IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. BP#1(STST/W), SH#1, BeWindow,SC#8.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1. N. Souchlas BNL (Oct. 5, 2010)
Advertisements

P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
IDS120j WITH/WITHOUT GAPS SH#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/14/2012) 1.
Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Comparison of Power Depositions Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jul. 13, 2010.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
IDS120h: Be WINDOW DETAILED CALCULATION, SHIELDING VESSELS, RESULTS FOR DIFFERENT GLOBAL STEPS Nicholas Souchlas (9/20/2011) 1.
Energy Deposition of 4-MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Meeting, Feb. 9, 2010.
MC/NF TARGET SHIELDING STUDIES. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/29/2010)‏ 1.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Mar. 9, 2010 (Update of talk on Feb. 9, 2010)
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.
Comparison of Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jun. 29, 2010.
Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Apr. 20, 2010.
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 3. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/28/2010)‏
IDS120h POWER DEPOSITION AND Hg POOL STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas (7/26/2011) 1.
STUDY II: m1507 vs. m1510 IDS120f: m1507/MCNP vs. M1510/MCNP vs. FLUKA IDS120f vs. IDS20g GEOMETRY IDS90f: B10/B11 SHIELDING RING(S) STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas.
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1..
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
Energy deposition for intense muon sources (chicane + the rest of the front end) Pavel Snopok Illinois Institute of Technology and Fermilab December 4,
IDS120j WITHOUT GAPS AND WITH MAXIMUM SIZE GAPS ( aka ''NIGHTMARE'' CASE SCENARIO ) SC#4, SC#7 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS. Nicholas Souchlas,
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS EFFECTS OF Be WINDOW WATER.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET. (From STUDY II to IDS120f geometries) NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL)‏ ‏ 1.
Shifting the Position of Focal Point of Proton Beam Relative to Intersection Point with Fixed Emittance for IDS120h Configuration X. Ding, UCLA Target.
DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET STATION. Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012) 1 DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET.
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
IDS120j WITH GAPS SC#3 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS WITH MAX GAPS SC#3, SC#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS, DP AND SC TOTAL DP WITH VARYING.
Particle Production at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Sept. 23, /23/13.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE mars1510 ( DESKTOP ) vs. mars1512 ( PRINCETON CLUSTER ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/28/2012) 1.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Particle Production of Carbon Target with 20Tto2T5m Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies April 3, /3/14.
Beam Dump for Carbon Target with IDS120h Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Jan. 24, /24/14.
Particle Production with Carbon Target and IDS120j Configuration at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Nov. 14, /14/13.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Meson Production of Carbon Target at 3 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies 17/18/13.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Chicane shielding and energy deposition (IPAC’13 follow-up) Pavel Snopok IDS-NF phone meeting June 4, 2013.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
Multiprocessing/MARS15(2012)/Princeton Cluster (IDS120j w/t Resistive Magnets: New Hg Module) X. Ding UCLA (4/11/2013)
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS MODIFYING Hg MODULE Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/1/2012) 1.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle, V Wagner, A Krása, F Křížek This document can be downloaded.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.
IDS120i GEOMETRY. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. Hg vs. Ga DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION. (using Ding's optimized parameters)
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BEAM PIPE BEYOND FIRST CRYOSTAT ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BP#2 WITHIN FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc.
PAC questions and Simulations Peter Litchfield, August 27 th Extent to which MIPP/MINER A can help estimate far detector backgrounds by extrapolation.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Ids120h_side. ids120h_top ids120h_iso ids120h_end.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR IDS80 (NO IRON PLUG/YOKE), ADDING SHIELDING IN 75 TO 80 cm (WC/H 2 O, B, Cd). NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL) Dec. 14, 2010‏ ‏ 1.
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting
IDS120h: PROTON P0-P14 TRAJECTORY FOOTPRINT
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE
1 Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/15/2011)
1 Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012)
GAMOS tutorial Shielding Exercises
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
How to stop a, b, g-rays and neutrons?
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Presentation transcript:

IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. BP#1(STST/W), SH#1, BeWindow,SC#8 SEGMENTATION STUDIES. Hg vs. Ga DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION. Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (1/24/2012) 1

