August 2014 Dr James Fergsuon-Clinical Lead Debbie Johnston–RCP Head of Assessors & Accreditation Consultant Liver quest project Project update.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overarching Issues. Competing Legislation Legal requirement for mandatory QA of professional membership vs. personal privacy protection legislation Know.
Advertisements

The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
1 GRS and Accreditation March Learning objectives After reviewing this presentation, you will understand  How the Global Rating Scale supports.
NATSPEC Annual Conference Hard times or great expectations? Gill Reay SHMI Birmingham March 2015.
Talent Management for Future Clinical Commissioning Groups Building Leadership Capacity November 2011.
Performance management guidance
INTEGRATE: INTerlinking and Embedding GRaduate ATtributes at Edinburgh Dr Jessie Paterson, Institute for Academic Development.
A Brief overview of the Standards to support learning and assessment in practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
How to write a Report On Assessment Source: AUN Secretariat.
The Association of Cost Engineers THE ASSOCIATION OF COST ENGINEERS 3 rd November 2009 Cost Engineers A Tiered Approach to Accreditation.
CPA is a UKAS company The Assessment Process 2014 Seminars.
Rita-Sue Meintjes Development Manager Professional Map The Evolving World of HR and.
Council for Disabled Children May What is Independent Support? A 2-year programme to provide additional support to young people and parents during.
Needs Analysis Session Scottish Community Development Centre November 2007.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Session 1: Getting started on the PSQM Journey.
The New Scottish Teacher Education Professional Standards and the Development of the Professional Update System Tom Hamilton Director of Education and.
Provide folders with initially information in
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
National Disability Advocacy Program (NDAP) Quality Assurance (QA) – report on the FaHCSIA trial.
Global APC Content Review Project Update February 2015.
Session 1: Getting started on the PSQM Journey.
Add presentation title to master slide | 1 New inspection methodology from September 2009 NATSPEC conference Lorna Fitzjohn May 2009.
Validation of Non-formal Adult Education courses REACTION No CP LT-GRUNDTVIG-G1.
NAVCA Quality Award Andrea Allez Performance Improvement Manager Excellent service for local groups.
Your opportunity to influence development. Where are we up to? Current UKMi audit processes and documentation have been in use since 2010, now significantly.
INTERNAL AUDIT WORKSHOP: 19 JUNE 2007 JUANITA WILKENS.
Process Assessment Method
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Name Position Organisation Date. What is data integration? Dataset A Dataset B Integrated dataset Education data + EMPLOYMENT data = understanding education.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Presented by CIDA on behalf of the Task Team on Multilateral Effectiveness.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Overview of the R-Package Kenn Rapp, Facility Management Team Asia-Pacific Indigenous Peoples Dialogue of the FCPF Chiang.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Quality Assuring Deliverers of Education and Training for the Nuclear Sector Jo Tipa Operations Director National Skills Academy for Nuclear.
1 Hertfordshire County Council Knowing your school.
Improving the Craft of Teaching: Training & Implementation of Idaho’s Teacher Evaluation Framework Nick Smith, Deputy Superintendent School Support Services.
Accuracy in assessment Evidence bundles: tracking Trainee achievement through pupil progress overtime.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.
PGCE Early Years & Primary Pre-Placement Meeting November / December 2015.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
Phil Mason, who made £1million in the timber industry by the age of 25.
Mentor Training Brunel University Primary Partnership Friday 25 th January pm – 4.00pm Barbara Hosier & Alison Silby.
THINK EFFICIENCY Administration Review Customer & Support Services Scrutiny Committee 24 th November 2008.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Endoscopy Global Rating Scale and Knowledge Management System National Endoscopy Team April
Link Tutor Update 17 th March Inspection of Leeds Beckett ITE We anticipate being inspected this year as an ITE provider The Ofsted window opens.
CPA is a UKAS company The Assessment Visit UKAS Processes John Ringrow – Senior Assessment Manager.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
A Brave New World: Using the New Ofsted Framework on DWP Inspections Karen Adriaanse March 2010.
Canberra Chapter July PMI Chapter Meeting July 2007 PMCDF Competence Framework A presentation by Chris Cartwright.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Enterprise in the Curriculum Review Meeting 22 nd September 2010.
LCR Sexual Health Strategy Project Board 6 October 2016
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Foster Carers: at the heart of a world class children’s workforce
Functional Skills Reform Programme Consultation January – July 2016
Evaluating performance management
Preparing for Systems Verification
Key Information Summary (KIS)
School Self-Evaluation 
Team Up for School Nutrition Success: Next Steps
NPQonline - Final Assessment
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Presentation transcript:

