE AND HEADING HOLD SYSTEM.
Gary MKIII University of Central Florida Chris Valle, Braden Urban, John Rowe, and Tyler Yoemans.
1 Design Group 2 Kat Donovan - Team Leader Andrew DeBerry Mike Kinder John Mack Jeff Newcamp Andrew Prisbell Nick Schumacher Conceptual Design for AME.
1 Post SHOT II Experiment University of Minnesota Max Schadegg, Cole Christensen, Ian Macmillen, Steve Haviland June 10 th, 2010 University of Minnesota.
Chandelles.
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
METEOR BACKGROUND This is a foundation project in an ambitious endeavor to provide the RIT research community with a means to conduct near space.
UHM CanSat Team Members: Chris Ho: Team master, software Tyson Fukuyama: Hardware.
March 22, Prototype Fabrication Economic & Test Plan QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew.
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P09122 Final Project Review Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
Aviation Requirement 1 A) Define “aircraft”- an airplane, helicopter, or other machine capable of flight What are the operation of the following:  Jet.
AEM 5333 Search and Surveillance. Mission Description Overhead surveillance and tracking Humans on foot Moving vehicles Onboard GPS transceiver Onboard.
B757 Review Questions.
1 ECE Department Thermal Mapping Drone FPR Team 17 Jamyang Tenzin Stefan Totino Dylan Fallon Jason Fellow Advisor: Joseph Bardin.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
PHAT-TACO Experiment Pressure Humidity And Temperature Tests And Camera Observations Hannah Gardiner, Bill Freeman, Randy Dupuis, Corey Myers, Andrea Spring.
Unmanned aerial systems, what they are and what is available? Professor Sandor M Veres University of Sheffield.
Lecture 7: DESCENT PERFORMANCE
Large Crowd Surveillance UAV
CanSat Interim Presentation II
 Model airplanes are sized down models of an aircraft  The calculations are easy and the importance is given to building of the plane.
Computational Mechanics and Robotics The University of New South Wales
Recent and Future Research for Bird-like Flapping MAVs of NPU Prof. B.F.Song Aeronautics School of Northwestern Polytechnical University.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Autonomous Helicopter James LydenHarris Okazaki EE 496.
AEM 5333 UAV Search and Surveillance. Mission Description Overhead surveillance and tracking – Humans on foot – Moving vehicles Onboard GPS transceiver.
Time and Monetary Budgets Repair ExpenseCost Autopilot Replacement$2,500 RX Antenna Replacement$55 Camera Lens Replacement$78 Camera Replacement$190 Total.
Vanderbilt Aerospace Club Rocket Launched Reconnaissance UAV Design Team William Runge (ME) Kyser Miree (ME) Thomas Carroll (ME) Thomas Bowden.
M E T ROVER MSCD Engineering Technology Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 2004.
1 Mission Details AA241x - Design, Construction, and Testing of Autonomous Aircraft Lecture 3 April 8, 2013 Juan J. Alonso Roberto Bunge Wade Spurlock.
MICRO AIR VEHICLE PROJECT Ryan Goldberg Tiffany Khong Brett Keenan Loryn Chen Harris Benjamin Dani Batlle Erica Edney.
Boundary Layer Targeted Observations using the Glidersonde Meteorological Package Part I: Description and Results Daniel B. Weber Frank W. Gallagher III.
BASICS OF RC PLANE. Overview  What is RC Plane?  RC Planes’ Parts and their Role  How planes fly?  Concepts and Terminologies of RC Plane  Stability.
Group Members Mike Svendsen – Computer Engineer Steve Towey – Computer Engineer Brian Walker – Architect Richard George – Industrial Technology Client.
AVAT11001: Course Outline 1.Aircraft and Terminology 2.Radio Communications 3.Structure, Propulsion, Fuel Systems 4.Electrical, Hydraulic Systems and Instruments.
Flight Testing Small Satellites Through High Altitude Ballooning Presented by Zach Henney 18 April 2015.
October 2008 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Meeting 102 Niagara Falls, NY October 2008 Steve Jacobson (661)
Aero Week 10 Robbie McNally CpE. Optimus Prime Startup Code Sends a message saying program has started Checks for SD card and notifies user of result.
X-Pilot: Autopilot Solutions C. Edwards, J. Lasseigne, W. Overstreet, B. Penland Project Description: The X-Pilot: Autopilot Solutions project is developing.
National Airspace System
Aero Week 9 ROBBIE MCNALLY. SAE Competition Rule Changes.
Motor Air Vehicle Group 1 Jacky, Osama, Eddy, Abdul, Michael, Serge.
Introduction to Aerospace – Historical Perspective Dr. Doug Cairns.
DemoSat IV: RedRoverSat University of Colorado at Boulder Jaime Catchen, Chris Homolac, Emily Walters August 9, 2006.
Final Semester 2 Presentation: April 24, Joshua Lasseigne: Team Lead and Autopilot Programming Christopher Edwards: AGL Subsystem and Website Maintenance.
Mid Semester 2 Presentation: February 27, Joshua Lasseigne: Team Lead and Autopilot Programming Christopher Edwards: AGL Subsystem and Website Maintenance.
Ex. 6 - Straight-and-Level Flight Ex. 6 – Straight-and-Level Flight.
Mini Autonomous Flying Vehicle CASDE is part of the National effort to develop a Micro Air Vehicle. CASDE has chosen a Mini Vehicle, in the short term,
End of Semester 1 Presentation: November 28, 2007.
RIT MAV System Review (P08121) Dr. Jeffrey Kozak – Faculty Guide Michael Reeder – Team Leader Kevin Hand – Lead Engineer Todd Fernandez – ME.
Presented by Robert Clark Instrument Technician
X-Pilot: Autopilot Solutions C. Edwards, J. Lasseigne, W. Overstreet, B. Penland X-pilot flight testing X-pilot groundstation demonstrating waypoint navigation.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
High Altitude Aeronautical Platform Station
P07122 – Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin (EE – Team Leader) Courtney Walsh (ME – Aero) Richard Nichols (EE) Glenn Kitchell (CE) Jeff Welch (ME) Dr.
Exercise 10B Stalling Aim To recognise and enter a fully developed stall in various modes of flight both straight and turning, then to recover with minimum.
Transportation Unit 3 - Flight. Introduction Fixed Wing Heavier than air, atmospheric transportation vehicles sustain flight by utilizing the scientific.
FlySpy Patent Liabilities Analysis
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
AirTheo “Autonomous solution to your surveying needs”
Cargo Airplane Challenge
HA1L High Altitude 1U Laboratory
Presentation transcript:

