Slide 1 of 40 Brovko, Haag, Cebra January 06, 2011 LF Spectra Phone Conference STAR as a Fixed Target Experiment? Sam Brovko, Brooke Haag, Daniel Cebra.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics Results of the NA49 exp. on Nucleus – Nucleus Collisions at SPS Energies P. Christakoglou, A. Petridis, M. Vassiliou Athens University HEP2006,
Advertisements

Direct Photon Production in pp collisions at the LHC 第 8 届高能物理大会分会 南昌 F.M. Liu IOPP/CCNU, Wuhan, China.
Quark Matter 2006 ( ) Excitation functions of baryon anomaly and freeze-out properties at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (University of Tsukuba) for.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
Identified particle transverse momentum distributions in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC 刘海东 中国科技大学.
Results from PHENIX on deuteron and anti- deuteron production in Au+Au collisions at RHIC Joakim Nystrand University of Bergen for the PHENIX Collaboration.
A probe for hot & dense nuclear matter. Lake Louise Winter Institute 21 February, 2000 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez.
Particle Production in p + p Reactions at GeV K. Hagel Cyclotron Institute Texas A & M University for the BRAHMS Collaboration.
17-Nov-2004G.S.F.Stephans Exploring the Phase Diagram of Strongly Interacting Matter Exploring the Phase Diagram: The RHIC Contribution  RHIC is currently.
Mid-rapidity charged hadron spectra in the Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s NN ) = 19.6 GeV at STAR University of California, Davis for the STAR Collaboration.
Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur. Outline February 9, 2008Quark Matter Results –dN/dy –Stopping Results –dN/dy –Stopping Summary and discussion Experiment.
We distinguish two hadronization mechanisms:  Fragmentation Fragmentation builds on the idea of a single quark in the vacuum, it doesn’t consider many.
Experimental Results for Fluctuations And Correlations as a Signature of QCD Phase Transitions in Heavy Ion Collisions Gary Westfall Michigan State University,
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
9 GeV Au+Au Collisions Run on March 11 th, 2008 Out of ~200k Events –11000 had Vertices –6700 had Vertices within 2 cm of the beamline –4150 appeared to.
Christina Markert Physics Workshop UT Austin November Christina Markert The ‘Little Bang in the Laboratory’ – Accelorator Physics. Big Bang Quarks.
QUICK TIPS (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--) This PowerPoint template requires basic PowerPoint (version 2007 or newer) skills. Below is a list of commonly.
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.
Sevil Salur for STAR Collaboration, Yale University WHAT IS A PENTAQUARK? STAR at RHIC, BNL measures charged particles via Time Projection Chamber. Due.
RIKEN CCJ Project Regional computing center in Japan for BNL-RHIC experiment especially for PHENIX collaboration. CCJ serves for RHIC physics activity.
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © The RHIC Beam Energy Scan (BES) was proposed to search for the possible critical.
1 Nov. 15 QM2006 Shanghai J.H. Lee (BNL) Nuclear Induced Particle Suppression at Large-x F at RHIC J.H. Lee Physics Department Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Reaction plane reconstruction1 Reaction plane reconstruction in extZDC Michael Kapishin Presented by A.Litvinenko.
BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO CNS workshop, Tokyo Univ. Identified Charged Single Particle Spectra at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX.
STAR Ready to move on to 7.7 GeV Bill Christie For The STAR Collaboration April 13, Please N.B. All data plots shown in this presentation are online.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
STAR Strangeness production and Cronin effect in d+Au collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV in STAR For the STAR Collaboration Xianglei Zhu (Tsinghua U / UCLA)
Grazyna Odyniec STAR physics program and technical challenges with the RHIC Au+Au energy scan Grazyna Odyniec/LBNL for STAR collaboration QM 2008, Jaipur,
HuaZhong Normal University IWND09, August 22~25, Shanghai 1 Event-by-Event Fluctuations of Net-Baryon Distribution and Higher Order Cumulants ZHOU You,
Charged Hadron Nuclear Modification Factors in the Beam Energy Scan data from STAR Stephen Horvat for the STAR collaboration Yale University Stephen HorvatCPOD.
Fixed Target Program in STAR Fixed-target running allows much higher rates without e-cooling at lower energies Top of  B range now ~ 400 MeV; extends.
Introduction The statistical model approach is established by analysis of particle ratios of the high energy heavy ion collisions in GSI-SIS to CERN-SPS.
