6.1 - One Sample 6.1 - One Sample  Mean μ, Variance σ 2, Proportion π 6.2 - Two Samples 6.2 - Two Samples  Means, Variances, Proportions μ 1 vs. μ 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Students” t-test.
Advertisements

Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 9 Inferences Based on Two Samples.
Inference about the Difference Between the
Statistical Inference for Frequency Data Chapter 16.
Copyright ©2011 Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning More about Inference for Categorical Variables Chapter 15 1.
Comparing Two Population Means The Two-Sample T-Test and T-Interval.
1 1 Slide © 2009 Econ-2030-Applied Statistics-Dr. Tadesse. Chapter 11: Comparisons Involving Proportions and a Test of Independence n Inferences About.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved The Chi-Square Test of Independence.
Chapter 14 Analysis of Categorical Data
Chap 11-1 Statistics for Business and Economics, 6e © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 11 Hypothesis Testing II Statistics for Business and Economics.
Chapter Goals After completing this chapter, you should be able to:
Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 9-1 Introduction to Statistics Chapter 10 Estimation and Hypothesis.
Lecture Inference for a population mean when the stdev is unknown; one more example 12.3 Testing a population variance 12.4 Testing a population.
Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 14 Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Categorical Data Analysis.
Inferences About Process Quality
5-3 Inference on the Means of Two Populations, Variances Unknown
6.1 - One Sample One Sample  Mean μ, Variance σ 2, Proportion π Two Samples Two Samples  Means, Variances, Proportions μ 1 vs. μ 2.
Hypothesis Testing and T-Tests. Hypothesis Tests Related to Differences Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Tests of Differences One.
Power and Sample Size IF IF the null hypothesis H 0 : μ = μ 0 is true, then we should expect a random sample mean to lie in its “acceptance region” with.
Presentation 12 Chi-Square test.
One Sample  M ean μ, Variance σ 2, Proportion π Two Samples  M eans, Variances, Proportions μ1 vs. μ2 σ12 vs. σ22 π1 vs. π Multiple.
Estimation and Hypothesis Testing Faculty of Information Technology King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok 1.
Inferential Statistics: SPSS
8 - 1 © 2003 Pearson Prentice Hall Chi-Square (  2 ) Test of Variance.
1/2555 สมศักดิ์ ศิวดำรงพงศ์
The table shows a random sample of 100 hikers and the area of hiking preferred. Are hiking area preference and gender independent? Hiking Preference Area.
Business Statistics, A First Course (4e) © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 11-1 Chapter 11 Chi-Square Tests Business Statistics, A First Course 4 th Edition.
Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Inference on the Least-Squares Regression Model and Multiple Regression 14.
The paired sample experiment The paired t test. Frequently one is interested in comparing the effects of two treatments (drugs, etc…) on a response variable.
More About Significance Tests
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Statistical Inferences Based on Two Samples Chapter 9.
Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Inference on Categorical Data 12.
1 Power and Sample Size in Testing One Mean. 2 Type I & Type II Error Type I Error: reject the null hypothesis when it is true. The probability of a Type.
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Procedures 11.3 Chi-Square Test for Independence; Homogeneity of Proportions.
Maximum Likelihood Estimator of Proportion Let {s 1,s 2,…,s n } be a set of independent outcomes from a Bernoulli experiment with unknown probability.
A Course In Business Statistics 4th © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 9-1 A Course In Business Statistics 4 th Edition Chapter 9 Estimation and Hypothesis.
1 1 Slide © 2006 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide Chapter 11 Comparisons Involving Proportions n Inference about the Difference Between the Proportions of Two Populations Proportions of Two Populations.
Chi-Square Procedures Chi-Square Test for Goodness of Fit, Independence of Variables, and Homogeneity of Proportions.
Essential Statistics Chapter 161 Review Part III_A_Chi Z-procedure Vs t-procedure.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide
Section 10.2 Independence. Section 10.2 Objectives Use a chi-square distribution to test whether two variables are independent Use a contingency table.
1 1 Slide © 2009 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Chapter Outline Goodness of Fit test Test of Independence.
The table shows a random sample of 100 hikers and the area of hiking preferred. Are hiking area preference and gender independent? Hiking Preference Area.
Copyright (C) 2002 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1 Understandable Statistics S eventh Edition By Brase and Brase Prepared by: Lynn Smith.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 11 Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables Section 11.2 Testing Categorical.
6.1 - One Sample One Sample  Mean μ, Variance σ 2, Proportion π Two Samples Two Samples  Means, Variances, Proportions μ 1 vs. μ 2.
Statistical Inference Drawing conclusions (“to infer”) about a population based upon data from a sample. Drawing conclusions (“to infer”) about a population.
Section 6.4 Inferences for Variances. Chi-square probability densities.
1 Math 4030 – 10b Inferences Concerning Proportions.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence n Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial.
ENGR 610 Applied Statistics Fall Week 7 Marshall University CITE Jack Smith.
Lecture 8 Estimation and Hypothesis Testing for Two Population Parameters.
Jump to first page Inferring Sample Findings to the Population and Testing for Differences.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical.
Statistics 300: Elementary Statistics Section 11-3.
Chapter 11: Categorical Data n Chi-square goodness of fit test allows us to examine a single distribution of a categorical variable in a population. n.
Section 10.2 Objectives Use a contingency table to find expected frequencies Use a chi-square distribution to test whether two variables are independent.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
Chapter 4. Inference about Process Quality
STAT 312 Chapter 7 - Statistical Intervals Based on a Single Sample
Elementary Statistics
STAT Z-Tests and Confidence Intervals for a
STAT 312 Introduction Z-Tests and Confidence Intervals for a
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Inference & Hypothesis Testing
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Inference & Hypothesis Testing
Chapter Outline Goodness of Fit test Test of Independence.
Presentation transcript:

