Experiment in PS G. Franchetti, GSI CERN, 20-21/5/2014 21/05/14G. Franchetti1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Correction of sextupole resonances. w.p. (6.36,6.22) - N=0.6*10^14, Correction of 3Qx=19 at low intensity Total emittance pi mm mrad % outside blue –
Advertisements

Study of Resonance Crossing in FFAG Masamitsu Aiba (KEK) Contents 1.Introduction 2.Crossing experiment at PoP FFAG 3.Crossing experiment at HIMAC synchrotron.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Nonlinear phenomena in space-charge dominated beams. 1.Why? 2.Collective (purely!) nonlinearity 3.Influence of distributions functions 4."Montague" resonance.
Helmholtz International Center for Oliver Boine-Frankenheim GSI mbH and TU Darmstadt/TEMF FAIR accelerator theory (FAIR-AT) division Helmholtz International.
Elias Métral, COULOMB’05, Senigallia (AN), Italy, September 12-16, /29 OBSERVATION OF OCTUPOLE DRIVEN RESONANCE PHENOMENA WITH SPACE CHARGE AT THE.
Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014
AC dipole for LHC Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
Resonance Crossing Experiment in PoP FFAG (preliminary report) M. Aiba (Tokyo Univ.) for KEK FFAG Group FFAG W.S. KEK.
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Resonant dipole-dipole energy transfer from 300 K to 300μK, from gas phase collisions to the frozen Rydberg gas K. A. Safinya D. S. Thomson R. C. Stoneman.
Main Injector Slow Extraction Studies f Y. Alexahin, E. Gianfelice-Wendt, J. Johnstone (APC) D. Morris, M.-J. Yang (AD) MI Slow Extraction Group Meeting,
4 th Order Resonance at the PS R. WASEF, S. Gilardoni, S. Machida Acknowledgements: A. Huschauer, G. Sterbini SC meeting, 05/03/15.
1 Dynamic aperture studies in e+e- factories with crab waist IR’07, November 9, 2007 E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Sensitivity of HOM Frequency in the ESS Medium Beta Cavity Aaron Farricker.
Tunes modulation in a space charge dominated beam: The particles behavior in the “necktie” Space charge meeting – CERN - 21/11/2013 Vincenzo Forte Thanks.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Space charge studies at the CERN PS A. Huschauer, Raymond Wasef H. Damerau, S. Gilardoni, S.Hancock, D. Schoerling, R. Steerenberg Acknowledgements: All.
HB Space Charge and Resonances in High Intensity Beams I. Hofmann, GSI HB2008, August 25-29, 2008  Motivation  The "Montague resonance" case 
Beam-Beam simulation and experiments in RHIC By Vahid Ranjbar and Tanaji Sen FNAL.
Villars, 26 September Extra Low Energy Antiproton Ring (ELENA) for antiproton deceleration after the AD Pavel Belochitskii for the AD team On behalf.
SC-30 FS1 Communication from SYNERGIA about GSI benchmarking 14/11/2013.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
The nonlinear dynamics of SIS100 at injection G. Franchetti Beam dynamics meet Magnets II 18/4/2012G.Franchetti1 Magnet multipoles: Dipole: Akishin et.
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
Fix-lines and stability G. Franchetti and F. Schmidt GSI, CERN AOC-Workshop - CERN 6/2/2015 G. Franchetti and F. Schmidt1.
Resonance Compensation Raymond WASEF S.Gilardoni, A.Huschauer, D.Schoerling Acknowledgments M.Delrieux, J.C.Dumont, H.Genoud, C.Hernalsteens and all PS.
Choice of L* for FCCee: IR optics and DA A.Bogomyagkov, E.Levichev, P.Piminov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk HF2014, IHEP Beijing, 9-12.
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06 1/15 TRANSVERSE LANDAU.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Y.Papaphilippou Thanks to
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
People who attended the meeting:
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
A. Franchi, N. Carmignani - ESRF
Space charge studies at the SPS
FAIR synchrotrons and optics challenges
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Impact of remanent fields on SPS chromaticity
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Summary of Space-Charge Measurements, 2011
SC Overview 2013 White & Rouge The Codes in Comparison The Noise Issue
Nonlinear Field Quality Checks
Lecture HT14 Beam-Beam II
Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB
Multi-Objective Optimization with possible application in SuperKEKB(in progress) Y. Zhang, D. Zhou
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Lecture 33 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
IMPACT Simulation of the Montague Resonance at PS
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
Progress in Code Benchmarking
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
Presentation transcript:

Experiment in PS G. Franchetti, GSI CERN, 20-21/5/ /05/14G. Franchetti1

PS measurements /05/14G. Franchetti2 R. Wasef, A. Huschauer, F. Schmidt, S. Gilardoni, G.Franchetti q y0 = s Resonance:q x +2 q y = 19 I = 2A Dqx = Dqy = Measurement Q x0 SPACE CHARGE 2013

Presence of natural resonance was not included, then we tried by enhancing the resonance strength 21/05/14G. Franchetti3 I=4A Simulation q y0 = 6.47

For a stronger resonance excitation but this is an artificial enhancement 21/05/14G. Franchetti4 I=6A Simulation q y0 = 6.47

Modeling was still incomplete 21/05/14G. Franchetti5 I=2A q y0 =6.47 Simulation new simulations performed after the visit of Frank Schmidt at GSI. Correcting the PS model in computer code.

