Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 290.
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
1Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 114.
Richardson PG et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 535.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Carfilzomib: High Single-Agent Response Rate with Minimal Neuropathy Even in High-Risk Patients 1 Baseline Peripheral Neuropathy Does Not Impact the Efficacy.
LaCasce A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 293.
Lesokhin AM et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 291.
Results of a Phase II Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin as First Line Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory HL Prior to AHCT Chen RW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Bosch F et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3345.
A Phase 2 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30-Positive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Interim Results in Patients with DLBCL.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Frontline Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin Combined with ABVD or AVD in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma Younes A et al. Proc.
Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Phase I Study After Full Enrollment.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 175.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Updated Results of a Phase I First-in-Human Study of the BCL-2 Inhibitor ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic.
CD19-Targeted 19-28z CAR Modified Autologous T Cells Induce High Rates of Complete Remission and Durable Responses in Adult Patients with Relapsed, Refractory.
Improved Survival in Patients with First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Vosaroxin plus Cytarabine versus Placebo plus.
Dyer MJS et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 1743.
Locatelli F et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4378.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Lonial.
Brentuximab Vedotin Administered Concurrently with Multi-Agent Chemotherapy as Frontline Treatment of ALCL and Other CD30-Positive Mature T-Cell and NK-Cell.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
A Phase 2 Study of Single-Agent Brentuximab Vedotin for Front- Line Therapy of Hodgkin Lymphoma in Patients Age 60 Years and Above: Interim Results Yasenchak.
Bortezomib (BTZ) and Panobinostat (PAN) Combination Is Effective in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) or NK/T-Cell Lymphoma.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
R-CHOP with Iodine-131 Tositumomab Consolidation for Advanced Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Southwest Oncology Group Protocol S0433 Friedberg.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
VANTAGE 095: An International, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Vorinostat (MK-0683) in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Phase II Study: Pembrolizumab + Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone for Patients With R/R MM New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage* of ASH.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Kantarjian HM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Long-Term Follow-Up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 182.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Oki Y et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 252.
Martinelli G et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 679.
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Ansell SM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 798.
Final Results of a Frontline Phase 1/2 Study of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (CRd) in Multiple Myeloma (MM)1 Final Results from.
Vitolo U et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 777.
Seymour JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 872.
Forero-Torres A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3711.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
Presentation transcript:

Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460. Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with the Bispecific T-Cell Engager (BiTE®) Antibody Construct Blinatumomab: Primary Analysis Results from an Open-Label, Phase 2 Study Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460.

Background Treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is challenging, with little progress in recent years. Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct, engages CD3-positive cytotoxic T cells, resulting in T-cell expansion and lysis of CD19-positive B cells.  In a prior Phase I study, blinatumomab treatment resulted in an overall response rate (ORR) of 55% in a subset of patients with DLBCL (Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 1637). Study objective: To compare stepwise versus flat dosing of blinatumomab and evaluate its efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460.

Ongoing Phase II Study Design (NCT01741792) Eligibility (n = 25) DLBCL refractory to first or later therapy or relapsed after auto-HSCT or relapsed and ineligible for auto-HSCT Blinatumomab, IV Auto-HSCT = autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant Nine, 2 and 14 patients enrolled in cohorts I, II and III, respectively. Stage 1: Stepwise dosing (cohort I: 9, 28 and 112 μg/d) compared to constant dosing of 112 μg/d (cohort II). Based on the benefit/risk assessment from stage 1, stepwise dosing was chosen for cohort III in stage 2. Patients achieving response after 8 weeks could receive a 4-week consolidation cycle after a 4-week treatment-free period. All patients received prophylactic dexamethasone. Primary endpoint: ORR Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460; www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Patient Characteristics Median age (range) 66 years (34-85) Men 56% Patients who had received prior auto-HSCT 7 (28%) Median duration of exposure for stepwise dosing* 46.8 days * Cohorts I and III Blinatumomab was received as a fourth-line systemic therapy after a median (range) of 3 (1-7) prior treatments. Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460 (Abstract only).

Response to Blinatumomab ORR 43% Complete response 4 (19%) Partial response 5 (24%) * Evaluable patients (cohort I, n = 7; cohort II, n = 1; cohort III, n = 13) Four patients were not evaluable for ORR due to early treatment discontinuation (<1 week on target dose in the absence of disease progression): 1 due to investigator’s decision and 3 due to adverse events. All patients who responded did so within the first 8-week cycle.  Among responders (n = 9), the median duration of response was 11.6 months. Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460 (Abstract only).

Adverse Events All patients (n = 25) experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE).  The most common AEs were tremor (52%), pyrexia (44%), diarrhea (24%), fatigue (24%), edema (24%) and pneumonia (24%). Grade 3 and 4 AEs occurred in 96% and 20% of patients, respectively. Serious AEs occurred in 92% of patients. Most common: pneumonia (24%), device-related infection (16%) and pyrexia (16%) Seven patients (cohort I, n = 3; cohort II, n = 2; cohort III, n = 2) had Grade 3 neurologic AEs. Grade 3 AEs occurring in >1 patient were disorientation, encephalopathy, aphasia and epilepsy (n = 2 each). Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460 (Abstract only).

Adverse Events (continued) No Grade 4 or 5 neurologic events were reported. Fourteen patients have died (cohort I, n = 5; cohort II, n = 1; cohort II, n = 8): 11 due to disease progression, 1 due to cardiogenic shock, 1 due to organ failure after transplantation; no cause of death was reported for 1 patient Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460 (Abstract only).

Author Conclusions In this Phase II study, a stepwise dosing regimen (9, 28 and 112 μg/day) was established as the preferred dosing for blinatumomab in DLBCL.  Treatment with blinatumomab showed an acceptable safety profile and resulted in objective and durable responses in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460 (Abstract only).

Investigator Commentary: Primary Analysis of a Phase II Study of Blinatumomab for Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL Blinatumomab is a bispecific antibody that binds to CD19 on B cells and CD3 on T cells. It brings these cells into close proximity and promotes their activation. In patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the results have been promising, leading to approval of blinatumomab in that setting. In this study, the investigators assessed the efficacy of blinatumomab in patients with disease progression on standard approaches, including auto-HSCT. One of the goals was to determine the optimal dose of blinatumomab. Twenty-five patients were enrolled, with a number of cohorts and dose levels. In the 21 patients who were evaluable for responses, an ORR of 43% was reported with 4 complete responses and 5 partial responses. So in patients who haven't responded to available therapies for DLBCL, a high response rate, particularly 4 complete responses, I believe is promising and encouraging. There are some toxicities, however. Common side effects included immune-related adverse events like fever, diarrhea, fatigue and infections. However, based on experience with other diseases like ALL, I believe this agent has real promise for relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Interview with Stephen M Ansell, MD, PhD, January 20, 2015