6.1 - One Sample One Sample  Mean μ, Variance σ 2, Proportion π Two Samples Two Samples  Means, Variances, Proportions μ 1 vs. μ 2 σ 1 2 vs. σ 2 2 π 1 vs. π 2 μ 1 vs. μ 2 σ 1 2 vs. σ 2 2 π 1 vs. π Multiple Samples Multiple Samples  Means, Variances, Proportions μ 1, …, μ k σ 1 2, …, σ k 2 π 1, …, π k μ 1, …, μ k σ 1 2, …, σ k 2 π 1, …, π k CHAPTER 6 Statistical Inference & Hypothesis Testing CHAPTER 6 Statistical Inference & Hypothesis Testing

6.1 - One Sample One Sample  Mean μ, Variance σ 2, Proportion π Two Samples Two Samples  Means, Variances, Proportions μ 1 vs. μ 2 σ 1 2 vs. σ 2 2 π 1 vs. π 2 μ 1 vs. μ 2 σ 1 2 vs. σ 2 2 π 1 vs. π Multiple Samples Multiple Samples  Means, Variances, Proportions μ 1, …, μ k σ 1 2, …, σ k 2 π 1, …, π k μ 1, …, μ k σ 1 2, …, σ k 2 π 1, …, π k CHAPTER 6 Statistical Inference & Hypothesis Testing CHAPTER 6 Statistical Inference & Hypothesis Testing

“Do you like olives?” I = 1I = 0 POPULATION Two random binary variables I and J TWO POPULATIONS Random binary variable I “Do you like Brussel sprouts?” Alternative Hypothesis H A :  1 ≠  2 “There is a difference in liking Brussel sprouts bet two pops.”  = P(Yes to Brussel sprouts) Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 =  2 “No difference in liking Brussel sprouts between two pops.” Binary Response: P(Success) =  “Test of Homogeneity” “Test of Homogeneity”

TWO POPULATIONS Random binary variable I “Do you like Brussel sprouts?” Alternative Hypothesis H A :  1 ≠  2 “There is a difference in liking Brussel sprouts bet two pops.”  = P(Yes to Brussel sprouts) Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 =  2 “No difference in liking Brussel sprouts between two pops.” Binary Response: P(Success) =  “Test of Homogeneity” “Do you like anchovies?” J = 0 J = 1 POPULATION Two random binary variables I and J

TWO POPULATIONS Random binary variable I “Do you like Brussel sprouts?” Alternative Hypothesis H A :  1 ≠  2 “There is a difference in liking Brussel sprouts bet two pops.”  = P(Yes to Brussel sprouts) Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 =  2 “No difference in liking Brussel sprouts between two pops.” Binary Response: P(Success) =  “Test of Homogeneity” “Do you like anchovies?” POPULATION Two random binary variables I and J “Do you like olives?”  1 = P(Yes to olives)  2 = P(Yes to anchovies) Alternative Hypothesis H A :  1 ≠  2 “An association exists between liking olives and anchovies.” Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 =  2 “No association exists between liking olives and anchovies.” “Test of Independence” “Test of Independence” I = 1I = 0 J = 0 J = 1

