Evaluation Of The Tetraflex and Crystalens Accommodative IOLs Using the iTrace Aberrometer Donald R. Sanders, M.D., PhD. David C. Brown M.D. Deepak Chitkara,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXPERIENCE WITH THE LENSTEC KH3500 TETRAFLEX LENS.
Advertisements

Advances in Intraocular lenses
RAY TRACING & WAVEFRONT ANALYSIS USING THE TRACEY SYSTEM Donald R. Sanders, M.D., Ph.D. Center For Clinical Research.
These figures correspond to the image using shear =10 pixels And 2D convolution was done in order to get the images Using R=0 y0 Using R=1 y1.
DR. FAİK ORUCOV İSTANBUL SURGERY HOSPİTAL DEPARTMANT OF CATARACT AND REFRACTİVE SURGERY Accomodative and Multifocal IOL implantations i s t a n b u l c.
Dr H. Razmjoo Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Multifocal IOLs
Introduction to Refractive Error and Prescription Writing Walter Huang, OD Yuanpei University Department of Optometry.
Monovision for Presbyopia Insert name/ Practice name/ Logo here if desired.
Homework Set 5: Due Wednesday, March, 17 From Chapter 5: P2, P8, P10, P11, From Chapter 6: P1, P2, P6, PM2,
The Camera The single-lens photographic camera is an optical instrument Components Light-tight box Converging lens Produces a real image Film behind the.
Eyes and Vision [Name of Presenter] Doctor of Optometry.
VISION DEFECTS By Urvan & Kester Ria & Vanessa HYPEROPIA MYOPIA VIDEO.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses & Contrast Sensitivity
Anupama Kotha 1, Simar J. Singh 1, William B. Trattler 1,2, Carlos Buznego 1,2 The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.
Myoung Joon Kim, MD Len Zheleznyak, MS2
1 OPTICAL QUALITY OF DUAL- OPTIC ACCOMMODATING INTRAOCULAR LENS Andrea Galvis, MD 1,3 a Ivan Ossma, MD MPH MSc 1,2, a Sanjeev Kasthurirangan, PhD 4, b.
Walter Huang, OD Yuanpei University Department of Optometry
Presbyopia Walter Huang, OD Yuanpei University Department of Optometry.
Retrospective Comparison of 3177 Eyes Implanted with Presbyopic IOLs Carlos Buznego MD Elizabeth A. Davis MD, FACS Guy M. Kezirian MD, FACS William B.
Hyperopia Walter Huang, OD Yuanpei University Department of Optometry.
 MANAGING PATIENT REQUIREMENTS DURING VISUAL ACUITY  USING TOOLS FOR TESTING DISTANCE AND NEAR VISUAL ACUITY  HAND HELD CARD  SNELLENS CHART  DISTANCE.
1 UCT PHY1025F: Geometric Optics Physics 1025F Geometric Optics Dr. Steve Peterson THE EYE.
Optical Conditions in the Eye. Marmor & Ravin, 1997, p.3. Eye ball.
Better Health. No Hassles. [Name of Presenter] Children’s Eyes and Vision.
Lenses in Combination The analysis of multi-lens systems requires only one new rule: The image of the first lens acts as the object for the second lens.
Hyperopia and Myopia.
Wavefront by Method of Ray Tracing: Because the Eye is Not a Telescope
1 Cataract Surgery Stephen G. Slade MD, FACS. 2 Financial Disclosure Alcon, AMO, B&L Consultant, Clarity, NuLens, RVO, Technolas 2 This presentation represents.
Accommodative Arching Eyeonics Briefing 2 February 2005 Kevin L. Waltz, OD, MD Eye Surgeons of Indiana Indianapolis, IN.
Recent Advances in Intraocular Lenses Jim Schwiegerling, PhD Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences Optical Sciences.
Mike P. Holzer, MD Annett Mannsfeld, MSc Angela Ehmer, MSc Gerd U. Auffarth, MD International Vision Correction.
For Accommodative Lenses Deepak Chitkara, M.B., ChB. D.O.
Integration of Aberrometry and Topography with the i Trace System
SK Kwok, MD Hong Kong Laser Eye Centre, Hong Kong The author has no financial interest in the subject matter of this e-poster ASCRS 2011 San Diego, US.
Clinical and simulation outcomes of a multifocal intraocular lens with rotational asymmetry and two different levels of near addition Jorge Alió, MD,PhD.