August 2014 Dr James Fergsuon-Clinical Lead Debbie Johnston–RCP Head of Assessors & Accreditation Consultant Liver quest project Project update

Project aims (1) 1.Review and remap the standards framework, ensuring that they are fit for purpose 2.Develop an effective partnership between the RCP, BSG and BASL to achieve the project objectives 3.Establish a clear structure to achieve the pilot standards in a systematic and staged way 4.Create clear underpinning quality indicators and auditable outcomes. Link to information available (national data) 5.Develop the accreditation evidence requirements to achieve the standards 6.Develop the IT system to support self assessment and knowledge management

Project aims (2) 7.Create and test a ‘pathway focused’ accreditation process 8.Provide updates and learning to as appropriate to the Clinical Service Accreditation Alliance on project work, ensuring that it feeds into wider develop work for clinical service accreditation. 9.Evaluate the project and make recommendations to key stakeholders on the future of the standards and proposed accreditation model.

Revised project stages & timescales Project PhasesTimeline Phase one: 1.launch of project. 2.Review of framework-final agreement of domains/items March-June Phase two: 1.IT development final agreement of domains/items 2.Reassessment and action plan 3.WebEX contact with project sites. 4.Create evidence to support a pilot accreditation process July-August Phase three 1.Develop pilot accreditation process 2.Agree final pilot sites/services for visits to test accreditation process (4 sites) 3.Prepare sites/services for visits (remote training) 4.WebEX contact with project sites-review of progress September- November

Project stages & timescales Project PhasesTimeline Phase four: 10.Train assessors & lay reps-workshop 11.Conduct site/service assessments. 12.Review process and evidence criteria 13.Monthly WebEX calls November- February Phase five: 14.Final meeting review and feedback 15.Evaluation report March/April 2015

Liver QuEST domains & Standards For the purposes of the pilot only the highlighted standards will be mandatory and tested

The accreditation pathway-pilot Objective 1 : test the standards in different levels of liver services across a pathway Proposed stages: Self-assessment against accreditation standards online Online submission of defined minimum data/evidence. Assessment of evidence and service: Remote-online assessment Site visit-interviews and assessment of further evidence Assessment report draft Feedback on process

Accreditation pilot 4 different types of liver services will be assessed Some pilot sites (not being assessed) will be invited to form part of the assessment teams Support will be provided through a number of mechanisms: –Direct training –Remote support 8

Pathway - Stage One Liver Service complete online self-assessment Liver Service works on improvements Online system automates a rating for each standard according to a traffic light system (level 1-4) Liver Service reviews evidence requirements & gap analysis Access to evidence information & upload 9

Stage Two Agree date for remote and site review Pilot Services have access to accreditation training, Accreditation Agree who needs to be interviewed Assessors review evidence prior to visit Assessors review the evidence portfolio, provide feedback to the Service and add comments Assessors conduct an assessment and prepare a report Assessors conduct site assessment and complete their report with their findings and recommendations 10

Project teams-tasks summary 1.Complete a new assessment and action plans 2.Provide feedback on the updated standards and evidence requirements (10 mandatory standards) 3.Host a site assessment (4 sites only) 4.Repeat the assessment (6 months later) 5.Provide feedback about the overall process 6.Share learning and improvement ideas