AUTONOMOUS HIGH ALTITUDE RECORD AA241X students – Stanford Aero & Astro Advisors: Profs. Juan J. Alonso and Ilan M. Kroo

AA241X – Design, Construction, and Testing of Autonomous Aircraft  Stanford Aero & Astro course taught by Profs. Alonso and Kroo since 2002  In one quarter (about 10 weeks): design, build, flight test and autonomous airplane to fulfill a specified mission, provided:  On-board computer with 4 Hz GPS, microprocessor, pressure altitude (1 oz of weight)  Motor, battery, propeller combination  Note that, while the board is capable of having gyros and accelerometers, these are not allowed so that the students have to design a stable airplane

AA241X – Spring 2009 Edition  Design an electric airplane (< 5 Kg of mass) that autonomously, from launch to landing, is able to set a world altitude record  Target: approximately 15,000 ft AGL  Initial flight tests at Lake Lagunita (Stanford Campus) by climbing to 500ft, descending, and repeating until out of battery (FAA restricts to < 500 ft)  All 4 teams demonstrated between 12,000-15,000 ft of cumulative climb AGL  Flight tests at DFRC, September with no ceiling limit. Achieved 8,200 ft because of limitations on the area allowed for flights.

The entire AA241X class at Lake Lagunita – June 09

Changes for DFRC: New Sensors and Radios  Pressure sensors for altitude measurement  Voltage reading to automatically determine end of climb. Planned to use for trim scheduling of elevator and rudder  Xbee’s 2.4Ghz have high baud rate but small range. Migrated to the XSC 900Mhz.  Tested range using a balloon test with the help of Jennifer Schmerling (only tested receive capability)

Issues before DFRC: Autopilot Reliability  Board Resets started happening.  Decided to save critical data to EEPROM: Became robust to board resets  Board Freezes incidents: Lost 4 planes, system became almost unusable (guaranteed crash after ~20 minutes or so)  Major review of the code. Found a memory leak that was fixed. More error checking for GPS packages. No more problems

High Altitude and Long Range  Tested that control law was able to fly back to HOME point from a large distance. Flight tests from Roble Pool then from Sand Hill.  Made sure climb performance and stability were acceptable at high altitude by flight testing at Lake Tahoe.

Configuration modifications during summer (getting ready for DFRC)  Suave’s wing + Cero’s fuselage = CeroSuave  Tested 2600mAh batteries: BluePanther did worse, CeroSuave soared to a total of 4200 m (14,000ft)  Best performance when close to stalling

State Machine  For fly off: Initialize → Climb → Land  Except special cases complicate things:  Loss of GPS Lock  Loss of Communication (required by NASA)  Flight Termination outside of allowable airspace (required by NASA)

Weaknesses  Never tested Yagi antenna properly  Never tested the beacon (important for loss comm) in long range  Drift with the wind when climbing  Inverted servo arm on CeroSuave

Record attempts at NASA DFRC  First day  Beautiful windless day  Limited to 3000 ft by DFRC (range being used by others)  Tested both planes  Noticed communication issues with Yagi  Servo arm on CeroSuave kept breaking

Record attempts at NASA DFRC  2 nd day  Early morning start  Attempted to trim CeroSuave with different controller… Lost the plane 20 seconds after launch  3 Attempts with BluePanther 2161m, limited by Communication range 2175m, limited by Winds aloft 2498m, Violated airspace limits (provided by DFRC) and engaged flight termination mode automatically  Only used ~40% of battery capacity

Record flight at NASA DFRC

Flight Termination Westerly Winds 2.8 m/s climb rate, 30 m/s dive speed

18km/h Westerly Wind

Media Coverage  Story by David Orenstein on Stanford news  blog posts on Wired, AviationWeek, Popular Science  German article on presse.at  Podcast by Geoff Bower (TA) on DIYdrones: their next contest is going to try to beat our record using cumulative climb!

Shuttle Landing Picture taken by students on the same day they set their record

Setting up at DFRC: 5:45 am 9/11

Getting ready: students with Mike Marston, DFRC

During flight 1: checking the info on ground computers

Students getting ready for flight 2: Mike Marston and Starla Carroll, our DFRC hosts, in background

Zouhair Mahboubi launches flight 2

Team picture: Stanford students, profs, DFRC hosts, and the observer (for certifying the altitude record)

With our thanks to NASA and DFRC