Understanding Rigor in Reading: Text Complexity and Supported Struggle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reading Complex Text and Exemplary Text Common Core State Standards Carrie Wozniak.
Advertisements

Copyright ©2011 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 3.
Session 3: Text Complexity Audience: K – 5 Teachers.
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Understanding Rigor in Reading: Text Complexity and Supported Struggle.
►Identify the importance of text complexity in disciplinary literacy. ►Compare the CCSS grade level expectations for text complexity. ►Identify the three.
Module 2 Text Comprehension
Text Complexity Quantitative Qualitative Reader and Task.
Amy Painter 3 rd Grade Teacher Chesnee Elementary School.
Text Complexity AND THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS Adapted from Kansas State Department of Education.
Lexile and Text Complexity Training Indian Knoll Elementary July 2012.
 Be on time  Actively Listen/participate › All electronic devices (i.e. laptops, iPads, cells phones-[on vibrate]) should be put away unless instructed.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS SIX INSTRUCTIONAL SHIFTS FOCUS ON SHIFT STAIRCASE OF TEXT COMPLEXITY- QUANTITATIVE MEASURES.
{ Helping English Learners Access Complex Text in the Common Core CATE-FACET: Yosemite Conference Alesha M. Ramirez, Tulare County Office of Education.
Text Complexi ty in the Common Core Classroo m Patricia Coldren Lee County Schools k 12. nc. us.
Benefits from Formal and Informal Assessments
Text Complexity and The KY Core Academic Standards for ELA and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science & Technical Subjects Carole Mullins Eng/LA Regional.
Text Complexity Common Core State Standards English Language Arts
UNLOCKING THE TOOLS TO TEXT COMPLEXITY. Agreements We will… – A – Assume Responsibility – S – Seek information – P – Participate actively – I – Integrate.
ELA Coordinators Meeting: Close Reading and Text Complexity Tamra Gacek October, 2012 Literacy and Early Learning Unit Office of Teacher Effectiveness.
The What, the Why, and the How California Reading Association October 18, 2014.
1. 2 August 15, 2012 (Part 1)  Provide ADMINISTRATORS with EXPERIENCE & MATERIALS to “turnkey” workshops and informations in your buildings.  Understand.
Text Complexity the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts, Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science and Technical Subjects 3-5 Learning Community.
Building Core Strength through the Shifts Focusing on Shifts 1, 2, and 3.
Simplifying Text Complexity Module 4. The Dilemma The difficulty in transitioning from high school to college and careers may be caused, in part, by a.
IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT AND LEADERSHIP! PRESENTED BY: SHERYL WHITE EDUCATOR LEADER CADRE- ELA CHAIR Common Core Shifts in English Language.
November 18 th, 2014 ELA Review and Adoption Committee.
Text Complexity and the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Text Complexity and the Common Core Standards. Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction (text complexity) Reading, writing, and speaking grounded.
Text Complexity & The KY Core Academic Standards for ELA and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science & Technical Subjects.
Qualitative Measures of Text Complexity
ELA SCHOOL TEAM SESSION Welcome to EEA, 2012! 10/2/2015MSDE1.
College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Montana K-12 Content Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects Text Complexity.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS MODULE 4 FEBRUARY 2013 Reading Common Core Focus: Text Complexity.
Overview of Text Complexity Text complexity is defined by: Qualitative 2.Qualitative measures – levels of meaning, structure, language conventionality.
Subtitle Text Complexity in Common Core State Standards Erin Thompson
CCR Anchor Standard 10 – Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently 10/18/2015MSDE2.
Text Complexity and the Common Core Standards for Middle School ELA Waiver Day ~ November 8, 2011 Sherry Birchem.
Text Complexity This portion of the module will explore quantitative and qualitative dimensions of texts as well as reader and task considerations.
We’re not through with you yet!. Educator Enhancement Academy ELA, Grades 2 Day 2 Ashley Gunnoe – Title 1, Wirt County Carrie Cronin – 2 nd Grade Teacher,
Text Complexity and Close Reading for the Developing Reader Read 180 Common Core Kick-Off Judy Fuhrman K-12 Staff Developer.
Even though grade leveling has been widely used, it has a number of problems that make it hard to match children with reading material reliably: Grade.
Science & Literacy - Text Complexity “Beyond the Land of Oz” Sid Larson, Literacy Consultant CESA2 Dr. Kevin Anderson.
Meeting the Challenge of Common Core: Planning Close Reading CFN 604 October 21 st, 2014.
Qualitative Measures of Text Complexity. Agenda 12:30-12:50 Seminar: Does accessible text have to sacrifice rigor? Why or why not? 12:50-1:15 Activity.
Text Complexity for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Close Reading. AGENDA Demands of complex text on the reader Close reading tools for comprehending complex text Question and answer opportunities with.
Close Reading.  Discuss Model for Text Complexity  Discuss Reader and Task  Define Close Reading  Model a Close Reading Lesson  Create a Close Reading.
Text Complexity COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. Essential Questions What is text complexity? Why is text complexity an integral component of the Common Core.
1 The Role of the Text in Comprehension Reader Activity Sociocultural Context Text RAND READING REPORT.
The What, the Why, and the How California Reading Association October 23, 2015 This presentation can be found on SlideShare at
Teaching Close Reading of Complex Texts … Learning (and Teaching) Argumentation Structures.
Crossing the Bridge Day 3 Heidi Elmoustakim & Eileen Hartwell Secondary Literacy Specialists.
ACADEMIC LANGUAGE AND PERSPECTIVE TAKING EDC 448 WORKSHOP Building/Supporting Critical Thinking from Multiple Perspectives.
1 The Role of the Text in Comprehension Reader Activity Sociocultural Context Text RAND READING REPORT.
WELCOME TO PARENT OUTREACH Accelerated Reader Fountas & Pinnell “Just Right Books”
Understanding the Lexile Stretch and Its Rationale Text Complexity.
Participants will:  Become more familiar with Disciplinary Literacy  Identify the importance of text complexity in disciplinary literacy.  Identify.
GREENSBURG SALEM SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT March 2013 Unpacking the Standards Skype Session Benchmark Assessment Continuum of.
Text Complexity, Lexile Levels and Instruction February 11, 2016 “Building Academic Excellence Through Coherence, Collaboration, High Expectations and.
 An abbreviated look at the evolution of comprehension instruction › Check and assess comprehension after reading, but not really teach it › Brain research.
D 4 Understanding the Common Core State Standards & Assessment Katie McKnight, Ph.D.
Measures of Text Difficulty
EDC 448 Seminar Bridging the Knowledge Gap while Supporting Struggle: Rigor & Accessibility in Disciplinary Teaching Practices.
Text Complexity in Common Core State Standards
Challenging Texts and Measures of Text Difficulty
The Common Core State Standards and English Language Learners
Meeting comprehension demands for Complex text
Three Instructional Shifts
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Rigor in Reading: Text Complexity and Supported Struggle

