The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
Advertisements

Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Plan SIP February 2011.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement ISD/RESA Workshop February 26, 2008.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
ARRA Title I: The chance of a lifetime to address our most vexing challenges Reform and Restore: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Statewide System of Support 9/11/20151 ESEA Flexibility Waiver March 22, 2012.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Boston Public Schools Elementary Math Plan: District-Wide Reform in Math Teaching and Learning Presented by: Linda Ruiz Davenport, Director of Elementary.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.
COTTON INDIAN ELEMENTARY LEADER IN ME WHAT IS A TITLE 1 SCHOOL? Each year the Federal Government provides funding to schools that qualify based.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Supporting the Improvement of Washington Districts and Schools.
Title I Accountability Grant to Expand the SSOS for Schools in Phases 1 & 2 1.
OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Michigan School Improvement Conversation Starter Kit II.
Virginia WebEx Program Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
EXPECTATIONS FOR MICHIGAN’S FOCUS SCHOOLS 11/12/20151 FOCUS SCHOOL WEBINAR Office of Education Improvement and Innovation School Support Unit August 27,
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
SIOP Implementation in Manatee County A Title I and Title III Partnership Presented by: Debra Estes, ESOL Coordinator.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Continuous Improvement Planning with the eCIP Tool
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Framework for an Effective Statewide System of Support
Michigan School Improvement Grant
Presentation transcript:

The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools

Foundations of School Improvement

The Framework

Creating a Common Vocabulary For School Improvement One Common Voice-One Plan Creating a Common Vocabulary For School Improvement One Common Voice-One Plan Common Vocabulary A comprehensive needs assessment includes three components… 1. School Data Profile/Analysis 2. School Process Profile/Analysis* 3. Summary Report (Goals Management) *In Michigan, the School Process Profile/Analysis is part of the Michigan School Accreditation & Accountability System (MI-SAAS) requirement and must include one of four designated options.

In Michigan, all schools must complete one of these four School Process Profile options as a component of the MI-SAAS requirements: School Process Rubrics (90) or School Process Rubrics (40) (Formerly Education YES!) or ASSIST Self Assessment (ASSIST SA) or Self Assessment (SA) School Process Profile Common Vocabulary MDE AdvancED Michigan

6 One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Plan Develop Action Plan Study Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Student Achievement Gather Getting Ready Collect Data Build Profile

Putting it all Together School Improvement Framework School Improvement Plan Comprehensive Needs Assessment

Reconstituting Restructuring MDE Statewide System of Support Interventions ESEA Requirements Special Populations Title Programs; Interventions for English Language Learners; At-Risk; McKinney-Vento; Special Education Statewide Initiatives School Improvement Framework; Comprehensive Needs Assessment; School Improvement Plans; Content & Course/Credit Expectations; Statewide Levels of Intervention

Reconstituting Restructuring MDE Statewide System of Support Interventions ESEA Requirements Special Populations Title Programs; Interventions for English Language Learners; At-Risk; McKinney-Vento; Special Education Statewide Initiatives School Improvement Framework; Comprehensive Needs Assessment; School Improvement Plans; Content & Course/Credit Expectations; Statewide Levels of Intervention

Michigan’s Statewide System of Support (SSoS)

Who Receives Support? The Statewide System of Support is a system of interventions for Title I schools only. A Title I High Priority School is any school that is not making AYP for reasons of proficiency.

Overview of the Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools Provide technical assistance to High Priority Title I schools Provide cohesive activities with other state and federal initiatives Align resources with best practices

Purpose of the Statewide System of Support To improve student achievement To focus on leadership at the building level To support the school improvement process using the School Improvement Framework, the Comprehensive Needs Assessment and the School Improvement Plan To build regional capacity for assistance

Funding the Statewide System of Support

Source of Funding for School Improvement Funds Title I A State Allocation 100% 4% 5% Statewide System of Support for HP Schools Administration of SSOS for HP Schools 95% Money to schools 5%

Priorities for the Regional Assistance Grant Title I Schools Identified for Reasons of Proficiency Title I Schools Identified for Attendance, Participation or Graduation Rate  Kicks in only if there are extenuating circumstances that prevent an ISD/ESA from providing services to Title I Schools identified for proficiency

Components of the Statewide System of Support

Components of the Statewide System of Support (SSOS) Process Mentor Teams Principals Fellowship Coaches Institute Evidence Based Interventions Instructional Coaches Data Coaches Individual ISD/ESA Initiatives

