Start Something Enhanced School-Based Mentoring [Leadership Discussion] [Date] ™ Modify this slide: -Insert audience (e.g., Board Meeting, Senior Leadership.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Head of Learning: Job description
Advertisements

Embedding Public Engagement Sophie Duncan and Paul Manners National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
1 An Introduction to Mentoring and the Alberta Mentoring Partnership.
Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs for Youth: Current Status and Future Prospects Invited Presentation for the Big Brothers Big Sisters -- Large Agency.
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
August 2013 School of Medicine Strategic Planning Community Engagement Committee.
Public engagement and lifelong learning: old wine in a new bottle, or a blended malt? Paul Manners Director, National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
Early Childhood Professional Development in Indonesia— Steps Toward a System.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Family Engagemen t Family Engagemen t The Secret Sauce for Successful Youth Mentoring Programs.
Customer Focus Module Preview
Healthy North Carolina 2020 and EBS/EBI 101 Joanne Rinker MS, RD, CDE, LDN Center for Healthy North Carolina Director of Training and Technical Assistance.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
Company LOGO Leading, Connecting, Transforming UNC… …Through Its People Human Capital Management.
I.S.O.T.U.R.E. A Model for Volunteer Management Success Improving Lives. Improving Texas.
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
Being an Advocate for your Students Professional Development January 7, 2014.
Teen Mentoring Toolkit Permission to adapt as needed
Community Involvement The Community Compact Model Engaging Student, School and Community.
Julia King Tamang, Senior Consultant LERN 2009 Annual Conference.
Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
Your Business, Our Community, Our Kids A partnership proposal for: (add company name here) Your Business, Our Community, Our Kids.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
An independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Mentoring Program February 12, 2009.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
EAST MIDLANDS PUBLIC SECTOR APPRENTICESHIPS SUMMIT HOW TO MAKE APPRENTICESHIPS WORK FOR YOU 25 MARCH 2009.
A Peer Education Approach to Sexuality Education in Schools Melissa Blake Melissa Reagan Princeton Center for Leadership Training AAHE-AAHPERD National.
Sustaining Community-Based Programs and Supporting Families: The Virginia Tech Interactive Training On Sustainability Training Developed by: Lydia I. Marek.
E-MENTORING: New Skills and Competencies for New Jobs e-MENTORING: New Skills and Competencies for New Jobs No LLP LT-KA3-KA3MP European.
Post-Secondary Coaching & The 4 C’s to College Success: How and Why It Works Dr. Toinette Gunn, VP of Programs 1.
Big Brothers Big Sisters of …
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
Children’s Mental Health Reform Overview: North Sound Mental Health Administration Prepared by Julie de Losada, M.S./CMHS
TELECONFERENCE/WEBINAR ON MAY 6,2010 2:30 – 4:00 PM EASTERN THE NATIONAL CHILD WELFARE RESOURCE CENTER FOR ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENT Building Ongoing.
Mentoring: A New Approach Effectively Weaving Technology into a Mentoring Program.
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
Maria E. Fernandez, Ph.D. Associate Professor Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences University of Texas, School of Public Health.
Member Development and Support Tools and Resources for Building Strong Programs.
“Sustaining Momentum & Growing the Game” – WSP II 2009/13 February 2009.
Why a CPCRN? CDC Expectations Katherine M. Wilson, PhD, MPH CPCRN Technical Monitor Division of Cancer Prevention and Control CDC.
Operational Excellence: Outcomes Evaluation System Impact and Outcomes Breakout Session June 14 th, 2011 Sandra LaFleur, Senior Director of Youth Outcomes.
Collaboration: “WE The People…” The National Network for Collaboration and The University of Vermont Present The National Network for Collaboration and.
Presented to: [District] Staff DATE RECOGNIZING EDUCATOR EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
 Necessity for successful youth mentoring has grown in the United States substantially over the years  Indianapolis Star series focus “Our City Our.
Operational Excellence: SDM Enhancements for Results 2011 National Conference Dallas, Texas June
This information is confidential and was prepared by The Bridgespan Group solely for the use of our client; it is not to be relied on by any 3rd party.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Planning Evaluation Setting the Course Source: Thompson & McClintock (1998) Demonstrating your program’s worth. Atlanta: CDC/National Center for Injury.
May 2010 Company Due Diligence Process The University of Texas at Austin.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
The Power of Parents: National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness Family Leadership Training Program It all begins today!
Start Something ™ Enhanced School-Based Mentoring Affinity Group Leadership Discussions April 2012 ™
Sustainability Training Series 2016 From Piloting to Sustaining Practices January 13, :00pm - 3:00pm The Essentials of Full Implementation Part II.
Education Partnerships A conversation starter for school leadership teams and teaching staff.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
WELCOME! 4-H 101. Basic Needs for Healthy Growth 1. safety & structure 2. belonging and membership 3. closeness & several good relationships 4. experience.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.
Still Building a Brighter Future for Young People through Sport
Partnership Development Manager
Agenda Welcome and Introductions Purpose of Investment
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
2019 Alumni Leadership Conference
Presentation transcript:

Start Something Enhanced School-Based Mentoring [Leadership Discussion] [Date] ™ Modify this slide: -Insert audience (e.g., Board Meeting, Senior Leadership Team Meeting) and date -Remove “DRAFT” tag Pre-Read -Prior to hosting this discussion, have participants read the ESBM Report Executive Summary