Text Complexity Factors 2 HUMAN RATED Levels of meaning Structure Language conventionality Clarity Knowledge demands COMPUTER SCORED Word length Word frequency Sentence length Text Cohesion Co-Metrix and Lexiles READER Motivation Knowledge Experiences TASK Purpose/Context Complexity Questions Posed Common Core Standards

What makes a text difficult? (Turn and talk…) – Writing style (formality, genre, historical time, language, literature features) – Content (vocabulary; assumptions about prior knowledge) – Text Structure: arrangement of ideas (narrative/expos) – Coherence: logical connections & explained – Sentence Complexity (coreference/coherence) – Unity: sticks to the topic – Audience Appropriateness: match target reader PK – Themes and Ideas: easy texts, but big ideas – Purpose (for pleasure or to analyze) 3

Determining Appropriate Leveled Texts for Readers… Goldilocks Method – 5 fingers, too hard Oral reading (decode vs. comprehend) but…

Understanding readability The estimated reading level is “the break-off point” (or a student’s limit)! Readability formulas are linked to a 50% correct answer score on a comprehension test (Johnson, 2005). So, if a book has a reading level of 14 years, an average 14-year old pupil would score only 50% on a test of comprehension! For a student to read independently (without help, but with comprehension), the reading level of the text should be 2 years below the students’ reading level!

