Perkins IV Secondary Accountability Data Michelle Kamenov Kari-Ann Ediger “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Advertisements

Perkins IV Secondary Accountability Data Dan Smith Marlys Bucher “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Perkins Accountability II – Postsecondary Webinar September 23, 2014.
Career and Technical Education in Minnesota Presentation to the Governor’s Workforce Development Council March 13, 2008 Minnesota Perkins State Career.
IL State Board of Education - 9/18/2007 Perkins IV - Secondary Indicators Carol Brooks Illinois State Board of Education.
CTE Accountability and Planning Perkins Planning Meeting March 2013 MSDE/DCCR Accountability Team Pat Mikos, Program Manager George Comegys, CTE Specialist.
Slide 1 Perkins IV Changes and Additions to Perkins Data, Tables and Reports August, 2009 Michele Dorschner, System Developer, Office of the Chancellor,
Where does data come from and how it is used
Perkins Accountability I: Secondary and Postsecondary Overview September 23, 2014.
DQI State Plan Accountability Requirements, Guidelines, Timeline, Student Definitions and Indicators John Haigh, U.S. Department of Education Savannah,
NWOCA Fall EMIS Update Meeting October 3, 2007 FY’08 EMIS Changes Orig. Presentation by: Roger Holbrook Office of Information Policy and Management During.
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
Minnesota Assessment System Update Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Using CTE/Perkins Data to drive Program Improvement Program.
Graduation – 2013 Cohort New Jersey Department of Education.
ACCESS for ELLs and Alternate ACCESS for ELLs
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Perkins Accountability II – Postsecondary Webinar September 27, 2012.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
Evaluation 101: After School Programs February 1, 2007 Region 3 After School Technical Assistance Center Conference.
Perkins Data Collection Help Link - MDE Marlys J. Bucher, Ph.D. Coordinator Secondary Perkins CTE Assessment and Evaluation Specialist
CTE Data and EDFacts September 22 & 23, Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) For , due December 31, 2010 – Either CAR or EDFacts, not both –
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability Data September 8, 2015 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Perkins Technical Assistance Webinar January 15, 2014 Oregon Department of Education | Department of Community Colleges and Workforce Development.
Data in Perspective: A view of national, state, and local data collection, compilations and systems Presented by : Beth Hartness Program Specialist, National.
Reporting Industry Certifications and Career & Professional Academies Tara Goodman Tara McLarnon Division of Career and Adult Education.
Perkins Accountability I: Secondary and Postsecondary Overview September 20, 2012.
Perkins Accountability I: Secondary and Postsecondary Overview September 2, 2015.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Foundations for Perkins Accountability: Core Indicators, Annual Reports, Targets, and Gap Evaluation Carl D Perkins.
Perkins Accountability II – Postsecondary Webinar September 9, 2015.
Dale Gruis Ag Ed Consultant Iowa Dept. of Education
Career and Technical Education Assessments New CTE Teacher Workshop September 22-23, 2015 Valerie Felder Office of Career and Technical Education Grants,
Georgia Department of Education Bradley Bryant, State Superintendent All Rights Reserved 1.
Presentation will start at 2:00 If you are using your phone for audio, please put it on mute. Submit questions through the chat feature For assistance.
Marlys Bucher Dan Smith. Secondary Consortium Data Reports 1S1 Academic Attainment in Reading/Language Arts 1S2 Academic Attainment in Mathematics 2S1.
Perkins IV – What ’ s In Store? Mimi Lufkin NAPE/Women Work National Conference April 6, 2008 National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
By Krishnan Sudharsan Data, Accountability, and Technical Assessments OCTE November 7, 2013.
Title III Updates & AMAOs Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Title III Susan Ketchum, Office of Educational Accountability September 24, 2008.
Using Perkins Data To Improve CTE Sharon Enright, Ph.D. Ohio Department of Education Office of Career-Technical Education 1 NCLA Conference October 1,
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
CTE by the Numbers CTE data entry, verification and reporting Counselor & Administrator Conference Dover, Delaware January 26, 2016.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Core Indicator Cohort Selection Carl D Perkins (Perkins IV) Career and Technical Education Act Dr. W. Charles Wiseley.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services November 21, 2014.
Federal - Perkins IV Programs of Study (Pathways) Secondary/Postsecondary Links Improving Student Performance –Academic and Technical Skills –Graduation/Completion.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Perkins IV Data and Accountability
Annual Report Georgetown ISD 2016 Accountability Rating:
Perkins Accountability ~ Secondary 2016 CTE Fall Webinar Series
Geoff Grove & Melissa Maynard July 2017
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Negotiating Your Local Targets and Understanding Perkins Core Indicator Annual and Trend Reports November 9, 2017.
Secondary Perkins Data
REPORTS CTE 103.
Perkins IV Postsecondary Accountability
CTE Data and Accountability Overview
CTE Data and Accountability Overview
Michigan School Report Card Update
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability
Alternate Assessment Updates
Overview of Ohio’s Career-Technical Planning District Report Card
Strengthening Secondary Indicators under Perkins V
School Improvement Process
Presentation transcript:

Perkins IV Secondary Accountability Data Michelle Kamenov Kari-Ann Ediger “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”

Review student definitions, reporting categories & special populations Discuss the secondary accountability indicators & how they impact district results Examine current targets and performance Timeline: negotiating targets Timeline: data submission for the P-file Goals education.state.mn.us 2

Secondary Consortium Data Reports 1S1 Academic Attainment in Reading/Language Arts (GRAD) 1S2 Academic Attainment in Mathematics (GRAD) 2S1 Technical Skill Attainment (TSA) 3S1 School Completion 4S1 Student Graduation Rates (MN 4-year Graduation Rate, prior year) 5S1 Placement (MOHE Match) 6S1 Nontraditional Participation 6S2 Nontraditional Completion education.state.mn.us 3

Other Reports (current year) –Career Cluster Report (1 page)  by the 16 career clusters  Includes unduplicated counts –Program Report (3 pages)  6 digit program codes  Only reported for approved programs –Course Report (42 pages)  digit course codes  Provides overall duplicated counts and unduplicated total Duplicated and Unduplicated Data are specified in each report Data by school, district, consortium, state education.state.mn.us 4 Reports

All data reported out by: –Gender (MARSS, Female/Male) –Ethnicity (7 codes as of 2011 data) 1) American Indian or Alaskan Native, 2) Asian, 3) Hispanic, 4) Black, Non-Hispanic, 5) White, Non-Hispanic, 6) Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander, 7) Multiracial –Special Populations 1.Individuals with Disabilities (MARSS, SEES codes: 4, 6, 9) 2.Economically Disadvantaged (MARSS, Econ codes: 1, 2) 3.Nontraditional Enrollees (from P-file) 4.Single Parents (self-reported) 5.Displaced Homemakers (Federal definition, self-reported) 6.Limited English Proficiency (MARSS: Y/N) 7.Migrant (MARSS until ; different department this SY ) Reporting Categories education.state.mn.us 5

DATA ELEMENT LENGTH POSITION VALID DATA FILL/JUSTIFICATION School Year2 1 – 2 NumericRight Justify, leading zero fill School District4 3 – 6 Numeric Right Justify, leading zero fill District Type2 7 – 8 NumericRight Justify, leading zero fill School Number3 9 – 11 Numeric Right Justify, leading zero fill MARSS ID Number – 24 Numeric Right Justify, leading zero fill Program Code6 25 – 30 Numeric Right Justify, leading zero fill Course Code2 31 – 32 Numeric Right Justify, leading zero fill Course Length in Minutes 5 33 – 37 Numeric Right Justify, leading zero fill Grade Received1 38P or NProficient/Non-Proficient Teen (single) Parent1 39Y / NDefault to N Displaced Homemaker1 40 Y / N Is a TSA Given1 41Y / NState Approved TSA given in class Student Proficiency1 42P / NIF Line 41=Y then student P or N Last Name – 82 Alpha Left justify, fill with spaces to end First Name Alpha Left justify, fill with spaces to end Middle Name Alpha Left justify, fill with spaces to end Suffix Alpha/Left justify, fill with spaces to end Numeric Gender M or F Date of Birth Numeric yyyymmdd Data Record Example: PNNYPLASTNAME FIRSTNAME MIDDLENAME SUFXGYYYYMMDD Carl D. Perkins Record Layout 2014 education.state.mn.us 6

