Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology MITRE Corporation Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Internal Assessment Your overall IB mark (the one sent to universities after the IB test) in any IB science course is based upon two kinds of assessments.
Advertisements

FAA/Eurocontrol TIM 9 on Performance Metrics – INTEGRA Rod Gingell 16 May 2002.
Model Checker In-The-Loop Flavio Lerda, Edmund M. Clarke Computer Science Department Jim Kapinski, Bruce H. Krogh Electrical & Computer Engineering MURI.
Overview of the Interaction Design Process. Objectives By the end of today’s class you will be able to… –Describe the major steps in the interaction design.
Chapter 4 Quality Assurance in Context
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Adrian BĂRZOI, Pilot SFO (A320,A330,A33X),BEng
Development of a Closed-Loop Testing Method for a Next-Generation Terminal Area Automation System JUP Quarterly Review April 4, 2002 John Robinson Doug.
Simulation.
Effective Agent Participation in Rescue Operations Brent Dutson CS7100 Fall 2009.
Evaluating Hypotheses
REAL-TIME SOFTWARE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
Soft Field Takeoff and Landing. Soft Field Takeoff w Before landing, will you be able to take off? w Complex and high performance aircraft often have.
Air Traffic Control How Air Traffic is Coordinated © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Aerospace Engineering.
1 ES 314 Advanced Programming Lec 2 Sept 3 Goals: Complete the discussion of problem Review of C++ Object-oriented design Arrays and pointers.
TARGETS Enabling NextGen With Advanced Procedure Design Software October 22, 2013.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 10 Slide 1 Formal Specification.
Optimizing the Placement of Chemical and Biological Agent Sensors Daniel L. Schafer Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology Defense Threat.
Unit 3a Industrial Control Systems
Special Topics Introduction to Aeronautical Engineering
1/14 Development and Evaluation of Prototype Flight Deck Systems for Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management ASAS Thematic Network - Workshop 3 Toulouse,
© 2003 The MITRE Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Enhanced Flight Rules (CEFR) Randall Bone October 7, 2003.
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney,
Review Continuous Descent Operations Manual Roosevelt Pena (Dom Rep)
Real-time systems Systems Refers to: (computing, communication, and information) (c) Rlamsal DWIT.
Study Continuous Climb Operations
Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety Action Team 2014 Gary A. Palm ATM Teterboro ATCT.
20 In-Trail Climb experience and an airlines view of ASAS opportunities Captain Rocky Stone United Airlines Manager – Flight Systems Technology.
Project Tracking. Questions... Why should we track a project that is underway? What aspects of a project need tracking?
Object-Oriented Software Engineering Practical Software Development using UML and Java Chapter 7: Focusing on Users and Their Tasks.
ASAS-TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, MalmöSlide 1 Airborne Surveillance Applications included in ‘Package I’ Francis Casaux CARE/ASAS manager.
Chapter 14 Part II: Architectural Adaptation BY: AARON MCKAY.
Optimization Problems - Optimization: In the real world, there are many problems (e.g. Traveling Salesman Problem, Playing Chess ) that have numerous possible.
NextGen Current System Primary Radar – Creates blip on Radar Screen Secondary Radar – Aircraft encodes identifier and telemetry data VHF Radio – Voice.
- Session 4: Interoperation José M. Roca Air/Ground Cooperative ATS Programme Eurocontrol.
Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology MITRE Corporation Center.
Office of Aviation Safety Response to Stick Shaker and Stall Human Performance presentation.
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Federal Aviation Administration System Airport.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
F053-B © 2007 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Case # Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Eric Shi H. Peter Stassen,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Noise 101: Federal Noise Laws and Regulations Town of Payson M.L. Chittick, Scottsdale FSDO January.
Observer Scanner Training Navigational Assistance Section 4 by 1st Lt. Alan Fenter.
Cognitive Engineering Perspective of ASAS Amy Pritchett Cognitive Engineering Center School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Tech Atlanta, GA.
LECTURE 4: ICAO CHART requirements
Lecture 4: Global Positioning System (GPS)
Chapter 9 Gauss Elimination The Islamic University of Gaza
© 2015 Noblis, Inc. Jonathan Hammer Modeling for Verification and Validation Workshop, FAA WJHTC Monte Carlo Modeling Techniques in FAA Systems Development.
Neural Networks - Berrin Yanıkoğlu1 Applications and Examples From Mitchell Chp. 4.
Problems n The main problem is the congestion of traffic in the air. With the congestion come further problems, such as: –There are too few large airports.
Chapter 5:User Interface Design Concepts Of UI Interface Model Internal an External Design Evaluation Interaction Information Display Software.
14/01/20161 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP HOW TO SAVE FUEL.
The Analytic Blunder Risk Model (ABRM) A computer model for predicting collision risk Kenneth Geisinger Operations Research Analyst Federal Aviation Administration.
Redesigning Air Traffic Control: An Exercise in Software Design Daniel Jackson and John Chapin, MIT Lab for Computer Science Presented by: Jingming Zhang.
1 Controller feedback from the CoSpace / NUP II TMA experiment ASAS-TN, April 2004, Toulouse Liz Jordan, NATS, U.K. Gatwick approach controller.
Optimizing Parallel Programming with MPI Michael Chen TJHSST Computer Systems Lab Abstract: With more and more computationally- intense problems.
