WHO ARE WE? We are a corporate foundation established in 1984 by an endowment from the Matsushita Electric Corporation of America, which is the parent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
National Institute for Educational Options NIEO Shaping Americas Schools through Research, Leadership, and Innovative Teaching Practices.
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Elementary School Counselor
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Carnegie Schools for a New Society: Reflections on a National, Districtwide High School Reform Initiative ROCHELLE NICHOLS-SOLOMON & MICHELLE FEIST Academy.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
1 The Nebraska Leadership Initiative Overview of Rationale and Research A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Designed to help leaders identify the key elements that support a district-wide improvement strategy and to bring these elements into a coherent and integrated.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 The Indiana Department of Correction presents New Employee Orientation: Vision and Mission Statements.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
CLASS PROJECT: CAREER PATHWAYS CSD 509J Mid-Year Update.
A Framework For School Counseling Programs
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
WHAT’s A STATE TO DO? TO BUILD SCHOOL/EDUCATION LEADERSHIP CAPACITY Betty Hale.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Elizabeth A. Clark, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Virginia Foundation for Educational Leadership Virginia Department of Education Webinar Series 2012 Welcome to Webinar 7.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
April –February 2014 – Advisory Council (SCAC) convenes –April 2014 – NYSED School Counselor Summit –June 2014 – Summit recommendations to BOR.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California P-16 Council Recommendations The State’s Transformational.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
1 SCHOOL LEADERS FOR COLORADO A project of School Leaders for America, Inc., a Colorado 501 C (3) Non Profit Corporation.
2012 Summer Institute THE PIVOT FROM RECRUITMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Professional Development for High-Poverty Schools Joseph F. Johnson, Jr., Ph.D. MSP Conference January 10, 2007 Phoenix, AZ.
Knowledgeable and Skillful Leadership
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
 Leadership Discussion  Selection Process  Questions and Answers.
ELI Educational Leadership Initiative Learning and Leading Together for a Brighter Future.
Principal Student Achievement Meeting PLC Visioning and Beyond.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
BOSTON SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS Dr. Thomas Hehir Professor of Practice Harvard Graduate School of Education.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Focus on scholarship, leadership, and results
Accreditation External Review
Strategic direction Chapter 4.
October 13, 2016.
By Richard DuFour and Robert Eaker
Comprehensive Planning
Becoming a High-Quality Teacher in a Changing World
February 21-22, 2018.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Presentation transcript:

WHO ARE WE? We are a corporate foundation established in 1984 by an endowment from the Matsushita Electric Corporation of America, which is the parent company of Panasonic, Technics, and Quasar. WHAT IS OUR MISSION? Our mission is to help public schools and school districts improve learning for all students so that they may use their minds well and become productive, responsible citizens.

Why is the Panasonic Foundation Unique? It is aimed at systemic, system- level restructuring It is long term (5-10 years) vs short term (1-3 years) It provides direct technical assistance vs grants Each partnership is built on collaborative structures involving multiple stakeholder groups

Corpus ChristiPasco County Allentown Lancaster Cincinnati Public Schools Northern New Mexico Network or Rural Education & NM Dept of Ed Hayward Unified School District Boston Norwalk-LaMirada Unified School District San Diego Public Schools Broward County Santa Fe Norfolk Columbus Public Schools Flint Public Schools Current Graduates Highline Minneapolis & MN Dept of Ed Racine Atlanta Norristown Seattle Miami-Dade Baton Rouge Englewood & NJ Dept of Ed Learning by Doing: Panasonic Partnerships and Systemic School Reform by Terry Clark and Richard Lacey (St. Lucie Press, 1997) Strategies looks at district-level reform issues and is published in collaboration with the American Association of School Administrators. Learning From Each Other: Questions & Answers About the Clark, Panasonic, and Rockefeller Foundations’ Long-Term Investment in Systemic School Reform By Robert A. Kronley (Grantmakers for Education, 2000).

Essential School System Purpose and Responsibilities The essential purpose of school systems is to educate all students to high levels through high quality instruction: All Means All. Based on this purpose, school systems must fulfill eight responsibilities: 1. Clarify and promote the core value that all students can and will learn at high levels; 2. Ensure a culture and climate of care, commitment, and continuous improvement; 3. Establish high learning standards and promote standards-based teaching and learning so that all students learn at high levels; 4. Establish clear and explicit performance expectations for all system personnel to support all students meeting the standards; 5. Ensure that all system personnel have the capacity to meet the performance expectations; 6. Allocate fiscal and material resources to support the system’s essential purpose and core value; 7. Implement a shared-accountability system that holds students, staff, and the system itself accountable for all students meeting high standards; 8. Engage in advocacy, coalitions and other significant relationships at the local, state and national levels so that the system can achieve its essential purpose and core value.

5.c.Does the system provide high-quality instructional leaders for all classrooms in all schools? How? How well? 1. District and school staff describe instructional leadership not only in terms of an individual or individuals, but as a set of behaviors that include deep content knowledge, a shared picture of effective teaching and learning, and modeling and inspiring improved instruction among colleagues.

5.c. Does the system provide high-quality instructional leaders for all classrooms in all schools? How? How well? 2. The district and individual schools are continually seeking to identify, develop, and nurture instructional expertise:  Principals are expected and trained to be instructional leaders. They are enabled to spend a significant portion of each day in classrooms, coaching for improved instructional practice.  Central office staff who directly support and supervise principals and teachers are constantly developing their understanding of content knowledge, effective instructional practices and strategies for how to promote such knowledge and skills in others.  Cadres of teacher leaders are developed to increase the level of instructional support to classrooms.

5.c. Does the system provide high-quality instructional leaders for all classrooms in all schools? How? How well? 3. Principals, teachers and staff are seen designing and conducting professional development activities, modeling lessons in colleagues’ classrooms, serving as data analysis coaches, and encouraging colleagues to hone their instructional craft.

5c.Does the system provide high- quality instructional leaders for all classrooms in all schools? How? How well? 4. The district and teacher union collaborate on multiple supports that build the capacity of new teachers, including orientation, guidance during the opening days of schools, mentoring and coaching programs, and training.