TWO POPULATIONS Random binary variable I “Do you like Brussel sprouts?”  = P(Yes to Brussel sprouts) Binary Response: P(Success) =  “Test of Homogeneity” “Do you like anchovies?” POPULATION Two random binary variables I and J “Do you like olives?” “Test of Independence” Sample, size n 1 Sample, size n 2 Sample, size n 1 Sample, size n 2 (Assume “large” sample sizes.) I = 1I = 0 J = 0 J = 1  1 = P(Yes to olives)  2 = P(Yes to anchovies)

If n   15 and n (1 –  )  15, then via the Normal Approximation to the Binomial… If n   15 and n (1 –  )  15, then via the Normal Approximation to the Binomial… If n   15 and n (1 –  )  15, then via the Normal Approximation to the Binomial… If n   15 and n (1 –  )  15, then via the Normal Approximation to the Binomial… Sample 1, size n 1 Sample 2, size n 2 X 1 = # Successes X 2 = # Successes Sampling Distribution of Solution: Use Problem: s.e. depends on  !! Recall…

If n 1  1  15 and n 1 (1 –  1 )  15, then via Normal Approximation to the Binomial If n 1  1  15 and n 1 (1 –  1 )  15, then via Normal Approximation to the Binomial Sample 1, size n 1 Sample 2, size n 2 X 1 = # Successes X 2 = # Successes Sampling Distribution of If n 2  2  15 and n 2 (1 –  2 )  15, then via Normal Approximation to the Binomial If n 2  2  15 and n 2 (1 –  2 )  15, then via Normal Approximation to the Binomial Mean(X – Y) = Mean(X) – Mean(Y) Recall from section 4.1 (Discrete Models): and if X and Y are independent… Var(X – Y) = Var(X) + Var(Y)

0 Sampling Distribution of Sample 1, size n 1 Sample 2, size n 2 X 1 = # Successes X 2 = # Successes Similar problem as “one proportion” inference s.e. !  For confidence interval, replace  1 and  2 respectively, by standard error  For critical region and p-value, replace  1 and  2 respectively, by….. ???? Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 =  2 …so replace their common value by a “pooled” estimate. standard error estimate = 0 under H 0 “Null Distribution”

Study Question: “Is there an association between liking Bruce Willis movies and gender, or not?” Example: Two Proportions (of “Success”)

Test of Homogeneity or Independence? Example: Two Proportions (of “Success”) Design: Randomly select two large samples of males and females, and record their binary responses (Yes = 1, No = 0) to the question “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?” samples Let the discrete random variable X = “# Successes” (i.e., “Yes” responses) in each gender of the samples, and use these data to test… Data: Sample 1) n 1 = 60 males, X 1 = 42 Sample 2) n 2 = 40 females, X 2 = 16 Analysis via Z-test: Point estimates Null Hypothesis H 0 : P(“Yes” among Males) = P(“Yes” among Females), i.e., H 0 : π 1 = π 2 where π = P(Success) in each gender population. “No association exists.” π 1 – π 2 = 0, NOTE: This is > 0. Therefore, REJECT H 0 Conclusion: A significant association exists at the.05 level between “liking Bruce Willis movies” and gender, with males showing a 30% preference over females, on average. Test of Homogeneity (between two populations) Study Question: “Is there an association between liking Bruce Willis movies and gender, or not?”

TWO POPULATIONS Random binary variable I “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?” Alternative Hypothesis H A :  1 ≠  2 “There is a difference in liking Bruce Willis bet two pops.”  = P(Yes to Bruce Willis movies) Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 =  2 “No difference in liking Bruce Willis between two pops.” Binary Response: P(Success) =  “Test of Homogeneity” “Do you like anchovies?” POPULATION Two random binary variables I and J “Do you like olives?” Alternative Hypothesis H A :  1 ≠  2 “An association exists between liking olives and anchovies.” Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 =  2 “No association exists between liking olives and anchovies.” “Test of Independence” I = 1I = 0 J = 0 J = 1 MalesFemales  1 = P(Yes to olives)  2 = P(Yes to anchovies)

Conclusion: A significant association exists at the.05 level; “liking Bruce Willis movies” and gender are dependent, with males showing a 30% preference over females, on average. Study Question: “Is there an association between liking Bruce Willis movies and gender, or not?” Example: Two Proportions (of “Success”) Design: Randomly select two large samples of males and females, and record their binary responses (Yes = 1, No = 0) to the question “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?” samples Let the discrete random variable X = “# Successes” (i.e., “Yes” responses) in each gender of the samples, and use these data to test… Data: Sample 1) n 1 = 60 males, X 1 = 42 Sample 2) n 2 = 40 females, X 2 = 16 Analysis via Z-test: Point estimates Null Hypothesis H 0 : P(“Yes” among Males) = P(“Yes” among Females), i.e., H 0 : π 1 = π 2 where π = P(Success) in each gender population. “No association exists.” π 1 – π 2 = 0, NOTE: This is > 0. Therefore, REJECT H 0 Test of Homogeneity or Independence