G. Musulmanbekov, K. Gudima, D.Dryablov, V.Geger, E.Litvinenko, V.Voronyuk, M.Kapishin, A.Zinchenko, V.Vasendina Physics Priorities at NICA/MPD.
Recent Charm Measurements through Hadronic Decay Channels with STAR at RHIC in 200 GeV Cu+Cu Collisions Stephen Baumgart for the STAR Collaboration, Yale.
UC Davis June st Rosi Reed Low Energy Test Run Results Rosi Reed University of California at Davis.
1 Jeffery T. Mitchell – Quark Matter /17/12 The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program: Results from the PHENIX Experiment Jeffery T. Mitchell Brookhaven.
Light nuclei production in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC Md. Rihan Haque, for the STAR Collaboration Abstract Light nuclei (anti-nuclei) can be produced.
System size dependence of freeze-out properties at RHIC Quark Matter 2006 Shanghai-China Nov System size dependence of freeze-out properties.
Incident-energy and system-size dependence of directed flow Gang Wang (UCLA) for STAR Collaboration  Introduction to directed flow  Detectors: ZDC-SMD,
Hadron Collider Physics 2012, 12/Nov/2012, KyotoShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Heavy Ion results from RHIC-BNL ShinIchi Esumi Univ. of Tsukuba Contents.
Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL
Lecture 07: particle production in AA collisions
Robert Pak (BNL) 2012 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting 0 Energy Ro Robert Pak for PHENIX Collaboration.
Abhilash Nair STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago 1 STAR.
Masashi Kaneta, LBL Hadron Spectra in Au+Au Collisions by STAR Experiment at RHIC Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration LBNL.
Aerogel Cherenkov Counters for the ALICE Detector G. Paić Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM For the ALICE VHMPID group.
Nu XuDirector’s Review, LBNL, May 17, 20061/23 Future Program for Studying Bulk Properties in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions Nu Xu.
Oct 論文セミナー. Abstract  Au+Au √s NN =62.4GeV  mid-rapidity, 7 centrality classes  m T spectra  dN/dy  energy dependence (SPS, AGS data)  yield.
1 Charged hadron production at large transverse momentum in d+Au and Au+Au collisions at  s=200 GeV Abstract. The suppression of hadron yields with high.
QM2008 Jaipur, India Feb.4– Feb. 10, STAR's Measurement of Long-range Forward- backward Multiplicity Correlations as the Signature of “Dense Partonic.
Systematic Study of Elliptic Flow at RHIC Maya SHIMOMURA University of Tsukuba ATHIC 2008 University of Tsukuba, Japan October 13-15, 2008.
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO JPS RHIC symposium, Chuo Univ., Tokyo Hadron Production at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Christina MarkertHirschegg, Jan 16-22, Resonance Production in Heavy Ion Collisions Christina Markert, Kent State University Resonances in Medium.
24 June 2007 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2007 STAR 2S0Q0M72S0Q0M7 Strangeness and bulk freeze- out properties at RHIC Aneta Iordanova.
June 2009 H. Ströbele, Uni. Frankfurt Matter Effects at SPS energies What we can learn about stopping from the system size dependence of net.
Al+Au Analysis Plan Why study asymmetric systems like Al+Au (or Cu+Au as was recently done at RHIC)? Collisions of symmetric heavy ions do not create a.
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
of secondary light ion beams
NA61/SHINE: status and energy scans with Pb+Pb collisions
Soft Physics at Forward Rapidity
Status of 20 GeV Au+Au Analysis
STAR Geometry and Detectors
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
What have we learned from Monte Carlo models? HIJING
Outline Background Global Observables in Heavy Ion Collisions
Xiaobin Wang (for the STAR Collaboration)
Energy dependence of stopping
Single  production at forward rapidity by PHENIX
High-pT Identified Charged Hadrons in √sNN = 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 of 40 Brovko, Haag, Cebra January 06, 2011 LF Spectra Phone Conference STAR as a Fixed Target Experiment? Sam Brovko, Brooke Haag, Daniel Cebra Abstract for APS meeting: Analysis of fixed target collisions between gold ions in the beam and aluminum nuclei in the beam pipe using the STAR detector at RHIC will be presented. These fixed target collisions allow us to study a region of collision energy below the lowest energy scheduled for the RHIC beam energy scan. This might extend the region baryon chemical potential available for discovery of the critical point in the hadronic gas to quark-gluon plasma boundary in the nuclear matter phase diagram. In this talk, we will show preliminary results of pion, proton and light nuclei spectra as well as dN/dy distributions for pions and protons. Comparisons will be made to results from the AGS heavy ion program and to UrQMD simulations.

