FA-005-910 Awarding of Supervisory Units. Purpose Investigate issues related to assignment and awarding of supervisory units and respond to questions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho. © 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7,
Advertisements

Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
College Textbook Transparency Act FA Background In Summer 2007 Bronco Bookstore newsletter informed the campus community that: – Governor has.
The Florida College System House Bill 7135: Relating to Postsecondary Education Julie Alexander & Carrie Henderson April 20,
Overcoming the Rubber Stamp Phenomenon: The Shifting Sands of Curriculum and the Senate's Roles Comunicación y Gerencia Pat James Hanz Michelle Pilati.
Faculty Adequacy – Methods to Meet the Standard
Curricular Practical Training at UC Merced. What is Curricular Practical Training ? Curricular Practical Training (CPT) is an employment opportunity,
Slide 1 Jail, Prison, or Parole? Assigning Courses to Disciplines Kevin Parker, Michelle Pilati, Randy Lawson.
Credit where Credit is Due: Understanding Non-Credit Mark Wade Lieu, Ohlone College Paul Starer, Foothill College Leadership Institute 2005.
Process for conducting a vote of confidence in a Dean FA
AS /AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger or Movement of an Academic Department- Resubmission.
Setting Course Enrollment Maximums: Process, Roles, and Principles Adopted Spring 2012 The Academic Senate of the California Community Colleges.
Offer Letters: 7 Common Mistakes and How to Correct Them Fall 2013 –Office of the Provost Academic Administrators’ Series Angel Kwolek-Folland, Associate.
Design and Development Awards Spring 2015 TLOS Networked Learning Design and Strategies (NLDS)
Academic Affairs BOT Orientation 29 August 2011 Dr. Chula King Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Faculty Handbook The Faculty Handbook states that the normal full-time teaching load is 15 credits per term, including 12 credits of assigned courses and.
Workload Fulfillment New Faculty Orientation Patricia Linton Senior Associate Dean College of Arts & Sciences.
Accelerated Instructional Program Review Handbook Spring 2007.
Work of the Faculty Leadership Team A Progress Report.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
1 PENN STATE HARRISBURG CAPITAL COLLEGE Curricular Cooperation at Penn State: Major Themes and Goals
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
ARTICLE X, DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION PROCEDURES GOVERNING TENURE, PROMOTION, AND CONTRACT RENEWAL contract, unchanged for
Wrestling with Workload: Valpo’s Faculty Workload Task Force Kraig Olejniczak, Dean, College of Engineering Mike Owens, Assistant Provost for Faculty Affairs.
CCLC Conference March 18, 2005 Pam Deegan, CIO President, Miramar Randy Lawson, CIO President Elect, Santa Monica.
Ad hoc Committee on Faculty Bylaws Todd Ellis Michelle Hendley Jimmy Johnston Michael Koch Eileen McClafferty John Relethford Renee B. Walker (Chair)
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Faculty Senate Standing Committees Draft Presented by Richard Sher Faculty Meeting Sept. 19, 2012.
Faculty Governance Jane Dillehay Faculty Chair Jan Hafer AAUP Chair 12 August 2011.
Powered by Course Release Banking and Financial Compensation Monday, September 28, 2015.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.
Senate 101 California State University, Los Angeles Nancy Warter-Perez, Academic Senate Chair
1 TERMS OF REFERENCE Assoc.Prof.Dr. Osman YILMAZ April 20, 2004 University Curriculum Committee.
Process for conducting a vote of confidence Cal Poly, Pomona Academic Senate.
Periodic Review Report Committee Summary: Amended Monthly Progress Report December 22, 2003.
AA Semester Calendar Time Modules and Final Exam Schedule.
Curriculum Mapping: Academic Faculty & Subject Librarians Working Together By Barbara Tierney, Head Research & Info Services, UCF Libraries With some content.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
CLINICAL FACULTY WORKLOAD: HOW TO SPEND 40 HOURS (OR MORE) MARTHA W. WILSON, AUD, CCC-A, F-AAA CLINICAL PROFESSOR AUBURN UNIVERSITY, AUBURN, AL.
Course Classification Primer Margy Merryfield June 1, 2016.
Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC 1 3/10/14.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Workload Fulfillment Term Faculty Appointments Patricia Linton
Where the CBA Meets Curriculum
Course credit hour definition (7.13)
Senate and Union Purview
Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment
Faculty Senate Committees
Post-Doctoral Trainee Senior Professional Research Staff Staff
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
New Department Chair Workshop
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
Faculty Evaluation Plan
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Online Curricula Where are we? Where might we go?
Preparing for Promotion and Annual Review August 22, 2018
Curricular Practical Training
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
New Certificate Program
Erosion of Senate Authority Over Curriculum?
Creating a More Effective Senate by Establishing Strong Relationships
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Fall 2018 Overview from Curriculum Regional Meeting (11/17)
New Faculty Orientation
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Fort Valley State University
PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESS
New Faculty Orientation Non-tenure-track Faculty Appointments
Committee for Effective Teaching Chair: Joel Dittmer
Presentation transcript:

FA Awarding of Supervisory Units

Purpose Investigate issues related to assignment and awarding of supervisory units and respond to questions raised in the referral Investigate issues related to assignment and awarding of supervisory units and respond to questions raised in the referral

Background Information There are two categories of classes: There are two categories of classes: –S classes –C classes Supervisory classes, also referred to as S-Factor classes, are assigned when the mode of instruction involves direct one-on-one contact between faculty and student. Supervisory classes, also referred to as S-Factor classes, are assigned when the mode of instruction involves direct one-on-one contact between faculty and student.