Adding random errors 21/05/14G. Franchetti6 sigma = 10% sigma = 10% but distribution of errors with inverted sign, same seed (“inverted seed”)

For larger random errors of the same seed 21/05/14G. Franchetti7 sigma = 20% inverted seedsigma = 40 % inverted seed

Emittance evolution 21/05/14G. Franchetti8 q x0 = sec q y0 = 6.47 Measurement Simulation “inverted seed” 10%

Final/Initial distribution for the “inverted seed” 10%, I=2A 21/05/14G. Franchetti9 initial final initial final q y0 = 6.47 q x0 = 6.11 q y0 = 6.47 q x0 = 6.11

With a stronger current I=4A, to include artificially a pre-existing resonance 21/05/14G. Franchetti10 core growth thick halo initial final initial final Y [mm] X [mm] q y0 = 6.47 q x0 = 6.11 q y0 = 6.47 q x0 = 6.11 Simulation “inverted seed” 10%

Halo formation: experiment 21/05/14G. Franchetti11 q y0 = 6.47 q x0 = 6.11 Measurement YX

Challenges 21/05/14G. Franchetti12 The main challenges are 2 1) Reliable modeling of the nonlinear lattice 2) Understanding the coupled dynamics in the resonance crossing + space charge

1D dynamics well understood 21/05/14G. Franchetti13 The asymmetric beam response is mainly attributed to the resonance crossing of a coupled resonance. Third order resonance 1D

Halo formation/core formation 21/05/14G. Franchetti14 If the island of the frozen system go far out, than an halo is expected If the islands of the frozen system remain inside the beam edge  core growth

Halo formation through non adiabatic resonance crossing 21/05/14G. Franchetti15 Third order resonance 1D Halo

Coupled dynamics much more difficult 21/05/14G. Franchetti16 What is it an island ? What is it a fix point ? Resonance 

Fix-lines 21/05/14G. Franchetti17 Fix points are points in phase space that after 3 turns go back to their initial position In 4D this dos not happen, but in 4D after 3 turns a point does not return back on the same point. However there are points that after each turn remains on a special curved line. This line is closed and it span in the 4D phase space. 3 Qx = N Qx + 2Qy = N

Fix-line projections 22/5/2014G. Franchetti18 Frank Schmidt PhD

Properties 22/5/2014G. Franchetti19 What are the parameters that fix these sizes ? Δ r K2 (driving term) Stabilizing detuning (space charge, octupole, sextupole-themself)

What happen to the islands ? 21/05/14G. Franchetti20

What happen to the islands ? 21/05/14G. Franchetti21 fix- line “island”

For sextupoles alone fix-lines set DA ! 21/05/14G. Franchetti22 From trackingFrom theory ax ay

What do the stable fix-lines do to the beam ? 21/05/14G. Franchetti23 After turns Here we change the distance of the resonance. Stabilization with an octupole

21/05/14G. Franchetti24

21/05/14G. Franchetti25

21/05/14G. Franchetti26 Halo Core growth y x

21/05/14G. Franchetti27

21/05/14G. Franchetti28

21/05/14G. Franchetti29

Effect of space charge: Gaussian round beam 21/05/14G. Franchetti30 Qx + 2 Qy = N DQy DQsc

3 rd order fix-line controlled by the space charge of a Gaussian CB 21/05/14G. Franchetti31 DQsc = DQy = 0.08

21/05/14G. Franchetti32 DQsc = DQy = 0.08

21/05/14G. Franchetti33 DQsc = -0.3 DQy = 0.08 x [1] y [1]

trapping/non trapping 21/05/14G. Franchetti34 Resonance crossing without trapping Resonance crossing with trapping FAST (10000 turns) SLOW (10000 turns)

21/05/14G. Franchetti35 Resonance crossing with trapping + larger fix-line

time evolution fast crossing 21/05/14G. Franchetti36

time evolution slow crossing 21/05/14G. Franchetti37

Summary 21/05/14G. Franchetti38 After the lattice model is improved the simulation shows an emittance increase ratio of 2 Beam distribution from simulations have the same pattern as for the measured Theory of the fix-lines with detuning (space charge or octupoles) is essential to understand the extension and population of the halo/core growth  hence to control the negative effects: impact on effective resonance compensation in SIS100…. but it would be nice to measure it! Random errors have a significant effect and may bring the emittance growth ratio to 2.5 A pre-existing resonance is not properly included The asymmetric beam response is explained in terms of the periodic crossing of fix-lines with the beam