By: Katie Blake and Paul Walters.  To analyze land cover changes in the Twin Cities Metro Area from 1984 to 2005 Image difference and Thematic Change.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
Advertisements

The Use of Remote Sensing in Habitat Management for Wildlife Helen Holdsworth EES 5053 University of Texas at San Antonio December 2,
Urbanization and Land Cover Change in Dakota County, Minnesota Kylee Berger and Julia Vang FR 3262 Remote Sensing Section 001/002.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Introduction. Evaluation of ARTMAP classifiers - Dependence on cluster representation Large number of classification algorithms available without detailed.
Land Use/Land Cover Assessment of Dane County, Wisconsin: Contemporary Trend and Future Projections By Eric Fabian.
1 SWALIM Workshop June, Nairobi Monitoring Land Cover Dynamics in sub-Saharan Africa H.D. Eva, A. Brink and D. Simonetti.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
CHANGES IN VEGETATION RELATED TO BEAR RANGES BY: AURORA HAGAN, JAIME NIELSEN, KRISTA TRENDA.
Minnesota Elevation Mapping Project Metro Area Collect 1/13/2011 Tim Loesch Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Co-authors: Maryam Altaf & Intikhab Ulfat
The Dying Dead Sea Assessing the decline of the Dead Sea area in relation to irrigated agriculture Noel Peterson and Zach Tagar FR 5262.
Ann Krogman Twin Cities Urban Lakes Project. Background Information… 100 lakes throughout the Twin Cities Metro Area Sampled in 2002 Land-use around each.
Investigating Land Cover Change In Crow Wing County Emily Smoter and Michael Palmer Remote Sensing of Natural Resources and the Environment University.
Exercise #5: Supervised Classification. Step 1. Delineating Training Sites and Generating Signatures An individual training site is delineated as an “area.
Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Report, 2009 Minnesota Department of Health STD Surveillance System Minnesota Department of Health STD.
Conversion of Forestland to Agriculture in Hubbard County, Minnesota By: Henry Rodman Cory Kimball 2013.
Josiah Emerson, Majory Silisyene, Cynthia Ratzlaff FR 3262 Section 1.
Select High Quality Natural Communities MLCCS Slope & Aspect Restoration Prioritization and Prediction Model (RePP) SUMMARY: In 2008, Ecological Strategies.
Hurricane Katrina Damage Analysis Alex Stern and William Tran.
Experience of multiple approaches to increase response rate in a mixed-mode implementation of a population-based health survey Urban Landreman Hennepin.
Change Detection in the Metro Area Michelle Cummings Laura Cossette.
Land Use / Land Cover Change in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area Lori Krider & Melinda Kernik
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management California Department of.
Crop Mapping in Stanislaus County using GIS and Remote Sensing Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of.
Accuracy of Land Cover Products Why is it important and what does it all mean Note: The figures and tables in this presentation were derived from work.
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Explosion
MetroGIS Regional Parcel Dataset An Overview. Areal Coverage 7 Counties – Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and Washington Area : 6,924 km.
Digital Image Processing
Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy
Application of spatial autocorrelation analysis in determining optimal classification method and detecting land cover change from remotely sensed data.
An Analysis of Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Population Growth in the Pedernales River Basin Kelly Blanton-Project Manager Paul Starkel-Analyst Erica.
Visual Interpretation for Forest Change Detection in Fiji Vilisi Tokalauvere SOPAC Pacific GIS&RS Conference November 2011 Lotus Building, Suva.
1 Estimation of Diffused pollution loads declination by purchasing Land of Riparian buffer zone assigned to Dae-cheong water resource area using Remote.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
APPLIED REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY TO ANALYZE THE LAND COVER/LAND USE CHANGE AT TISZA LAKE By Yudhi Gunawan * and Tamás János ** * Department of Land Use.
Land Use, Land Cover and Change Mapping Geog 115A.
CHANGE DETECTION ANALYSIS USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES Change in Urban area from 1992 to 2001 in COIMBATORE, INDIA. FNRM 5262 FINAL PROJECT PRESENTATION.
Employment of gis and remote sensing to detect land use change Class Project FR 3262/5262 Dec 2011 Peder Engstrom Chad Sigler.
By:Nick Severson Brian Trick Land Cover Change of Twin Cities Metro and Scott County ______________________________FR Fall 2013.
LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE IN BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS Maryia Bakhtsiyarava FNRM 5262.
Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas Sarah Belcher & Grant Cooper December 8, 2014.
By: Reid Swanson Sam Soper. Goal: To describe land cover/use changes that have occurred in the Twin Cities Metro-Area from the 1991 to 2005 Quantifying.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Jakobshavn Isbrae Glacial Retreat
Jakobshavn Isbrae Glacial Retreat
Quantifying Urbanization with Landsat Imagery in Rochester, Minnesota
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
HYDRAULIC FRACKING & ITS EFFECTS ON LAND COVER CHANGE
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data
Frank Falzone Ross Meyer FR December.2012
By Yudhi Gunawan * and Tamás János **
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
REMOTE SENSING ANALYSIS OF URBAN SPRAWL IN BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA:
Urbanization by Watersheds
Land Change and Desertification in the South Asembo Region
Effect of Land Use and Land Cover changes on Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary
Corn and Soybean Differentiation Using Multi-Spectral Landsat Data
Bailey Terry1 & Benjamin Beaman2 with Ramesh Sivanpillai3
Supervised vs. unsupervised Learning
GEOG-4045 Environmental Remote Sensing Larry Kiage & Naresh K. Sonti
Quantifying Producer Error in the Unsupervised Classification of Reservoirs Skye Swoboda-Colberg1, Chris Sheets2, Dr. Ramesh Sivanpillai3 1. Department.
MRV & Reporting Status & Related Space Data Needs
Hill Country Associates Progress Report
SA8922: Remote Sensing and Spatial data
WP05: Turkey Land Use Change Model
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Calculating land use change in west linn from
Christina Konnaris (Jake Brenner)
Presentation transcript:

By: Katie Blake and Paul Walters

 To analyze land cover changes in the Twin Cities Metro Area from 1984 to 2005 Image difference and Thematic Change  This type of information can be used in city planning, to evaluate the impact of land cover change on water quality, and other environmental effects

 TWIN CITIES METO AREA:  Anoka  Carver  Dakota  Hennepin  Ramsey  Scott  Washington

 We used the provided Landsat images from 1984 and 2005  We used MN Data Deli and ArcMap to clip the 7 county Metro Area  We used ERDAS to perform a supervised classification of both images  We used ERDAS for change detection and from-to classification

ColorClassification = Urban = Water = Vegetation = Agriculture

 We used Supervised classification because we were unable to identify the classes with unsupervised classification  We used 20 training sites to identify 4 classes: Urban, Agriculture, Water, and Vegetation

20% Threshold Value10% Threshold Value

AgriculturePercent (%)Hectares (ha) Water to agriculture Urban to agriculture Vegetation to agriculture

UrbanPercent (%) Hectares (ha) Water to Urban Vegetation to Urban Agriculture to Urban

WaterPercent (%) Hectares (ha) Agriculture to water Urban to water Vegetation to water

VegetationPercent (%) Hectares (ha) Water to vegetation Urban to vegetation Agriculture to vegetation

 Had some issues with our classification Will discuss in our accuracy assessment  Vegetation was converted to Agriculture 38.46% 50,693.8 ha  Vegetation was converted to Urban 27.18% 47,944 ha  Agriculture was converted to Urban 7.98% 14,076.2 ha

 Unable to perform accuracy assessment because we had no reference photo  The thematic change matrix union summary doesn’t make sense in some categories due to misclassification and other problems Cloud in the 2005 Landsat Image was classified as Urban Our supervised classification isn’t entirely accurate despite our best efforts to select training sites

 More skill is needed to perform supervised classification accurately  Unsupervised classification requires more knowledge of the area to be used effectively  A reference photo is needed for accuracy assessment  Cloud cover from Landsat image influences classification and accuracy