Background Information Assignment of release time is a separate issue from assignment of faculty to S-Factor classes with low enrollment. Assignment of release time is a separate issue from assignment of faculty to S-Factor classes with low enrollment. WTU releases may be given by the president/designee for direct or indirect instructional activities such as release time for research, scholarship, new course preparation, course overload, credit by examination, instructional support for graduate students, etc.. WTU releases may be given by the president/designee for direct or indirect instructional activities such as release time for research, scholarship, new course preparation, course overload, credit by examination, instructional support for graduate students, etc..

Background Information Faculty workload is measured in Weighted Teaching Units (WTU) Faculty workload is measured in Weighted Teaching Units (WTU) Faculty workload is average of 12 WTU of direct instructional and 3 WTU of indirect instructional activities. The average is commonly over one academic year. Faculty workload is average of 12 WTU of direct instructional and 3 WTU of indirect instructional activities. The average is commonly over one academic year. There is a misconception that faculty workload is 3 classes per quarter. It may or may not be. There is a misconception that faculty workload is 3 classes per quarter. It may or may not be.

Background Information For supervisory (S-Factor) classes the WTU is computed as: For supervisory (S-Factor) classes the WTU is computed as: –WTU = K- Factor * Number of Students K Factor varies by the classification. The typical K-factor is for undergraduate and.50 for graduate classes. K Factor varies by the classification. The typical K-factor is for undergraduate and.50 for graduate classes. Note that the workload in S-Classes does not depend on number of units assigned to the class. Note that the workload in S-Classes does not depend on number of units assigned to the class.

Background information S-Classes are expensive. They result in large WTU and low FTES. S-Classes are expensive. They result in large WTU and low FTES. Example: 12 Students in a two unit undergraduate class with S-36 Classification. Example: 12 Students in a two unit undergraduate class with S-36 Classification. –WTU =.333*12 = 4 –FTES = (12*2)/15 = 1.6 This same class would require 12 hours per week of direct contact with students. This same class would require 12 hours per week of direct contact with students.

Fall Quarter 2010 Data In Fall quarter of 2010 a total of 657 active S-Factor classes were offered at Cal Poly, Pomona. These classes required approximately 876 WTUs and generated only 415 FTES. In Fall quarter of 2010 a total of 657 active S-Factor classes were offered at Cal Poly, Pomona. These classes required approximately 876 WTUs and generated only 415 FTES.

Q1: Should there be a university policy that limits the number of supervisory units a faculty member can be awarded per quarter? Faculty workload issues are adequately addressed by existing university policy and collective bargaining agreement, there does not seem to be a need for any additional policy. Faculty workload issues are adequately addressed by existing university policy and collective bargaining agreement, there does not seem to be a need for any additional policy. Two implicit concerns: Two implicit concerns: –faculty not receiving credit for the WTU of S-Classes or resulting WTU is used for release time for other faculty. –student enrollment in non-supervisory classes (C-Classes) is raised to support the S-Factor classes with low enrollment.

Q2: Who decides how many units are given for a particular activity supervised? Should it be a Departmental Committee? The number of units, the classification, and the enrollment in S-Factor classes are curricular matters that are subject to the university curriculum process. The approved university curriculum process must be followed. The number of units, the classification, and the enrollment in S-Factor classes are curricular matters that are subject to the university curriculum process. The approved university curriculum process must be followed.

Q3: What is the mechanism of assessment to make sure that the expected outcome is met? Student learning in both supervisory and non-supervisory classes should be addressed in each college or department’s assessment plan. Student learning in both supervisory and non-supervisory classes should be addressed in each college or department’s assessment plan.

Q4: For faculty who receive reassigned time bought out by an external grant, it is generally implicit in the grant that the faculty member will be doing this work with students. Should faculty be awarded additional assigned time units for supervising students working on those projects for which they already receive reassigned time? Release time is assigned by the President/designee to support faculty activities as deemed appropriate. Release time is assigned by the President/designee to support faculty activities as deemed appropriate. Assignment of faculty to S-Factor classes as well as non-supervisory classes shall be determined by the appropriate administrator (Dean of the college) after consultation with the department chair or designee and/or the individual faculty member. Assignment of faculty to S-Factor classes as well as non-supervisory classes shall be determined by the appropriate administrator (Dean of the college) after consultation with the department chair or designee and/or the individual faculty member.

Q5: Should there be a difference in units awarded for undergraduate vs. graduate students supervision? There is a difference in S-factor between graduate and undergraduate classes. There is a difference in S-factor between graduate and undergraduate classes. The number of units is a curricular matter The number of units is a curricular matter

Recommendations 1. S-Classes have significant budgetary impact. Each department should review its current offering of the S- factor classes to ensure that the classification and number of units assigned are appropriate to the department, college, and university educational mission while available resources are efficiently utilized. 2. Academic Affairs and the appropriate senate subcommittee review and refine the current S-Factor classifications to ensure adequacy for Cal Poly, Pomona. 3. Many large enrollment S-Factor classes seem to be used for internship, direct studies, lab supervision that would not require one-on-one interaction with the students enrolled in the class. Academic Affair and the appropriate senate subcommittee should modify the C78 classification for use in supervisory classes that do not require one-on-one interaction with the student.