What are some more formal ways of determining/calculating readability?? TURN AND TALK

How is readability determined? Word difficulty is determined by… COUNTYING SYLLABLES Fry Readability: sentence length & syllables [Grades 1- 12] [Do this by hand] Flesh-Kinkaid: sentence length & syllables [How many years of schooling to understand the content … 0-12] - Use Microsoft Word (Tools: Options: Spelling) Gunning-Fox Index: sentence length & difficult words (3 syllables) [How many years of schooling to understand the content…0-17] Juicy Studio’s Online Readability CalculatorOnline Readability Calculator WORD FREQUENCY/Commonness

Fry Readability Formula = # of sentences and # of syllables 8 ONLY CONSIDERS LIMITED TEXT FEATURES

Word Frequency: Lists of Frequently Used Words Dale Chall’s List of 3,000 Most Frequent Words – see the wiki Coxhead’s (2000) Academic Word List Get to later in vocabulary

Levels, Levels, Levels! “Zombies with Scripts”…. CCSS Appendix A

Lexile Level = sentence length and word frequency 12 CONSIDERS THE TEXT & THE READER

Appendix B List…So now what? The standards leave room for teachers, curriculum developers, and states to determine How those goals should be reached and what additional topics should be addressed. Teachers are free to provide students with whatever tools and knowledge their professional judgment and experience identify as most helpful for meeting goals set In the Standards.

14 So why is this a little scary?? Standard #10: Text Complexity Common Core Standards Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently

Text Complexity Factors 15 HUMAN RATED Levels of meaning Structure Language conventionality Clarity Knowledge demands COMPUTER SCORED Word length Word frequency Sentence length Text Cohesion Co-Metrix and Lexiles READER Motivation Knowledge Experiences TASK Purpose/Context Complexity Questions Posed Common Core Standards Considers Teacher, text, reader, & task/context

Students should read challenging texts in their content area on a regular basis(small groups – then large group) YES NO

What can you control? And how? NO – JUST BY SELECTION How can you design/change/scaffold the task? HUMAN RATED Levels of meaning Structure Language conventionality Clarity Knowledge demands COMPUTER SCORED Word length Word frequency Sentence length Text Cohesion Co-Metrix and Lexiles We’ll consider later…

The Case for Struggle? Struggle Alone vs. Struggle With Support Productive Failure (Ch 1, p. 11 ) = Supported Struggle – Role of “easy” texts with big, complex ideas – Role of guided high-level questioning before, during, and after reading – Role of conversation/dialogue during re-readings – Role of summary, synthesis, transformation

Noticing Good Teaching What are ten effective teaching techniques that Ms. Chin uses that foster “supported struggle” with a complex text?

10 Effective Teaching Techniques for Supported Struggle 1.Pre-read with authentic purpose (character change) 2.Pre: Provide organizer (Beginning, middle, end) 3.During: Read hard text indep. for purpose (get familiar with character, language, and how change) 4.During: (Time 1) Annotate and note author craft 5.After: (Time 1) Dialogue/conversation with evidence- based reasoning 6.During: (Time 2) Revisit purpose to analyze more closedly 7.During: (Time 2) Think-aloud (notice strategy links) 8.After: (Time 2) Discuss with text-dependent questions 9.After: Respond/Transform (Write/new dialogue) 10.Together: Use dialogues and writing as multiple forms of formative assessment (to prepare for PARRC test!)

Homework Fisher & Fry Ch. 3: Qualitative Measures Skim Appendix A& B of Common Core Writing Response: Discussion Web: – Accessible text doesn’t sacrifice rigor – 3 Agree, 3 Disagree – Then write your conclusion with supporting evidence (PLEASE DOWNLOAD & TYPE) Optional: Video (Simplifying Text Complexity)