IDS120hm: (m IS FOR) modified Hg pool vessel IN IDS120h. # BP#1(STST), SH#1: 1E05 (2 DIFFERENT INITIALIZATIONS) AND 2E05 SIMULATIONS COMPARISON. # BP#1(STST):Hg vs. Ga + BP#1: STST vs. W (Hg TARGET) # SC#8: 3E05 (2 DIFFERENT INITIALIZATIONS) AND 4E05 SIMULATIONS. # BeWind: 1E05 (2 DIFFERENT INITIALIZATIONS) AND 2E05 SIMULATIONS. # Hg vs. Ga: 1E05 DP SIMULATIONS. >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING:60%W+40%He ( WITH STST VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam,Np=1E05/2E05/3E05/4E05 events. >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV (P12 'POINT'). >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120h: introducing shielding vessels (STST OR W) Different cases of shielding material. >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING: 60%WC+40%H 2 O/60%WC+40%H 2 O/ >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120h: introducing shielding vessels (STST OR W) Different cases of shielding material. >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING: 60%WC+40%H 2 O/60%WC+40%H 2 O/ >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120h: introducing shielding vessels (STST OR W) Different cases of shielding material. >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING: 60%WC+40%H 2 O/60%WC+40%H 2 O/ >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120h with shielding vessels. # Different cases of shielding material. # N=100,000 AND N=500,000 events simulation for 80%W+20%He SHIELDING # Energy counting for N=500,000 events simulation for 80%W+20%He SHIELDING >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING:60%W+40%He, 80%W+20%He, 88%W+12%He ( WITH W VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000/500,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120h with shielding vessels. # Different cases of shielding material. # N=500,000 events simulation for 60%W+40%He AND 60%W+40%H 2 SHIELDING # Energy counting for N=500,000 events simulation for 80%W+20%He SHIELDING >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING:60%W+40%He, 80%W+20%He, 88%W+12%He ( WITH W VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000/500,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120h with shielding vessels. # Different cases of shielding material. # N=500,000 events simulation for 60%W+40%He AND 60%W+40%H 2 SHIELDING # Energy counting for N=500,000 events simulation for 80%W+20%He SHIELDING >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING:60%W+40%He, 80%W+20%He, 88%W+12%He ( WITH W VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000/500,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120h with shielding vessels. # Different cases of shielding material. # N=500,000 events simulation for 60%W+40%He AND 60%W+40%H 2 SHIELDING # Energy counting for N=500,000 events simulation for 80%W+20%He SHIELDING >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING:60%W+40%He, 80%W+20%He, 88%W+12%He ( WITH W VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000/500,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120h with shielding vessels. # Different cases of shielding material. # N=500,000 events simulation for 60%W+40%He AND 60%W+40%H 2 SHIELDING # Energy counting for N=500,000 events simulation for 80%W+20%He SHIELDING >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING:60%W+40%He, 80%W+20%He, 88%W+12%He ( WITH W VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000/500,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120h with shielding vessels. # Different cases of shielding material. # N=500,000 events simulation for 60%W+40%He AND 60%W+40%H 2 SHIELDING # Energy counting for N=500,000 events simulation for 80%W+20%He SHIELDING >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING:60%W+40%He, 80%W+20%He, 88%W+12%He ( WITH W VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000/500,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120h with shielding vessels. # Different cases of shielding material. # N=500,000 events simulation for 60%W+40%He AND 60%W+40%H 2 SHIELDING # Energy counting for N=500,000 events simulation for 80%W+20%He SHIELDING >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING:60%W+40%He, 80%W+20%He, 88%W+12%He ( WITH W VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000/500,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120h with shielding vessels. # Different cases of shielding material. # N=500,000 events simulation for 60%W+40%He AND 60%W+40%H 2 60%W+40%H 2 SHIELDING SHIELDING # Energy counting for N=500,000 events simulation for 80%W+20%He SHIELDING >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING:60%W+40%He, 80%W+20%He, 88%W+12%He ( WITH W VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000/500,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. 2 IDS120hm: (m IS FOR) modified Hg pool vessel IN IDS120h. # BP#1, SH#1: 1E05 (2 DIFFERENT INITIALIZATIONS) AND 2E05 SIMULATIONS COMPARISON. # SC#8: 3E05 AND 4E05 SIMULATIONS. # BeWind: 1E05 SIMULATIONS. >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING:60%W+40%He ( WITH STST VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000/500,000 events. >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV (P12 'POINT'). >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. IDS120hm: (m IS FOR) modified Hg pool vessel IN IDS120h. # BP#1(STST), SH#1: 1E05 (2 DIFFERENT INITIALIZATIONS) AND 2E05 SIMULATIONS COMPARISON. # BP#1(STST):Hg vs. GA + BP#1: STST vs. W # SC#8: 3E05 (2 DIFFERENT INITIALIZATIONS) AND 4E05 SIMULATIONS. # BeWind: 1E05 SIMULATIONS. # Hg vs. Ga: 1E05 DP SIMULATIONS. >mars1510/MCNP > MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING:60%W+40%He ( WITH STST VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam, Np=100,000/500,000 events. >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV (P12 'POINT'). >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm.

