SCOEL and Carcinogens Group A: Non-threshold genotoxic carcinogens; for risk low-dose assessment the linear non-threshold (LNT) model appears appropriate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
Advertisements

ETUI, Brussels, 26th June th Seminar on workers’ protection & chemicals Alicia Huici-Montagud, PhD. Ex-Scientific Secretary of SCOEL.
1 Crystalline Silica: The EU Regulatory Approach Dr. Michelle Wyart - Remy, IMA - Europe / EUROSIL Crystalline Silica and Oncogenesis Bologna, 24 October.
1 Copyright © 2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Analysis of Categorical Data Goodness-of-Fit Tests.
Chemical Carcinogens – workplace risk assessment and health surveillance Tiina Santonen Paide.
Descriptive vs.- Quantitative Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens London, April 2, 2009 Dealing with Genotoxic Carcinogens: Strategy of the Scientific.
Wien.arbeiterkammer.at Revision of the Carcinogens and Mutagens Directive – Why do we need it? Christoph Streissler Arbeiterkammer Wien (Chamber of Labour,
Chemicals Inventory Management as a Tool to Check Compliance with Restricted Substances Regulations Ursula Schumacher.
It Takes a Village to Raise a Child Roberta L. Grant, Ph.D. Toxicology Section - Chief Engineer’s Office Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
Sources of Uncertainty and Current Practice for Addressing Them: Toxicological Perspective David A. Bussard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The views.
Age-Related Differences in Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis—Toward an Improved Analysis of Data on Age-Related Differences in Cancer Sensitivity in the.
1 Issues in Harmonizing Methods for Risk Assessment Kenny S. Crump Louisiana Tech University
Why Risk Analysis?  General public concern over real or imaged food- borne hazards to health  Recognition of the absence of systematic framework for.
Assessing Advanced Higher Investigating Physics Unit.
Inferential Statistics
The EU Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) Presentation by Professor Len Levy, Cranfield University (Vice-Chair of SCOEL)
1 Harmonised classification of substances (Annex VI of the CLP Regulation)- Example of substance classification Semira Hajrlahović Mehić, LL.M.
Toxicity Evaluation of Chemicals with Limited Toxicity Data Roberta L. Grant, Ph.D. Toxicology Division - Chief Engineer’s Office Texas Commission on Environmental.
Occupational Exposure Limits & Other Reference Values.
Health and Safety Executive UK Approach to Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens in the Occupational Setting Dr Susy Brescia Chemicals Regulation Directorate.
Proposed Regulated Waste Framework Julian Chan - EHP.
Table of Contents The goal in solving a linear system of equations is to find the values of the variables that satisfy all of the equations in the system.
Committee on Carcinogenicity (COC) Approach to Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens David H. Phillips* COC Chairman Descriptive vs. Quantitative.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to human health.
TeACH Dutch Approach to RA of GCTechnical Assistance in the Field of Chemicals Slide 1 …een vruchtbare combinatie Beoordeling van beroepsmatige blootstelling.
Michael J. Sullivan, Ph.D., CIH, REA
Charge Question 5-1 Comment Summary for HHCB Peer Review Panel Meeting January 9, 2014.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
EU Nickel Risk Assessment under EU Regulation 793/93 Human Health Classification a review by Dr. Tony Hart – Nickel Institute Consultant Given to the Nickel.
Charge Question 4-1: Please comment on the ecotoxicity studies selected to represent the most sensitive species in each of the risk scenarios (acute aquatic,
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
(Dr). Santosh Kumar Narla, Formulation Regulatory Affairs,
Juan Alguacil, MD Huelva University Brussels, 26 June 2012 Limits on Occupational Exposure Limits for Carcinogens 8th Seminar on workers’ protection &
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Dekant Department of Toxicology University of Würzburg Germany Risk, Hazard, and Innovation.
Determining Risks to Background Arsenic Using a Margin – of – Exposure Approach Presentation at Society of Risk Analysis, New England Chapter Barbara D.
Volker J. Soballa, Evonik Industries AG Assessing and Managing the Chemical Risk Responsible Care Metrics and GPS Workshop Dubai 24 and 25 September 2012.
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
By: Dhananjai Borwankar Senior Safety Officer University of Waterloo Safety Office UW N ANO T OOL I NSTRUCTIONAL.
Welcome Descriptive vs. Quantitative Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens 2 nd April 2009.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Health risk assessment – systemic effects (1) REMINDER OF INHALED DOSE PO intake is 7.2 mg/day 0.12 mg/kg bw/day for a 60-kg adult 2.
The IB Way.  Title  Background Information -enhances the understanding of the investigation and… - demonstrates personal significance, interest or curiosity.
Summation of Toxicity Data in Vitic Andrew Thresher
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Technical Exercise 1 (50 pts.) INTD 3990: Alternative and Appropriate Technologies.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
CHAPTER 5 Occupational Exposure Limits and Assessment of Workplace Chemical Risks.
Linear Equations in Two Variables
An Overview of Methods to Develop
About Operational Research
Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science (3rd ed.)
Investigating Physics Unit
EU-OSHA Workshop: Workplace Risks to Reproductive Function
In effect, the modes of action of these 2 types of chemical carcinogens are more complex: genotoxic carcinogens may also exert epigenetic effects and nongenotoxic.
Health Risk = Consequences X Probability (Likelihood)
Reprotoxic substances in the context of the revision of the 2004/37/EC (CMD) - Viewpoint from WPC and France - Matthieu Lassus Ministry of Labour, Employment,
Risk Assessment Dec 7, 2009 Timbrell 3rd Edn pp 16-21
Risk, Toxicology, and Human Health
Risk, Toxicology, and Human Health Chapter 11
STEM Fair Graphs.
What is risk assessment?
Ozone: specific indicators
Risk, Toxicology, and Human Health
In practice, mainly 2 of the mathematical models shown in Figure 1 have been used for risk assessment of substances that are genotoxic and carcinogenic,
Dover Insurance Premium Graphs
Ovanes Mekenyan, Milen Todorov, Ksenia Gerova
The Category Approach for Predicting Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Correspondence Analysis
Presentation transcript:

SCOEL and Carcinogens Group A: Non-threshold genotoxic carcinogens; for risk low-dose assessment the linear non-threshold (LNT) model appears appropriate. Group B: Genotoxic carcinogens, for which the existence of a threshold cannot be sufficiently supported at present. In these cases the LNT model may be used as a default assumption, based on the scientific uncertainty. Group C: Genotoxic carcinogens for which a practical threshold is supported.

SCOEL and Carcinogens Group D: Non-genotoxic carcinogens and non DNA- reactive carcinogens; for these compounds a true (“perfect”) threshold is associated with a clearly founded NOAEL. Health-based OELs are derived by SCOEL for carcinogens of groups C and D. If dataset allows, SCOEL might perform a risk assessment for carcinogens and/or mutagens placed in category A and B. In such cases, the corresponding SCOEL document (recommendation) will clearly state that a carcinogenic risk assessment has been carried out. It will contain a table summing up the concentrations explored and the associated risks calculated and won't show the frame with recommended OELs like it is the case for health- based values.