Start Something Does school-based mentoring (SBM) continue to provide opportunity for positive impact? Answer: b Recent meta-analysis of mentoring programs and both PPV studies found that school-based mentoring has the same level of impact as community-based mentoring. What makes the difference in impact is the use of evidence-based practices Choose the best answer: a.SB impact < CB impact b.SB impact = CB impact c.SB impact > CB impact Source: DuBois, et al. “How Effective Are Mentoring Programs for Youth?“ 2010, Herrera, et al., 2007

Start Something Both the PPV studies and our own YOS results show that SBM may be better positioned to impact educational outcomes than our CBM program: 1995 PPV Study Impacts (CBM) Initiation of drug and alcohol useViolenceTruancyParental & Peer RelationshipsImproved GPA 2007 PPV Study Impacts (SBM) Academic Performance and QualitySchool-related MisbehaviorScholastic competenceTruancy

Start Something School-based mentoring (SBM) may also have strategic importance for our agency Is it critical to reaching certain populations of Littles? Is it critical for accessing certain groups of Bigs, who may not come into community- based (e.g., through corporate or school partners)? Are we getting similar YOS results, indicating that youth are benefiting from SBM?

Start Something The national ESBM pilot demonstrates that we can improve our SBM impact Demonstrated potential to improve SBM: percent of matches carrying over from one school year to the next was 56% in pilot vs. 40% in PPV study Effective SB programs look more like CB programs 2007 National SBM Impact Study PPV study of SBM finds positive outcomes in first year that are not sustained beyond that year Longer matches and closer relationships are important for outcomes National ESBM Pilot We have an opportunity to expand our impact in SBM by implementing tested, evidence-based practices

Start Something Implement Test & evaluate Refine Theory & plan As an evidence-based program, we learn from both successes and setbacks… Planning and developing our school-based mentoring program [insert date when agency began SBM] Execution and growth of SBM [insert date] 2007 Public/Private Ventures national impact study and internal data (e.g., retention rates) Findings and implications of ESBM pilot identify improvements to the school-based model Modify this slide: -Insert appropriate dates and add any relevant, agency-specific details

Start Something Now, what will our agency do with this evidence? "I continue to be impressed with the commitment of the Big Brothers Big Sisters organization to fully embrace an evidence-driven approach to program improvement. The ESBM pilot project demonstrates how knowledge, effort and resources can be marshaled to make a meaningful difference in program quality. Big Brothers Big Sisters is truly 'moving the dial' in a definitive manner.“ - Dr. Carla Herrera, P/PV

Tool #1BOS Start Something In the ESBM pilot, several practices surfaced as important to long, strong matches ™ Commitment 12 month match commitment Program structured to encourage matches to last over two school years Pre-match training for volunteers Collaboration Deepened school partnerships Partnerships that can supply 12 month volunteers Little involved in activity selection Connection In-depth child interview Parent engagement Summer and holiday match communication 1 to 1 match interactions High quality contacts outside of program time Increased match support contacts

Start Something Build strong school partners, with clear roles and MOU Partner with volunteer-rich organizations, setting expectation of minimum 12 month involvement Recruit for minimum 12 month commitment with summer contact Set expectation for one-to-one match interactions Reinforce and plan for minimum 12 month involvement Carefully screen, assess, and train Bigs for child safety Engage parents Match based on expanded input and common interests Provide frequent, regular contacts with all participants Make contacts outside of program time and provide opportunity to listen to, support, and coach Encourage one-to- one interaction Encourage summer and holiday contact Partnership Recruitment & customer relations Match support Enrollment & matching Pilot findings have implications across functional areas

Start Something Build strong school partners, with clear roles and MOU Partner with volunteer-rich organizations, setting expectation of minimum 12 month involvement Recruit for minimum 12 month commitment with summer contact Set expectation for one-to-one match interactions Reinforce and plan for minimum 12 month involvement Carefully screen, assess, and train Bigs for child safety Engage parents Match based on expanded input and common interests Provide frequent, regular contacts with all participants Make contacts outside of program time and provide opportunity to listen to, support, and coach Encourage one-to- one interaction Encourage summer and holiday contact Partnership Recruitment & customer relations Match support Enrollment & matching Some of these practices are already standard in our SBM; others require change Modify this slide: -Gray out practices you are already doing and circle or highlight those that require change

Start Something These changes to our program practices raise strategic questions for our agency Program capacity Sustainable resources Leadership

Start Something These changes to our program practices raise strategic questions for our agency Program capacity Sustainable resources Leadership How can we lead change for our staff? Are we putting the appropriate emphasis on impact and quality? Do we reward quality in our agency? Modify this slide: -Change or add agency-specific questions

Start Something These changes to our program practices raise strategic questions for our agency How can we leverage this as an exciting opportunity to enhance our impact through evidence-based practices and attract more resources for SBM? Program capacity Sustainable resources Leadership Modify this slide: -Change or add agency-specific questions How does SBM offer different resources than CBM for our agency to serve more youth (e.g., funding, volunteers, youth)?

Start Something These changes to our program practices raise strategic questions for our agency Do we have the capacity to support these changes with our current staffing and infrastructure? Can we shift the resources we have to improve quality? What balance of SB and CB matches will optimize our community impact and our efficiency? Program capacity Sustainable resources Leadership Modify this slide: -Change or add agency-specific questions

Start Something Final thoughts or questions? ESBM provides an opportunity for us to improve our program and our impact – How will we lead our agency to successfully embrace the change it will take to get to the next level of impact? Depending on the audience, you may wish to insert a “Next Steps” slide before or after this one