3 IDS120hm GEOMETRY=IDS120h WITH MODIFIED Hg POLL VESSEL AND SHIFTED Be WIDOW FROM 600 cm (0.6 cm THICK) TO 300 cm (1 cm THICK). MODIFIED Hg POOL EXTENTS FROM 86 cm TO ~300 cm ALONG THE z-AXIS AND UP ~50 cm RADIALLY SH1-->SH1A SH2-->SH1B + SH2 1 cm THICK Be WINDOW IS LOCATED AT 300 cm (ORIGINALLY 0.6 cm THICK PLACED AT 600 cm) 1 cm THICK STST WALLS USED FOR THE Hg POOL VESSEL

4 TABLES CONTENT: BP#1,SH#1,BeWind :A=100,000 EVENTS, B=200,000 EVENTS, C=100,000 EVENTS/NEW EXECUTABLE SC#8:A=300,000 EVENTS, B=400,000 EVENTS, C=300,000 EVENTS/NEW EXECUTABLE Hg/Ga TARGET: A=Hg, B=Ga (100,000 EVENTS) “PIECES” VOLUMES ARE CALCULATED MANUALLY, NOT FROM MARS VOLUME MODE. IDS120hm Hg POOL SURFACE AT y = - 20 cm, STST SHIELDING VESSELS

BP#1 AZIMUTHAL SEGMENTATION STUDIES 5

IDS120hm:BP#1 AZIMUTHAL SEGMENTATION PLOTS 7.5 < r < 8.5 cm dr=1.0 cm N r =1 bin < z < 0.0 cm dz=5.0 cm N z =21 bins 0.0 < φ < deg d φ =30.0 deg. N φ =12 bins Ntot=252 “pieces” 6

Np=1E05 EVENTS Np=2E05 EVENTS Np=1E05 EVENTS(NE) TOP TEN DEPOSITED POWER DENSITIES (DPD) FOR STST BP#1 FOR 3 SIMULATIONS STATISITCAL FLUCTUATIONS AND UNCERTAINTIES FOR THE MAXIMUM DPD IN BP#1 REGIONS ARE OF THE ORDER OF A FEW WATTS. PEAK VALUES APPEAR TO BE ALONG THE -y DIRECTION AND - 27 < z < -12 cm. INITIAL ESTIMATIONS OF MAXIMUM DPD FOR BP#1 WITH VOLUME DETECTORS ~ 10 W/g. BP#1 SUM OF DEPOSITED POWER IN 252 “PIECES” kW kW kW vs kW WITHOUT SEGMENTATION FOR 1E05 EVENTS 7

TOP TEN DEPOSITED POWER DENSITIES (DPD) FOR BP#1: STST BP#1 vs. W BP#1, AND STST BP#1 FOR Hg vs. Ga TARGET Np=1E05 EVENTS (BP#1:STST,Ga) Np=1E05 EVENTS (BP#1:W,Hg) Np=1E05 EVENTS (BP#1:STST,Hg) W BP#1 HAS SLIGHTLY HIGHER DPD PEAK VALUES (~ W), ~SAME REGIONS. FOR Ga PEAK DPD ABOUT SAME AS WITH Hg. THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN THE DP DISTRIBUTION ALONG z AXIS : MAXIMUM DPD IS FROM ~ - 23< z < 0 cm, ALONG ~ - y DIRECTION. BP#1 SUM OF DEPOSITED POWER IN 252 “PIECES” kW kW kW vs kW kW kW WITHOUT SEGMENTATION(1E05) 8