Eye (Relaxed) Determine the focal length of your eye when looking at an object far away.
Use of Multifocal IOLs in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Helga P. Sandoval, MD, MSCR 1 Reid B. Murphy, MD, 1 Luis E. Fernández de Castro,
Tracey Technologies AAO 2004 Advisors Group Breakfast Tom Padrick, PhD Director of Engineering.
Vision. Normal Vision light is focused directly on the retina - can see clearly both near & far.
Children’s Eyes and Vision [Name of Presenter] Doctor of Optometry.
VISION.
Factors which Influence Accommodative Amplitude in Crystalens HD Patients Uday Devgan, MD, FACS Devgan Eye Surgery, Los Angeles, CA FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES:
Phys 102 – Lecture 20 The eye & corrective lenses 1.
The Eye LO: To know the structure and function of parts of the eye and how the lens allows us to focus on objects.
DGII 2008 Comparison of Aspheric ReSTOR and Tecnis multifocal IOL Dongho Lee MD, PhD Yonsei eye center, Seoul, South Korea No Financial Interest.
Depth of Field Only one distance is in “perfect “ focus. But all sensors have finite sizes Can not tell whether in perfect focus and a small circle of.
Sheela Evangeline K Co ordinators: Ms. Rizwana Mr. Kabilan
Theme 6: Optics of Refractive Error
LogMAR-Analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses: Clinical performance A. Mannsfeld, I.-J. Limberger, A. Ehmer, M.P. Holzer, G. U.Auffarth International.
Construction of Human Eye –iris, pupil, cornea, aqueous humour, lens, ciliary muscle, vitreous humour, retina Focusing –seeing near object ( near point.
Structure of Human Eye: –Eye Muscles, Optic nerve, sclerotic coat –Cornea, iris, pupil,, lens, retina, blind spot –aqueous humour, vitreous humour, ciliary.
iTrace Dynamic Laser Refraction: Clinical Application
Chapter 12 Review Light and Vision. Category: The Eye Give the name and function of the eye part indicated by #3 (the thin layer between #1 and #2). 1.
Theme 7: Optical neutralization of the ametropias Principle and value of neutralization. Influence of the vertex distance. Neutralization of the presbyopic.
P CrystaLens™ Model AT-45 Multipiece Silicone Posterior Chamber Accommodating IOL.
Vision Changes with Aging Mark Swanson, OD, MSPH Associate Professor.
9-Month Results after Implantation of a new accommodative IOL that works with one focus Mark Tomalla M.D.* Clinic for Refractive and Ophthalmic Surgery,
Examples of Accommodation Evaluation with the Tracey 3-D Difference Maps Tracey Technologies, Corp.
John P Berdahl M.D.* David R. Hardten M.D., F.A.C.S.* *No relevant financial disclosures.
The Eye.
Outcomes Update for an Aspheric Accommodating IOL John A. Hovanesian, M.D. Clinical Instructor, UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute Harvard Eye Associates,
VISION SCREENING 101.
Postoperative Refraction and Patient Satisfaction after Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Robert Cionni, MD Financial.
Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
Long Term Clinical Outcomes of Refractive Lens Exchange in Moderate     to High Hyperopia Frank Goes, BELGIUM Ascrs 2008.
Comparison of vision with an accommodating IOL versus a multifocal IOL
Human Eye Structure of Human Eye: Focusing Eye defects
David T. Vroman, MD Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology
Kellan Tetraflex KH3500 Accommodative IOLs vs. Acri
*Center for Excellence in Eyecare
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Of The Tetraflex and Crystalens Accommodative IOLs Using the iTrace Aberrometer Donald R. Sanders, M.D., PhD. David C. Brown M.D. Deepak Chitkara, M.B., ChB. D.O.