Participant  100 hours or more in one career field Concentrator  240 hours or more in one career field Secondary Completer  A concentrator who graduates Definitions education.state.mn.us 7

1S1 Academic Attainment in Reading/ Language Arts* education.state.mn.us 8 Numerator __________________________________________ Denominator Number of CTE Concentrators who have met the proficient or advanced level on the Statewide high school reading/language arts assessment administered by the State under Section 1111(b)(3) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act based on the scores that were included in the State’s computation of adequate yearly progress (AYP) and who, in the reporting year, left secondary education. Number of CTE Concentrators who took the ESEA assessment in reading/language arts whose scores were included in the State’s computation of AYP and who, in the reporting year, left secondary education. *Based on the GRAD

1S2 Academic Attainment in Mathematics * education.state.mn.us 9 ___________________________________________ Numerator Denominator Number of CTE Concentrators who have met the proficient or advanced level on the Statewide high school mathematics assessment administered by the State under Section 1111(b)(3) of the (ESEA) as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act based on the scores that were included in the State’s computation of adequate yearly progress (AYP) and who, in the reporting year, left secondary education. Number of CTE Concentrators who took the ESEA assessment in mathematics whose scores were included in the State’s computation of AYP and who, in the reporting year, have left secondary education. *Based on the GRAD

GRAD Testing: 1S1 & 1S2 reports education.state.mn.us 10 REPORT: DEC 2017 REPORT: DEC 2016 REPORT: DEC 2015 REPORT: DEC SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR th graders have taken Reading & Math GRAD 11 th grade Math GRAD 10 th grade Reading GRAD 9 th 8 th Dec 2015 is the last year of using the GRAD assessment to report 1S1 & 2S1

GRAD Testing: 1S1 & 1S2 reports education.state.mn.us 11 REPORT: DEC 2017 REPORT: DEC 2016 REPORT: DEC 2015 REPORT: DEC SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR th graders have taken Reading & Math GRAD 11 th grade Math GRAD 10 th grade Reading GRAD 9 th 8 th 12 th graders have taken Reading & Math GRAD 11 th grade Math GRAD 10 th grade Reading GRAD 9 th 8 th 7 th 12 th 11 th ACT plus Writing 10 th 9 th 8 th 7 th 6 th Dec 2015 is the last year of using the GRAD assessment to report 1S1 & 2S1

GRAD Testing: 1S1 & 1S2 reports education.state.mn.us 12 REPORT: DEC 2017 REPORT: DEC 2016 REPORT: DEC 2015 REPORT: DEC SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL YEAR th graders have taken Reading & Math GRAD 11 th grade Math GRAD 10 th grade Reading GRAD 9 th 8 th 12 th graders have taken Reading & Math GRAD 11 th grade Math GRAD 10 th grade Reading GRAD 9 th 8 th 7 th 12 th 11 th ACT plus Writing 10 th 9 th 8 th 7 th 6 th 12 th 11 th ACT plus Writing 10 th ACT Plan and possibly Compass 9 th 8 th ACT Explore (where available) 7 th 6 th 5 th 11 th ACT plus Writing 10 th ACT Plan and possibly Compass 9 th 8 th ACT Explore (where available) 7 th 6 th 5 th 4 th Dec 2015 is the last year of using the GRAD assessment to report 1S1 & 2S1