SH#1 AZIMUTHAL SEGMENTATION STUDIES 9

IDS120hm:SH#1 AZIMUTHAL SEGMENTATION PLOTS FOR FIRST 1 cm ALONG r DIRECTION 9.5 < r < 10.5 cm dr=1.0 cm N r =1 bin < z < cm dz=5.161 cm N z =21 bins 0.0 < φ < deg d φ =30.0 deg. N φ =12 bins Ntot=216 “pieces” 10

TOP TEN DEPOSITED POWER DENSITIES (DPD) FOR W/He SH#1 FOR 3 SIMULATIONS Np=1E05 EVENTSNp=1E05 EVENTS(NE)Np=2E05 EVENTS STATISITCAL FLUCTUATIONS AND UNCERTAINTIES FOR THE MAXIMUM DPD IN SH#1 REGIONS ARE LESS THAN 1 WATT. PEAK VALUES APPEAR TO BE ALONG THE -y DIRECTION AND – 26 < z < 9 cm REGION. INITIAL ESTIMATIONS OF MAXIMUM DPD FOR SH#1 WITH VOLUME DETECTORS~10-11 W/g WERE “ON THE MONEY” 11

Be WINDOW AZIMUTHAL SEGMENTATION STUDIES 12

0.0 < r < 50.0 cm dr=2.0 cm N r =25 bins < z < cm dz=1.0 cm N z =1 bin 0.0 < φ < deg d φ =30.0 deg. N φ =12 bins Ntot=300 “pieces” IDS120hm:Be WINDOW AZIMUTHAL SEGMENTATION PLOTS. 13

14 STATISITCAL FLUCTUATIONS AND UNCERTAINTIES FOR THE MAXIMUM DPD IN Be WIND. REGIONS ARE OF THE ORDER OF A FEW WATTS. PEAK VALUES APPEAR TO BE ALONG THE +y DIRECTION AND 0 < r < 4 cm. INITIAL ESTIMATIONS OF MAXIMUM DPD FOR Be WIND. WITH VOLUME DETECTORS~100 / 200 W/g (dx,dy,dz)=(2.0,1.4,1.0) cm / (1.0,0.7,1.0) cm BINS SIZE. Be WIND. SUM OF DEPOSITED POWER IN 300 “PIECES” 7.54 kW 7.54 kW 7.41 kW vs kW WITHOUT SEGMENTATION FOR 1E05 EVENTS TOP TEN DEPOSITED POWER DENSITIES (DPD) FOR Be WINDOW FOR 3 SIMULATIONS Np=1E05 EVENTS Np=2E05 EVENTS Np=1E05 EVENTS(NE)

SC#8 AZIMUTHAL SEGMENTATION STUDIES 15

IDS120hm:SC#8 AZIMUTHAL SEGMENTATION PLOTS < r < cm dr=2.495 cm N r =2 bins < z < cm dz=10.0 cm N z =6 bins 0.0 < φ < deg d φ =30.0 deg. N φ =12 bins Ntot=144 “pieces” 16

TOP TEN DEPOSITED POWER DENSITIES (DPD) FOR SC#8 FOR 3 SIMULATIONS Np=3E05 EVENTSNp=4E05 EVENTSNp=3E05 EVENTS(NE) SC#8 MAXIMUM DPD REGIONS ARE SENSITIVE TO STATISITCAL FLUCTUATIONS AND UNCERTAINTIES. STRONG INDICATIONS OF REGIONS WITH DPD>0.15 mW/g PEAK VALUES APPEAR TO BE MOSTLY ALONG THE -y DIRECTION AND < z < cm. INITIAL ESTIMATIONS OF PEAK DPD FOR SC#8 ~0.054 mW/g FROM 5E05 SIMULATIONS. SC#7-9(SC#8 SUM) SUM OF DEPOSITED POWER USING TOTAL FROM 300 “PIECES” (0.0375) kW (0.0274) kW (0.0299)kW vs kW WITHOUT SEGMENTATION FROM 5E05 EVENTS 17

