Recent PSD Experiences in SWRO Regulatory & Statutory Requirements Relationship with EPA Federal Land Managers - FLAG Appeals.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Regional Haze November 15, 2012 Michele Notarianni EPA Region 4 1.
Advertisements

The Entergy facility is a boiling water reactor with a rated core thermal power level of 1912 MW, providing a gross electrical output of 620 MW. The facility.
1 Unit 4 Administrative Law Basics l Administrative agencies Created by Congress To carry out specific duties.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS’ AQRV WORKGROUP (FLAG): CONSTRUCTING A CONSISTENT PROCESS.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Variations and Timelines in the Federal Appeals Process Robert Mathes, Bjork Lindley Little PC.
Administrative Law Washington & Federal Cheryl Nyberg June 14, 2006.
National Park Service U. S. Forest Service Bureau of Land Management U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement MissionEnsure that coal mines are operated in a manner that protects citizens and the environment.
Working with State and Federal Regulatory and Land Management Agencies Trent Wickman USDA Forest Service Eastern Region, Lakes States.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
AIR QUALITY for the Interagency Wilderness Fire Resource Advisor 2011 SOUTHERN AREA ADVANCED FIRE AND AVIATION ACADEMY Discussion Topics: Very Brief Overview.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
Chapter 25 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans020-1 Unit 20 Regulation of Wetlands Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Section 10, Rivers and Harbors Acts of 1890 and 1899.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Jim Luce, EFSEC Chair Port Of Vancouver Presentation Vancouver, WA June 27, 2013 EFSEC These Slides.
Proposed Rulemaking 25 Pa. Code Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review John Slade, Chief Division of Permits Bureau.
Southern Ute Indian Tribe Courtesy of the Southern Ute Air Quality Program Presentation Prepared by: James Temte and Virgil Frazier.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
1 GRIC TAS Development Process Dan Blair Compliance and Enforcement Mgr. Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Department of Environmental Quality.
Environmental Decision Making SC.912.L Why have environmental laws?  To regulate activities that are harmful to the environment. a. E.g., Clean.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
FLAG, Policy Overview 15 December 1999 Presenter - Bruce Bayle USDA/Forest Service.
1 Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal General Overview March 1, 2006 US EPA.
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
FLMs, PSD Increment, and AQRVs: the Oregon experience WESTAR Fall Technical Conference Seattle September 2003 Philip Allen, Oregon DEQ.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference on PSD Increment Tracking & Cumulative Effects Modeling Seattle, Washington Conducting Class I Area Increment Analyses.
Life After Class I Natalene Cummings Air Program Director Forest County Potawatomi NTF 2011.
New Source Review Rules Update Jessica Montanez U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Policy Division.
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
Update on EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Rulemakings Norman W. Fichthorn Hunton & Williams LLP 2010 American Public Power Association Energy and Air Quality Task.
Current State Issues in Title V Permitting Matthew A. Paque Environmental Attorney Supervisor Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Office of General.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
Class I Air Quality Related Values Kevin J. Finto Hunton & Williams APPA Energy and Air Quality Task Force Washington, D.C. March 10, 2005.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans04-1 Unit 3 Administrative Law Basics Administrative agencies –Created by Congress –To carry out specific duties.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
TAS and TIP Swinomish Tribe and the Incremental Approach.
After-the-Fact Conservation Area Impact Permit Request* Keene’s Pointe Community Association, Inc. District 1 November 1, 2011 *Postponed from the December.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
The Highlands Region: Partnerships to Conserve Forests & Watersheds Ramapo Mountains, NJ.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Petition to Adopt Regulations to Restrict Idling of Diesel-Powered Vehicles Environmental Quality Board Harrisburg, Pennsylvania January 17, 2006.
Environmental Quality Board May 16, 2007
Environmental Quality Board
Department of Environmental Quality
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
The Rulemaking Process
DNR’s Smoke management Plan Update: Options, Tradeoffs, and Challenges
Department of Environmental Quality
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Alaska Roadless Rulemaking
Class I Redesignations
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
Environmental/Energy policy
Wildland Fire Policy Revision
Presentation transcript:

Recent PSD Experiences in SWRO Regulatory & Statutory Requirements Relationship with EPA Federal Land Managers - FLAG Appeals

3 New Sources 3 applications received within a few months –Beech Hollow CFB waste coal EGU –Greene Energy CFB waste coal EGU –Cambria Coke non-recovery Coke plant all 3 projects subject to PSD and NA review

Regulatory requirements Completeness review within 30 days of receipt [40 CFR, Part 124] must take final action within 1 year of receipt of a complete application [CAA, 1659(c)] regulatory changes, PM designations published in January, effective on April 5, posed additional challenges for review

Relationship with EPA PA adopted PSD regulations with a few minor exceptions –EPA follows public notice procedures of Part 124 –DEP follows 25 PA Code, Chapter 127 EPA is still administrator that notifies Federal land manager hearings held under 40 CFR - EPA Discrepancies created procedural problems MOU developed for future reviews

Federal Land Manager The Secretary of the Department with authority over such lands Department of Agricultural –Forest - Service Department of the Interior –National Park Service –Fish and Wildlife Service

Federal Land Manager -FLM Charged with affirmative responsibility to protect natural and cultural resources of Class I areas from the adverse affects of air pollution. Have no permitting authority under CAA Have no authority to establish AQ rules or standards

FLM Continued Use Air Quality related values (AQRV) –deposition (DAT) –visibility May provide comments to EPA and States May make adverse impact determination Can accept/approve mitigation plans

FLM - FLAG Guidance used by FLM is the FLAG –Federal Land Managers’ Air Quality Related Values Workgroup (December, 2000) 210 page document Is Guidance, not policy or regulation DEP found FLAG to be very useful and informative

Class I Areas Established by Law –National Wilderness areas > 5,000 acres –National memorial Parks > 5,000 acres –National Parks > 6,000 acres –International parks May not be reclassified

Class I areas of Concern Otter Creek Wilderness - FS Dolly Sods Wilderness - FS James River Face Wilderness - FS Shenandoah National Park - NPS

PSD reviews - FLMs All three PSD projects affected Class I areas above significant impact levels mitigation plans for AQRVs DEP included permit conditions for mitigation

APPEALS All three PSD Plan Approvals were appealed to EHB Beech Hollow settled w/o hearing Greene Energy –hearing throughout month of June –ruling expected mid November Cambria Coke dismissed as moot –18-month construction period expired