“Do you like olives?” TWO POPULATIONS Random binary variable I “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?” Alternative Hypothesis H A :  1 ≠  2 “There is a difference in liking Bruce Willis bet two pops.”  = P(Yes to Bruce Willis movies) Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 =  2 “No difference in liking Bruce Willis between two pops.” Binary Response: P(Success) =  “Test of Homogeneity” “Do you like anchovies?” POPULATION Two random binary variables I and J  1 = P(Yes to Bruce)  2 = P(Yes to Male) Alternative Hypothesis H A :  1 ≠  2 “An association exists between liking Bruce and Male.” Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 =  2 “No association exists between liking Bruce and Male.” “Test of Independence” I = 1I = 0 J = 0 J = 1 MalesFemales “Gender: Male?”“Do you like Bruce Willis?”

“Do you like olives?” TWO POPULATIONS Random binary variable I “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?” Alternative Hypothesis H A :  1 ≠  2 “There is a difference in liking Bruce Willis bet two pops.”  = P(Yes to Bruce Willis movies) Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 =  2 “No difference in liking Bruce Willis between two pops.” Binary Response: P(Success) =  “Test of Homogeneity” “Do you like anchovies?” POPULATION Two random binary variables I and J  1 = P(Yes to Bruce)  2 = P(Yes to Male) Alternative Hypothesis H A :  1 ≠  2 “Liking Bruce” and “Gender” are statistically dependent. Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 =  2 “Liking Bruce” and “Gender” are statistically independent. “Test of Independence” I = 1I = 0 J = 0 J = 1 MalesFemales “Gender: Male?”“Do you like Bruce Willis?”

Study Question: “Is there an association between liking Bruce Willis movies and gender, or not?” Example: Two Proportions (of “Success”) Data: Sample 1) n 1 = 60 males, X 1 = 42 Sample 2) n 2 = 40 females, X 2 = 16 H 0 : π 1 = π 2 where π = P(Success) in each gender population. “No association exists.” π 1 – π 2 = 0, Null Hypothesis H 0 : P(“Yes” among Males) = P(“Yes” among Females), i.e., Design: Randomly select two large samples of males and females, and record their binary responses (Yes = 1, No = 0) to the question “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?” samples Let the discrete random variable X = “# Successes” (i.e., “Yes” responses) in each gender of the samples, and use these data to test… ~ ALTERNATE METHOD ~ I = 1I = 0 J = 0 J = 1

Study Question: “Is there an association between liking Bruce Willis movies and gender, or not?” Example: Two Proportions (of “Success”) Data: Sample 1) n 1 = 60 males, X 1 = 42 Sample 2) n 2 = 40 females, X 2 = 16 H 0 : π 1 = π 2 where π = P(Success) in each gender population. “No association exists.” π 1 – π 2 = 0, MalesFemales Yes4216 No 6040 MalesFemales YesE 11 = ?E 12 = ?58 NoE 21 = ?E 22 = ? Observed Expected (under H 0 ) MalesFemales Yes No Null Hypothesis H 0 : P(“Yes” among Males) = P(“Yes” among Females), i.e., Design: Randomly select two large samples of males and females, and record their binary responses (Yes = 1, No = 0) to the question “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?” samples Let the discrete random variable X = “# Successes” (i.e., “Yes” responses) in each gender of the samples, and use these data to test…

Recall Probability Tables from Chapter 3…. Under the null hypothesis, the binary variable I is statistically independent of the binary variable J, i.e., P(I ∩ J) = P(I) P(J). J = 1J = 2 I = 1 π 11 π 12 π 11 + π 12 I = 2 π 21 π 22 π 21 + π 22 π 11 + π 21 π 12 + π 22 1

Recall Probability Tables from Chapter 3…. Contingency Table Under the null hypothesis, the binary variable I is statistically independent of the binary variable J, e.g., P(“I = 1” ∩ “J = 1”) = P(“I = 1”) P(“J = 1”). J = 1J = 2 I = 1 π 11 π 12 π 11 + π 12 I = 2 π 21 π 22 π 21 + π 22 π 11 + π 21 π 12 + π 22 1 J = 1J = 2 I = 1 E 11 E 12 R1R1 I = 2 E 21 E 22 R2R2 C1C1 C2C2 n J = 1J = 2 I = 1 E 11 /nE 12 /nR1/nR1/n I = 2 E 21 /nE 22 /nR2/nR2/n C1/nC1/nC2/nC2/n1 Probability Table Therefore…, etc. 