THINGS TO REMEMBER. # THE SMALLER THE “PIECE” VOLUME, THE LARGER THE STATISTICAL UNCERTAINTY. # FOR CERTAIN CASES “CO-EXISTENCE” OF “SMALL” AND “LARGE” VOLUMES IS UNAVOIDABLE (SEE FOR EXAMPLE Be WINDOW CASE). # THE FARTHER AWAY THE VOLUME FORM THE TARGET REGION, THE LARGER THE STASTICAL UNCERTAINTY. # STEP SIZE RELATED ISSUES FOR THE BOUNDARIES LOCALIZATION OF THE “PIECES” AND PARTICLES TRACKING THROUGH EACH “PIECE”? # DP AND DPD DEPEND ON PIECES “LOCATION”, SIZE. NO RECIPE FOR THE > “PIECES” SIZE AND LOCATION. # MANY MORE DIFFERENT SEED(NE) SIMULATIONS ARE NECESSARY TO DETERMINE STATISTICAL (PHYSICAL) FLUCTUATIONS. HOW MANY? 18

Hg vs. Ga TARGET DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION STUDIES (Hg OPTIMIZED PARAMETERS USED FOR BOTH TARGETS). 19

POWER DEPOSITED IN THE SC COILS 20 SC#1~ kW, SC#3, SC#4 AND SC#7-9 INCREASE IN DP. DP IS SPREAD OUT MORE DOWNSTREAM.

DEPOSITED POWER IN THE SHIELDING AND SHIELDING VESSELS. 21 SH#1~ kW DECREASE, SH#2~ kW INCREASE. DP IS SPREAD OUT MORE DOWNSTREAM, MAINLY IN THE VOLUME REGION ENCLOSED BY SC#4-SC#10. ~38.5 kW DECREASE IN SHVS#1 AND ~ kW INCREASE IN SHVS#2 DP AGAIN INDICATES ENERGY IS SPREAD OUT MORE DOWNSTREAM.

POWER DEPOSITED IN RESISTIVE MAGNETS (RS#) AND BEAM PIPE (BP#). SIGNIFICANT DECREASE IN THE DP IN RS#1-5~ - 91 kW 22 ABOUT SAME TOTAL DP IN BP#1-3, REDISTRIBUTION BETWEEN BP#1 (DECREASE IN DP) AND BP#2 (INCREASE IN DP).

SUMMARY FOR TOTAL POWER DEPOSITED IN DIFFERENT AREAS AND SC PEAK VALUES. 23 Ga TARGET RECEIVES LESS THAN HALF THE POWER DEPOSITED IN Hg, WHILE Ga POOL ABOUT TWICE AS MUCH AS THE Hg POOL. Ga ATOMS HAVE MUCH SMALLER ATOMIC NUMBER (31) THAN Hg ATOMS (80) SMALLER NUMBER OF PROTONS INTERACTS WITH THE TARGET AND MORE WILL END UP IN THE Ga POOL. Be WINDOW ABOUT 1 kW LESS DP IN Ga. INDICATIONS OF LARGE DPD VALUES IS SC#9 REGION.

23 π ± SPECTRUM HISTOGRAM PLOTS AT z=1900 cm FOR Hg AND Ga TARGETS. PARTICLE(TARGET): π = (Hg) π = (Ga) π - (Hg) π - (Ga) # EVENTS PRODUCING: # DIFFERENT EVENTS PRODUCING: TOTAL # OF PARTICLES: # OF PARTICLES WITH 40<KE<180 MeV: PARTICLE(TARGET): π = (Hg) π = (Ga) π - (Hg) π - (Ga) # EVENTS PRODUCING: # DIFFERENT EVENTS PRODUCING: TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICLES: # OF PARTICLES WITH 40<KE<180 MeV: 23 24

23 π ± SPECTRUM HISTOGRAM PLOTS AT z=1900 cm FOR Hg AND Ga TARGETS. PARTICLE(TARGET): π = (Hg) π = (Ga) π - (Hg) π - (Ga) # EVENTS PRODUCING: # DIFFERENT EVENTS PRODUCING: TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICLES: # OF PARTICLES WITH 40<KE<180 MeV: PARTICLE(TARGET): μ = (Hg) μ = (Ga) μ - (Hg) μ - (Ga) # EVENTS PRODUCING: # DIFFERENT EVENTS PRODUCING: TOTAL # OF PARTICLES: # OF PARTICLES WITH 40<KE<180 MeV: μ ± SPECTRUM HISTOGRAM PLOTS AT z=1900 cm FOR Hg AND Ga TARGETS. 25