WP6: HIGH FIELD STUDIES The work package deals with 20 T field accelerator-type configurations and its consequences on mechanics and materials: The purpose.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Failure criteria for laminated composites
Advertisements

Topsfield Engineering Service, Inc. Figure 1 Thermoelastic Analysis in Design William Bell & Paul-W. Young Topsfield Engineering Service, Inc. John Stewart,
Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Mechanical Design & Analysis Igor Novitski. Outlines Electromagnetic Forces in the Magnet Goals of Finite Element Analysis Mechanical Concept Description.
Bending Moments A bending moment exists in a structural element when an external force is applied to the element so that the element bends (or wishes to.
Failures Due to Static Loading
R.Valbuena NBI March 2002 CNGS Decay Pipe Entrance Window Structural and Thermal Analysis A.Benechet, P.Cupial, R.Valbuena CERN-EST-ME.
Cable inventory, relative measurements and 1 st mechanical computations STUDY OF THE QUADRUPOLE COLLAR STRUCTURE P. Fessia, F. Regis Magnets, Cryostats.
Twin Solenoid Twin Solenoid - conceptual design for FCC-hh detector magnet - Matthias GT Mentink Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva Leonardo Erik Gerritse.
THEORIES OF FAILURE THEORIES OF FAILURE FOR DUCTILE MATERIALS
Contact Stress (3.19) MAE 316 – Strength of Mechanical Components
CERN/CEA Collaboration agreement No. KE2275/TE WP5 – HTS insert Kick-off meeting 07/07/2014.
EuCARD2 Magnet Status and action plan
2D STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE TS MAGNET PROTOTYPE Stefania Farinon and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008 Dr. Konstantinos A. Sierros.
Towards Nb 3 Sn accelerator magnets, challenges & solutions, history & forecast Shlomo Caspi Superconducting Magnet Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Tulkarem Multipurpose Sport Hall Prepared by: Moatasem Ghanim Abdul-Rahman Alsaabneh Malek Salatneh Supervisor: Dr. Shaker Albitar.
Failure Criteria and stress concentration
ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Thermal Structural FEA of Feeders A Brooks July 27, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_353BL2.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
Task 2.2 – Identification of most suitable face-sheets and optimization of panel properties Duration: month 1 to month 12 Partners involved: MOTULAB (WP.
GROUP C – Case study no.4 Dr. Nadezda BAGRETS (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) Dr. Andrea CORNACCHINI (CERN EN Dept.) Mr. Miguel FERNANDES (CERN BE.
Hybrid Structure with Cooling John Cozzolino LARP Collaboration Meeting Port Jefferson, NY November 4-6, 2009.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai
Lecture 20: The mechanism of plastic deformation PHYS 430/603 material Laszlo Takacs UMBC Department of Physics.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Update on Q4 DSM/IRFU/SACM The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 1/19 FRESCA II Dipole review March 28 th, CERN Magnet protection Protection studies.
Gravity load on SAS – comparison between real and mock-up April 13 th, 2016.
Review Questions: Chapter 0 Given, calculate all the possible binary products of a, a T, b and b T What are the eigenvalues of the matrix ? Is it positive.
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
3 rd ESAC Review, 27 th February to 1 st March 2013, CEA Saclay Fresca2 Dipole Structure Assembly J.C Perez on behalf of Fresca2 collaboration team.
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
WORK IN PROGRESS F C C Main Quadrupoles FCC week 2017
Static Analysis of P558 Running Board
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
16 T Cosq DIPOLE Mechanical Analysis
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils (DRAFT)
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Mechanical results on the double aperture Version V20ar
Date of download: 12/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Insert - dipole common issues
MKQXF FEA Model Haris Kokkinos
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Structural analysis of the CBM magnet coil
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Tutorial in Mechanical Properties
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
EML 2023 – Stress Analysis Lecture 1 – Stress State.
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
FRESCA2 - Coils 1+2 scenario
Q4 development M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet, E. Todesco
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
HQ test at CERN: strain and stress measurements
Yielding And Fracture Under Combine Stresses
Presentation transcript:

WP6: HIGH FIELD STUDIES The work package deals with 20 T field accelerator-type configurations and its consequences on mechanics and materials: The purpose of this work package is to study materials under the large stresses generated in such new configurations, Which are the mechanical properties needed, depending on the layout configurations (figure below) and on the location inside the magnet, Which materials are suitable for these properties ? Do they exist ? | PAGE 1 WP6 | 04/09/2015

WP6: HIGH FIELD STUDIES 0. We started from EucARD2 and J. von Nugteren study (done), 1. We selected of a limited number (4) of adequate configurations to study (in progress), 2. Mechanical study for each configuration (in progress), 3. Selection of appropriate materials (to do), 4. Report (to do) | PAGE 2 WP6 | 04/09/2015

WP6: HIGH FIELD STUDIES Configuration studied: cos theta in FRESCA2 outsert (done), | PAGE 3 Cos theta – 2 layers Pre-stress + cooling down + Laplace forces Cos theta – 1 layer Azimuthal stress: 235 MPa Von Mises stress: 515 MPa WP6 | 04/09/2015

WP6: HIGH FIELD STUDIES Configuration studied: blocks (stacked conductors) in FRESCA2 outsert (done), | PAGE 4 Titanium CuBe (yellow) External tube (SS316) Red: Conductor (SS304) Pink: Plate (SS3016) CAST3M Model (FEM) nodes elements shear stress study (conductor C) Total Von Mises stress Total shear stress on conductor (no sliding) Design from Grenoble-INPG, stacked conductors + transposition. Loading: cooldown and Laplace forces. Conductor: The total maximum Von Mises stresses on the conductor reaches a value of 512 MPa. This value remains below the SS 304’s allowable stress (593 MPa). The cooldown induces, on the conductor C, a maximum shear stress of 14 MPa, while the Laplace forces 37 MPa. The combined action of these two loadings generates a maximum shear stress of 49 MPa. This value is acceptable. These values were obtained by assuming that the conductor C was in sliding contact on its perimeter. If the conductor C is assumed to be glued to CuBe on its perimeter, the values mentionned infra become respectively 71 MPa, 116 MPa, and 188 MPa. Plate: The maximum Von Mises stress on this component is 699 MPa which is slightly larger than the allowable one (653 Mpa for SS116). CuBe: Its allowable stress is equal to 718 MPa which is far larger than the total Von Mises stress induced on the CuBe (585.5 MPa). Titanium: The maximum value of total Von Mises stress occured on titanium is 461 MPa. This value remains far below its allowable stress of 800 MPa. External tube: It is made of SS316 material. The total maximum Von Mises stress induced on this component is 429 MPa. This value is far below its allowable stress of 653 MPa. Total shear stress on conductor (with sliding) WP6 | 04/09/2015

WP6: HIGH FIELD STUDIES 2 configurations to be studied from J. von Nugteren (FCC design): Blocks (to do) Cos theta (to do) | PAGE 5 WP6 | 04/09/2015

WP6: HIGH FIELD STUDIES To FEM or not to FEM ? Discussion about the utility of FEM compared to formulas | PAGE 6 x y Steel: E = 210 GPa Azimuthal Lorentz forces pile-up F ∟ 12-mm-wide cable F ∟ = 189 kN/m σ ∟ = 16 MPa F ∟ = 765 kN/m σ ∟ = 64 MPa Adamantium: E = 910 GPa σ ∟ = 28 MPa σ ∟ = 98 MPa 5 T 13 T T σ ∟ = 55 MPa σ ∟ = 220 MPa FEM Formula. WP6 | 04/09/2015 More « advanced » formulas should be tested on a real case (cos theta) and applied to all designs if consistent

WP6: HIGH FIELD STUDIES  The delivery of this work package is a report on mechanical studies,  The work estimated as 3 person.month has started,  Chhon Pes and Clément Lorin, performed mechanical computations (CAST3M) on two possible configurations,  Two others configurations will be studied by FEM and/or formulas; when ? It will depend on Chhon’s load.  Selection of appropriate materials (and possible tests to performe) to do after mechanical computations completed,  Not so easy to simplify with formulas as real life is more complicated… | PAGE 7 WP6 | 04/09/2015