Certification of Reusable Software Artifacts
PIVOTING The pivot or pivot element is the element of a matrix, or an array, which is selected first by an algorithm (e.g. Gaussian elimination, simplex.
AIR TRAFFIC ONTROL.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
Lecture 2 of Computer Science II
Air Traffic Control Conestoga Valley High School Aviation Technology
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
Air Traffic Control Conestoga Valley High School Aviation Technology
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
Air Traffic Control Conestoga Valley High School Aviation Technology
Digital Control Systems Waseem Gulsher
Pre-Solo Training Program
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology MITRE Corporation Center for Advanced Aviations Systems Development Mentor: H. Peter Stassen Procedure While research efforts to have not yielded a consensus on what algorithms should be included in the software, an overall procedure for the use of the algorithms has already been defined. Spacing algorithms aim to recommend speeds to fly so that proper spacing will be maintained between the ownship and target aircraft. These algorithms use trajectory data from the target aircraft to calculate the current spacing value, that is, a measurement of how far ownship is behind the target aircraft, and compares that to the desired spacing value. The desired spacing value is a spacing distance that is declared by the Air Traffic Controller that is monitoring the airspace. After comparing the current spacing value to the desired spacing value, a spacing error is calculated that indicates how far ownship is from the desired spacing value. In order to maintain the desired spacing value, the spacing error must be corrected. The speed to fly that will eliminate the spacing error, and thus obtain the required spacing value, is estimated and sent to the pilot as a recommendation. While this is the core of the procedure, there are other functions and algorithms which are used in unison with those listed above. These include filters, quantizers, and the improved algorithm. Results and Conclusions We have consistently observed throughout our testing that the number of speed commands while running the improved algorithm can be reduced up to 50%. This feat was accomplished all the while maintaining acceptable spacing values, and is a significant improvement from the basic ``Merge Behind" and ``Remain Behind" applications. The largest role that the improved algorithm plays in the simulation is handling the final descent. Pilots typically make one large speed change to slow down aircraft during the final approach to the runway and under the basic spacing algorithms, many small, consecutive speed recommendations will be given to the pilot. The improved algorithm, on the other hand, gives one large speed recommendation. These algorithms were tested in a cockpit simulator in MITRE/CAASD's ATM lab. Using an interface called BigWig, the improved speed calculation algorithm was tested in a simulation that focused on human response patterns. BigWig creates an environment where trajectory data of aircraft in addition to environmental factors are considered. After initial testing, the algorithm produced desirable results that at one point reduced what would have been nine speed commands into one command. The improved algorithm is an essential aspect to MITRE’s Merging and Spacing simulations because it handles the final descent of an aircraft with unprecedented successes, allowing MITRE to take run experiments and simulations from takeoff to landing without interruptions. Abstract This project develops improvements to speed guidance algorithms that will be used in an engineering testing environment. The concept of the original speed guidance algorithms was to compute a suitable speed for a plane to fly when following another aircraft based on the distance between the two aircraft. The estimated speed to fly would then be given to the pilot as a recommendation on a Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI). Initial testing of these algorithms showed that a speed to fly was calculated successfully, however, an incredible number speed recommendations were being produced. To prevent the pilot from being overwhelmed with speed recommendations, we created improvements to the algorithms with the specific goal of reducing the number of speed recommendations. Improvements to the algorithms were implemented by creating an improved speed calculation algorithm, quantizers, and rounding filters. The improved speed calculation algorithm searches for speed changes in the lead aircraft that are of great magnitude and, instead of giving many small consecutive recommendations, gives one large speed recommendation to the pilot for an extended period of time. The improved speed calculation algorithm was tested in a simulation that focused on human response patterns. After initial testing, the algorithm produced desirable results that at one point reduced what would have been nine speed commands into one command. The improved algorithm is an essential aspect to MITRE's Merging and Spacing simulations because it handles the final descent of an aircraft with unprecedented successes, allowing MITRE to take run experiments and simulations from takeoff to landing without interruptions. Improved Speed Calculation Algorithm One of the problems with current algorithms is that they do not handle large speed changes well. To a human, it is easy to identify when to make one large speed change instead of small consecutive speed changes that will result in an equivalent magnitude of change but this change is indistinguishable to a computer. During standard arrival procedures, an aircraft significantly slows down for landing purposes. Before the improved algorithm, simulations did not handle the final approach to an acceptable level so it could not be included in simulations and experiments because of the undesirable results. The improved speed calculation algorithm that we designed aims to fix this problem by searching for large speed changes in the lead aircraft. Previously, when there was a large change in the Indicated Air Speed (IAS) for the target, ownship attempted to follow the desired speed profile but instead of making one large speed change as the target aircraft did, ownship made many consecutive adjustments. The amount of adjustments that came out of the previous algorithms overwhelmed the pilot. The goal of the improved algorithm is to reduce the number of speeds recommendations that are sent to the pilot by giving the pilot one large speed command in place of multiple small commands. However, this must be done while maintaining the proper spacing between aircraft. The improved algorithm is necessary to avoid small consecutive adjustments such as these. By searching through the target Indicated Air Speed (IAS) history, the moment when the lead aircraft begin making a large IAS change can be detected and the corresponding magnitude of change can be estimated. This large speed change is then sent to the pilot as a recommendation for an extended period of time.