2S1 Technical Skills Attainment* education.state.mn.us 13 Numerator __________________________________________ Denominator Number of Secondary CTE Concentrators within Programs of Study selected by the state for which state-approved technical skill assessment instruments have been identified who pass any of those identified technical skill assessment instruments pertinent to the Program of Study in which concentrator status is obtained. Number of Secondary CTE Concentrators within Programs of Study selected by the state for which state-approved technical skill assessment instruments have been identified who attempt any of those identified technical skill assessment instruments pertinent to the Program of Study in which Concentrator status is obtained.  * FY11 was the first year of reporting TSA outcomes for Secondary. (Prior to FY11, the number of concentrators passing 2 credits within one career field was reported.)  Assessments have been added each subsequent year. State-Approved Technical Skill Assessments have now been identified in 60 of the 79 career pathways.  Assessments are also identified for career clusters and career fields for programs that focus on career exploration.

3S1 School Completion education.state.mn.us 14 ___________________________________________ Number of CTE Concentrators who earned a regular secondary school diploma during the reporting year. Number of CTE Concentrators who left secondary education during the reporting year. Numerator Denominator

Number of CTE Concentrators who, in the reporting year, were included as graduated in the State’s computation of its graduation rate as described in Section 1111(b)(2)(C)(vi) of the ESEA. Number of CTE Concentrators who, in the reporting year, were included in the State’s computation of its graduation rate as defined in the State’s Consolidated Accountability Plan pursuant to Section 1111(b)(2)(C)(vi) of the ESEA. Includes: 1) graduates, 2) dropouts, 3) *unknowns, and 4) *continuing *Beginning in , the CTE calculation was adjusted to reflect the same definition as the calculation used by the state for 4-year graduation rate. All four categories of students are now included in the denominator, including the 1) unknown, and 2) continuing students. 4S1 Student Graduation Rates 4-year Cohort from grade 9 *Prior Year Data* education.state.mn.us 15 ___________________________________________ Numerator Denominator

4-year Graduation Rate All Students education.state.mn.us 16 *Beginning in , the CTE calculation was adjusted to reflect the same definition as the calculation used by the state for 4-year graduation rate. All four categories of students are now included in the denominator, including the 1) unknown, and, 2) continuing students.

4-year Graduation Rate All Students education.state.mn.us 17 *Beginning in , the CTE calculation was adjusted to reflect the same definition as the calculation used by the state for 4-year graduation rate. All four categories of students are now included in the denominator, including the 1) unknown, and, 2) continuing students.

4-year Graduation Rate Special Education education.state.mn.us 18 *Beginning in , the CTE calculation was adjusted to reflect the same definition as the calculation used by the state for 4-year graduation rate. All four categories of students are now included in the denominator, including the 1) unknown, and, 2) continuing students.

4-year Graduation Rate Special Education education.state.mn.us 19 *Beginning in , the CTE calculation was adjusted to reflect the same definition as the calculation used by the state for 4-year graduation rate. All four categories of students are now included in the denominator, including the 1) unknown, and, 2) continuing students.

4-year Graduation Rate All Students & Special Education education.state.mn.us 20 *Beginning in , the CTE calculation was adjusted to reflect the same definition as the calculation used by the state for 4-year graduation rate. All four categories of students are now included in the denominator, including the 1) unknown, and, 2) continuing students.

5S1 Placement (Prior year data) education.state.mn.us 21 ___________________________________________ Number of Secondary CTE Completers who register as participating in higher education in a data match through the Minnesota Office of Higher Education Number of Secondary CTE Completers. * Note second quarter enrollment following graduation (October-December). So for the December 2014 CAR report we will be reporting on students who graduated at the end of the SY Numerator Denominator

6S1 Nontraditional Participation education.state.mn.us 22 ___________________________________________ Numerator: Number of CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year. Denominator: Number of CTE participants who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year. Numerator Denominator

6S2 Nontraditional Completion education.state.mn.us 23 ___________________________________________ Number of CTE concentrators from underrepresented gender groups who completed a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year. Number of CTE concentrators who completed a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year. Numerator Denominator