DIFFERENCE Normal Accommodation – 30 Y/O Refraction Map Refraction MapNEARDISTANCENEAR

Normal Accommodation 3D Refraction Map (Tilted) DIFFERENCE NEARDISTANCE

Normal Accommodation 3D Refraction Map (Vertical) DIFFERENCE NEARDISTANCE

DISTANCE Mean = +0.4D 1.2DRefractive Range Range Hyperopia Hyperopia Myopia

Normal Accommodation 3D Refraction Map (Vertical) NEAR Mean = -4.2D 3.5DRefractiveRange

Normal Accommodation 3D Refraction Map (Vertical) DIFFERENCE Mean = -4.75D 2.4D Refractive Range

With Normal Accommodation and Near Focus - Refraction shifts to More Myopia - Refractive Range Increases

Monofocal IOL 3D Refraction Map (Vertical) DIFFERENCE NEARDISTANCE

DIFFERENCE No Refractive Difference 0.6D Refractive RefractiveRange

MONOFOCAL 33 cm. DISTANCE ACCOMMODATIVE EFFORT NO DIFFERENCE IN PSF

MONOFOCAL Image Simulation 33 cm. DISTANCE ACCOMMODATIVE EFFORT NO DIFFERENCE IN IMAGE

Pupil Size Same for Distance & Near DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE

DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE

Tetraflex in Other Eye 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEARDISTANCE

DISTANCE Mean = +1.6D 4.1DRefractive Range Range +2.8D -1.3D

Tetraflex in Other Eye 3D Refraction Map NEAR Mean = +1.1D 8.6DRefractiveRange +3.8D -4.8D

Tetraflex in Other Eye 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE Mean = -0.4D 5.5DRefractive Range Range +1.1D -4.5D

TETRAFLEX 33 cm. DISTANCE ACCOMMODATIVE EFFORT SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN PSF

TETRAFLEX Image Simulation 33 cm. DISTANCE ACCOMMODATIVE EFFORT SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT IN NEAR

Tetraflex Accommodative IOL 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEARDISTANCE

DISTANCE Mean =+1.3D 1.9DRefractive Range Range 2.1D 0.2D

Tetraflex Accommodative IOL 3D Refraction Map NEAR Mean = +1.2D 5DRefractive Range Range 2.6D -2.4D

Tetraflex Accommodative IOL 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE Mean = 0.1D 4.2DRefractiveRange 1.4D -2.8D

Tetraflex Accommodative IOL 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEARDISTANCE-3.8D -5.5D -5.2D Widened Refractive Range and More Myopia at Near and in Difference Map

Tetraflex Accommodative IOL 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEARDISTANCE-3.5D -5.2D -3.1D Widened Refractive Range and More Myopia at Near and in Difference Map

Tetraflex Accommodative IOL 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEARDISTANCE-0.6D -1.4D -2.1D Widened Refractive Range and More Myopia at Near and in Difference Map

Summary The Tetraflex Accommodative IOL is associated with a widened refractive range and more myopia with near fixation, which can explain the enhanced near acuity compared to monofocal IOLs.

Patient AB – OD Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE-3.5D -3.5D

Patient GB – OD Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE-2.3D

Patient GB – OS Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE

Patient RC – OD Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE-2.3D -2.8D

Patient DB – OD Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE

Patient DB – OS Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE

Patient GF – OD Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE-1.3D -1.4D

Patient PS – OS Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE -2.5D -2.5D

Patient ER – OD Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE

Patient ER – OS Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE

Patient BV – OD Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE

Patient MA – OS Crystalens 3D Refraction Map DIFFERENCE NEAR DISTANCE

Summary The Crystalens Accommodative IOL is associated with a widened refractive range and more myopia with near fixation in some cases. In others no clear accommodative effect is obvious