Seabird Monitoring in the California Current System U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.
Advertisements

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Introduction: Towards an Integrated Reporting System for Marine Protected Areas in the Baja to Bering Sea (B2B) Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
USFWS Migratory Bird Program James R. Kelley Mississippi Flyway Representative.
Ecological Monitoring Committee for the Lower Athabasca: Program Development and Implementation Presentation to the Alberta Environmental Monitoring Panel,
Birds of the Coastal Wetlands of Southern Sonora: Status and Conservation Osvel Hinojosa Huerta.
Lake-scale planning for management, conservation and restoration Objective: Bring together researchers, managers, NGO representatives and other interested.
Susan Haseltine Associate Director for Biology U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Avian Influenza– Science at the Forefront.
Seabirds, Shorebirds and Coastal Birds of Oregon REVIEW.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level The Economy and Conservation Agendas:
Southeast Alaska Network Inventory and Monitoring Program Marine Predators Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve.
Great Lakes Monitoring Inventory and Gap Analysis: Recommendations for Addressing Shortfalls and Improving Monitoring Coordination in the Great Lakes Basin.
New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.
Bristol Bay / N. Aleutian Basin -- Seabirds & Shorebirds Presented by Kathy Kuletz, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
Chicago Wilderness: An Ecosystem Management Plan Katy Berlin Shelly Charron Lisa DuRussel NRE 317 April 11, 2001.
Carolinas Integrated Sciences & Assessments (CISA) Work to Support NIDIS July 31 st – August 1 st, 2012 Wilmington, NC.
 Secretarial Order No establishes Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, which focus on on-the-ground strategic conservation efforts at the landscape.
NFHP Science and Data Committee Report Gary E. Whelan (MI DNR) and Andrea C. Ostroff (USGS) NFHP Science & Data Committee Co-Chairs June 2013.
Conservation Design and the Sagebrush Ecosystem Russell George Executive Director Colorado Dept. of Natural Resources.
EPA’s Work Related to P2 and the Great Lakes Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Round Table Summer Conference August 2005.
Seabirds Penguins Albatrosses, shearwaters, petrels Pelicans, cormorants, boobies Gulls, terns, skuas, puffins Diving ducks Loons, grebes.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
Main elements of an Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Programme: Biodiversity Integrated Correspondence Group on Monitoring 30 March-1 April (Athens,
The Invasive Species Threat. The National Strategy and Implementation Plan for Invasive Species Management -Forests Out of Balance- The Impact of Invasive.
Wetlands Subcommittee, Federal Geographic Data Committee  The Wetlands Subcommittee was re-launched in July of  Chaired by U.S. Fish and Wildlife.
A Partnership of U.S. Federal, State and Tribal Fish and Wildlife Agencies with support from the Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Shared solutions.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Prescott College Kino Bay Center For Cultural and Ecological Studies Bahia de Kino, Sonora, Mexico.
Identifying Information Needs and Research Priorities for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Birds Working Group Summary Findings John Krummel and the.
Photos by Peter LaTourrette and PRBO The California Avian Data Center (CADC) User Survey: Results and Trends The CADC Development Team, PRBO July 30, 2008.
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center Council for Data Integration Meeting Sept 16, 2009 U.S. Department of the.
Working Group Results Kirk LaGory North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research Planning Meeting Minerals Management Service Anchorage, Alaska November.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Nautilus (Dr M. Norman, Museum Victoria) Butterfly fish & Yellowback Fusiliners (R.Thorn) Soft coral and diver (M. Ball) Tiger Anemone (L. Wiseman) Whale.
Marsh Bird Monitoring Technical Workshop March 6-8, 2006 Patuxent National Wildlife Research Center.
Symposium in Context of Yellow Rail Conservation JENNIFER WHEELER, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Waterbird Conservation for the Americas JANE AUSTIN, US.
The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS. 9:30 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 10:30 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying.
Developing an Ecosystems Science Strategy for the USGS and the Nation Gary Brewer and Ken Williams Ecosystem SSPT Co-Chairs U.S. Department of the Interior.
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
US Fish and Wildlife Service Focal Species Strategy for Migratory Birds.
The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS. 9:00 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 10:00 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Columbia River Basin Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Reporting (MERR) Plan DRAFT Nancy Leonard Fish, Wildlife, Ecosystem Monitoring and Evaluation.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Draft. NAWMP Progress Assessment You did what with our $3 billion?
Supporting Community Participation in U.S. Arctic Ocean Governance Strengthening Institutions Strategies for Cooperative Management in the Marine Environment.
Implementation of the Lower Columbia River Recovery Plan Northwest Region August 19, 2013.
Selected Seabirds, Shorebirds and Coastal Birds of Oregon (all photos from National Wildlife Federation Website- E-Nature)
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
1. Adaptation – management actions to help fish and wildlife and their habitats adapt to climate change, using a Strategic Habitat Conservation Framework.
The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of the United States and Pacific Freely Associated States: 2005 NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program
Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Reviewing methods and experience.
Cooperation among state wildlife agencies with the purpose of protecting and conserving migratory birds in western North America. Involved with annual.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Biodiversity Collaborative Draft Framework For Working Together.
FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department The Canary Current LME project (CCLME) Implementation of the full phase started 1 April 2010 FAO and UNEP act.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act & Birds of Conservation Concern.
Prioritizing Species for Biological Planning in the North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (NALCC) USFWS Region 5 Strategic Habitat Conservation.
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
North Atlantic LCC RFP Topics 1&2: Recommendations for Funding
Presentation transcript:

Seabird Monitoring in the California Current System U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey

Regional Seabird Conservation Plan Objectives Review seabird resources, threats, and management issues Identify priorities for management, monitoring, research and outreach Develop a comprehensive strategy to direct future FWS actions

Seabird Monitoring Program for the California Current System Monitoring at a variety of scales, using a hierarchical approach Scientifically rigorous, and logistically and fiscally feasible Cooperatively with other federal, state, and private partners USFWS is working with USGS and seabird experts throughout the Pacific to develop a monitoring program for seabirds breeding in the California Current System. NWR State Oceanographic sub-region California Current System

Geographic Scope California Current System: coastal and marine habitats from Scott Islands, British Columbia, Canada to Punta Eugenia, Baja California Sur, Mexico Initial effort is focused on the U.S. portion of the CCS.

Seabird Monitoring Workshops Experts in seabird monitoring convened for two workshops Oregon - September 2004 Southern California - April 2005 Participants from Canada, Alaska, Washington, Oregon, and California Experts from USGS, USFWS, State Agencies, University, and private sector

Objectives of Seabird Monitoring Workshops Develop specific objectives for seabird monitoring in the CCS Outline the underlying design or framework for a seabird monitoring program Select focal species for monitoring For each of these species recommend: monitoring locations, population parameters, measurement variables, and field methodologies.

Goals for Seabird Monitoring GOAL 1 Detect and understand changes in the status and trends of seabird populations in support of conservation strategies in the CCS. GOAL 2 Integrate seabird monitoring into an overall assessment of the health of the marine/coastal ecosystem in the CCS.

Goals for Seabird Monitoring OBJECTIVES Monitor trends of seabird populations. Determine conservation status of seabird populations, incorporating abundance, distribution, trends, and threats to seabird populations. Gain insight as to causes of population change. Collaborate with partners to achieve and advance all objectives. GOAL 1: Detect and understand changes in the status and trends of seabird populations in support of conservation strategies in the CCS.

Goals for Seabird Monitoring OBJECTIVES Use seabirds as indicators of CCS health (i.e. structure, function, and productivity). Collaborate with partners to integrate seabird monitoring with other marine monitoring efforts. GOAL 2: Integrate seabird monitoring into an overall assessment of the health of the marine/coastal ecosystem in the CCS.

Considerations for Species Selection Birds of Conservation Concern Stewardship species – those species and subspecies for which the CCS supports the majority of the global population Representation from each foraging guild Species with broad distribution across the oceanographic sub-regions of the CCS Species that can provide data to address the Goals and Objectives TARGET SPECIES Leach's Storm-Petrel Ashy Storm-Petrel Pelagic Cormorant Brandt's Cormorant Western Gull Glaucous-winged Gull Elegant Tern Black Skimmer Common Murre Xantus's Murrelet Cassin's Auklet Rhinoceros Auklet

Basic Framework of the Monitoring Program Two tiered approach Inventory of all colonies at infrequent intervals (e.g., every years) More intensive monitoring of population parameters of target species at selected colonies

Schedule 2005Draft manual developed: Species specific recommendations for monitoring, monitoring locations, population parameters, measurement variables, and field methodologies. Spring 2006 Review by team of experts Summer 2006Peer review Fall 2006Final Manual