H 0 : π 1 = π 2 where π = P(Success) in each gender population. “No association exists.” Null Hypothesis H 0 : P(“Yes” among Males) = P(“Yes” among Females), i.e., Check: Is the null hypothesis true? Study Question: “Is there an association between liking Bruce Willis movies and gender, or not?” Example: Two Proportions (of “Success”) Data: Sample 1) n 1 = 60 males, X 1 = 42 Sample 2) n 2 = 40 females, X 2 = 16 MalesFemales Yes4216 No 6040 MalesFemales YesE 11 = ?E 12 = ?58 NoE 21 = ?E 22 = ? Observed Expected (under H 0 ) MalesFemales Yes No “Chi-squared” Test Statistic where “degrees of freedom” df = (# rows – 1)(# cols – 1), = 1 for a 2  2 table. π 1 – π 2 = 0, Design: Randomly select two large samples of males and females, and record their binary responses (Yes = 1, No = 0) to the question “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?” samples Let the discrete random variable X = “# Successes” (i.e., “Yes” responses) in each gender of the samples, and use these data to test…

Study Question: “Is there an association between liking Bruce Willis movies and gender, or not?” Example: Two Proportions (of “Success”) MalesFemales Yes No Observed Expected (under H 0 ) MalesFemales Yes No “Chi-squared” Test Statistic = on 1 df p = ????? Design: Randomly select two large samples of males and females, and record their binary responses (Yes = 1, No = 0) to the question “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?”

Because is much greater than the α =.05 critical value of 3.841, it follows that p <<.05. More precisely, < < 9.141; hence.0025 < p <.005. The actual p-value =.0029, the same as that found using the Z-test! Yes = c(42, 16) No = c(18, 24) Bruce = rbind(Yes, No) chisq.test(Bruce, correct = F) Pearson's Chi-squared test data: Bruce X-squared = 8.867, df = 1, p-value = α =.05

Study Question: “Is there an association between liking Bruce Willis movies and gender, or not?” Example: Two Proportions (of “Success”) MalesFemales Yes No Observed Expected (under H 0 ) MalesFemales Yes No “Chi-squared” Test Statistic = on 1 df p =.0029 The α =.05 critical value is Recall… Design: Randomly select two large samples of males and females, and record their binary responses (Yes = 1, No = 0) to the question “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?”

H 0 : π 1 = π 2 where π = P(Success) in each gender population. “No association exists.” Study Question: “Is there an association between liking Bruce Willis movies and gender, or not?” Example: Two Proportions (of “Success”) Data: Sample 1) n 1 = 60 males, X 1 = 42 Sample 2) n 2 = 40 females, X 2 = 16 Analysis via Z-test: Point estimates populationpopulation Null Hypothesis H 0 : P(“Yes” in Male population) = P(“Yes” in Female population), i.e., π 1 – π 2 = 0, NOTE: This is > 0. Therefore, REJECT H 0 Conclusion: A significant association exists at the.05 level; “liking Bruce Willis movies” and gender are dependent, with males showing a 30% preference over females, on average. Design: Randomly select two large samples of males and females, and record their binary responses (Yes = 1, No = 0) to the question “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?” samples Let the discrete random variable X = “# Successes” (i.e., “Yes” responses) in each gender of the samples, and use these data to test…

Study Question: “Is there an association between liking Bruce Willis movies and gender, or not?” Example: Two Proportions (of “Success”) MalesFemales Yes No Observed Expected (under H 0 ) MalesFemales Yes No “Chi-squared” Test Statistic p =.0029 The α =.05 critical value is NOTE: (Z-score) 2 = (2.9775) 2 Connection between Z-test and Chi-squared test ! = on 1 df NOTE: (Z-score) 2 = (2.9775) 2 Connection between Z-test and Chi-squared test ! = on 1 df Design: Randomly select two large samples of males and females, and record their binary responses (Yes = 1, No = 0) to the question “Do you like Bruce Willis movies?”

Categorical data – contingency table with any number of rows and columns See notes for other details, comments, including “Goodness-of-Fit” Test. 2  2 Chi-squared Test is only valid if: Null Hypothesis H 0 :  1 –  2 = 0. One-sided or nonzero null value  Z-test! Expected Values  5, in order to avoid “spurious significance” due to a possibly inflated Chi-squared value. Paired version of 2  2 Chi-squared Test = McNemar Test Formal Null Hypothesis difficult to write mathematically in terms of  1,  2,… “Test of Independence” “Test of Homogeneity” Informal H 0 : “No association exists between rows and columns.” 80% of Expected Values  5