Facilitated Continuous Improvement Process Mentor Team This component of the SSoS is required Two or Three-Person Team  ISD/ESA Facilitator – Case Manager  District level leader  Michigan Department of Education (MDE) representative added in Corrective Action and Restructuring  The MAISA Regional Support Coordinator is available for those schools using their Instructional and/or Data Coaches

Facilitated Continuous Improvement Process Mentor Team (cont.) Monitors SI Process and Action Research Objective Removes Barriers at the District Level Coordinates Services Provides Technical Assistance

Available Services of the SSoS The PMT, with the ISD/ESA representative or Regional Support Coordinator as the lead, will lead a school team through a needs assessment Based on the identified needs, the ISD/ESA representative will complete a Request for Services form to access the appropriate SSoS services

Available Services: Leadership Coach Leadership Coaches recruited, selected, and employed by ISDs/ESAs; trained by MSU Intensive and ongoing support through the Coaches Institute focused on building a cadre of highly skilled leadership coaches to assist principals and leadership teams Focused on building the capacity of school leaders by supporting, challenging, and assessing their progress around instructional leadership

Available Services: Principals Fellowship Intensive and ongoing support focused on building principal’s and leadership team’s capacity to lead the systematic instructional improvements needed to raise student achievement Combination of residential institutes and follow-up workshops Focused primarily on the Teaching for Learning and Leadership strands of the School Improvement Framework

Available Services: Data Coach Engage staff in data analysis process Engage staff in clarifying the problem Identify additional data needed Help identify professional development needs Review alignment with the School Improvement Plan

Available Services: EBI Investigation and Selection Evidence Based Interventions are backed by extensive documentation and theoretical links and can be used when a targeted need does not yet have a formally established research based Support given to school teams in this investigation and selection

Available Services: Instructional Coach Support Helps teachers implement selected literacy and/or math evidence-based intervention Collaborates with teachers in lesson planning and/or delivery Works with teachers on literacy and/or math strategies

Available Services: ISD/ESA Initiatives Technical support for data collection and data analysis Support for building level literacy and/or math initiatives Research-based professional development aligned with school improvement plans Other specific initiatives

Required Service: School Process Review Intended for schools that are Identified for School Improvement - Planning

Turn and Talk Based on what you have heard thus far: What seems most beneficial for your school in the SSoS? What provides a challenge for your school in the SSoS

Squeak Video here

How do Schools Select SSoS Services? MDE is asking the ISD/ESA rep with the Regional Support Coordinator (if applicable) to take the lead on this as they are the school improvement experts on the PMT as well as the people who have the relationship with the schools.

Service Matrix This is a tool to guide the schools in looking at their data and identifying needs that are reasonable and necessary and will help increase student achievement It is not the tool that is going to provide the quality of the service choice, it is the process of the school team looking at their data and having the substantive guided conversations about what will best support the needs of the students and improve the processes of the school

Request for Services MDE is asking that all schools use this form to request appropriate services from the Statewide System of Support PMT is responsible for meeting with the school team and completing the form. ISD/ESA rep or Regional Support Coordinator submits to MDE

Service Agreement The Request for Services form also serves as a Service Agreement among all of the stakeholders:  Building  District  ISD/ESA  MAISA (Regional Support Coordinator, if applicable)  MDE (if applicable)

What makes sense about choosing services based on need rather than having services assigned based on AYP stage?

Statewide System of Support Expectations

What can a district expect from SSoS? Insight into the processes and instructional core of the high priority building through participation in the Process Mentor Team A $30,000 - $45,000 Building Level School Improvement Grant for the high priority building to provide staff with intensive professional development addressing the reasons the school was identified for improvement.

What can a building principal expect from SSoS? Assistance with monitoring and implementing a building school improvement plan through the Process Mentor Team Assistance from the PMT in the completion of a needs assessment based on the building’s School Process Profile and School Data Profile The opportunity to request appropriate services from the SSoS

What can a building principal expect from SSoS? Principals in buildings that are Identified for School Improvement – Year One will receive: A Mi-Map kit Membership to:  Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)

What does a district need to do? Appoint a central office representative to participate regularly as part of the Process Mentor Team, meeting a minimum of four times Actively support the building’s continuous improvement efforts Assure that the $30,000 -$45,000 is allocated to the High Priority building on high quality professional development

What does a building principal need to do? Actively and regularly participate in the Process Mentor Team meetings a minimum of four times per year Help the building achieve short term Action Research Objectives between PMT visits Monitor the school improvement process throughout the year

Contacts Linda Forward  Director  Office of Education Improvement and Innovation  Mark Coscarella  Assistant Director  Office of Education Improvement and Innovation Karen Ruple  SSoS Manager  Bill Witt  High Priority Schools Consultant 