Core IndicatorOCTAE STATE 1S1 Reading71.50% 76.99% 1S2 Mathematics44.00%53.20% 2S1 Technical Skill 53.00%54.76% 3S1 Completion*98.50%98.44% (>88.65%) 4S1 4-year Graduation**96.50%88.03% (>86.85%) 5S1 Placement** 50.00%89.87% 6S1 NT Participation50.00%26.49% (>45.00%) 6S2 NT Completion34.50%12.02% (>31.10%) *Prior Year students (SY ), **Prior year students, graduated SY Red = Did not make the negotiated targets Purple = Did not make the negotiated target, but, are within 90% of the target, so, it does not count against us Negotiated State Target vs. Actual State Performance for SY12-13 education.state.mn.us 24

Core Indicator SY SY S1 Reading (GRAD) 72.00% 73.00% 1S2 Mathematics (GRAD) 56.00% 56.00% 2S1 Technical Skill 53.00% 54.00% 3S1 Completion* 98.50% 98.50% 4S1 4-year Graduation** 89.00% 89.00% 5S1 Placement** 54.00% 54.00% 6S1 NT Participation 27.00% 27.00% 6S2 NT Completion 12.00% 12.00% *Prior Year (SY ) **Students from SY MOHE Data via SLEDS (Statewide Longitudinal Data System) Purple – Renegotiated with OCTAE March 2013 (one year) Negotiated State Target for SY and SY education.state.mn.us 25

March – April (Spring) –MDE submits any changes to the Minnesota Certified Software Vendors for character layout –Table C – Table of Career and Technical Education Programs and Licenses updated and posted –Web changes completed May – June (Summer) –District CTE personnel (teacher, counselor, local designated CTE contact) should ensure that all data are available for the P-file submission (appropriate programs/courses, course length in minutes, proficiency status for the courses, TSA identifier, and TSA proficiency –MDE web submission site is opened Data Submissions for the P-File education.state.mn.us 26

Middle of May through the middle of September –P-files submitted to MDE via the web based submission (*Written directions are provided to all identified district personnel who download the data file, 1 per district) –MARSS errors are reported back to as soon as the district downloads their file –Beginning in August, MDE sends out reminders of data download status to all identified district personnel and 26 Perkins secondary consortium coordinators –September MDE phones all districts who have yet to complete the data submission –October 10, 2014: WEB SITE NOW CLOSED FOR SY CARL PERKINS DATA SUBMISSION Data Submissions for the P-File (continued…) education.state.mn.us 27

October: Updates for the FY12 MARSS data are due to MDE November: Initial data is examined for accuracy December: Data is due to OCTAE via EDEN January: *Data Reports available for district download. Consortia directors should ask the local district personnel for copies of the district reports. (*Written directions are provided to all identified district personnel who download the data file - 1 per district) February: plan for changes for next fiscal year Data Submissions for the P-File (continued…) education.state.mn.us 28

Career and Technical Program Administration –Perkins IV –Program Approvals –Transition-Disabled Programs Carl Perkins ex.htmlhttp://education.state.mn.us/MDE/SchSup/DataSubLogin/CarlPerkins/ind ex.html –Enter System for data downloads and report retrieval –Step-by-Step directions –Carl Perkins Record Layout Go to this website for a list of Technical Skills Assessments by pathway, CTE/Perkins Web Site Resources education.state.mn.us 29

education.state.mn.us 30 Questions and Comments can be sent to: Direct#:

Annual Perkins Consortium Coordinators Meeting November 12, 2014 Normandale Community College –Bloomington Fall Career & Technical Education Conference CTE Works! Learning that Works for Minnesota November 13, 2014 Crowne Plaza West, Plymouth, MN Upcoming Professional Development Events education.state.mn.us 31

REMINDER: For secondary participants, Continuing Education Units (CEU’s) will be made available for teachers for this series of webinars. In order to get the necessary certificates you must complete the session evaluation. Teachers can get certificates (1 hour) within two weeks of completing the session evaluation for today’s webinar. A note about CEU’s… education.state.mn.us 32

We value your feedback about today’s session. Please click on the link in the chat window now to complete the Webinar Evaluation. Thanks for joining us today! education.state.mn.us 33