Slide 2 of 40 Low Energy Reach of Fixed Target Collision Energy (GeV) Single Beam Energy Single Beam Pz (GeV/c) Fixed Target Root S Single Beam Rapidity Center of Mass Rapidity Beam Energy Scan

Slide 3 of 40 Beam Energy Scan 64 GeV Fixed Target points What if the critical point is here? Or here?

Slide 4 of 40 Be Beam Pipe Al Beam Pipe  =1.0  =1.5  =2.0  =1.0  =1.5  =2.0

Slide 5 of 40 Required Steps: 1)Demonstrate that we can select Al target events 2)Demonstrate that we can demonstrate that we have am Au projectile 3)Demonstrate that we know that collision energy 3 AGeV 197 Au + 27 Al

Slide 6 of 40 Selecting Aluminum Target “7.7 GeV” Data set: Select Events with 100 < |V z | < 200 and 2 < V r < 5 cm VzVz VxVx VyVy Counts Al Be FTPCSVT Support Au+AuBeam pipe

Slide 7 of 40 Determining the Collision Energy Challenge – We have “oriented” the target parallel to the beam axis  The target is infinitely “thick”. The initial projectile energy is 2.94 AGeV. How much energy is lost prior to the Au+Al nuclear collision? Range of 3 AGeV Au in Al is 64.8 cm due to dE/dx The Au+Al nuclear interaction length is 3.63 cm.  The Au ion travels only 5% of its range before experiencing a nuclear collision, therefore it will lose only 5% of its energy.  Collision Energy is 2.8 +/- 0.2 AGeV

Slide 8 of 40 Data to Support Collision Energy Note, protons show a narrow distribution around mid-rapidity.  + contamination

Slide 9 of 40 Daniel Cebra October 6, 2009 STAR Collaboration Meeting LBNL Determining that the projection is Au 7.7 GeV Au+AuProjectile + 27 Al From E895 Au+Au M max at 2 AGeV is ~200 M max at 4 AGeV is ~300 N part ~380 M max ~50 For Au+Al: Npart ~70 Expect M max ~45 from extrapolation of E895

Slide 10 of 40 Determining that the projection is Au Glauber Prediction for 3 AGeV Au+Al STAR 3 AGeV Au+Al data

Slide 11 of 40 Daniel Cebra October 6, 2009 STAR Collaboration Meeting LBNL

Slide 12 of 40 Pion Spectra from 3.85 AGeV Au+Al

Slide 13 of 40 Acceptance for Fixed Target  = 1.8

Slide 14 of 40 Conclusions We can select fixed target Au+Al events The collision energy is fairly well defined Fixed target geometry is adequate to RHIC sub- injection energy beams. We will focus on charged particle spectra.

Slide 15 of 40 Backup Slides

Slide 16 of 40 Daniel Cebra October 6, 2009 STAR Collaboration Meeting LBNL

Slide 17 of 40 Daniel Cebra October 6, 2009 STAR Collaboration Meeting LBNL

Slide 18 of 40 Daniel Cebra October 6, 2009 STAR Collaboration Meeting LBNL

Slide 19 of 40 Daniel Cebra October 6, 2009 STAR Collaboration Meeting LBNL

Slide 20 of 40 Daniel Cebra October 6, 2009 STAR Collaboration Meeting LBNL

Slide 21 of 40 Daniel Cebra October 6, 2009 STAR Collaboration Meeting LBNL

Slide 22 of 40 Daniel Cebra October 6, 2009 STAR Collaboration Meeting LBNL

Slide 23 of 40 Daniel Cebra October 6, 2009 STAR Collaboration Meeting LBNL

Slide 24 of 40 Daniel Cebra October 6, 2009 STAR Collaboration Meeting LBNL

Slide 25 of 40 STAR Beam Pipe Location A description of the STAR beam pipe can be found at arXiv:nucl-ex/ v1 Features: Diameter of the central region of the beam pipe is 7.62 cm There is/was a support disk for the SVT at 54.8 cm with OD 128 mm and ID 89 mm From 0 to 76 cm => pipe is made of 1.0 mm thick beryllium At 76 cm there is a weld to an 1.24 mm thick aluminum pipe At 130 cm there is an Al to Al weld, no change in pipe diameter or thickness. From 76 to 402 cm => the pipe is 1.24 mm thick aluminum There is a flange and bellows at 4 meters, the pipe diameter goes to 12.7 cm There is another flange and bellows at 7.12 meters.

Slide 26 of 40 Schematic Diagram of the beam pipe profile

Slide 27 of 40 Daniel Cebra April 26, GeV Au+Au GeV Au+Au 2008 Vxy Vz (r>2) Vz (r>2) Al Be 6733 Au+Au 4150 Beam pipe Au+Au 2882 Beam pipe ~3000 Au+Al ~1000 Au+Be 2241 Au+Al 641 Au+Be Au+Al |Vz|>75 Au+Be |Vz|<75 Au+Au r<2 Au+pipe r>2 Beam Pipe Locations

Slide 28 of GeV Cu+Cu GeV Au+Au 2010 Vxy Vz (r>2) Al Be Au+Au Beam pipe Au+Al |Vz|>75 Au+Be |Vz|<75 Au+Au r<2 Au+pipe r>2 Vxy Vz (r>2) Al Be C u+Cu Beam pipe Beam pipe supports

Slide 29 of 40 Beam-on-Pipe Collisions